this is a sticky one, some comments needed

Submitted: Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 19:53
ThreadID: 62879 Views:4296 Replies:14 FollowUps:25
This Thread has been Archived
Hi all, my parents are thinking of selling up, they own there home, have a lge caravan and 4x4. mum is 70, dad 73, the problem is dad would like to just sell and then travel around this great country then come back and rent. mum would like to buy another house and travel with the knowledge she has a home base.
some real life experiences would be a help. they are self funded retirees, dad has had a gut full of the burbs.
cheers Shane.
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Leigh (Vic) - Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 20:00

Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 20:00
Hi Shane. Tough one mate!! Not sure I can enlighten you as I suspect you have already some apprehension? I'd only point to the question of how much spare room do you have at your place? Good luck in any event. Cheers
AnswerID: 331847

Reply By: Motherhen - Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 20:05

Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 20:05
I'm not at their age yet, but i am with your Mum. If they can afford it, invest in real estate now as a security.

Motherhen
Motherhen

Red desert dreaming

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 331848

Follow Up By: Member - Redbakk (WA) - Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 21:18

Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 21:18
Motherhen.....is that what you and your hubby have done?
0
FollowupID: 599720

Follow Up By: Motherhen - Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 22:27

Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 22:27
Hi Redbakk - No, we are still poor farmers. Mh
Motherhen

Red desert dreaming

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 599735

Follow Up By: Member - Redbakk (WA) - Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 23:50

Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 23:50
Oh...hayseeds huh... : )

Anyway I agree with you...invest into real estate so they have something to come back to....this is exactly what I am doing.
0
FollowupID: 599747

Reply By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 20:12

Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 20:12
Have just gone thru the exercise last week.

As a self funded retiree you can put the proceeds of your house sale (up to a certain limit) into your super fund and if its an allocated pension fund you don't pay tax.

I believe if you invest the money and buy a house within 12 months there are tax concessions.

We are aged 67 me and wife 61. She has an allocated pension fund and can put $450,000 into it. This year and 2 years in advance. A once only payment
As I'm over 65 I can only put $150,000 into it. So the ATO tell me.

The rest will have to be invested and tax paid on the proceeds.
If I'm still under the asset limit I may get a part pension.

Later we intend to buy a cheaper house when we return from travelling.

On today's market it seems the sensible thing to do with house prices going down the gurgler in parts of the country.

Incidentally Centrelink told me that if I get a Pension I can apply for Telephone allowance, internet allowance and rent allowance when staying in Van parks.

I believe if you invest the money and buy a house within 12 months there are tax concessions.

As far as assets are concerned if you dont own a house your van is considered to be your home and is therefore not included in your assets.

AnswerID: 331849

Reply By: Newbiesb - Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 20:21

Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 20:21
Ultimately be happy fpor them whatever their decision - let them join the SKIN club and travel. My parents do 5 - 9 months a year at the same age and love it - but for them, they like a base. They are considering selling up though.

When our parents work hard and provide for us, we leave home. It's now time to let them do what's right for them and just be present for them whatever they decide.
AnswerID: 331852

Follow Up By: Member - shane (SA) - Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 20:55

Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 20:55
you are a 100% right, i will be happy what ever they decide. and they know my door is always open.
cheers Shane.
0
FollowupID: 599716

Follow Up By: Miss(an)Jo - Toad Keeper (Bris - Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 22:37

Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 22:37
Would your door be open for my mother in law???
0
FollowupID: 599738

Follow Up By: Member - Redbakk (WA) - Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 23:51

Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 23:51
Jo.......That bad huh?
0
FollowupID: 599748

Follow Up By: Miss(an)Jo - Toad Keeper (Bris - Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 06:46

Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 06:46
Ah huh!.. I'd share but the situation is safer if I keep my mouth shut, you wouldn't believe me anyway! you'd think I was making it all up. This year I had enough of her and the carry on, so all this other stuff that has gone down with her and having 11 years of keeping mouth shut has gone out the door! I have let loose on the woman and by God she didn't like it! But too bad! I am not going to put up with her and her crap anymore! she didn't know that person existed inside me and I tell ya, finally letting go and blowing my stack on numerous occasions has been the best thing to do to make her hear what I want to say!!!!!!! (I say hear, not understand, because she will go back to usual self,)
then I can go off again!..goodie goodie!!!
0
FollowupID: 599755

Reply By: Member - Barnesy - Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 20:30

Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 20:30
I know that many people keep their houses and rent them out to fund their travels. They have the best of both worlds, continuous income and security when they return. They wouldn't have the large amount of money from selling up though.

