Thursday, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:07
I can see both sides of the argument here and (funnily enough), I actually agree with both...... But that doesn't solve the problem.
I've only done one Simpson trip (and that was with my Ultimate camper in tow), so I know that doesn't make me an instant expert. We were "lucky" with our crossing as we did it immediately after the desert had been re-opened (closed because of excessive rain). I firmly believe that if I tried to cross when the sand wasn't nice and damp/hard-packed, I probably would have done some damage to the tracks.
Just as an aside.....and to be a knit-picker......it is NOT the trailer in itself that causes any issues (as the trailer just rolls along and does NO damage)...... it is the extra work the TOW vehicle has to do to drag the trailer along that causes any damage that people are talking about.
Having said that, I still believe that for any given situation in the desert (ie: whether the sand be dry or damp etc), a heavily-laden 4x4 with it's tyres not deflated sufficiently, will cause a greater amount of damage to the tracks than what a similarly-laden vehicle, towing a trailer, and with all 6 of it's tyres dropped to a proper pressure (say 16psi).
We saw a damned MOTORHOME crossing the desert when we went across. It was part of a large convoy and was having to be towed/snatched over the vast majority of the dunes.
I would hate to see the law increased to police the desert more stringently, but it may
well come to that I suppose. If anything, perhaps the desert should be closed to ALL VEHICLES during periods of prolonged dry spells, as any vehicle can and will do damage to the dunes when they are at their most vulnerable (IE: dry and powdery). I'm not suggesting that this occur, just saying that if the desert is not fit to be traversed by a
well-set-up 4by and trailer, then it's probably is not fit to be traversed by anything.
Cheers
Roachie
FollowupID:
545048