New V8 Cruiser Issue
Submitted: Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 17:24
ThreadID:
71755
Views:
4225
Replies:
9
FollowUps:
21
This Thread has been Archived
Voxson
Workmate/Troopy/Utility.
Has anyone heard when Toyota are going to fix the problem with the rear diff?
The factory wont admit to an issue so it is no good asking them,,, and i did a search on here... Couldnt find much.
Reply By: Geoff (Newcastle, NSW) - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 17:30
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 17:30
Hi Voxson,
What problem with the rear diff?
I may have slept through the post but I don't remember reading anything about it here or on any other 4wd
forum I occasionally visit.
Most importantly there's nothing on LCOOL about the "issue"
Geoff
| Geoff,
Grey hair is hereditary, you get it from children. Baldness is caused by watching the Wallabies.
Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message |
AnswerID:
380296
Reply By: Rockape - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 17:34
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 17:34
Mate what is there a problem with diff, ones at work seem ok except for the limited slip, what limited slip.
We had one go back to Toyota with bigend problems and that was fixed by Toyota, they didn't say what the problem was.
We also had one that required jump starting 3 days in a row. Cause!!!! no
water in the block, ran for 3 days until it finally seized.
AnswerID:
380297
Reply By: Dennis Ellery - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 17:43
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 17:43
Jump starting it because it had no
water in the block?
I would say the operator was a bit short in the block.
AnswerID:
380298
Follow Up By: Rockape - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 17:47
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 17:47
They checked back through the prestarts and those involved got a big kick up the rear end. $15000 dollars worth of kicks.
FollowupID:
647608
Reply By: Member - John (Vic) - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 18:35
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 18:35
Isn't it the same diff thats been used on the TD6 before it??
Never heard of any issue with the rear diff either??
AnswerID:
380304
Reply By: Foxhound (WA) - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 19:11
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 19:11
Never heard of a Diff problem with this vehicle either. Would be interested to hear just what the problem is.
AnswerID:
380309
Reply By: ctaplin - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 19:50
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 19:50
Voxson is probably referring to the issue of the rear track being 100mm narrower than the front. In certain circumstances, ie mud, dried black soil, the vehicle tries to 'tram track' and some drivers have run off the road.
This current model is a parts bin special and Toyota only get away with it because of their market dominance. If they brought out a model with front & rear track matched, auto trans and a few more creature comforts like cruise control, their sales would go through the roof...
Chris
AnswerID:
380321
Follow Up By: Member - John (Vic) - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 20:04
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 20:04
How does one "tram track" and run off the road with a difference between front and rear track as you describe??
FollowupID:
647639
Reply By: ctaplin - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 20:18
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 20:18
It causes the vehicle the slew from side to side as one rear wheel slips into the track caused by the front wheel going there first and then follows it causing the whole vehicle to effectively be slightly side on, trying to follow the front. It may then violently swing across to the other wheel track and do the same.
Up here in Arnhem Land the police & others have had this issue and putting rear wheel spacers is the only fix. It is estimated that will take 20,000km off the life of the wheel bearings.
Having to drive on dirt tracks & roads all year round, through both wet & dry seasons, these problems tend to get noticed a bit quicker than down in the cities...
AnswerID:
380330
Follow Up By: Skippype - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 20:49
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 20:49
ctaplin
Do you mean that spacers will take 20,000km off the bearing life or the narrow track on the back and flicking from one side to the other will reduce the life of the bearings.
Skip
FollowupID:
647658
Follow Up By: ctaplin - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 21:32
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 21:32
The rear wheel spacers place the offset of the rim 50mm outside from where the rim is intended to be bolted so has an effect on wheel bearing life and some insurance companies won't insure your vehicle if they are fitted.
So Skip, 20,000km of the life of the bearings and the possibility that you won't get an insurance payout if you have an accident and they find out they were fitted...
Chris
FollowupID:
647669
Follow Up By: Member - Redbakk (WA) - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 21:33
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 21:33
Got them at work ( troopy's and utes) and have had none of the issues that you have described above....they all run and behave just fine.
In fact they are really good workhorse and very reliable.
FollowupID:
647670
Follow Up By: Gone Bush (WA) - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 21:45
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 21:45
I've experienced this myself in my TDV8 trayback.