Can't help from personal experience as we are working as we travel around and don't own a house.

Barnesy
AnswerID: 331854

Reply By: _gmd_pps - Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 21:12

Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 21:12
at the moment it's more a question of finances or the house prices rather than the feeling of having a base.

We were looking for a house (base) in North Queensland since some time and were researching various areas. About 18 months ago some smart people predicted what is happening now and only a few listened. We did .. We sold investment units and blocks and pulled all money out of public funds into term deposits at a bank rated AAA.
That was about finished 12 months ago. So we did not loose a cent so far from slumping stocks and real estate. At the end of the day we were not sure where to buy and decided to travel first before we make a decision unless we buy an investment and
it turns out nice enough to live there.

It would have been better to sell 12 months ago but it is still higher then it will be in 12 months time. It is most likely the better solution to sell now and put the money in some "save" investment. Unfortunately the term deposits are down also.. nevertheless you will not loose any money. Don't put it into super unless you have a self managed fund because even the so called cash funds are loosing. So secure the money and start traveling.

Four arguments:
1. Houses will get cheaper
2. They have a chance to travel and find a base where they really like it, not just buying one to have one ..
3. No hasel with tenants, outgoings etc etc ..
4. Their money is going to bring interest.

If they need money to live from the house sale then I am
the wrong person to say anything because I would not put
any money in a public fund or pension. You only loose in the next
2 years or more.

First quarter next year we will see at least another 2% unemployment and I personally believe that it will be higher. There will be another wave of bad credits coming on top of that and this will also affect Australia to a high degree .. (credit card dept).

So my advise would be to sell as long as you still get a decent price. In some areas this is already dropping fast.

Not an easy decision, but I am quite sure that buying now is loosing money. Same applies for shares .. we hav not seen the bottom yet.

good luck
gmd
AnswerID: 331867

Follow Up By: Austravel - Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 19:17

Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 19:17
Hi gmd,

Well done in putting all your money into cash. I very much doubt anyone predicted anything this bad even though they will take credit for it. I'd say you were one in a million taking the risk that the market would actually crash. I'd doubt even those predicting it put all their assets into cash. This is a one in a century event and no matter what anyone tells you no one predicted this. Perpetual bears will also say so but, yea right. It could very well have gone very bad for you but it didn't so well done. You actually have lost money in cash via the currency rate and inflation but your right not to the extent of most of us.

I agree houses will keep going down on average or at the least stagnate for many years. Though picking that shares will keep going down is a very brave tip. If they do it'll beat every correction and crash ever. It could but even if it does maybe 10-15% at most. Most probably will trade sideways for a year or two. If not and there is a real crash you're stuffed, money means nothing in a full on crash it becomes worthless. Only assets count in a major depression inflation will destroy your cash. You've done well so far, now is the time to start averaging back into investments, no one picks the bottom, you could miss a stellar run back up. Still your call. Why would you say cash accounts in super are loosing money, that's rot, your in cash are you not. Also facts are most SMSF loose more than managed supers. Try not to believe just because you made one good call that you will continue to do so. Regardless of what you believe mangers are no different to professionals in every field. Some bad, most better than most of us in their profession.

Take the comments for how they are intended, you've done well to date now your at cross roads that will either make you stacks of money or not. Still you might be a so it matter not.

Good luck
0
FollowupID: 599853

Follow Up By: _gmd_pps - Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 21:17

Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 21:17
Well .. you may not believe it, but there were people predicting what happens now .. and there is worse to come ..

I was not talking cash funds (they are loosing) I am talking term deposits which we still hold at 8.45% at the moment.

And yes you are right .. you need to convert that cash again into property. We have started doing that with selected locations.
But the pressure is on and property will fall further especially when we see jobs going early next year. Shares are too early although there are a handful of totally undervalued blue chips
which may go up a bit, but general direction is still down.

I do not believe in "so called experts". If they would be as smart as they want to appear then they would not have to do what they do, right ? People holding seminars about investments have no clue about investing otherwise they would not have the time to hold seminars. The ones who know do, the ones who don't teach or are consultants.

Anyway .. everyone has to make up their own mind, but most don't they are just sheep.

Have fun
gmd
0
FollowupID: 599866

Follow Up By: The Landy - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:17

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:17
Hi GMD

You are quite right; there were many people predicting this 'catastrophe' and some very good books were written on the subject. The problem is that greed is insidious and people are often blinded by the reality.

