TPMS experience - mine not good
Submitted: Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 10:56
ThreadID:
62659
Views:
19012
Replies:
19
FollowUps:
19
This Thread has been Archived
richard
Hi,
I am just wandering if any body has had soome experience with the TPMS systems around - the ones that screw on to the valve.
I bought one with 6 sensors - 2 for camper.
I have just returned from a trip and was not happy how they performed.
They are very easy to install and set up but on the trip I found the following:
They were often 2-3PSI higher than my pressure gauge.
They give very different results on each tyre even when cold and checked with gauge.
Both of these you can work around but the thing that griped me the most is that the console consistently lost track of the sensors after driving for awhile - all 6 of them. When this happens you get warned every 20 minutes or so - very annoying and you can't read the current tyre pressure and temperature. I must admit I did not check the batteries in the sensors but they are new so 6 should not be bad but will do so over next day or so - just in case.
What I am not sure of is would they still let me know if you had a puncture or not. I say this because if you remove one of the sensors (to reset them) it does know about it and comes up on the console with a message.
They are a great concept but need to work better.
Any way would like to hear from other people who have used them and see how they have got on.
Richard
Reply By: Mobi Condo - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:31
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:31
Sorry to say Richard, but from my VERY limited experience with "Technology & Electronic gagdetry" - all of which I wished I had not wasted money on, I would say that such are like fishing lures in that they were designed to "catch the fisherman". My technology is stop after first 100k and do a rig check, tyre temp check, hub or bearing temp check and then each 1.5 - 2 hrs at most another break and check as above.
That way we get a good idea of how everything is travelling and we catch even the slow pin hole leaks before they get too flat and go kaboom!
Now we shall see all the Teknos get on the band wagon! :-)
Cheers - Mobi
AnswerID:
330541
Reply By: richard - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:45
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:45
Condo,
Unfortunately I like gadgets and do get burnt often. I think the idea of these are good but they have to be reliable.
However the what is reliable is the approach you have described.
All the best,
Richard
AnswerID:
330544
Reply By: Stevo - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 14:19
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 14:19
"Tyredog"brand. First set lasted 700 km before each sensor successively died. New unit replaced under warranty and lasted 800km before two sensors died, a third worked erratically and the fourth gave readings up to 10 psi in error. This set has been back with the
Adelaide distributor for over a month now am
nd are procrasting over replacing them.
AnswerID:
330550
Follow Up By: Time - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 15:54
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 15:54
I had a Tyredog Unit which did not survive the Simpson. 3 of the sender units (that screw onto the valve stem) broke their battery retaining clips and thus where useless. Worked fine on the tar and "easy" dirt, but corrugations killed the senders pretty quick. I have heard of others that worked fine in similar conditions, and some that suffered the same fate as
mine. At around $400 I expected a long life from these units.
Returned the bits to supplier for refund without any hassles.
FollowupID:
598152
Follow Up By: Member - Stephen (WA) - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 19:42
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 19:42
My experience with the Tyredog system is the same as Times' above.
One sensor stopped working towards the end of our recent Simpson journey. The company asked me to return the whole lot. When they inspected it, they found that the battery retaining clips in two of the valve mounted sensors were broken. Apparently they cannot be repaired.
They replaced the entire system for me with a complete new one without any prompting from me. The sensors in the new kit look a bit different to the original ones. However, I havent done any serious corrugation work since the new system was installed. Time will tell I guess.
Cheers
Stephen J.
FollowupID:
598202
Follow Up By: Dunaruna - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 23:02
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 23:02
Interesting, I got a customer who just completed a
cape york trip (GU). Melb to the Cape and back again. The tyredogs operated faultlessly although he did report a 1 to 2 PSI differential compared with a handheld tester.
He wasn't easy on the old girl either, broken shock mounts, snapped a rear stab link, 5th gear disappeared somewhere near
cairns, cracked engine pipe, broken fan blades.
