next gen external antenna
Submitted: Saturday, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:05
ThreadID:
56769
Views:
2529
Replies:
7
FollowUps:
2
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Geoff C (QLD)
I've searched but not found what I'm after.
Basically I'd like to know if the $120 it would cost to buy the antenna for my Samsung A412, I have the cradle, is worth the effort. We travel a fair bit but don't use the internet on the mobile phone and are retired so don't have a lot of calls to receive/make. Would like to know if others found the antenna worthwhile.
Thanks, Geoff
Reply By: Sand Man (SA) - Saturday, Apr 19, 2008 at 17:49
Saturday, Apr 19, 2008 at 17:49
Geoff,
$120 sounds too expensive to me.
I have a Laser brand antenna I bought for my original CDMA phone and this is also suitable for Next-G reception (same frequency) and even GSM which is close enough in frequency response.
It is a UC9SF-800-259 CDMA 2EL Collinear fibreglass antenna.
I actually use a stubby antenna in the city which screws onto the same base, and change over to the longer antenna when trvelling in the country.
A search found them advertised for $72.00 (Powertec) and they should be available from any reseller of UHF radios, etc. in your State.
Bill.
AnswerID:
299318
Reply By: Robin Miller - Saturday, Apr 19, 2008 at 21:47
Saturday, Apr 19, 2008 at 21:47
Hi Geoff
Its good to have a fixed external aerial setup but my guess is it may not be worth it for you.
The aerial plug on the back of the phone is a bit fiddly to plug/unplug the aerial , and its more awkward to use the phone with it attached, these issues can be lessened with good car kit etc , but on balance if you mount the phone such that its stubby aerial can see outside the car then the loss of signal won't be to bad.
I use a small magnetic base one with
mine when I feel I need the extra range.
If you get into serious trouble and you really need range then standing on the roof of the car or on a small
hill nearby will see you go further than a car monted aerial anyway.
AnswerID:
299352