The reality is that money/credit was far too cheap and readily available, we saw that in the late Eighties, and history is just repeating itself. Risk was being mispriced. Unfortunately this time around there is still a chance of systemic failure of the financial system, albeit small - but all hell will break if that happens.

In the very least the world is heading in to deep recession. I wouldn't own shares in that environment........we are still a long way from everything turning aound for the better (a long way!)
0
FollowupID: 599912

Follow Up By: Austravel - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:58

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:58
Hi GMD and Landy,

The few people you talk about predicting this have been doing so for the last decade. They are perpetual bears and sometimes get it right. Most did think there was something going to happen but no one predicted this outcome, come on no one has a crystal ball. But it's worked for you so great your one of a handful in the World that did what some of the "prophets" said. Could there be more to come. Probably a bit more but just as we get caught up in the world recession, we should side track it (just). Could it be doom and gloom as they predict? Maybe but I very much doubt it. The doom and gloom bear merchants come out to play in this environment but it generally passes. Markets are more adept in pulling themselves out of this mess than they were in previous times. But yep it could all turn to crap, in that case no one is spared. If it got that bad that countries couldn't pay their bills etc what do they have to loose they will take what they need.

If you wouldn't own shares what would you own? Property has had it's day for a while and may fall further regardless of location. Property and shares work in tandem and always have, property has more to fall. Cash always goes backwards in a bank and remember the guarantee is only as good as the people/country backing it. If the world falls over I'd be damn worried about having cash in a bank. What about Gold, doubt it this time round.

"The ones who know do, the ones who don't teach or are consultants". Heard this garbage when I was an apprentice and it's still rubbish. This implies that anyone who teaches is a fool and only those that do are competent. So anyone who was taught by a fool is a ...... You get the drift. So doctors, nurses, accountants, engineers, anyone who is taught was taught the wrong thing or at the least incompetently. "Those that know do" so the assumption is that we never have doctors, nurses, accountants, engineering that do, make any mistakes. It's a foolish statement and should be taken for what it is. Disrespects anyone that teaches and anyone that has ever been taught. Nasty cycle isn't it.

Good to get different opinions on this mess and I hope you're both wrong for everyone's sake and within 6-12mths we are back on track.
0
FollowupID: 599917

Follow Up By: Member - DAZA (QLD) - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:44

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:44
I'm from the old school, where the old proverb Little Fish Are Sweet,
being self employed and getting close to retirement, I have been
watching with great interest over the past 18 months or so, re: the
Share Market, and I thank my lucky stars that we have stayed with
Term Deposits, several years ago we were stung by a N A B Financial
Planner, who stuffed us up big time, we lost a lot of money,
from that day onwards, I swore I would never let any body, ever
control our hard earned Dollars again, I know Banks are risky allso,
but a little bit of Interest is better than risking a lot, just depends how greedy you want to be.

Cheers
Daza
0
FollowupID: 599925

Follow Up By: The Landy - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:24

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:24
Hi Austravel...

To the contrary, there is some very good stuff written on the topic, especially post 2001 and by well respected people,; not your talk circuit 'prophets'. Some of the work by Satyajit Das (an Australian), among others, has been outstanding.

I work in the financial markets and we were talking about this two years ago. Predicting the timing is difficult, but the outcome was inevitable. And I must add that after 25 years of commodity and currency trading (for a living) and thinking I'd seen it all - this crisis came along.

To be perfectly honest, I think markets are less adept at dealing with this particular crisis than previously as many have simply lost confidence in the regulators and those 'vested' with fixing the problem. Part of the problem is that no-one knows the full extent of it. We've witnessed the credit crisis in the US and how it spread around the world; the next big issue will be the default of loans made to Emerging Countries..

My tip is that within six months the world will be in the depth of a recession with unemployment rising at the rate of knots. Hard to own shares in that environment...I'm not an investment advisor so I can't offer you alternatives, but I can tell you what I wouldn't own.

Good luck with it..
0
FollowupID: 599931

Follow Up By: _gmd_pps - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:23

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:23
Austravel,

"This implies that anyone who teaches is a fool and only those that do are competent. So anyone who was taught by a fool is a .""

