bigger tyres for fuel economy

Submitted: Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 07:37
ThreadID: 48952 Views:7687 Replies:9 FollowUps:20
This Thread has been Archived
Hi every body
I have a nissan patrol 4.5l petrol we are running 265 75 16 on it at the moment and are due to get new tyres . I would like to know if anyone has put bigger tyres on there 4x4 and had better fuel economy and how big of a tyre can you go to on the std wheel carrier on the rear door

Thanks
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Mick - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 07:54

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 07:54
DOn't worry about the spare wheel - just keep standard size on the carrier and increase the size of your road wheels. You'll get heaps better economy and in the rare event of needing to use a spare don't go too fast.
AnswerID: 258551

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:01

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:01
LOL

0
FollowupID: 519892

Follow Up By: 62woollybugger - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 16:22

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 16:22
DO worry about your spare. If you put different size tyres on the back, you could damage the limited slip diff. Maybe Mick drives a Toymota whos LSD was worn out by the time it got out of the dealers yard :)
0
FollowupID: 519986

Reply By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:11

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:11
Bigger tyres will not give you better economy, except if you were driving long distances with a tail wind!!!

The bigger they are, the more effort it takes for the motor to get them rolling. Given that most people use their vehicles in a manner such that there is a lot of stopping and starting involved, then you will actually use MORE fuel with the bigger tyres.

There is also the issue of braking (takes more braking effort to pull up bigger rolling diameter wheels/tyres too).

Having said that, I am running 35" tyres on my Patrol, but only cos I've got oodles of torque from the 6.5 V8 and wanted to try to keep the revs down. Because of this torque factor, I can actually claim to use about the same amount of fuel tht I would use if I had 32" tyres.

To answer your last question, you should be able to fit 285/75R16s on your spare wheel carrier.

There are other reason why fitting larger tyres IS a good choice; they all revolve around more ground clearance.....so if you go off the beaton track very much, then the 285s could be a good option anyway (just not for saving fuel)

Cheers

Roachie
AnswerID: 258554

Follow Up By: BennyGU - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:16

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:16
285/75 R16 BF Goodrich All Terrains fit on the standard patrol wheel carrier. 35 inch tyres need a spacer plate (Marks Adaptors) to fit.

Benno
0
FollowupID: 519893

Follow Up By: Nick R (VIC) - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:53

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:53
285/75 R16 Mickey Thompson FC II tyres won't fit without a spacer, Didn't go the adaptor kit, went to the hardware and bought 3 x 3/4 nuts, the bolts for the wheels are quite long so I put the nuts between the wheel and carrier, even so it is still very tight to get my EO wheel cover on...

as for economy, with the 285s towing a CT into a head wind the economy was pretty poor although I didn't account for the extra 7% more distance covered than indicated on the speedo...
NickR
Carpe Cerevisi

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 519900

Follow Up By: jt - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:31

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:31
roachie could you please email me at Fordfalcon69@hotmail.com
as i am intersted in the 6.5 v8 chev in the gu

thanks
jeff
p.s thanks everyone for your comments
0
FollowupID: 519936

Follow Up By: Bilbo - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:59

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:59
Don't do it JT,,,,,,,,,,,,driving a Nissan will never be the same again!!

I did it and it ruined me for life. It's scar that I'll have to wear forever,,,,,,,,,,,,

Bilbo - "The V8 Hobbit"
0
FollowupID: 519944

Reply By: brett patrol - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:40

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:40
Hi jt,
I have a GU 4.2 TD and have put 35" mud tyres on. I found that on the open road i will actually get better economy than running 31" tyres because the revs are lower, but for start/stop driving in town economy is worse.

cheers
Brett
AnswerID: 258558

Follow Up By: Nick R (VIC) - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:55

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 08:55
Interesting, do they rub or have you a big lift, spacers and the guards cut?
NickR
Carpe Cerevisi

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 519901

Follow Up By: Trevor R (QLD) - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:17

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 09:17
I too would like to know the answers to Nick's questions.