I was towing my van, reasonably slowly, on a gravel road when it tried to head into the bush.
I put it down to the van "pushing" the vehicle and its narrower rear track couldn't hold it.
Coincidentally, we pulled up for lunch off the road later that day and I had another trayback pull in to say hullo and asked me if I had experienced any fishtailing. It was too much of a coincidence. He put it down to the narrow rear track as
well.
I have had spacers on the rear
wheels but I gave up on them, not because they didn't do the job, but because I had to take them off whenever the service involved wheel bearings. I couldn't trust the dealer to torque them up correctly and they are impossible to check once the wheel goes back on.
Too much potential to play mind games with me while I'm driving.
FollowupID:
647673
Follow Up By: ben_gv3 - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 22:53
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 22:53
ctaplin
Are you saying the police were intentionally making their vehicles unroadworthy by putting on wheel spacers??? How can they do that? Not unless they got engineers certs some how?
FollowupID:
647686
Follow Up By: ctaplin - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 23:01
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 23:01
No, I'm not implying that the police have even fitted the wheel spacers, only that these vehicles have an problem that Toyota don't seem to be bothered with!
FollowupID:
647690
Follow Up By: Voxson - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 23:44
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 23:44
So i guess my original question is not answerable yet,,,,, i have only noticed one Cruiser which has had the spacers.....
As ctaplin said it has a dramatic effect on drivability in certain conditions.
Apparently wet muddy roads with a camber can be treacherous with this issue.
Dont even know how they got away with selling them this way?
FollowupID:
647697
Follow Up By: Richard Kovac - Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 23:59
Monday, Aug 24, 2009 at 23:59
Voxson
whats the track difference between front and rear of your 105? 5 mm?
Would not that do the same?
mine is 15 mm i cant say I've notice a problem
Kerb Weight (kg) 2312
Tare Mass (kg) 2167
Gross Combination Mass (kg) 6350
Gross Vehicle Mass (kg) 3300
Pay Load (kg) 988
Towing Braked (kg) 3500
Towing Not Braked (kg) 750
Wheel Base (mm) 2980
Length (mm) 5060
Width (mm) 1690
Height (mm) 2115
Track Front (mm) 1435
Track Rear (mm) 1420
Regards
Richard
FollowupID:
647700
Follow Up By: Voxson - Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 00:06
Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 00:06
NO.
Mine is 2.5mm a side.
Yours is 7.5mm a side.
The new Problem child is 52.5mm a side.
You do the math.
FollowupID:
647701
Follow Up By: Richard Kovac - Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 00:13
Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 00:13
That one thing I can..
all deul wheel 4WD truck would have a greater difference them 50 MM
anyway 1515 - 1420 = 95 / 2 = 47.5 mm .. LOL
2009 Toyota Landcruiser GXL Troopcarrier VDJ78R
Kerb Weight (kg) 2335
Gross Combination Mass (kg) 6800
Gross Vehicle Mass (kg) 3300
Pay Load (kg) 965
Towing Braked (kg) 3500
Towing Not Braked (kg) 750
Wheel Base (mm) 2980
Length (mm) 5080
Width (mm) 1790
Height (mm) 2115
Track Front (mm) 1515
Track Rear (mm) 1420
Cheers
Richard
FollowupID:
647702
Follow Up By: Member - John (Vic) - Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 00:29
Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 00:29
Vox wasn't the original question regarding rear diffs not tracks??
The track issue is a non issue, plenty of vehicles today have differing track widths and no issues.
Tens of Thousands of the V8's 76,78 & 79 series out there in mining and farming/agricultural use and no issues with track widths.
I would submit that if any problem was to occur it would have shown up pretty quickly with these operators.
As for the claimed Tram tracking, sounds like a crock of $hit.
No wheel ruts I have ever come across are so tight as cause the issues described let alone ruts inscribed by the front wheels whilst travelling being deep or hard enough to cause the the same issue.
FollowupID:
647705
Follow Up By: Richard Kovac - Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 00:54
Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 00:54
Sorry
John didn't really read FollowupID: 647697
Please forgive me...
:-)
Richard
FollowupID:
647708
Follow Up By: Voxson - Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 00:57
Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 00:57
Richard... I stand corrected.... Thank you.