FollowupID:
598236
Follow Up By: chris_s - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 21:25
Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 21:25
My tyredogs worked faultlessly across the Nullabor and then completed the
Canning Stock Route. The monitor gave up in the Bungle Bungles (the valve monitors were working when tested back home, even after several
creek crossings). The unit was replaced without hesitation and has continued to work on all road surfaces (now done about 5000Km).
FollowupID:
600050
Reply By: richard - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 15:17
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 15:17
With my set I can get them to register but after a bit of travel
they lose the connection to the sensors.
I have contacted the place I bought them from and am waiting on a response. I just emailed them late yesterday so will give them time.
It was a bit disappointing that they did not work as supposed to cause I like the idea.
Richard
AnswerID:
330561
Reply By: Member - Willie , Sydney. - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 16:12
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 16:12
I am glad you made this post . I was not aware these gadgets had such problems .
Some time in the future I hope that one of the brands comes out with a good quality set that will cover the 4 wheels on my car plus the four wheels on my van .
Good luck Rick ,
Willie .
AnswerID:
330573
Reply By: PeteS - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 16:45
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 16:45
G'day Richard
I have owned the new 6 sensor version of the TyreDog TPMS for about 5 weeks now. I'm only using 4 of the sensors and I intend to use the 2 extra sensors when towing our off-road van.
I had a lot of issues in the first week with getting the sensors to register in a reasonable time. I was using the cigarette lighter as the power source which was via the ignition switch and this cut off power to the unit each time I stopped the engine. After reading the manual I found the unit was supposed to be left on all the time. Since then I have used the battery source (I'm too lazy so far to wire the cig lighter into the battery direct) and I have not had any issues at all since doing that.
The pressure accuracy seems reasonable to me (I'm sceptical of the temperature accuracy) and I have unscrewed a sensor and it does go into alarm. I'm more interested in having something to warn me when travelling on dusty, corrrugated roads and the ability to know about a slow leak before I destroy as tyre as I have seen many do.
I find the reply regarding corrugations interesting and agree the battery holder does not seem very robust. I will very interested in seeing how others have found them.
Cheers
PeteS
AnswerID:
330580
Follow Up By: richard - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 17:10
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 17:10
Pete,
I had been turning
mine off and did think that was the problem as
well but after reassigning the sensors at the start of the day they still lost contact.
I used them on a recent trip to
Arkaroola and the Flinders so got a bit of rough time with corrugations etc but still did not work on the bitumen.
After you assign the sensors I think you can turn the controller off and on and it will pick them up but after awhile they lose the connection again.
May be the ones that are internal to the tyre work better but they would be a pain to fit/move.
But am happy to hear some one has had good luck with them - perhaps worth trying again as I guess I am stuck with them.
Richard
FollowupID:
598173
Reply By: Wayne (NSW) - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 17:14
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 17:14
Richard,
I have also been let down by the tyre monitor.
I have had the unit back 4 times now and the last time the battery holders have broken away.
I have worked out why they are failing. On corrugated roads the rubber tyre valve mover up and down rapidly. The screw on sender unit hits the rim and this has an effect on the sender unit.
Image Could Not Be Found
As you can see in the photo the mark on the rim just below the tyre valve. This is where the sender unit has been hitting.
Wayne
AnswerID:
330584
Follow Up By: PeteS - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 17:18
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 17:18
Hi Wayne
My Prado has alloys with solid valve stems so I guess this will not be a problem however my van has rubber valve stems. Maybe I will look at getting solid valve stems on my van!
PeteS
FollowupID:
598178
Follow Up By: Mikee5 (Logan QLD) - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 21:56
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 21:56
Hi Wayne,
What brand of TPMS are you using, I am looking into buying a set. I have noticed that some of the valve fittings are quite heavy, what weight are yours?
FollowupID:
598227
Reply By: RobAck - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 18:06
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 18:06
Richard we are currently doing a long term test on a Schraeder brand TPMS and they have proven very reliable. In fact they are now used by Toyota and were launched as an option for the LC200 series. We had been evaluating them for around six months prior to the LC200 coming to Australia.
