Saturday, Feb 14, 2009 at 14:06
Regarding your comment:
--------------------------------------------------------------
"It's a sad refelection on peoples' comprehension ability, that what they understand is that 121.5 will not be monitored AT ALL."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I disagree. Because EPIRBS are part of a global distress system that no longer monitors 121.5.
There is no requirement for any aircraft to guard/monitor 121.5 - the only reason they do it is because it is a company policy.
Aircraft in Australia are only required to listen on 121.5 prior to start up and shut down so they can
check that their
beacon is not accidentally on.
There are areas within the globe that aircraft will monitor 121.5 - such as an ADIZ- but those areas and requirements are established and promulgated as required.
With the increased growth of RAA (over GA) the chance is reduced further as they do not have any requirement to carry radios.
IF, an aircraft does "just happen" to hear a 121.5 transmission, they report it. Then ATC will request aircraft transiting through that area to listen out.
The detections since 01 FEB have all just been "CHANCE"
AMSA (Aussar) have been advertising to people for the last 5 years that from 01 FEB they will no longer be monitoring 121.5.
Considering AMSA is the only organisation within Australia with the responsibility of monitoring EPIRBS - it is quite understandable that people say that it wont be monitored.
So yes its true that if a 121.5 is detected by chance, then AUSSAR is responsible for coordinating a response - but if you are in Distress and someone finds you it is just "LUCK".
I suppose Im a bit passionate about it - but (as a disclaimer) - I work in Aussar and am one of the team that monitors and responds to EPIRBs :)
FollowupID:
617242