Odyssey Aust Off Road Camper Vs Kimberley Kamper
Submitted: Friday, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:31
ThreadID:
72180
Views:
7318
Replies:
3
FollowUps:
0
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Judy L (VIC)
Well have just completed a fantastic trek up the Cape and around the Gulf. We took our brand new AORC Odyssey Camper (Signature) and joined two brand new
Kimberley Kampers (Platinum).
Firstly i must say that both brands did the job superbly. We slid down some pretty rugged stuff and all came out smiling so there is no dispute that both brands will perform.
Before we bought our Odyssey we procrastinated between buying a
Kimberley and did a great deal of prodding and poking but finally decided on the Odyssey.
Well, after 12 weeks of traveling together we are still delighted with our choice.
One of our hesitations about the Odyssey was the lack of back opening when the unit is shut. Which we thought would be a nuisance when needing to access our clothes during a daytime stop but this was never an issue.
One attraction towards the Odyssey was in the storage capacity although we feel now could be even further enhanced with the addition a smaller storage area above the existing one.
A big difference between the two campers was the canvas design. On the Odyssey when setup, the canvas was always taut, as too, was the tropical roof (permanent fly) which was
well above the tent roof. Our
Kimberley friends were constantly annoyed by the "saggy baggy" appearance of their campers when set-up which could only be remedied by tying the rear end to a fixture.
Another feature we also liked about the Odyssey was the simplicity of the en-suite with the hot and cold
water taps directly accessible.
But the ease of set-up and pack up on the Odyssey with the awning attached probably was the deciding factor for us.
What improvements could Odyssey make?
Well! The lighting in the kitchen area needs attention. The
Kimberley use LED strips which were far superior. And even though the Odyssey has generous storage, a separate smaller storage option would be ideal. We will be changing both these things when we get home.
Image Could Not Be Found
Reply By: Gronk - Friday, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:55
Friday, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:55
Yes they are both quality campers...
I have a KK and the tropical roof does sag a bit without using poles and a couple of ropes..
When you say they had to tie the rear end to a fixture.....was that to make the camper look taught or was it only the tropical roof ??
On the extended tent models ( nearly all are these days ), the trick is not to use the poles( holding up the rear wall) down to the floor onto the plastic anchor things, but to put them onto the next bow back and tension from there....makes the tent much taughter !!
The lack of a rear access door was a MAJOR negative for us as we can't open the camper to pack our clothes before a trip ( lack of space )..
Between them they could make a near perfect camper....except maybe price !!
AnswerID:
382750
Reply By: Member - Scoof (SA) - Friday, Sep 11, 2009 at 16:21
Friday, Sep 11, 2009 at 16:21
Judy , good on ya for taking the time to share your thoughts on both campers.
Cheers Scoof . :-)
AnswerID:
382774
Reply By: Member - Ian H (NSW) - Friday, Sep 11, 2009 at 17:29
Friday, Sep 11, 2009 at 17:29
Judy,
What a pleasure it is to read your
well prepared ,spelling and grammar error free post. I suspect you didn't have to use the spell check either.
Glad to hear the camper lived up to its price.
Ian
AnswerID:
382778