Thursday, May 29, 2003 at 13:30
Soler king
In the
test results you are quoting in 4wd Monthly, the method of testing the fridges is as follows...
"in discussion with ADI testing staff WE decided"
( you implied that the Australian Defence Industries STAFF actually did the
test, that was not true, ONLY their facilities were used, by NON qualified people, so nonqualified the tests had to be done twice )
"to use temperature profile replicating the type of daily temperature variation a fridge might encounter. While tropical areas and winter highlands temperatures gradients would look a lot different"
( YES, THEY ADMIT IT AND THEY CERTAINLY WOULD BE DIFFERENT, so why not set up the
test to replicate the conditions where the fridge's would normally be used.... short answer, most of the fridges would FAIL)
"The fridge enviromental chamber was designed with a peak of 55 degree's for only 2 hours, ramping up and down either side to an ambient assumed temperature of only 15 degree's during a 24 hour period"
( WITH A BACKGROUND AMBIENT TEMPERATURE OF ONLY 15 DEGREE'S, indicating the fridges were tested at less than 15 degree's for more than half of the
test time, that is not a fair
test for some one who wants to buy a fridge to use up in the hot north Australian conditions is it )
"Some of the fridges took up to eight (8) hours of moitoring and adjustments to 'drive' them down to a cycling opperational temperature between zero and 40 degree's that they could maintain without constant monitoring."
(With LIEMACK'S digital temperature monitoring you do not get those hassles, so how long were those 'problem' fridges tested for, if it took 8 hours just to get them down to opperating temp?
These facts reprinted from your quoted 4wd magzine
test, prove that your biased posts are not relevant to the NORMAL temperature workings of a 12 volt fridge)
FollowupID:
13931