Tuesday, Dec 18, 2007 at 02:00
The Suzuki Vitara would tow the trailer OK, but they really are a light chassis on them (actually the same as the sierra modified for the IFS and coil rear - body mounts in the same position). Chassis flex/fatigue could be an issue as the kids grow up and you are carrying and pulling more weight.
Kia Sportage has a far better chassis, but minimal after market, bull bars, spring lifts, ECM upgrades being the majority of mods in Australia. They do have more load carrying volume in the 2000+ models than a Vitara/GV (actually about the same as the XL-7) but far more mass from empty to GVM (~800kg total vs 400kg in the Suzukis). Pre 1998 Kias can have iffy electrics, but most of the bugs were ironed out by the start of the "long body" versions (Hyundai bought out Kia in 1998 and instigated some better QC measures).
Low first ratio is considerably better in the Kias (~35:1 Vs Suzuki 26-29:1) although the Suzukis win on power in the 2.5-2.7 litre V6's. 2 litre 4 cyl is actually the same motor block as the Kia (Mazda derived, European delivered Suzukis are supplied with an R2 Mazda diesel...)). 2 litre V6 is considered underpowered and a dog.
Kia is rated to tow 1800 KG and I have successfully towed a 2 tonne furniture trailer (12'x7'x6') 2700km in 38+ degree heat into a stiff headwind at altitude (outback NSW) for two days. Full box chassis on the Kia (= bloody strong) vs partial box and "C" section on the Suzukis.
Both vehicles can have spring lifts from most of the major retailers, body lifts can also be done, as can larger tyres (not so much on the Suzukis) Kia can carry 235/75R15 tyres on the standard rims (29 inch) vs 205/70R15 (26 inch) originals
Several US Kias have clocked up in excess of 200 000
MILES without major incident. Don't write the Kias off.....
FollowupID:
541082