Sunday History Photo /Au

Submitted: Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 04:29
ThreadID: 70018 Views:5537 Replies:3 FollowUps:9
This Thread has been Archived
The Thylacine was the largest known carnivorous marsupial of modern times. Native to continental Australia, Tasmania and New Guinea, it is thought to have become extinct in the 20th century. It is commonly known as the Tasmanian Tiger, It was the last extant member of its genus, Thylacinus, although several related species have been found in the fossil record dating back to the early Miocene.
Image Could Not Be Found
The Thylacine became extinct on the Australian mainland thousands of years before European settlement of the continent, but it survived on the island of Tasmania along with several other endemic species, including the Tasmanian Devil. Intensive hunting encouraged by bounties is generally blamed for its extinction, but other contributory factors may have been disease, the introduction of dogs, and human encroachment into its habitat.
The Thylacine was one of only two marsupials to have a pouch in both sexes (the other is the Water Opossum). The male Thylacine had a pouch that acted as a protective sheath, protecting the male's external reproductive organs while running through thick brush.
The modern Thylacine first appeared about 4 million years ago. Species of the Thylacinidae family date back to the beginning of the Miocene; since the early 1990s, at least seven fossil species have been uncovered at Riversleigh, part of Lawn Hill National Park in northwest Queensland and back to 23 million years ago.
The skulls of the Thylacine and the Timber Wolf are almost identical although the species are unrelated.
Image Could Not Be Found
The indigenous peoples of Australia made first contact with the Thylacine. Numerous examples of Thylacine engravings and rock art have been found dating back to at least 1000 BC.Petroglyph images of the Thylacine can be found at the Dampier Rock Art Precinct on the Burrup Peninsula in Western Australia. Rock paintings from the Kakadu National Park clearly show that Thylacines were hunted by early humans. By the time the first explorers arrived, the animal was already rare in Tasmania. Europeans may have encountered it as far back as 1642 when Abel Tasman first arrived in Tasmania. His shore party reported seeing the footprints of "wild beasts having claws.
The Thylacine was a nocturnal and crepuscular hunter, spending the daylight hours in small caves or hollow tree trunks in a nest of twigs, bark or fern fronds. It tended to retreat to the hills and forest for shelter during the day and hunted in the open heath at night. Early observers noted that the animal was typically shy and secretive, with awareness of the presence of humans and generally avoiding contact, though it occasionally showed inquisitive traits.

There is evidence for at least some year-round breeding (cull records show joeys discovered in the pouch at all times of the year), although the peak breeding season was in winter and spring. They would produce up to four cubs per litter (typically two or three), carrying the young in a pouch for up to three months and protecting them until they were at least half adult size. Early pouch young were hairless and blind, but they had their eyes open and were fully furred by the time they left the pouch. After leaving the pouch, and until they were developed enough to assist, the juveniles would remain in the lair while the female hunted.Thylacines only once bred successfully in captivity, in Melbourne Zoo in 1899. Their life expectancy in the wild is estimated to have been 5 to 7 years, although captive specimens survived up to 9 years.Although long extinct on the Australian mainland by the time the European settlers arrived, the Thylacine survived into the 1930s in Tasmania. At the time of the first settlement, the heaviest distributions were in the northeast, northwest and north-midland regions. From the early days of European settlement they were rarely sighted but slowly began to be credited with numerous attacks on sheep. This led to the establishment of bounty schemes in an attempt to control their numbers. The Van Diemen's Land Company introduced bounties on the Thylacine from as early as 1830, and between 1888 and 1909 the Tasmanian government paid £1 per head for the animal.
Image Could Not Be Found
The last known specimen in captivity referred to as "Benjamin" was captured in 1933 and sent to the Hobart Zoo where it lived for three years and died in captivity in 1936


.
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Sir Kev & Darkie - Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 07:02

Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 07:02
Doug,

Another good post.

We were just last night telling the kids about the Thylacine and how it is now listed as extinct.

Cheers Kev
Russell Coight:
He was presented with a difficult decision: push on into the stretching deserts, or return home to his wife.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 371112

Follow Up By: Member - DAZA (QLD) - Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 07:57

Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 07:57
G/Day Doug

Another informative post, makes you wonder about the rest of Australias native Animals in the future.

G/Day Kev

Maybe from next Wednesday night the Blues might go the same way lol lol.
0
FollowupID: 638409

Follow Up By: Sir Kev & Darkie - Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 08:20

Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 08:20
There is NO "Maybe" about it Daza LOL
Russell Coight:
He was presented with a difficult decision: push on into the stretching deserts, or return home to his wife.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 638411

Follow Up By: On Patrol & TONI - Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 08:50

Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 08:50
well done AGAIN Doug, you must have seen the special about the Tassie Devil last week.

