Offline blog editor

Submitted: Friday, May 30, 2008 at 13:12
ThreadID: 58177 Views:1353 Replies:2 FollowUps:3
This Thread has been Archived
Is there an offline blog editor that works with the EO system? i.e. something that I can create the blog, with photos, offline then dump it into the system in one lot.

Adrian
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: The Landy - Friday, May 30, 2008 at 13:32

Friday, May 30, 2008 at 13:32
I've written in power point and then PDF and put it in as an attachment...if that is any help.
AnswerID: 306745

Follow Up By: The Landy - Friday, May 30, 2008 at 13:33

Friday, May 30, 2008 at 13:33
I meant publisher, not power point
0
FollowupID: 572653

Follow Up By: AdrianLR (VIC) - Friday, May 30, 2008 at 23:49

Friday, May 30, 2008 at 23:49
Thanks Landy,

Always an option.

Adrian
0
FollowupID: 572748

Reply By: ExplorOz - David & Michelle - Friday, May 30, 2008 at 15:43

Friday, May 30, 2008 at 15:43
Adrian,

At this stage there is now support for offline direct edit and image uploads using word or things like that. However I am not adverse to adding support for some of these types of products, do you have any favorites I can look at to see how much work is involved?

As already mentioned you can edit in word or publisher or anything you like and convert to pdf or even upload the word document type file with attachments etc installed - I just means people will need to open to attachment to read the blog information rather then seeing it in plain text.

David
David (DM) & Michelle (MM)
---------------------------------
Always working not enough travelling!

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message
Moderator

AnswerID: 306763

Follow Up By: AdrianLR (VIC) - Friday, May 30, 2008 at 23:48

Friday, May 30, 2008 at 23:48
Thanks David

I was thinking of something like BlogDesk at www.blogdesk.org I've only played with it and haven't uploaded anywhere but it came up on a Google search for blog editors with a good report. May take some setting up for the user so a guide might be necessary.

I could do as Landy suggested but it seems more elegant to do it this way.

Adrian
0
FollowupID: 572747

Sponsored Links