Saturday, Sep 01, 2007 at 18:44
An interesting experiment.
University of
Melbourne
Department of Zoology
i
Executive summary
Animal/vehicle collisions are a concern in many countries because collisions raise
economic, welfare and conservation issues, which have gained momentum with
evidence that the number of collisions is increasing. Collisions between animals and
vehicles are caused when animals and vehicles occur in the same place at the same
time. The three broad factors that bring animals and vehicles together, creating the
potential for roadway collisions, are the attributes of the road, the behaviour of the
animal and the behaviour of the driver.
Kangaroos are considered a pest species throughout Australia, in part because they
collide with road vehicles. Although human fatalities from kangaroo/vehicle
collisions are rare, it has been estimated that a kangaroo causes a similar amount of
damage to a vehicle as does a deer (A $3000 / vehicle). Eastern
grey kangaroos,
western
grey kangaroos, red kangaroos,
swamp wallabies and red-necked wallabies
are the most commonly hit species throughout most of Australia.
The methods available to reduce the number of animal/vehicle collisions can be
divided into those that 1) minimize vehicle damage, and those that 2) avoid collisions.
One popular method of avoiding collisions is the use of sonic deterrents, such as the
Shu Roo. The Shu Roo is an ultrasonic deterrent device that claims it warns
kangaroos of impending danger, enabling them to flee from the path of the vehicle.
This study tested the efficacy of the Shu Roo. Tests were limited to eastern
grey
kangaroos and red kangaroos. Efficacy was measured by systematically testing the
claims made by the manufacturer in a static and dynamic environment. This included
characterizing the Shu Roo signal in the lab and field, measuring captive kangaroo
behavioural response in static trials, and comparing the rate of kangaroo/vehicle
collisions for vehicles fitted and not fitted with a Shu Roo.
Lab tests found the Shu Roo signal was composed of a mix of audible and ultrasonic
frequencies with a short syllable (<0.6 s) that was repeated approximately two times
per second. Static field trials showed that the Shu Roo propagation patterns were
similar on grass and bitumen surfaces, with the Shu Roo signal just detectable at
50 m. Recordings made during dynamic drive by tests of four vehicle types at
different speeds showed the Shu Roo signal was not detectable above the noise
produced by the moving vehicle and therefore there was no difference between the
Shu Roo on and off.
Behavioural observations of eastern
grey kangaroos and red kangaroos in captivity
showed that vigilance response did not differ significantly between Shu Roo on and
off for either kangaroo species and they did not take flight in response to the Shu Roo.
A survey conducted by phone enlisted 17 companies that participated in the road
survey from four states, New South Wales, Queensland, Victoria and Western
Australia. All participants traveled large distances. There were 58 treatment vehicles
fitted with a Shu Roo and 40 control vehicles without the Shu Roo. Collision records
showed that very few vehicles hit kangaroos and there was no difference in the
number of kangaroos hit by vehicles fitted with or without a Shu Roo.
AnswerID:
259891
Follow Up By: Warrigal - Tuesday, Sep 04, 2007 at 00:34
Tuesday, Sep 04, 2007 at 00:34
Yep. If you see any roos die laughing, they're doing a great job.....
FollowupID:
521610