Tuesday, Jun 30, 2009 at 09:12
The reason there are so many CTs on the market may be partly because in practice they are not as convenient as some sales people make out, and probably some owners decide very quickly that they are not for them. Another reason is that some people, like us, unintentionally get in to caravanning via CTs, but suddenly discovering the fun of vanning and then want to upgrade to a full sized van to enjoy it more.
In our case we used a tent when our kids were
young, but stopped camping when the kids grew up. When we decided to get back into camping, we decided we didn't want to sleep on the ground any more. We looked long and hard at a large number of different camper trailers before settling on a Jayco
Penguin Outback. We loved it, and took it over all sorts of roads around 4 states. However, after I retired we decided that we wanted more comfort and convenience, and traded the CT in on a 20 foot Jayco Sterling Outback which we also love.
We don't unpack our Sterling (apart from perishable food, clothing, bedding etc). It is always packed and ready to go.
We have used the CT in temperatures down to -6 at
Adaminaby to low 40s in
Adelaide, and the van in similar temperatures.
The differences in our experience are:
The CT was much easier and less hassle to tow, but the van is much nicer once stopped. Better sound and heat insulation makes a huge difference, as does having everything set up (such as clothes hanging in wardrobes etc). The en suite is great as well, and is available even when travelling between sites, although the CT had a PortaPotti which did the job but had to be set up at night and put away in the morning.
Setting up the CT was no issue at all, but setting up the awning was a bit of a hassle, as was pulling it down (hammering in and then removing tent pegs and rolling it up by hand etc). I would for preference only use it for stays of more than one night, but we actually used it most nights.
Cooking and washing dishes with the low benches in the CT was not as comfortable as in the van, but no real hassle.
Fuel consumption with the van was substantially higher than with the CT.
Towing speeds with the van are substantially slower than with the CT (around 85 vs around 100), so 500 km days become 350-400 km days which adds to travel time.
Both are waterproof but the van is better insulated and easier to heat or cool than the CT.
We can be self contained including shower water for 2-3 days with the van.
There is a huge price difference which with the CT could be put towards fuel etc.
You definitely feel closer to nature in the CT. The van tends to keep you a bit more isolated.
The greatest benefit of the van is in breaking
camp. Just uplug the facilities, lift the stabilisers and go. And you still have a place to clean up and change after packing. With the CT, there is a lot more to do. In wet weather you get wet and muddy and in hot weather sweaty, and then you have to go to the park facilities to change and then store the dirty clothes, toilet gear etc in the car because the CT is closed up. No drama, and still easier than tenting, but definitely not as convenient or comfortable as vanning.
We love the Sterling but miss the
Penguin CT at times, from which I conclude that they are optimised for somewhat different purposes. The CT is ideal for short holidays etc, or for really tough tracks, and is more economical. The van is more convenient and is better for longer term travelling, but you pay for it. We would probably have kept the CT if I was still working and with limited opportunities to get away. Now that we spend longer on the road, the van is (for us) a better choice.
Hope this helps.
AnswerID:
372420
Follow Up By: D-Jack - Tuesday, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:13
Tuesday, Jun 30, 2009 at 12:13
Good reply and analysis. Thanks.
FollowupID:
639679