New members
Submitted: Sunday, Jul 12, 2009 at 23:22
ThreadID:
70624
Views:
2699
Replies:
5
FollowUps:
9
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Tony S (WA)
At present there are -:
37 members,
21 visitors,
793 Anonymous on this site.
Concerning those 793 anonymous, you people must find the site interesting other wise you wouldn't be on it.
How about becoming members. It doesn't cost much and it helps to run this site.
With out its members this site wouldn't be here!
Tony
Reply By: timglobal - Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 01:18
Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 01:18
Google, Yahoo and other indexing spiders tend not to take up subscriptions, sadly.
AnswerID:
374266
Follow Up By: ExplorOz - David & Michelle - Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:52
Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:52
bots and spiders are excluded in this count already.
FollowupID:
641685
Reply By: Member - Matt (Perth-WA) - Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 09:54
Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 09:54
I dont log on every time that Im here and Im sure Im not the only one...only
logon if I post a reply or start a thread. So as always...statistics arent always accurate.
All the best
Matt.
AnswerID:
374291
Follow Up By: robertbruce - Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:56
Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:56
I dont log on every time that Im here niether and Im sure Im not the only one...
the rest are prolly trolling...
FollowupID:
641539
Follow Up By: Louie the fly (SA) - Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 14:47
Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 14:47
Same here. I don't log on very often on any
forum I'm a member of (unless I need to).
Logging off now.
Louie
FollowupID:
641563
Follow Up By: Member - Tony S (WA) - Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 19:48
Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 19:48
Matt, Robertbruce and Louie
I dont either. However, I would say that there are a heck of a lot of prospective new members out there even allowing for Google etc.
I was a visitor for about 3 years before commiting myself. In other words I saw the light.
Tony
FollowupID:
641605
Reply By: fisho64 - Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 15:29
Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 15:29
while there are experts here, can anyone tell me how (if possible?) to change the setup so that threads which have been updated appear at the top like most forums instead of disappear down the page?
Im sure it was noted here somewhere previously but can find where.
cheers!
AnswerID:
374341
Follow Up By: Sir Kev & Darkie - Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 15:33
Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 15:33
fisho64
On the main
forum page, you need to select the display option of sort by "Response Time". This will allow the most recently updated threads to be at the top of the
forum thread directory.
Cheers Kev
| Russell Coight:
He was presented with a difficult decision: push on into the stretching deserts, or return home to his wife.Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message |
FollowupID:
641568
Follow Up By: fisho64 - Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 15:39
Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 15:39
thanks Kev, but I must be a bit simple, I cant see any display option or similar on there!
FollowupID:
641569
Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 20:04
Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 20:04
When you click on
Forum from the home page or if you just open the
Forum page there is a box at the top above the first thread and the option is in there.
FollowupID:
641607
Follow Up By: Sir Kev & Darkie - Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:51
Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:51
Read this Blog I finally found it. It has piccys to help explain it for you.
Cheers Kev
| Russell Coight:
He was presented with a difficult decision: push on into the stretching deserts, or return home to his wife.Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message |
FollowupID:
641683
Follow Up By: fisho64 - Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:00
Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:00
found it - thanks guys!
FollowupID:
641696
Reply By: Rob! - Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 16:10
Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 16:10
Tony,
As seaid above. The nonymous are generally people redirected from search engines like google. They're still worth money to EO through the ads.
AnswerID:
374353
Reply By: Member - Tony S (WA) - Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 19:55
Monday, Jul 13, 2009 at 19:55
May-be I should have worded "anonymous figures" slightly different. However it has created a bit of a discussion.
Tony
AnswerID:
374384