unleaded vs diesel
Submitted: Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 17:56
ThreadID:
59337
Views:
4606
Replies:
12
FollowUps:
12
This Thread has been Archived
brentos
hi there everybody
i was recently asked a question"dont you think diesels are overated.
you pay more for fuel,they are usually slower than a petrol driven
car,they need to be serviced more,and when they break down they also cost a lot more for parts, labour and service so whats the point,he also said i know you do get better fuel economy but
for the extra costs is it worth it.
so it did get me thinking and considering i dont really do any big
creek crossings(yet)is the diesel overated.
but saying that, i said i love my LC 100 TD it goes great.
and i definently think they need to be turbo though, i also have a 75 series ute(non turbo) and there is no comparison in power.
what your opinions
regards
brentos
Reply By: Member - Footloose - Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 18:25
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 18:25
A non turbo means never having to say you were speeding :))
The extra range from a
tank of diesel is a definate plus once you leave the cities behind.
AnswerID:
312907
Reply By: Member - Tony B (QLD) - Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 18:28
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 18:28
Interesting question and when you think of it with todays motors quite a valid question. It used to be diesel for more reliablility, less chance of drowning the motor, better tourque and cheaper fuel. Now with the fuel injected petrol vs the diesel and both of them having heaps of electronic equipment there may not be a difference anymore. The petrol car is cheaper to buy, has more power, cheaper fuel and around the same consumption. Will be interesting to see what people say. Regards Tony
AnswerID:
312909
Reply By: Crackles - Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 18:53
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 18:53
Presently petrol is the best option price wise particually for city drivers although the difference may close a little towing a heavy van. Where the diesels come into their own is with range as on remote trips not having to carry huge amounts of fuel is priceless. A Madigan run needs around 280L for a diesel where the petrol has to find space for over 400L! On a recent
Easter run into Wonnangatta a petrol 80 driver in our convoy had to leave his car in
camp for one day & still only just made it out to Myrtleford. To rub salt in, despite driving 200km less of high country tracks he still put more dollars worth of fuel in than any of the diesels.
Owning arguably one of the best turbo diesel engines you no doubt can appreciate the smooth power, good economy & low down torque so cost really becomes irrelevant :-)
Cheers Craig..............
AnswerID:
312918
Follow Up By: Member - Warfer (VIC) - Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 20:59
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 20:59
Hiya Craig
Spot on,People do not take into consideration a heavy laden vehicle (
camping gear) Going up and down hills all day in 4wd..The diesel will come out on tops everytime,Petrol ive heard on numerous occasions on 4wd trips run out
well before any diesel looks like it..
If your going to hav a Toorak Tractor as they say petrol is the way to go !
Cheers
FollowupID:
578958
Follow Up By: Crackles - Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 22:26
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 22:26
Funny when fuel consumption is compared that almost everyone always quotes the best figures they've ever got, the difference is on a bad day a diesel may only drop by 20% where as a heavily laden petrol working hard could be as bad as 50%.
Of course for many, range & heavy conditions are not an issue so for them the petrol is probably the better option.
Cheers Craig..........
FollowupID:
578981
Reply By: Richard Kovac - Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 19:01
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 19:01
Not our VW Polo
$25000 to buy
1.9 TDI turbo inter cooled common rail
50 mpg
195 km/hr @ 4000 rpm
And then the Troopy
well what can I say "oh what a feeling" LOL
Cheers
Richard
AnswerID:
312920
Reply By: Member - Nev (TAS) - Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 19:04
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 19:04
Hi all,
One big factor I am seeing on various sites and forums is the safety factor. I would much prefer to be outback travelling with my tanks and jerrycans full of diesel than petrol. The similar performance issues and costs though are closing the argument as above postings are saying. My thoughts only.
