Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:23
Austravel,
"This implies that anyone who teaches is a fool and only those that do are competent. So anyone who was taught by a fool is a .""
The reversal is not true. Education and Dressage are two different things. Teachers are conditioned for a certain way of pushing knowledge into heads. For me this is dressage. Same thing as teaching a horse or a dog some tricks. Repetitive work requires that sort of dressage and a few fresh-ups at times. Many don't even get those fresh-ups and do the same tricks all their live.
Learning is something different. You grow far beyond your teachers because you use them as a tool for specific knowledge in a specific area and you combine it with other areas and release the synergy effects and inventions based on the combined and extrapolated knowledge.
Doers are researchers, engineers, artists etc. Creative people growing beyond the past.
The occupations you mentioned are highly repetitive and non creative. They need dressage. Australians on average do not learn a second language. This is affecting the learning capabilities of the average kid. Studies have shown that learning of a second language is helping in developing general abilities of the brain. Elsewhere a second language is mandatory and sometimes a third for that matter, depending on the path you take.
If students would not grow beyond their teachers we would not have innovation or any development for that matter. You don't need to be smart to be a teacher or teach doctors or nurses. You just need to be trained accordingly. get the drift ?? same with financial consultants. They are trained to sell a product (mostly) and in many cases they don't even understand the consequences of their actions. Why is an accountant any better than a person having read and understood the tax act and current regulations ? The accountant knows more than the average small business owner, because most people don't bother to stay on top of the regulations. But that does not make the accountant smart does it? knowing more than others is not necessarily smart, it's only what you make of it in terms of your own or others development. What I am saying is that you do not have to be smart to be a teacher or being trained
well. And I am also not saying that there are no smart teachers. If you are a smart teacher you may not survive in this landscape for long anyway. You have to have a certain bluntness and ignorance to deal with today's kids and parents.
Also, being smart has nothing to do with being wealthy or successful. Some people choose different paths and have different values. For me being smart means using your abilities to create an environment in which you are happy. Non smart people make themselves depending on an environment and adapt.
A smart person is able to make their own decisions and can afford not work just for the cheque at the end of the week. They are usually sought after people because they like what they do, whatever its is. And yes I agree and have seen smart teachers but only very very few.
Have fun
gmd
have fun
gmd
FollowupID:
599938