To Treg or not to Treg...?
Submitted: Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 21:18
ThreadID:
63386
Views:
7991
Replies:
9
FollowUps:
23
This Thread has been Archived
Grunter65
I have a Jayco camper which we drag along the beaches of SE Qld behind a diesel Paj. People have been telling me for a while that I should have a Treg (double yoke) hitch. I've been off the Moreton and Fraser barges with the conventional ball coupling without a problem, but I'm always getting hit up because I've not got the "correct hitch" for the camping we're doing. I'm not off to the Cape or doing extreme 4WD-ing, why do I need this type of hitch?
Reply By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 21:31
Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 21:31
Chances are you don't need to change the hitch to a TREG type.
Why not
check it next time you're in a situation where you think you might be asking a lot of the ball coupling. Stop the rig in that position (eg: getting off the barge) and get out and inspect the coupling.....does it appear to be at it's limit of travel? If so, maybe you should consider a TREG.
What about a Hyland coupling? I've heard they're pretty good and just as much articulation and 360 degree roll-over capability as a TREG.
Cheers
Roachie
AnswerID:
334411
Follow Up By: Grunter65 - Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 21:48
Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 21:48
Been considering the Hyland Roachie, just trying to justify the expense and exactly why I need to upgrade from what I have considering the relatively light 4WD-ing / camping I do. We don't go bush, just beach. Sure, some sand tracks and dune areas can be a little bumpy but we haven't had any troubles thus far. Still, I'm being told all the time that I need the Treg-style hitch?
FollowupID:
602176
Reply By: Keith_A (Qld) - Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 21:52
Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 21:52
Hi Grunter - the standard ball coupling probably does the job 80% of the time. The problem is that once you start enjoying the experince of out-of-the way locations, the last 20% starts to grow.
We are in SE Qld, and owned a Jayco Dove for 20 yrs and dragged it all over the place incl
Double Island point, Inskip and Frazer, the Stezlecki, Expedition NP etc. Like you, not the Cape or extremes.
A few years ago we had a Coromal with a Treg hitch, and the van rolled on the Roper Hway NT- various reasons. The Patrol was as solid as a
rock, while the poptop did a 180deg - and was a write off. VERY glad for the Treg hitch.
As your adventures take you further afield, the greater articulation of the hitch starts to become more important. Better to have it before an incident, than after - that would be my thought.
nb - the Bro-inlaw has a van with the Highland , and it works
well in most situations - ( used on-road) . They are a ball, but with similar ability to the Treg.
.............................Keith
AnswerID:
334419
Follow Up By: Grunter65 - Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 22:16
Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 22:16
Gday Keith
Re the van rollover, do you think the flexibility of the Treg contributed to the problem? I've spoken to people who say that towing on bitumen with a Treg hitch is not much chop with a heavier van in tow with the propensity to sway. Obviously the double yoke style hitches are for the more extreme off-roading ventures. I'm assuming that these hitches don't use / require anti-sway bars ala conventional ball coupling / more on-road adventures?
FollowupID:
602183
Follow Up By: Keith_A (Qld) - Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 22:39
Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 22:39
There are 2 possibilities - one is that with a standard ball, the weight of the Patrol would have kept the van on the road. The second is that with a standard ball, the momentum of the van would have taken the patrol over with it. I prefer to know the hitch will keep the vehicle safe - the van can go if it must.....Keith
FollowupID:
602191
Follow Up By: Grunter65 - Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 22:53
Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 22:53
Glad to hear you're still hear to tell the tale Keith! Interesting perspective on the issue, hadn't considered that side of the argument.
FollowupID:
602192
Follow Up By: Nomadic Navara - Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 00:20
Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 00:20
The rules are simple. If you need WDH (incorrectly called anti-sway bars) on a ball coupling then you need it with a Treg or Hyland hitch. The idea is to get the weight back on the front wheels after you have hitches up the van.
PeterD
FollowupID:
602202
Follow Up By: Grunter65 - Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 08:53
Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 08:53
Gday Peter
Would the use of WDH ( thanks for the correction :) ) on a Treg-style hitch negate its benefits through limiting its flexibility?
FollowupID:
602218
Follow Up By: Nomadic Navara - Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 09:33
Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 09:33
Grunter
You do not use the WDH when travelling at low speeds when the flexibility of the Treg or Hyland is absolutely necessary. However you restore the WDH before you start running free and faster.
PeterD
FollowupID:
602225
Follow Up By: Grunter65 - Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 09:50
Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 09:50
Thanks Peter, I'll have to investigate further.
FollowupID:
602227
Follow Up By: wendys - Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 13:53
Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 13:53
Grunter, have Treg coupling on offroad van, which we have towed over 100,000km - about two thirds of this on bitumen. Use Hayman Reece weight distribution bars on bitumen - no problems, and we often tow around the speed limit. Usually take bars off once we leave the bitumen - unless we are confident that the track is really smooth.
FollowupID:
602265
Follow Up By: Grunter65 - Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 16:53
Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 16:53
Reason I was dubious about the Treg's capabilities on bitumen goes back to a Caravan & Motorhome DVD I watched. They were towing a single axle van across the Nullabor that had a Treg hitch - absolutely bagged it they did due the van's tendency to sway on the road. But, they didn't have the WDH. They did fit same early in the piece and were fine.