Rgds
AnswerID:
312922
Follow Up By: brentos - Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 19:21
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 19:21
hey there guys
thanks for the answers
yes i agree with fuel consumption on long trips hence diesels being better,though does anybody out there spend more time per year travelling long distance trips either outback,towing vans,camper trailers,or large boats(etc)or driving around town to work shopping visiting friends(etc)to to justify a diesel,and all i know is that diesel prices are starting hurt and there doesn,t seem to be a cheaper day to buy diesel like unleaded
regards
brentos
FollowupID:
578933
Reply By: Best Off Road - Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 19:43
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 19:43
There is also the "third" fuel.
LPG is the most economical way to power a vehicle.
Disclaimer: LPG may have limited availability and/or be expensive in remote areas.
Jim.
AnswerID:
312931
Follow Up By: stefan P (Penrith NSW) - Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 21:45
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 21:45
yes LPG makes perfect sense for 'soccer mums'
refer to the original question 'unleaded vs diesel'
FollowupID:
578967
Follow Up By: Phil.Fehlberg - Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 22:00
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 22:00
You are right Jim. LPG is the fuel of choice in a 4WD. It is the cleanest and cheapest fuel to use. The new sequential gas injection systems provide performance equivalent to petrol and dollars per k better than diesel. The only problem is availability in the North. LPG has been around for 30 years now, so it shouldn't be too long before the North catches up. lol
FollowupID:
578971
Follow Up By: Best Off Road - Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:08
Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:08
Phil,
I've got sequential and it actually uses about 10% more LPG than ULP. Performance is also marginally down when checked against a stopwatch.
Overall a very good system.
Jim.
FollowupID:
579032
Follow Up By: Tasrat - Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 15:21
Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 15:21
It's a bit dear to get into but diesel running with LPG has got to be best all round. More power ,more range ,cleaner exhaust and much cleaner oil therefore less wear of those expensive diesel bits.
Gas
tank needs to be about 25% of diesel capacity. Will run happily with no gas so no probs if it is hard to get.
Cheers Paul
FollowupID:
579060
Reply By: Member - Rodney B- Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 20:39
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 20:39
Just to throw a spanner in the works heard a rumour from a truvking group that the Government is about to increase diesel by 40% (via tax I guess) as a carbon offset.
This will tip the balance quite significantly.
Also send most of the small truckers to the wall.
Rod
AnswerID:
312951
Follow Up By: Member - joc45 (WA) - Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 22:36
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 22:36
Why would the govt do that to diesel and not petrol?
Sounds like just that, a rumour.
Gerry
FollowupID:
578985
Follow Up By: Saharaman (aka Geepeem) - Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 07:58
Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 07:58
It is true that the carbon credits trading scheme (CCTS) will increase the cost of all energy including petrol, diesel and electricty etc. This will commence from January 1, 2010 but Rudd is now considering staggering the introduction of CCTS. The cost has been forecast at between 10 and 20 cents per litre and as far as I know should apply approx the same rate to petrol and diesel. The CCTS is a direct result of Australia signing the Kyoto protocol (I think this was the very first public event Rudd did after being elected).
All Australians had a choice at the end of 2007 and the majority voted for an increase in energy costs by wanting Australia to
sign the Kyoto protocol. (Howard had refused to
sign as it would increase energy costs and cost jobs). Thus as
well as increased fuel costs due to market forces as from 1/1/2010 (or at a date thereafter if it is staggered) we will be paying a CCTS tax as
well.
The cost of electricty will also increase significantly in the years after 2010 due to CCTS.
FollowupID:
579014
Reply By: chisel - Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 20:46
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 20:46
For a 100 series cruiser, the petrol V8 uses about 50% more fuel than the diesel. The price of diesel is only 10-15% more than petrol.
AnswerID:
312952
Follow Up By: John S (NSW) - Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 23:41
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 23:41
Chisel, thats a bit of a broad statement. What are you comparing it to ?
When we took our Triton V6 up to the VHC, we used less fuel than the LC's - petrol, diesel & TD - carried just as much payload if not more - yes the Triton did weigh less, but was still working harder than the LC's.