John,
Might sound like a crock but is a real issue in the wrong circumstances...
It is going to be real issue when people start finding out why they are sliding off the road....
And the original question was rear diff problem yes,,,,, not being wide enough.
FollowupID:
647709
Follow Up By: Member - John (Vic) - Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 01:12
Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 01:12
Richard your forgiven, for what I'm not sure but your forgiven anyway LOL :-))
Vox The wrong circumstances would have no doubt shown already in the areas I described and as posted by Redbakk above no issues.
I spoke in some detail with a number of owners on my recent 2 month trip through WA, NT and SA, ranging from 4w drivers like us plus the outback station guys and not a negative comment about the vehicle and no issues expressed over track width.
I have driven a couple also and noticed no difference in road handling between my 2006 TD6 and the V8 in regards to tracking or road holding, (granted not in a heavy 4wd situation as yet)
We have a few in our 4wd club also and they have performed in all circumstances very well with no reported issues either.
FollowupID:
647711
Follow Up By: Skippype - Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 06:07
Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 06:07
ctaplin
Well that opened a can of worms.
My V8 ute is now 2 years old and has done 55,000km. All of it off road in the Cooper Basin. I have had spacers in it since I got flicked around on some of the hard dry tracks up here. That was 45,000km ago. The police and the SA RTA have said that they are illegal on the road. I realize that they can be a problem if you have an accident and it is proved that they contribute to the cause, but by the same token, I feel that they have helped me avoid accidents in some of the driving conditions up here.
I intend to keep them in place.
Skip
FollowupID:
647712
Follow Up By: Rut Tearer - Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:27
Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:27
I am from the city and shielded from the UFO sightings, strange flashing lights and Landcruisers mysteriously sliding off the road all by themselves.! The local Moonshein is pretty powerful stuff and if your not careful you'll do more than slide off the road, fortunately the Cruisers amazing technological poweress will get you back on the straight and narrow pretty soon..!
FollowupID:
647749
Follow Up By: Rockape - Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 14:33
Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 14:33
Skip,
I will agree with you about the handling, have had the same problem on some tracks and the cockies where I work also aren't to happy.
They are fine at work, on the surface and underground, it only occurs on some of the tracks if you could even call them that.
Also something else is showing up with rust in the doors where the window pillars join the door skin, none of the old cruisers had problems in this spot. Something has changed on the production line.
Have a good one
FollowupID:
647764
Reply By: Member - Kroozer (WA) - Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 01:11
Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 01:11
Cant say i have ever driven one, but the BIL once commented on his work car beng very very unstable and hard to control in wheel ruts in the new Cruiser. And i must say, i experienced it and wasnt impressed. They thought it was because of the rear tank being full, but it remained when it was empty. This was within the first month of being released, and once i found out about this we realised why. I am a Toyota man, but for the type of work we put our vehicles through, this is just unacceptable. Not safe, nor is it a pleasant ride. This was on a well used track that Prados and 200 series were flying through.
AnswerID:
380370
Follow Up By: Member - Timbo - Wednesday, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:45
Wednesday, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:45
That's interesting, because you'd expect that the Prados would have a dramatically different track width than the 200 series 'Cruisers - if the problem is really caused by the difference in f/r track widths, wouldn't that mean that all the Prados would be dangerously 'tram tracking' in the 200 series Cruisers' wheel tracks?
I've you've ever driven a Suzuki over a rutted dried-mud road you'll now what I mean! :)
FollowupID:
647891
Reply By: Member - Tour Boy ( Bundy QLD) - Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 08:00
Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 08:00
Everyone forgets that the coil / leaf cab patrols also differ in track quite considerably.
Maybe there aren't that many around (other than Telstra) for people to complain about.
Has anyone seen the specs for the new model yet?
Cheers
Dave
AnswerID:
380388
Follow Up By: Geoff (Newcastle, NSW) - Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 08:49
Tuesday, Aug 25, 2009 at 08:49
That they do!
I was following one of them the other day and noticed it.
The idea that there aren't many of them around was the conclusion I came to as nobody seems to be talking about them!
Geoff
| Geoff,
Grey hair is hereditary, you get it from children. Baldness is caused by watching the Wallabies.
Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message |
FollowupID:
647721