The reversal is not true. Education and Dressage are two different things. Teachers are conditioned for a certain way of pushing knowledge into heads. For me this is dressage. Same thing as teaching a horse or a dog some tricks. Repetitive work requires that sort of dressage and a few fresh-ups at times. Many don't even get those fresh-ups and do the same tricks all their live.
Learning is something different. You grow far beyond your teachers because you use them as a tool for specific knowledge in a specific area and you combine it with other areas and release the synergy effects and inventions based on the combined and extrapolated knowledge.
Doers are researchers, engineers, artists etc. Creative people growing beyond the past.
The occupations you mentioned are highly repetitive and non creative. They need dressage. Australians on average do not learn a second language. This is affecting the learning capabilities of the average kid. Studies have shown that learning of a second language is helping in developing general abilities of the brain. Elsewhere a second language is mandatory and sometimes a third for that matter, depending on the path you take.
If students would not grow beyond their teachers we would not have innovation or any development for that matter. You don't need to be smart to be a teacher or teach doctors or nurses. You just need to be trained accordingly. get the drift ?? same with financial consultants. They are trained to sell a product (mostly) and in many cases they don't even understand the consequences of their actions. Why is an accountant any better than a person having read and understood the tax act and current regulations ? The accountant knows more than the average small business owner, because most people don't bother to stay on top of the regulations. But that does not make the accountant smart does it? knowing more than others is not necessarily smart, it's only what you make of it in terms of your own or others development. What I am saying is that you do not have to be smart to be a teacher or being trained well. And I am also not saying that there are no smart teachers. If you are a smart teacher you may not survive in this landscape for long anyway. You have to have a certain bluntness and ignorance to deal with today's kids and parents.
Also, being smart has nothing to do with being wealthy or successful. Some people choose different paths and have different values. For me being smart means using your abilities to create an environment in which you are happy. Non smart people make themselves depending on an environment and adapt.
A smart person is able to make their own decisions and can afford not work just for the cheque at the end of the week. They are usually sought after people because they like what they do, whatever its is. And yes I agree and have seen smart teachers but only very very few.

Have fun
gmd


have fun
gmd
0
FollowupID: 599938

Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Yalgoo) - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 13:11

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 13:11
well just for starters calling investment seminar holders 'teachers" is ridiculous
they do no more than talk up ways to get people to part with ther money in dodgey ways for their dodgey investments for their own profit.
the only thing they "teach" is a fool and his money is easily parted
0
FollowupID: 599952

Follow Up By: Austravel - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 13:52

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 13:52
Hi Landy,

Maybe we're on a different wave length. Guess I'm talking about the doom dayers. Did the people you speak of get it right ie a crash of this level? If people were conservative or out of the market since 2000 then they've done worse than this market would have caused them.

You might be right regarding unemployment. If it does spike up I think it will only be that just a spike and within 12mths come back again. Plus will only be in select areas. Even though commodity prices have dropped I'm led to believe that volumes have not as yet dropped. Growth will be hammered but not sure over 12mths whether the market is right this time. It's factoring in a very large drop in earnings.
0
FollowupID: 599963

Follow Up By: _gmd_pps - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 13:58

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 13:58
You can not derive from my statement that I called them teachers. They fall under the category of "consultants" for me.

have fun
gmd
0
FollowupID: 599964

Follow Up By: Austravel - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 14:12

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 14:12
Hi GMD,

We differ on so many levels I don't know were to begin. That style of teaching went out long ago but now they think maybe it should be brought back into schools at least. That is the style of repetitive teaching. Maybe my view is slanted due to a background in universities. In theory the teacher should be far better equipped than the student. Sadly in some areas this isn't so. I still get the assumption that you think that teachers/lectures etc never grow beyond today and teach only the same stuff day in day out. In fact everything is moving constantly. Surely teachers/academics need to be in front constantly to continue this upward progression. Most research comes from within the teaching/academic profession. This is what advances learning/society/understanding.Well that's what's supposed to happen. Fails sometimes.

Are you saying doctors, nurses are caught in the past as well? Maybe accountants don't move as quickly with practices but they do move. I doubt there's a single body of professionals that have stood still over the past decade. As far as you don't need to be smart to teach doctors and nurses, I'm stunned.

Anyway each to their own so I won't go one.

Good luck

P.S. You did say teachers which is what I narrowed in on, but I get your drift now. "The ones who know do, the ones who don't teach or are consultants".
0
FollowupID: 599967

Follow Up By: The Landy - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 14:50

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 14:50
Hi Austravel

We are long way from a resolution, in fact I’d say it is not far out of its infancy and has a long way to run.