We have also spent a lot of time looking at any number of TPMS over the last few years and have the view that more expensive is not necessarily better. The unit we have on test is around $150 cheaper than anything else we have seen.
As for differences in readings between your gauge and the monitors that is nothing to get excited about. If you used a different gauge you would have every chance of getting different readings regardless. The key is using the same gauge every time for consistency of readings.
The unit we have is powered by two AA batteries in the head unit and the valve senders are powered in the same way a self winding watch is, by movement. So they go to sleep when stopped and start again when the vehicle starts to move. The batteries, in the head unit, last around a year.
We are firm believers in the value of TPMS. They have saved us several tyres. Rapidly changing temperature is the first
sign of a failing tyre NOT a change in pressure. that comes later and generally too late.
Regards
RobA
AnswerID:
330591
Follow Up By: PeteS - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 18:22
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 18:22
Hi RobA
I'm curious re your comment
"Rapidly changing temperature is the first
sign of a failing tyre NOT a change in pressure. that comes later and generally too late".
I thought drop in pressure would have been seen/heard via the alarm first as the side walls bulging from lower pressures would produce the heat. If the lower threshold set in the TPMS is say just 3 psi below cold then I would have thought they would pick up pressure drop first? Hope I make some sense here LOL
PeteS
FollowupID:
598192
Follow Up By: RobAck - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 18:36
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 18:36
PeteS a very good question. Most tyre failures these days are the result of a slow loss of pressure which causes a very rapid build up of heat and then you most likely lose a sidewall as this is always the thinnest part of the tyre.
What happens with a slow puncture is the heat build up actually keeps pressure in the tyre for a period of time which gives you a false sense of security and then suddenly it lets go. Without a TPMS all people see is a failed tyre with no real understanding of why in many cases. This is particularly evident with sidewall failures. Almost every one we investigated had resulted in a small hole or something like a stick etc that was so small that it was not really evident. This allows a very slow leak which when then increases tyre temperature and next thing you know you are doing the tyre failure waltz
We have tested this a lot and find, for example, if you were running at 26psi on dirt at 80 kph then hit the bitumen and sped up or stayed at 80kph then the tyre temperature rises extremely rapidly due to the increase in friction. Tyre pressure also increases but at nowhere near the same rate as temperature.
I can assure you that if you do have a tyre failure and had the opportunity to check the carcass temperature you would find it would be in the >80C range immediately at failure.
I hope that explains it a bit more.
Regards
RobA
FollowupID:
598195
Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 18:52
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 18:52
I have a Securetire set made by Kysonix (Chinese) These are a bit slow to pick up the sensors when standing still but pick them up pretty quick when moving.
Have had them going for about a month and so far they retain connection with each other constantly.
I checked my tyres with a gauge and they were within 1/2 a lb.
However I got two new tyres fitted last week and asked for them to be set at 40lb.
They assured me they had but the sensors say 36.5 and 36.3. So someones gauge is out and
mine and the sensors are similar.
Will try them on a longer trip in a month or so.
This setup has 10 sensors 5 for car and 5 for van cost $420 inc postage
FollowupID:
598198
Follow Up By: Mikee5 (Logan QLD) - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 22:16
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 22:16
Hi Rob,
Is the Schrader TPMS one where the sensors screw onto the valve stem, which is the subject in this thread, or are the sensors fixed to the rim inside the tyre? If as you say the sender is powered by movement it must be tiny to screw onto a valve stem.
FollowupID:
598231
Follow Up By: RobAck - Sunday, Oct 19, 2008 at 09:47
Sunday, Oct 19, 2008 at 09:47
Mikee5 the short answer is yes and the longer answer is not necessarily so. Powering the sender can be done either by battery or a small gyro which is what the Schraeder units use. The senders are actually about the size of half a matchbox, very light and quite strong. And they DO NOT have any impact on tyre balancing. It is around 5-10 grams per tyre which is the weight of the sender. All in all these units have now done around 25000kms and with plenty of changes in tyre pressure as we travel across different terrain and without a problem
The gyro is a mechanical device and does not necessarily have to be attached to the bottom of the valve stem. Several units use this process and one is attached, internally, by a band around the centre of the rim.
