No its all due to the world oil price isnt it
Submitted: Wednesday, Apr 30, 2008 at 06:17
ThreadID:
57132
Views:
2904
Replies:
10
FollowUps:
30
This Thread has been Archived
Cape York Connections
BP's first-quarter profit jumps 63 percent
BP has reported a 63 percent jump in profits in the first quarter compared to the same period a year ago. (CNN — 10 hours ago)
+ related stories
Shell's profit soars to record $9 billion
Royal Dutch Shell's has reported a 25 percent rise in first-quarter earnings, crediting strong increases in energy prices. (CNN — 11 hours ago)
+ related stories
Sinopec: Q1 profit drops 69 percent
China's second-biggest oil company, Sinopec, says its first quarter profit fell 69 percent due to government controls that bar it from passing on record crude costs to consumers. (CNN — 28 April, 2008)
+ related stories
Reply By: Member - Paul Mac (VIC) - Wednesday, Apr 30, 2008 at 07:54
Wednesday, Apr 30, 2008 at 07:54
Oil Companies greedy???????????? Never. I mean, we are being told all the time they aren't manipulating their prices to benefit themselves.
I want a job with the ACCC. They must pay their employees a fortune for doing as little as possible.
I wonder if the ACCC is sponsored by the Oil Companies?
Besides, be nice to the Oil companies, they own all the technology already that will replace the petrol combustion engine when the oil runs out in about another 100 years or so, or is that sooner and that's why the price is increasing? Gosh, I wonder who you need to believe? Oil prices wouldn't have anything to do with Iraq either would it? The war on Iraq was instigated because of all those nasty weapons of mass destruction Saddam had stockpiled away and nothing to do with oil.
What will we all be saying when the price hits say $5 a litre or even $10 ? It will, one day.
Be happy though. Providing your super funds have invested heavily in Oil companies.
AnswerID:
301254
Follow Up By: Member - Serg (VIC) - Wednesday, Apr 30, 2008 at 08:42
Wednesday, Apr 30, 2008 at 08:42
“I wonder if the ACCC is sponsored by the Oil Companies?”
It is strongly seems to me that all governments (former, current and even future) sponsored by Oil Companies.
Serg
FollowupID:
567340
Reply By: brushmarx - Wednesday, Apr 30, 2008 at 16:35
Wednesday, Apr 30, 2008 at 16:35
I personally think it this level if increase to profits is obscene, but it's not just fuel, it's the Reserve Bank, power suppliers etc.
USA's interest rate is around 2%, and their fuel is cheaper.
Obviously the big drawback for living in the USA is having to live in the USA.
The biggest benefit they have is a history of political assassinations, where we don't.
Our politicians seem to have no regard for the poor or soon to be poor, because they have virtual immunity to wrong decisions.
The Qld Government is directly responsible for inept doctors killing people, goat tracks instead of roads killing people, too much judicial control ensuring criminals don't go to jail because we don't have enough room, thus putting them back on the streets selling drugs and (just for a change) killing people.
And what can we do?. All we can do is vote them out to an endless gravy train.
Maybe the USA has something to teach us after all.
AnswerID:
301340
Reply By: Member - Mfewster(SA) - Thursday, May 01, 2008 at 08:48
Thursday, May 01, 2008 at 08:48
The Finance report on last night's ABC news showed a useful graph for this discussion. It compared demand for oil with successful oil exploration. What it showed was that over the last 10 years, very little new oil has been found whereas demand for oil continues to rise rapidly. Crude oil is sold on an auction system, so the price goes up and down daily depending on stocks and supplies and weather etc. The only way to change this is to produce more oil or consume less. Opec could pump more out, but current oilfields have peaked and this would simply bring on a major catastrophe faster when the wall is hit. Better to buy as much time as possible and hope technology will find some answers. The same thinking is behind Australia's fuel tax. While we were pretty
well self sufficient in oil, we could have sold it much cheaper, but as we only had limited
reserves, the decision was made to keep the price more or less on a par with international prices so that our economy would adjust to that reality. Probably a good thing as our
reserves are pretty
well gone.
The sad thing is that the politicians used the fuel windfall to wind back Australian taxes rather than invest in new technology. They were possibly correct in this because that is what the Greens wanted to do and we all know how most Australians responded to this sort of thinking 10 years ago. Who would you have voted for 10 years ago? A party that said we will give you tax breaks or a party that said we will put the $ into developing alternative fuel?
AnswerID:
301418