The problem that we have now is that what started as a credit crisis has quickly turned into a blunt instrument bludgeoning the ‘real’ economy. Many banks globally are under-capitalised and that is part of the problem that unfolded, people underestimated what effect this would have on credit availability (an explanation would be too lengthy to discuss here)….

There are a number of examples that can be looked at in a historical context to glean what impact the current crisis could have; and these pail into insignificance when compared to what is unfolding presently.

Now I run the risk of being a doomsayer here, but I am viewing it from the pointy-end and I can tell you the picture isn’t pretty.

Mind you this is now diverging from the thread previously started; send me a note if you would like to discuss further.

In the meantime following is a link to a book that is interesting reading. Das is well respected and has a wealth of knowledge. Note the date of the seminar, August 2006! Mind you it isn't just about equity markets, but the current problem had its roots in what he discusses.


Cheers

Traders, Guns & Money: The Liars Guide to Risk Management
0
FollowupID: 599972

Follow Up By: _gmd_pps - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 15:05

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 15:05
Austravel,

I don't think we are that far apart. I did not include a "decent" university professor or lecturer to some part into the group of teachers. With an academic education you "should" get some fundamentals of independent learning. The lectures are held and its up to the student to grasp the knowledge or not. It does not mean that they are capable of research and independent intellectual growth. That's usually determined post graduate when the smarter ones take off on their own path. I agree with you that a lot of our new knowledge comes from uni's and their research but also a lot comes from business oriented research or inventions. I very well differentiate between lecturer/researcher and teacher.

Today and especially in Australia the curriculum is highly adapted to the specialised workforce we need. For example "Basic Mathematics" is split up in Applicable Mathematics, or Discrete Mathematics, or Calculus, or Geometry and Trigonometry. What a nonsense. We bring education and teaching to the lowest common denominator and as a consequence we do not need smart teachers, we only need "specialised" teachers. Every person with a TEE should have a certain overview of the state of the art knowledge.

Unfortunately also universities scale their results to have a certain required number of students pass and not look too bad when the general level of education goes down. It does not encourage the system to improve the quality of teaching and it also does not improve the quality of the graduates. Only a very small percentage of people (usually the ones with HD) achieve a level of independents in their intellectual abilities that I would call them "smart". The rest is "trained" .. probably "well trained" but just trained. Those smart ones usually are the doers.
I really enjoy the exchange of thoughts and I have no problem at all if you do not agree, because I believe that only an unreasonable man/woman will bring progress. The reasonable man/woman will adapt and nothing will change, in the sense that satisfaction is the end of progress.

have fun
gmd

0
FollowupID: 599977

Follow Up By: Austravel - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 16:24

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 16:24
Hi Landy,

Would like to discuss it further do you have an email address I can get you on?
0
FollowupID: 599993

Follow Up By: Austravel - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 16:30

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 16:30
Hi gmd,

Yes you're right we are closer than I first thought on our views. In fact your second paragraph relates not only to schools but trades as well now. The trade I did has now been broken down into 3 separate trades/skills.

Good chatting.

Regards
0
FollowupID: 599995

Follow Up By: The Landy - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 16:58

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 16:58
Hi Austravel

thelandyoptusnet.com.au

cheers
0
FollowupID: 600000

Reply By: Member No 1- Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 21:49

Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 21:49
as above ...i'm with your mum....you need somewhere secure for when you cant travel....it will always be there
AnswerID: 331879

Reply By: Nomadic Navara - Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 23:35

Saturday, Oct 25, 2008 at 23:35
I do not know the situation in SA but there are a few states that have developed good legislation to protect residents of manufactured homes villages. I live in one of those villages in NSW. I own the house and rent the land. The excess funds from my original cottage were placed in an allocated superannuation fund (they now have another name.) The rent I pay on the land my house sits on is around the same as the combined fees you pay for the body corporate fees, rates and other charges on a unit in a strata title. The village is marketed to people in the 50 and over age group. We have a compound for our caravan storage (rent free) when we are home.

The legislation that covers manufactured home parks in NSW gives protection against summary eviction. The legislation gives a time period (used to be 90 days but has recently been extended) for residents to find another park and make arrangements to move. The park owner then has to pay for the transfer. On top of that, the park owner has to get a development application approved before he can issue eviction notices. I feel extremely sure of my present lease and look forward to spend the rest of my life here (at least up to the point of having to move into assisted living.) For further details on the legal situation in the desired state contact the relevent Department of Fair Trading.