As an andjunct to this discussion the remote head of the unit we are testing can be stored anywhere and ours tends to live in the centre console as we rely on the alarm for advanced warnings and do not need to be continually checking it. So it is a practical way of not cluttering up the dash.
If there is any drawback with this unit it is that you have to reset the warning parameters when you change tyre pressures and by that I mean when we drop pressures for sand or dirt tracks. It takes less than 20 seconds to do.
RobA
FollowupID:
598289
Follow Up By: RobAck - Sunday, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:10
Sunday, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:10
Mikee5 as an additional bit of explanation most systems sensors are attached to purpose designed valves which have a large retaining screw in the bottom of the valve to hold the sender unit. I have never seen one where the sensor and sender are built inside of the valve stem
RobA
FollowupID:
598295
Reply By: x4by4 - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 19:03
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 19:03
I bought a set of 4 in June and 2 failed on the CSR trip. The third had broken three of the four little battery mounting legs so it was about to fail. I did not bother opening the fourth one. The whole system was replaced in July 08 at no cost.
They worked OK. I did not expect the temp to be an accurate value of the tyre temp as the ambient temp has a lot of affect and the two tyres on the sunny side of the vehicle will always be hotter.
I bought them to warn me when a tyre has a slow leak so that when on a straight road/track I would not destroy the sidewall before realising that a tyre has a puncture
I did find that all 4 transducers were accurate to 0.5 PSI which impressed me.
Cheers
Pete
AnswerID:
330599
Follow Up By: Mikee5 (Logan QLD) - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 21:58
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 21:58
Hi Pete,
What brand are you using please?
FollowupID:
598228
Reply By: Rick (S.A.) - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 19:30
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 19:30
Bought 4 x TPMS for my GU Patrol recently.
My reckoning was that one saved tyre would go 3/4 of the way to paying for them, and then I was home free - or nearly. Plus I couldn't resist another toy. The TPMS retail package was cunningly place on the front counter of my service bloke's premises.
Drove from
Adelaide to
Alice Springs on the black top & thought that batteries in the sender/monitor on two of the 4 tyres was faulty. After hunting high & low in The Alice got a replacement set of the little coin shaped batts. Still got'em as the intermittent faults disappeared.................
Drove through Docker River, north side of the Rawlinsons,
Warburton, Heather H'way, Gary H'way,
Windy Corner, Talawana Tk,
Newman, Pt Hedland,
Pilbara,
Newman,
Wiluna, Gt Vic desert, northern side of the Nullabor,
Forrest,
Eucla,
Adelaide. Carried 5 x passengers + 8 x swags on the roof - back was chocka as
well, so a fair load, it could be said.
At about half way, two senders failed. Inspection revealed the soldered brackets retaining the battery had let go on these two valve stem units. As a consequence, power to transmit a pressure signal was not available. Hardly surprising as they are light construction, and the tracks haaddd corrruuugggatttioonsssss! Then ran with just two senders on the rear only - it did not matter that one said "left front".
Got home, took vehicle in for a 10,000 service: complete senders & new in cabin monitor replaced, no questions asked.
Only driven about 1500 km since then on relatively easy (
Flinders Ranges) surfaces. All is
well.
Yes, it is hard to get each tyre to read as you want on the in cabin monitor - however, no harder than getting a tyre's pressure to be exactly where you want in regular circumstances.
My unit is effectively hard wired, but I have been in the habit of turning it off overnight.
Hope this helps.
Cheers
AnswerID:
330600
Follow Up By: Willem - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 23:04
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 23:04
Hahahaha...I didn't know you were a gadjet man!
No need for that crap on my tyres. Get a puncture, replace tube...lol
Better to spend the monitor money on some decent reds :-)
CYA
FollowupID:
598237
Reply By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 19:37
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 19:37
I've just sold
mine as
well.... They'd been sitting in the glovebox for the past 6 months or more.