Last VHC trip in our LC100 V8, we averaged around 30ltrs/100km compared to a TD Troopy @ 25ltrs/100km, yet on the HWY we were 18.5 to 17 respectively.
I grew up with Holden V8's, love the instant power that a V8 can deliver and happily pay for it at the pump.
We are off to
the desert soon, and I am curious how the V8 will perform fuel wise as consumption can be erratic for petrols, but my concern is range rather than cost.
I have run figures on both petrol & diesel, and I would rather spend 12K on a supercharger than change vehicles at this stage.
FollowupID:
578996
Follow Up By: chisel - Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 09:42
Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 09:42
Based it entirely upon official ADR81/01 fuel usage figures for the cruiser. About 11L for the TD, 17 for the petrol.
FollowupID:
579027
Reply By: Member - Davoe (Yalgoo) - Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 22:53
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 22:53
Diesals still got its place. heavy haulage, remote areas, beter range, better availability
its ULP that is now obselete with 3 grand rebate for gas conversons andless than 1/2 the price theres no reason to be using ULP anymore
AnswerID:
312997
Reply By: V8Diesel - Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 22:59
Sunday, Jun 29, 2008 at 22:59
Been through this a hundred times.
Bottom line.....it's horses for courses. What vehicles are you interested in buying, where do you want to go and for what percentage of the time????
Without this information the only advice you'll receive are useless sweeping generalisations that aren't worth a pinch of dried poop.
Be specific.
AnswerID:
312999
Reply By: _gmd_pps - Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 15:55
Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 15:55
thats only true for jap crap.
my diesel v8 has more power than the alternative V10 petrol.
it was not more expensive considering the tranny upgrade, tow package etc., it is faster off the blocks than any V8 petrol Landcruisers and it uses less fuel than the V10 or Landcruiser when towing anyway. I service myself and it does not need spark plugs, timing adjustments. Oil change every 10k-15k as per computer (I ususally change oil every 7.5k). Top speed is irrelevant after the 9 seconds I need to get to 100kph.
the myths you are quoting are still sold here. The diesel engine is not yet at its peak development and the fuel price would be much less if the profiteering and lack of investment in refineries would not keep the prices up.
Your arguments were valid 40 years ago but then we drove diesel because the liter was at 12c for the heating oil which burnt nicely in a diesel merc.
have fun
gmd
AnswerID:
313077
Reply By: Paul_L - Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 20:20
Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 20:20
I hear diesel prices are being heavily driven at present by the Chinese - they're stockpiling diesel to run their power stations instead of coal over the olympics - drive down pollution. They'll stop again after the olympics.
Also, apparently diesel comes from the same grade of oil as heavy fuel oils do. There isn't much market for those heavy fuel oils, and they come out in a fixed ratio - so the diesel subsidises the fuel oils. Apparently refineries can be modified to "crack" some of those heavier grades into diesel, but it takes a bit of investment. Nobody is sure if that will pay off long-term, so high prices for now. If these prices hang around then they will start upgrading the refineries, and the price will drop again.
What I'm interested in is how diesel goes on short trips. I'm thinking of replacing the town car with a diesel. We do a lot of shortish trips (only 5km to work), and petrol economy suffers enormously over this distance - it overfuels until it warms up. Wondering what a diesel does in the same situation - seems to me it doesn't have a choke so shouldn't suffer as badly?
AnswerID:
313128
Follow Up By: Stephen M (NSW) - Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 21:21
Monday, Jun 30, 2008 at 21:21
Hi Paul you will do more damage to a diesel only doing 5klms a day then a petrol motor. Diesels need to be warmed up and ran at normal operating temps for a period of time. I only do 9 ks one way to work and agree with you inregards to them (petrol) running rich etc its a killer on the prado. In summer time I get 15L per 100 come winter (now) it jumps to 17. I am getting LPG fitted next month, but will still have 70 litre reserve petrol. Regards Steve M
FollowupID:
579149