The new cottages in NSW manufactured home villages are built in accordance with the Australian building code and are identical to the non brick houses you will see being placed on suburban blocks. for examples of these see http://www.valhallavillage.com.au/for_sale.html

Check out the situation in the state where your parents intend to settle. Even with the current low interest rates the investment income from their excess funds will more than pay for the land rent and income tax if they move into a manufactured home village. If you wish to read more and you are also a member of the Caravaners forum there is a paper I have submitted in the documents section (or you can PM me.)

PeterD
PeterD
Retired radio and electronics technician

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

AnswerID: 331894

Reply By: Trekkie (Member - WA) - Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 00:29

Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 00:29
In relation to the issues of Centrelink benefits (if they currently qualify) and the ability to place proceeds into superannuation, or to obtain an exemption relating to the "principal residence" I would suggest they consult a Financial Planner - there will be limitations on what they can do due to their ages.
For a small fee they will be provided with various options and the Taxation and Centrelink implications
AnswerID: 331898

Follow Up By: didiaust - Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 17:11

Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 17:11
Centrelink Financial Information Services (FIS Officers ) are FREE!

You need to call an make an appointment to see one. Excellent services not just for retirees but those getting close.

Sometimes the wait is a few weeks for an appointment
0
FollowupID: 599836

Reply By: disco driver - Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 00:33

Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 00:33
Shane,
Whichever way they decide I hope that they have many years of happy travelling ahead of them.
I tend to agree with your mothers idea of a home base to return to.
Mainly just in case something drastic and unforeseen should happen to one of them, (stroke, heart attack, major accident type drastic) and then trying to deal with the stress of coping with that issue as well as trying to find somewhere suitable to live all in a short time frame.

Perhaps a unit in a seniors type lifestyle village or something similar (in a suitable location of course) may give your mother some sense of security and still allow a bit of extra funding for travelling.

Just my thoughts.

Disco.
AnswerID: 331899

Reply By: The Landy - Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 08:25

Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 08:25
A hard question with no 'right' answer. But I wonder whether by selling up everything and having the freedom of no ties to anything, free and easy so to speak, would actually enhance the trip.

Just a thought and good luck to them in their travels.....
AnswerID: 331930

Reply By: HappyCamper - Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 17:53

Sunday, Oct 26, 2008 at 17:53
G'day Shane

As others have said, there is no 'right' answer and what suits one person won't necessarily suit the next. However I'm in agreeance with your mother and it got me out of a spot over the last few years. At that time I was contemplating selling up and hitting the road for a year or three, but decided to wait a while because I was to-ing and fro-ing with the decision and I work on the theory...if in doubt, don't!! This has always worked in my favour and this time was no exception because during that 'thinking' year I ended up with an ongoing illness that has kept me at home for 5 years with 'no' camping or travelling at all. So if I had sold up I hate to think where I'd be now and what may have happened, as being crook for 5 yrs and only having a small caravan for accommodation might have sent me further around the twist. LOL

Now that I'm ready to hit the track again I don't have to think about selling/keeping the house, the decision was much easier this time around, then again if you (and wife/family?) are prepared to have your parents park in your yard for an extended period of time then their decision could be different. I didn't have that luxury.

Not sure this helps much? But I do hope they enjoy their trip, I might meet them around a campfire somewhere on the track.
Bronwyn ;-)



AnswerID: 331983

Reply By: Member - Matt & Caz H (QLD) - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 06:34

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 06:34
Hi Shane,

This is a hard one and everyone is different, however bit about us - we have just sold our home as the mortgage was killing us (we are in our late 30's) we are about to set off around OZ with our to daughters (6 & 8) they are home schooled so there is no time limit for us we plan to work as we go, we figure we will just see it all then settle where we like best - we will rent first then perhaps buy (either that or travel for the rest of our lives!!). If we could of afforded it we would have prefered to keep our home and rent it out so later we could move back (highly unlikely as I hate the burbs as well) or just sell it.

At the moment we are just looking forward to not having really high blood pressure LOL.

Hope all goes well.

Cheers Matt & Caz
AnswerID: 332044

Follow Up By: The Landy - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:23

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 09:23
Good luck to you and have fun!
0
FollowupID: 599913

Reply By: Member - Matt & Caz H (QLD) - Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:19

Monday, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:19
Thanks Landy,

We cant wait!!!! how good it will be to be debt free.......and just roaming.

Cheers
Matt & Caz
AnswerID: 332078

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)