Kev, an interesting site to look at S o O stats.
cheers Colin
0
FollowupID: 638418

Follow Up By: Member - Donks1 (NSW) - Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 09:41

Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 09:41
I'm sure it was a question on Eddies Millionaire the other night tooo

Donks1
0
FollowupID: 638425

Reply By: Saharaman (aka Geepeem) - Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:04

Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:04
Hi Doug,


I always look forward to reading the Sunday history post every week. I think it is a valuable way to learn more about our great country. But there is one aspect that concerns me a little. And that is that the information published in the post is not referenced or credited to the original author. In recent weeks (today’s and the one about the rabbit proof fence for example) appear to be plucked straight out of Wikipedia. There is no problem with that per se as Wikipedia information can in general be freely re-used but they do have policy guideline in that regards.
Refer to:

http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use


I am sure that the owners of this site would want compliance with these guidelines as well. Having published many research papers over my professional life it is something that is common in the literature world – simply reference all material used and give credit where appropriate. This is not intended to be negative comment (I certainly want this post to continue every Sunday) but just to make sure everyone is happy please reference where the information is obtained and provide credit to the original authors (even if what you provide is a summary of their work).

Cheers,
Saharaman
AnswerID: 371136

Follow Up By: Member - Damien L (Cairns) - Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 21:45

Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 21:45
G'day Saharaman, Just about every thing we talk about is either read somewhere or was told by someone else. If we have to say where when or how we arrived at our thoughts or writings we would take up that much time and space that no one would have a comment about anything.
I read a lot about the places I go, mostly historic places and tell othe people about it. I love going to old gold mining arears up here and I talk about it to a lot of people, do I have to to give a history of where I found out about the place?
I think Doug does an excelent job on what he does every Sunday and we all learn something from the history lessons.
I have collected a lot of data and when reading it I have no idea of where I got it. One day I hope to wirite a sory on what I have collected and learnt from where I have been but would have no idea what came from where.
Like Wikpedia I will use what ever I can and tell the story.

Damien
Love the bush

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 638528

Follow Up By: Saharaman (aka Geepeem) - Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 22:18

Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 22:18
HI Damian,

I never suggested Doug was not doing an excellent job - quite the contarary - I applauded and read with interest the Sunday history post.
We are not talking about collecting a lot of data etc etc to write a post like this.
In this case Doug knows exactly where the information comes from - copy and paste sentences and or whole paragraphs straight from Wikipedia. Whether we like it or not (its common courtesy anyway) its a Wikipedia policy and term of use to reference where you copy the information from. There is nothing difficult or time consuming about it - just a simple reference at end of copied section. For private use it maybe different - but when you regularly post on a public forum information thats copied from somewhere else without reference and credit I think its quite appropriate to raise this as a concern. In no way does it dedract from the excellent post Doug puts up on Sundays.

Hope that clarifies where I am coming from.

Cheers
0
FollowupID: 638539

Follow Up By: Member - Doug T (NT) - Monday, Jun 22, 2009 at 06:59

Monday, Jun 22, 2009 at 06:59
Saharaman
I had a look a look at the Terms , from what I read there it refers to people adding content to Wiki' , when I copy and paste text it is usually not exactly , some parts missing, some added from other sites thus the block of text is not exactly the same ,
Good to get some feedback and hope you enjoy reading as much as I enjoy doing,

.
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 638554

Reply By: D200Dug- Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 14:34

Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 14:34
I know of several sightings of Thylacine like creatures in both Tasmania and Victoria.

It is a sad legacy that we killed off such a wonderful species so quickly and easily for such greedy reasons.

I do wonder if there aren't remnant populations out there somewhere, there is a lot of very deep and unexplored areas still in both states.

One more reason to stop logging old forests and let some of the natural areas survive intact.
AnswerID: 371170

Follow Up By: Madfisher - Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 14:47

Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 14:47
Agree , with some of the wild country in Tassie hard to believe they wiped them all out.
Cheers pete
0
FollowupID: 638467

Follow Up By: D200Dug- Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 15:19

Sunday, Jun 21, 2009 at 15:19
I know of a person who is looking for them in the more remote regions of Victoria after some interesting sightings.

he is very secretive about the areas he is looking in.

I gave him some information about trail cameras

Cameras that can be set to remotely photograph wildlife traveling through an area.

There are a few areas up here in Queensland I would like to set some of these cameras to see just what turns up on the photos!!!
0
FollowupID: 638472

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)