Cheers Trevor.
0
FollowupID: 519905

Reply By: ross - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:04

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 10:04
How much better economy were you expecting?
It will be barely 5% or probably less and you wont even know until you have done a few thousand klms at least.
Bigger tyres can have an adverse effect because of the wind and rolling resistance.
I would get the bigger tyres for better offroad capability and ride,but for better fuel economy it will be pot luck.
AnswerID: 258574

Reply By: Wizard1 - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:33

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:33
Those that claim you are getting better economy fail to undersdtand that the larger tyres are probably effecting the accuracy of your odometer and your not actually travelling further on the same amount of fuel.

But your odometer says you are. Get a GPS and mesaure how far you travel and see if it the same as odometer.
AnswerID: 258584

Follow Up By: madfisher - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 20:14

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 20:14
actually you will be travelling further than your odo reads, so you will be getting better economy than you think. Wifes paj speedo is now sreading 2ks slow at 100.
Cheers Pete
0
FollowupID: 520025

Follow Up By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 21:08

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 21:08
Pete's right. My speedo (with 315/75R16s) is 11 k/h out @ 100k/h. IE: The speedo shows 100k/h whilst the GPS shows I'm really doing 111k/h. The same thing applies to the odometer. On a trip down the Stuart Hwy (for example), I might expect to travel 1100 klm between 2 towns, but the odometer will show I've done about 1000klm or so.

Cheers

Roachie
0
FollowupID: 520039

Reply By: Robin Miller - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:47

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:47
Jt

Fatter tyre won't help you much even though it larger (285/75/16).

The tyre you need and which I run is 255/85/16.

These few choices though - I have Cooper st and Maxiss versions.

Fitting them will bring your speedo to virtually correct and overcome the inbuilt 6% Nissan speedo error.

These tyres are actually larger dia than 285's at 33 1/3 inch and there profile is such that they fit better under the guards and on the spare wheel carrier.

Ideally they should be fitted to specifically Trak 11 16 X 7 steel rims

Robin Miller


AnswerID: 258585

Reply By: _gmd_pps - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 12:49

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 12:49


Lets forget about rolling resistance, wind resistance, greater rotational mass, and engine out of sweet spot (although they all play a roll in worsening fuel consumption).

Also, lets forget about acceleration and just look at what it takes to maintain a particular speed on level ground. Lets say arbitrarily, for simplicity sake, that it takes 100 lbs of force where each rear tyre meets the pavement (refer to diagram) to maintain a velocity of 100km/h on level ground. With a 30 inch diameter tyre:
D=15 in (or 1.25 ft)
So, T=(100 lb) X (1.25 ft)
T=125 lb/ft, or the amount of torque required at each rear wheel to maintain the vehicle at 100km/h on level ground.

Now, lets look at a 35 inch tire:
D=17.5 in (or 1.46 ft)
So, T=(100 lb) X (1.46 ft)
T=146 lb/ft, or the amount of torque required at each rear wheel to maintain the vehicle at 100km/h on level ground.
Now it is easy to see why our engines have to work harder, and thus burn more diesel, to maintain a particular speed.

Now tack on the rolling resistance, wind resistance, greater rotational mass, and engine out of sweet spot and it just worsens the picture. Yes, you do "cover more ground" for each revolution of a tyre, but ultimately you will see a sacrifice in economy because the engine has to work that much harder to get that one revolution.

Another factor is tyre pressure. A larger tyre has more pressure variation and larger rolling resistance with lower pressure.

Even if you have adjusted your speedometer to accomodate for larger tyres, you will still see a consistent drop in economy compared to smaller tyres.