My issues related mainly to the complexity (for me) of re-programming the damn things anytime I aired-up/down etc plus the difficulty _I_ had in trying to drop 2 of them off the menu when I wasn't towing the camper trailer. I stress that this has more to do with ME than the units. I am technologically challenged and even have difficulty programming a modern VCR these days.
Although that was my main issue/s, I also did suffer from false reporting and/or the main unit's inability to read the sensor/s at various times.
In my opinion, these are a great idea which has yet to be perfected.
I will buy another set when the programming can be done more easily. In my mind, you should be able to physically set the tyres to your desired pressures, then jump back in the cab and press a button/s and hold for say 20 seconds during which time the sensors would register the pressure they have in their tyre and hold that in the memory of the main unit. That's what I would call the "setting" mode. From then on, any variance of say 4psi or 10oC would sound an alarm. When you air down for a desert drive or gnarly track, just repeat the 20 second hold-the-button/s proceedure and the unit would do the rest.
Same thing with a trailer....if you ditch the trailer in the garage or leave it at
camp while you do a day trip, just do the same thing once you're more than about 30 meters from the trailer. The unit won't "find" the trailer sensors, so will only register the 4 wheels on the 4x4.
Sounds easy to me, but I am relaibaly informed it would take a very special computer chip to be able to do all that at once with 6 or 8 sensors.
Roachie
AnswerID:
330602
Reply By: Mikee5 (Logan QLD) - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 21:53
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 21:53
Hi Richard,
I am close to buying a set and am wondering what brand you have. I had not heard of any problems before.
AnswerID:
330623
Reply By: Peter_n_Margaret - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 22:53
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 22:53
Can anyone tell me how a sensor screwed to the valve stem can possibly give a remotely useful temperature indication of the sidewall of a tyre, considering that the valve is quite
well insulated from the rim, let alone the tyre.
Measuring the pressure is one thing, and I love the idea of measuring the temperature, but can't convince myself that it can be done externally with useful accuracy by these screw-on devises.
Cheers
Peter
www.tinyurl.com/35ra68
AnswerID:
330632
Follow Up By: RobAck - Sunday, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:07
Sunday, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:07
Guys the sensors measure not only pressure which is the volume of aire in the tyre but also the temperature of that air and it is done quite accurately by some units.
We use a laser pyrometer to check ground, air and tyre temperature so testing can be as accurate as possible and find that the accuracy of some units is very good and others not so good
RobA
FollowupID:
598293
Reply By: richard - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 22:57
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 22:57
Hi,
Before mentioning the brand I want to take it up with the seller first. It is not one of those mentioned above. Unfair if I did and it proves to be my fault or is fixable but from others experiences it looks like a common concern.
If I have not heard back in a couple of days I will let you know.
Richard
AnswerID:
330634
Follow Up By: Member - JohnR (Vic) - Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 23:36
Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 23:36
Richard, I had some from a
Sydney importer that screwed onto the valve stem and ground themselves into the rims as the picture above, but the difference is that the rims are alloy so damaged goods now.
I originally had a set of the ones by a larger electrical chain that stayed inside the rims but the airway through the valve made reinflating the tyres very difficult to start with. They then displayed the problems yours did, that they didn't seem to transmit any information. They sometimes sent information from one tyre and not others.
The ones I mention first have an external antenna for the receiver and seem to get the information more reliably but I am not using them now after the wheel gouging damage.
The TPMS ones I was using were supposed to be secure but one got wiped off with a stick or somethiing and another problem was that the codes were only temporarily available so if some information was lost as to the setting address, you were stuffed.
FollowupID:
598239
Reply By: Dan - Yal - Sunday, Oct 19, 2008 at 19:59
Sunday, Oct 19, 2008 at 19:59
Hi there,
the TPMS sound very useful. I have just blown the sidewall on a tyre with a slow leak. I am sure I could have saved the tyre by repairing the
puncture if had I known there was a leak. I'm down to one spare at the moment which isn't great given the condition of the roads/tracks in the
Pilbara.
