Dyno Figures

Submitted: Thursday, Oct 04, 2007 at 22:52
ThreadID: 50253 Views:2258 Replies:2 FollowUps:7
This Thread has been Archived
Most dynos give a readout showing power and torque at the rear wheels.

Is there any way to relate these figures back to the manufacturer's published power and torque figures for the engine?
I'm glad I ain't too scared to be lazy
- Augustus McCrae (Lonesome Dove)

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Wayne-o (Pilbara WA) - Thursday, Oct 04, 2007 at 23:03

Thursday, Oct 04, 2007 at 23:03
GB,
the power and torque figures quoted by manufacturers are derived with the engine inside an engine room run up and tuned with the dyno on the output shaft. Therefore there is no friction and power loss through drivetrain etc.
I believe as a general rule power figures that are quoted should be reduved by 20-30% to give a RW power figure.
For example, a 4.2 iTD patrol is quoted at 114kw, but when runup on a dyno, they produce around 70rwkw. Thus around a 30% loss.
With this i can only make the assumption that by adding around 30% to the RWKW/RWHP figure should give flywheel, or power at the output shaft.
Hope its some help.
Wayne-o
AnswerID: 265098

Follow Up By: disco driver - Friday, Oct 05, 2007 at 01:01

Friday, Oct 05, 2007 at 01:01
Hi GB and Wayne-o,

It's not uncommon for the Kw and torque figures quoted for a motor to be calculated without any ancillaries (Alternator, power steering pump, air con or even viscous fan) connected while the motor is run up on the test bed dyno.

Hang a couple of G/boxes (Main & Transfer) a couple of diffs, a couple of drive shafts and all the extra's as above and it's not hard to see where all the power and torque has gone, before it gets to the rear wheels. (All those bearings and all that friction).

My thoughts are; It's not often that more than about 65-70% of developed power gets to the wheels.

Disco.
0
FollowupID: 526986

Follow Up By: Member - Oldplodder (QLD) - Friday, Oct 05, 2007 at 07:55

Friday, Oct 05, 2007 at 07:55
There is no rule of thumb that really applies.
About 30% for a 4wd in 2wd.
Have seen some figures that suggest a good road car 2wd might be 20%.
One of the 4wd magazines did a test on a 4wd dyno running a 4wd in 2wd and 4wd, was about 30% loss in 2wd and 40% loss in 4wd, due to the extra (front) diff losses.
As disco says, some car companies produce rated power figures at the flywheel without ancillaries connected. The japanese were famous for this.
Most European cars have a DIN rated power figure that includes some ancillaries.
So I suppose the dyno people measure something that has a little more real world relevance, power at the back wheel.
But then it is really only for comparison between before and after tuning and cars of the same model and spec.
A car with a top gear which is not 1:1 , or different diff ratio, or different tyre size will show a different power figure at the rear wheel, even with the same engine. Air temp on the day makes a difference.
Does the car get you to where you want to go, be happy :o)
0
FollowupID: 526999

Follow Up By: disco1942 - Friday, Oct 05, 2007 at 15:27

Friday, Oct 05, 2007 at 15:27
Wayne

If you loose 30% off the motors figures you add 42% to the driving wheel figures to get back to the motors figures.

PeterD
PeterD
Retired radio and electronics technician

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 527083

Follow Up By: disco driver - Friday, Oct 05, 2007 at 17:27

Friday, Oct 05, 2007 at 17:27
Hi All,
Just to clarify a point; there is NO constant figure that can be used to calculate ENGINE Horsepower/Kw from the dyno figure at the rear WHEELS.
Similarly NO constant to determine Power at the WHEELS given the stated ENGINE power.

There are too many variables: ie, power steering, Alternator load, aircon on/aircon off, state of tune/condition of engine, gearboxes and diffs, etc.

The best you can do is to rely on handbook for engine power and use Dyno to see what you get at the wheels.
Two similar vehicles may well return differing results on the same Dyno.

Trust this clarfies the situation.

Disco.
0
FollowupID: 527096

Reply By: Robin Miller - Friday, Oct 05, 2007 at 08:17

Friday, Oct 05, 2007 at 08:17
Hi Gone Bush

Fortunately there is a standard these days that requires cars engine KW claims to be done with ancillaries on so things are much fairer than in the past.

As per other posters roughly 30% is lost , in my case my engine rated at 185kw delivers 121 at the rear wheels , about 36% down.

Its possible to calculate back the other way.
I.E. From an acceleration run , and knowing the cars weight you can calculate KW , however do this accurately is not as easy as it sounds.

Robin Miller







AnswerID: 265119

Follow Up By: Member - MUZBRY (VIC) - Friday, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:20

Friday, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:20
Gday Robin
One would need a "tapley decelerometer" to do the job.
Murray
Muzbry
Great place to be Mt Blue Rag 27/12/2012

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 527052

Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Friday, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:43

Friday, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:43
Could do Murray - however i have 2 other approaches , first I wrote some software which plots acceleration from speedo pulses on a Patrol - but it only worked under windows 98 , so now I record the acceleration on my GPS in 1 sec increments and work from there - however this showed that my $1350 Unichip did nothing much so maybe it was a dumb idea.

Robin Miller
0
FollowupID: 527057

Follow Up By: Member - MUZBRY (VIC) - Friday, Oct 05, 2007 at 14:56

Friday, Oct 05, 2007 at 14:56
Robin
You better have that "chip" with the fish tonight.
Muzbry
Great place to be Mt Blue Rag 27/12/2012

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 527081

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)