H F or Sat Phone ?
Submitted: Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 15:32
ThreadID:
67114
Views:
3261
Replies:
8
FollowUps:
2
This Thread has been Archived
Robert HL (SEQ)(aka zuksctr)
G'day all,i in the position of either the HF or the Sat. Phone as not to being to afford both so in some people's opinion's which would or have you gone for & why?
Thank you,
Bob.
Reply By: Member - Dunworkin (WA) - Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 15:49
Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 15:49
Hi Robert, we chose Sat phone because we like to keep in touch with the family on a regular basis while we are away, (the kids like to know that they can get hold of us at anytime as
well, even if it is the grandies asking when we will be back LOL).
There are fors & against all things and I would be the first to suggest a
HF radio if not for wanting to keep in touch, I guess there are many good reasons for a HF. If you do go down the Sat Phone path be very careful of which way you go.
Cheers
Deanna
AnswerID:
355683
Reply By: The Geriatric Gypsies - Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 16:00
Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 16:00
goodday bob
how are you going
we chose the hf as a security blanket ie if stuck somewhere we can contact the vhs 737 club for help and advise and you can listen to others around you travelling and if needed to talk to if you or they are broken down and trying to get to 1 another
when we leave to travel we leave the
hf radio emergency no with family so that if we are needed urgently we can be contacted thru the radio we also leave a copy of our credit card with 1 of the kids so that the number doesnt have to be given out over the air in case of break down and parts are needed
have sometimes contemplated a sat phone but figure we are normally only out of contact for 3or4 days so kids can leave a message, as who wants to be on the bloody phone every day to me thats not why you retire after putting up with phones every day for years
steve
AnswerID:
355691
Reply By: Dave & Shelley (NT) - Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 16:09
Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 16:09
Hi Bob.
After researching this subject myself a few years ago, I went with HF. The main reason is the when you use a HF you become part of the community. VKS 737 enable you to "touch Base" every day during SKEDS (scheduled base call in times). You can listen in and chat with other users and
check out the track/road conditions. If anything mechanical goes wrong, instead of ringing someone for help, you can chat with other people who might be able to assist you. You can also make calls
home on HF on RADTEL. The phone quality can vary but it is a viable option. Oh yeah, and I was able to listen to ABC radio when I did my last trip along the CSR.
The down side is cost. I bought a new Codan NGT last year for $4000. That is a lot of cash. There are second hand units for sale but they are still rather expensive. On top of this VKS-737 is around $100 a year, and you pay similar for RADTEL.
I think if you just want a "call home" option, then a SAT phone might be a cheaper and better option. If you need to ability to get out of the poo in the middle of no-where, then I would go HF.
I hope my rambling helps out
Cheers
Dave
AnswerID:
355697
Follow Up By: Member - Fred B (NT) - Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 17:14
Monday, Mar 23, 2009 at 17:14
Esssentially.... ditto. I went with the HF options for mostly the same reasons. I have been on trips with people and the sat_ph(s) didn't work.... the HF DID... lol. (: Having read all the threads on this site and others for several months, I went with the HF.
HF "club" memberships such as VKS737 can help organise help in such a way that sat ph can't. With members coming to assist where other methods could cost you big $$$$$ in recovering you and your vehicle.
FollowupID:
623701