I run 255/85/16 on my truck. As a poster already stated this is a good size, though selection is limited, because it is higher with more clearance but not as wide as 265. Nevertheless the additional height will cost economy. I have reprogrammed my speedo and sitting on 80km/h my engine revs at 1300 in 6th gear. This is not as it was intended because the transmission shifts to 5th with the slightest acceleration. Not so with the original tyres.. there the engine revs above 1400 and with careful acceleration the transmission stays in 6th.

The characteristic of the auto transmission changes completely and in my case larger tyres do void the warranty (mind you I do not get any warranty on a US truck anyway here)..

In order to really adjust for larger tires the shift characteristics of the tranny has to be adjusted. The learning program in my Allison does not compensate for that and even with a TechII I can not adjust the tranny only the ABS speed sensors, which is another factor to consider when running larger tyres.

I do not exactly know how much I lost in economy since I never really checked it on a complete tank with same conditions. Too many variables ... power tune, towing, fuel quality ... etc..

I have a gutt feeling that I lost between 1 and 1.5 l/100km in economy, but thats just a feeling not a fact.. others have reported 2 - 3 mpg loss from 28" to 35" tyres on the same vehicle as I have.

You need to understand what you do to your vehicle when you mount larger tyres and understand why it is illegal to do so beyond the given limits in the ADR.

good luck
gmd
AnswerID: 258593

Follow Up By: Ingtar - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 13:16

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 13:16
Pretty picture. Nice to see some calculations too.

A couple of points I will disagree on though.
Larger tyres have LESS rolling resistance. Compare rolling a pencil over a notepad to a roll of stickytape over the same notepad.

Wind resistance as a percentage will not change significantly by lifting your vehicle 2". Before arguing this, remember that most of us with 4wds are driving bricks, not sleek race cars.

Increased rotational mass and pressure variations I agree with.

Now your calculations... you have increased the diameter by 16%. This is reflected in your increased torque calculations (16%) and also the travel speed (16%). So you are doing calculations for travelling at 116km/h, and if you compare fuel economy without changing tyre size between doing 100km/h and 116km/h you will notice an increase in fuel consumption (wind resistance etc..).

What it comes down to, for constant motion, is as you mentioned the engine 'sweet spot', being the engine running in its most efficient range at your given cruising speed. If, in this range, your engine can handle the bigger tyres then there should theoretically be no great change.

I believe where most people would experience an increase in fuel consumption would be stop/start traffic and lead foot syndrome. Trying to take off quickly with larger tyres WILL require more power and use more fuel.
0
FollowupID: 519954

Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 13:24

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 13:24
Hi Gmd

I'm with Ingtar on this , the larger tyre has inherently lower rolling resistance - for same air in each.

I'd probably explain this a little differently , however its definately the case.

Robin Miller
0
FollowupID: 519957

Follow Up By: _gmd_pps - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 13:39

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 13:39
your not serious with your pencil sticky tape example are you ? ..
have you missed your physics at school ???

weight/mass/downforce/rolling resistance ???

and I did not argue rolling resistance .. just read properly

pretty ueseless to argue with you ..


have fun
gmd
0
FollowupID: 519959

Follow Up By: Ingtar - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 15:35

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 15:35
hmm agro and defensive. Woohoo.

I had a look around my desk for common things that roll, that are different diameters. So yes, I was serious, and looking for some simple examples for people to see. If anyone else (Robin??) can explain it better/differently, feel free. And no, I have not missed my physics, which is why I mentioned it.

You said:
"Now tack on the rolling resistance"
So you did mention rolling resistance. Maybe you should re-read properly.

I wasn't arguing, just expressing a different point of view. Note that I didn't try to work out how much torque would be required to turn the wheels at different speed, as I didn't know how. Just pointed out some different ideas as they presented themselves to me.

