Monday, Jun 02, 2003 at 15:13
Here's a few facts on the Patrol.
1: They, by far, have the greatest towing, and load carrying capacity.
2: They are a much more 'serious' offroader, having rigid axles front and rear.
3: Out of the box, they are a wagon that is a much better tourer than the others.
4: The mechanical problems were mainly in the very early models, and have been rectified.
5: They are by a longshot, better value for money. 50k for the most capeable, and 2nd biggest fourby in oz!! Incluing air!!
The Pajero, I would regard as only a "dirt road tourer", and does not have any real offroad capability,
well, not if you want to drive it
home in one peice, anyway. It is nice to drive on road, but if that is where you wanted to drive, why bother with a fourby anyway. They are also a bit pricey, and, having a friend who is a Mitsubishi mechanic, I hold doubts about there realiabilty and durability.
The Prado Is a pretty good "crossover". It has reasonable offroad ability, and drives
well on road. But, it too is overpriced, and does not have the offroad ability, or "touribility??" of the Patrol. It's best asset in my mind, is the mamoth fuel capacity.
The Patrol, while not quite as good on road as the other's, still ride's and handle's pretty darn
well, seeming as we are talking about a 2.5 tonne truck, with rigid axles, and a part time 4x4 system. It is by far a better offraod vehicle, and has a lot more touring ability. And, when you consider, it is markedly cheaper than the other's in equivellant specification, it's no wonder they sell like hot cakes!!
So, if I was in buying, the Patrol would be a hands down winner. It's a great vehicle, at a bloody good price!!
Tristjo.
AnswerID:
21616
Follow Up By: Member - Bob - Monday, Jun 02, 2003 at 21:48
Monday, Jun 02, 2003 at 21:48
I've had two Pajeros and done 100,000km in each without a single problem. That includes most of the
well known
treks and Australia's roughest roads. In my experience, and from what other owners have said, there is no question about their toughness or reliability. Admittedly, I am not excited by
rock crawling, and I don't think the Pajero excels in this regard. But desert/beach/corrugated roads - no problemo. With few exceptions in today's market, it would be hard to buy a dud. The important thing is to know what you really need and buy accordingly. Even a Mazda Tribute might be the right vehicle for some people. I love touring, away from the crowds, so diesel is my preferred fuel. The new generation diesels are Pajero, Jackeroo, Discovery (Audi, BMW, Benz, VW, Range Rover)
FollowupID:
14132
Follow Up By: dixie - Tuesday, Jun 03, 2003 at 22:08
Tuesday, Jun 03, 2003 at 22:08
I agree with Bob , i have a 85 lwb 2.6 pajero and my sister has a 92 v6 3.0 lwb and we go everwhere the Landcruisers/Patrols go ,the LARGE
rock climbing is a bit of a problem but who really gos climbing rocks that large but the die hard 4x4ers ?? as for sand/mud/dirt etc they perform with the rest of them and i think Pajero has won the awards to prove it too.
FollowupID:
14210
Follow Up By: tristjo - Wednesday, Jun 04, 2003 at 14:24
Wednesday, Jun 04, 2003 at 14:24
Guy's,
I beleive we are talking about the "new" Pajero's here. I don't doubt for a minute that alot of people have got alot of good use out of the old Paj, but when we are talking new, the storie is different. Comparing your older Pajero's with the brand newies is like comparing apples with oranges.
The new Pajero, for one, is all independently suspended. That means, it is hard to raise, wether for touring or hard offroad, and there is no fixed point under the vehicle, so when offroad, instead of the axle housing being the lowest point because it can never move downwards, the belly of an IS vehicle is very susceptible to groundstrikes, because as the
suspension flexes, the whole vehicle moves downwards. It does not have the offroad capability of a rigid axled vehicle, because there is nowhere near enough wheel travel.
The fourwheel drive system, has so many weak links in it. The viscous coupled center diff is one. My Mitsi mechanic mate tells me that when they get hot, they lock up solid, and it becomes a bitch, and almost impossibleto to drive. The new Pajeros also have polyurathane tailshafts. If these get "chipped" or "scraped" offroad, it can take cunks out of the t/s, and as a result, you get chronic diveline vibration, and replacements are not cheap, with the pakaging alone that it is shipped in worth more than $500!!! They also have polyurathane fuel tank's, I beleive.
While I don't doubt that the Pajero is a delightfull vehicle to drive, it just isn't built for Austrailian users/conditions. Might be a great town car, but there is no way in hell I would be relying on it out in the sticks!!
The Pajero's days of being considered as an offroad/touring vehicle are over, in my mind. Give them 5 years, and you will see what I mean.
Tristjo.
FollowupID:
14250