FollowupID:
602285
Reply By: Member - Duncs - Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 22:55
Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 22:55
Grunter,
I have two trailers, one has a Tregg and the other doesn't.
The Tregg is on the TrakShak it is normally up around the 1000 to 1100kg mark when we are travelling, I know that is not as heavy as a Jayco.
The little box trailer has a standard ball coupling. It is probably less than 600kg most of the time.
The Tregg is a much more comfortable hitch to tow with. I mean it keeps the trailer solid on the back of the car without rattles. I have had it at high speed(think too high and you might be getting close, but I don't want to discuss the merits or otherwise of that now) on various road surfaces without any problems or fear. At low speed, crawling along rough tracks at walking pace it is wonderful.
The ball coupling is cheap and functional it does what it does OK but that is all.
Mine has always rattled and bumped on the back of the car. I have broken 2 ball couplings one on a mitre drain and the other at
the tip. Neither has been catastrophic but the safety chain has earned its keep.
I can't see why you could not fit a load equaliser to a trailer with a Tregg coupling. I would think the need would be determined by the vehicle not the coupling.
I don't know what a Tregg would cost these days but it is a nice bit of kit. If they are not overly expensive and if it worries you get one you won't be sorry.
If it was me I would stick with what I have unless the need for something better could be clearly demonstrated.
If you decide on a trip to the
Vic High Country or the like fit a Tregg before you go. Otherwise spend the $$$ on ice cream.
Duncs
AnswerID:
334432
Follow Up By: Grunter65 - Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 23:01
Sunday, Nov 09, 2008 at 23:01
Thx for your thoughts Duncs. Haven't considered the
Vic high country, don't know much about it to be honest, must look into it. When we have so much of the 4Wd stuff in sunny Qld to do up front the rest of our beautiful country gets a little forgotten!
FollowupID:
602194
Reply By: Sea-Dog - Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:19
Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:19
My thoughts were of the strength of the current hitch more so than articulation etc due to the relatively light off roading you are engaging in..
Reason being if you are stuck in very soft sand, which does occur on easy beach drives at times, you could be over stressing the standard hitch with the recovery etc..
I have a Hyland hitch on my camper trailer and can't fault it although a standard hitch such as on my boat is much easier to use as there is no aligning pins etc...
That is what I would base my decision to change the hitch over or not on..
cheers
AnswerID:
334467
Reply By: Member - Tour Boy (Bororen) - Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 14:40
Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 14:40
One other thing is if you have any grease or lube on the ball, that pesky sand can find it's way into the ball and wear it out quicker.
Personally I have only used trigg and treg hitches on off road campers and trailers. The balls rattled too much and didn't offer the same piece of mind if somthing is more of an angle than it looks.
I also have a large high tensile bolt (same dia as the tow pin) and padlock that I can slip into the "poly block" when the trailer is unatended to slow down thieves. I also use a padlock instead of the standard clip when on the car so noone can pinch it when you stop at macca's.
Cheers
Dave
AnswerID:
334497
Reply By: Sand Man (SA) - Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 19:42
Monday, Nov 10, 2008 at 19:42
The standard 50mm ball coupling restricts up and down and sideways movement to around 15% of the centreline.
When topping a rise, or going through a steep dip, you run the risk of breaking the cast iron coupling if it reaches the end on it's travel and is stressed further. Similarly, sideways twist beyond the same amount will cause the same problem.
The other hitches, (Tregg, Hyland) are made from steel and not only take much more up and down articulation and full 360° rotation, but are much stronger because they are not of cast iron construction. They also absorb any road shock and are totally silent.
Bill
AnswerID:
334539
Follow Up By: Grunter65 - Tuesday, Nov 11, 2008 at 14:45
Tuesday, Nov 11, 2008 at 14:45
Hi Bill
Just reading your post re the Cobb cooker, good to see a man with passion!
I think I'll go down the Hyland line from the info offered, I was almost there myself but convention for off-roaders seems to head that way. Thanks for your thoughts.
FollowupID:
602437
Follow Up By: Sand Man (SA) - Tuesday, Nov 11, 2008 at 18:45
Tuesday, Nov 11, 2008 at 18:45
Grunter,
The Hyland hitch has a good reputation too.
Have a look at the site below for more info on the Hyland hitch, especially the need for a longer shaft on the ball.
Off-Road hitches
I think we are all passionate with our camping and off-roading experiences. That's what makes this
forum worthwhile.
Amongst the "
mine is better than yours" replies we sometimes read, is some valuable knowledge and experiences that may help others.
All good mate!
Bill
FollowupID:
602495
Follow Up By: Grunter65 - Tuesday, Nov 11, 2008 at 22:20
Tuesday, Nov 11, 2008 at 22:20
Bill,
I've been 4WD-ing for only 6 years now so I'm learning all the time. Been camping since I was 8 so not as green in that area, but all the info on vehicles, van set ups, 12 volt and the myriad of other discussions that happen each day is just what I need to expand my knowledge and add to my family's experience when we go away. This
forum is invaluable I reckon. I've only recently come across it, I'm now an avid thread submitter and responder. There is so much experience out there relative to exactly the stuff I need to know about. As you say though, for all the good natured and
well founded advice there are a few boofheads who seem intent on nothing more than to alienate and offend, but for the most part, we off-roaders and campers are a decent bunch!
I'm off to buy a Cobb tomorrow too!
Grant
FollowupID:
602543