So dry your eyes, Princess.
0
FollowupID: 519975

Follow Up By: Ingtar - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 15:42

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 15:42
Ooh and more of that remembering physics... assuming that the tyres don't weigh significantly more, and you are travelling at the same constant speed, the acceleration (deceleration?) force on the vehicle will be the same, the mass will be the same, F=ma, so it should require the same force thus the same energy so your fuel economy, again, should not change.
0
FollowupID: 519979

Follow Up By: _gmd_pps - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 15:47

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 15:47
neither agro nore defensive ... can't be bothered
your arguments are simply not worth any emotion or forther words on my side .. go and play with the stuff on your desk ..
have fun
gmd


0
FollowupID: 519982

Follow Up By: Steve Ellis - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 15:50

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 15:50
GDay JT. I have a 4.5 Patrol on Petrol / Gas and have just gone the other way I did have 275x16 and have gone to 265 x 16. I also changed from Offroad style tyres to Highway Tread. The fuel consumption has improved, it pulls a lot better esp when towing a large caravan and road noise has improved. I know that this way is not for everyone but it works for me. It will still go places I want to go and I have not paid a premium price for tyres I dont need. The auto box is a lot happier as it does not need to pull uphill all the time and the overdrive works fine. I kept one of the big tyres as a spare and the cover for it wont fit! If you want improved fuel cost look at Gas or a smaller vehicle. The Patrols are thirsty no matter what you do.
0
FollowupID: 519983

Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 16:38

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 16:38
Hi Guys

I'll have a go at explaining why the rolling resistance drops which
gives better economy.

Some of the thinking above does not relate to car wheels it relates to solid wheels eg like those on a train.

Car wheels are a special case because they have a deformable outer casing (the tyre).

They tyre in contact with the road is flat and it curves away from the road to complete a circle.

The major part of rolling resistance is caused in, and by the bending action as it each part of the rotating tyre contacts the ground and changes direction from round to flat.

This action causes the heat and resistance.

From this you can derive two things.

A/ A tyre pumped up harder will have a smaller flat contact patch with the road and hence less of a bend angle.

B/ A larger tyre diameter with same air pressure must also have a smaller bend angle and hence less loss.

Both of the above are observable in actual use , and both will lower rolling resistance


Robin Miller
















0
FollowupID: 519988

Follow Up By: Gerhardp1 - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 23:24

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 23:24
I put 245/75-16 LT tyres on the Jack last year, in place of the standard 245/70-16.

I wanted more puncture resistance than the non-LTs offered.

The fuel consumption is higher, even though the Pirellis have a narrower tread width on the road than the standard size tyre. It's higher around town, and on the highway.

The auto shift points are noticeably affected, especially the torque convertor lock-up in 3rd and 4th. It takes much longer before lock, and unlocks again at the slightest engine load.

I wouldn't go oversize again, even the small amount in this case.

0
FollowupID: 520072

Reply By: Member - Doug T (Qld) - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 16:17

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 16:17
Like Micks reply I have to say BS, I been there, tried that ....don't work, what you do in effect is raise the gearing up higher and the engine has to work just that little bitsy more , but if you think your on a roll then go for it
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 258625

Reply By: Olcoolone (SA) - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 18:38

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 18:38
Mmmmm......... I would have to say that anyone who gives complex data to back up there claim is wrong.......Why because average poeple don't understand it so you must be wrong...LOL

Lets throw another 2 factors into it:-

The higher the vehicle is of the ground the less aeodymanic it becomes.

Do you use less power with bigger wheels because the rotational mass has increased and multiplied the torque.

Now a thing I got told last week on this forum was you can produce all the data and read all the books but you are still wrong because data and books are wrong and in real life it is differant.

Thats my 2 cent worth.

Richard
AnswerID: 258648

Follow Up By: Outnabout David (SA) - Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 21:43

Thursday, Aug 23, 2007 at 21:43
Richard,

you are right. The prove is inthe practical. I have had dozens of 4wds over 20 years and verytime I ad something hether it is tyres, lifting suspension , fitting bull bars etc ... fuel economy goes down the gurgler.

Bigger tyres and a more agressive tread will make a noticeable difference.

david
0
FollowupID: 520052

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)