Better tyres to front??
Submitted: Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 11:56
ThreadID:
53101
Views:
2388
Replies:
10
FollowUps:
2
This Thread has been Archived
Member -Signman
One for the tyre experts. Have a set of 4/ AT tyres, with 2 marginally better (by about 1.5mm). In a 'off road' situation, I'd fit the better ones to the front- reasoning that is would reduce understeer, and in 4WD the front 'pulling' action is as important- or more so- than rear 'pushing'.
On the other hand, when hillclimbing the rear wheels spin more, so maybe better traction to the rear??
Over to The
Forum.....
Reply By: cowpat - Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 12:23
Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 12:23
I'll not claim to be an expert but maybe if you put the better tyres at the rear you'll theoretically be able to climb hills that you can't as safely negotiate on the way down; so better tyres at front maybe safer much like fitting chains to the front rather than rear, unless it really is very slippery and there is a danger of the back end overtaking the front.
But on the other hand it is generally recommended for conventional rear wheel drive 2wd vehicles to fit the better tyres to the rear as it induces understeer rather than oversteer and most people are less able to control oversteer.
I prefer to fit the better tyres to the rear due to the second reason, but I suspect I'm in the minority because of the first reason, but I would not go anywhere gnarly without reasonably matched tyres all-round anyway. 1.5 mm probably makes no difference to a half-worn mud terrain though.
I also run lower pressures on the front which in practise probably makes more difference than anything else.
Opinions, preferably conflicting anyone? - Casper
AnswerID:
279734
Reply By: cowpat - Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 14:46
Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 14:46
Seems that many actual tyre experts will disagree though - best tyres should be at the rear of the vehicle. google "understeer oversteer tyres"...eg from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Understeer:
"... The recommendation from most manufacturers when replacing only two tires is to fit the unworn ones to the rear, and the best of the old ones to the front axle..."
Some magazines or other bodies - don't remember - have done "controlled" tests with average joe drivers to confirm this.
Of course this is all on-road behaviour, but I consider bitumen more dangerous than dirt just because of the generally higher speeds especially when wet.
I think that with modern tubeless tyres blowouts are probably rarer than driver misjudgement, bitumen or dirt - Casper.
AnswerID:
279760
Reply By: PeterInSA - Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 18:35
Friday, Jan 04, 2008 at 18:35
Casper,
I think the manufacturers and the magazines with their average joe tests, don't take their vehicles off the road like some of us do.
The reason why I want the best tyres on the front is on a trip I could have done hundreds of K's over rocks on dirt roads/tracks etc some tyre fractures do not occur straight away, the tread could have been damaged site unseen and its only when you are back on the highway and the tyre heats up going 80-90kph (towing a van) that you could have problems. If that's the case I personally would like the problem to be on a back tyre.
I had a blowout on a new rear tyre (2500km) on the
Gunbarrel highway after travelling a 100k's or more thru bush tracks, earlier in the day.
Of course if you don't go bush its not the same issue.
I agree with your misjudgement comment.
Peter
AnswerID:
279790