Has anyone got a TPMS that they have used for at least 6 months, including lots of work on corrugations/offroad tracks, AND been happy with the results.
If so which brand are you using and where did you get them?
I dont mind having to reprogram them after letting the tyres down etc, I just cant afford to have them break off or stop working part way along the GRR etc.
Cheers
Dan
AnswerID:
330783
Reply By: chocolate teapot - Monday, Oct 20, 2008 at 05:54
Monday, Oct 20, 2008 at 05:54
Hi all
I bought a TPMS - outfit with two extra sensors after corresponding with the agent about my application and vehicle.
Trouble started immediately - intermittent (NOS) no signal sensor alarm every few minutes.
Impossible to know if a sensor was gone or it was signalling a drop in tyre pressure or an increase in temperature. No one sensor involved - all of them were involved at different times.
Two sensors failed on the first dirt stretch - caps came off - dropped batteries.
Contacted agent but no spare parts only complete sensors at $35 each plus post. Thought that was a bit rough but wanted keep the system going and paid for another two. Agent suggested that caps needed to be fixed on with silicone rubber - followed this advice to no avail.
Next stretch of dirt saw three sensors drop their caps and batteries.
Corresponded with agent by email - gave full
feedback - apart from sending two emails to China and being told by the makers that the sensors had been discontinued because of poor design and light construction agent provided every assistance short of actual help - or replacement.
I would suggest on my poor experience with the product and unresponsive agent that TPMS be avoided.
Hope this helps
AnswerID:
330839
Follow Up By: richard - Monday, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:08
Monday, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:08
You may have the same set as me :)
The NOS message is a bloody pain. When traveling in areas where you want the TPMS to be working it scares the sh$%%t out of you when it goes off.
As mentioned earlier - even when in this situation I am not sure if it would not still pick up the dropped pressure as when you take them off the tyre to reset them it warns you of dropped pressure - but then again you are not moving at this point so who knows.
My experience is the same as yours - they seem to be unreliable even if a great idea.
Richard
FollowupID:
598488
Reply By: Dan - Yal - Monday, Oct 20, 2008 at 19:27
Monday, Oct 20, 2008 at 19:27
Thanks Richard/Teapot,
what brands were you using? I have heard a lot of bad news about the tyredog brand but very little about any other brand. I am hoping that there is a brand that is reliable. Any brand specific
feedback would be great.
Thanks
Dan
AnswerID:
330935
Follow Up By: richard - Monday, Oct 20, 2008 at 20:27
Monday, Oct 20, 2008 at 20:27
I was using the Jet 400c brand.
Richard
FollowupID:
598618
Reply By: titl4 - Monday, Oct 20, 2008 at 19:59
Monday, Oct 20, 2008 at 19:59
I have the Jette 400c from ABR Sidewinder (6 senders). Only a couple of months old but 5000k over some very ordinary roads in that time. No problems at all & have twice given useful (minor) warnings. So far so good & very happy at this stage.
.......... Alan
AnswerID:
330941
Reply By: richard - Thursday, Oct 23, 2008 at 15:44
Thursday, Oct 23, 2008 at 15:44
Mine still not good.
The previous post indicated that their experience with the Jet400c from ABR was working
well so as I have the exact same set up I thought I would give it another go.
tjis is what I did
I tested each of the 6 batteries in the sensors and confirmed that all were at at least 2.9v.
I recharged the console/monitor
I deleted the old tyre definitions from the console and reset them
I used a different pressure gauge to
check pressures and theye were fairly close to the values displayed
All looked OK.
I left the monitor on and the next day it still showed the settings, so still OK.
I went for a short drive on the bitumen, so no stress and as with the previous experience I started getting sensor alerts again and - in other words same as before they did not work. I have not heard back from the seller yet but will give them another go as they do have a good reputation for after sale service.
One thing that may be worth mentioning and I am not sure if significant. I have removed the lock nuts that come with the senors. They are a real pain undoing and doing up. I can't see why that would make a difference but who knows with this product.
Richard
AnswerID:
331434