Friday, Sep 28, 2007 at 19:01
Axel,
The point I was making was how many ROAD users travel around at 90 on open road with favourable driving conditions?
I will use Bruce highway, north from Gympie as an example
This BS about arriving safely is just that, If some one on an open highway that has virtually no speed rated corners and feel that 100 is just not safe has some real driving issues, If I was Towing a large caravan and on holidays I would probably be doing 85-90, with fuel prices punching big holes in my pocket, I'm
well aware how much money it will save in fuel, (every one else does up there) mindful of the fact that there will be traffic built up behind me and the fact I don't have to be anywhere in particular, would allow to pass, THAT is sharing the road, not this I'll do 90 on the single lane and then do 105 on the dual lane crap, that's why there is such amount of . .
well . . . .emotion, especially from truck drivers, and how many overtaking lanes aren't facing uphill?
I see that some one has done the maths in different distance/time
and there is stuff all difference between the two (90/100) but it all comes down to some one, telling some one else, dictating what speed to travel at, 80, 90, 100 are all in the spectrum of LEGAL and You telling me, we are ALL travelling at 90 today because that's what you think is safe, is EXACTLY the same as me telling you, no, today you will be travelling at 100, because that is safe.
Col88 reply just doesn't make sense, the original thread made reference to the truck wanting to go 100, your quote was, wouldn't trucks be holding us all up?, how?
Everybody' s doing 100!, what about hills I here you say, that's where most of the overtaking (climbing) lanes are anyway.
Shane
FollowupID:
526023