Friday, Oct 09, 2009 at 14:50
It's a bit of a difficult area Hairy - you and I might think that common sense prevails, but as many will tell you, the trouble with common sense is that it is not very common! Rules can then be helpful to guide those who aren't willing (or taught) to think for themselves. But then comes the danger you've highlighted: rules stop people from thinking for themselves. It has been said that all the playgrounds etc. are now so safe that kids are growing up without the ability to ever make a subconscious risk assessment before doing something (eg. if I do this, what could happen? Is it likely to hurt me/someone else? etc.). It's like a vicious cycle - people didn't think, so we made rules, now they think even less! Somewhere, perhaps there's a balance.
Flynnie, I agree in principle even if not in the details (ie. leaving the car in a bog overnight increases the risk of
water damage). The principle seems to be about being aware of our natural tendencies (ie. being tempted to take shortcuts) which can cause us problems, and taking steps against our normal tendencies.
And Hairy, yes, accidents will always happen as you've said - I think what you're trying to say is Australia will be a better place if we can accept that accidents happen and there is not always someone to sue over it (except perhaps our own clumsy self). I just fear that the other extreme would enable everyone to do what they like, even endangering other people, and never face any responsibility for it. Again, somewhere there's a balance.
I also fear a fatalistic attitude that says "accidents will happen so don't waste time/effort/etc. trying to prevent them" and I hope this is not what you're saying. To give one example, when the Titanic went down they could have just dismissed it as an unavoidable accident (they could even have quite rightly said "You weren't 'driving' according to the conditions") but many new regulations were implemented following that tragedy. Many of those regulations centred on the fact that accidents will continue to happen but tried to reduce the loss of human life in subsequent accidents (things like having radio rooms manned 24/7, having sufficient lifeboats for everyone, etc.). What is a lifeboat if not an acceptance that accidents will happen? And while you could argue that common sense would dictate that you should have enough lifeboats for the people on a ship but the fact is, this was an important lesson learned from a very bad 'accident'.
Less obscure: how do we know it's a bad idea to hook the snatch strap straight over the the towball? Possibly because someone once did it, it ended badly and we learned from their accident. Someone on here has in their profile/footer "There's only one thing more painful than learning from experience and that is NOT learning from experience!" and it doesn't always have to be our own experience that we learn from.
And finally, for me, the chance of me having to a vehicle recovery is higher than the chance of towing something so I have removed the towball from the tongue (I keep it in the car with a towball spanner - this also prevents wrecking the towball thread by bumping it on rocks etc.). To snatch, I just put a rated shackle through the towball hole in the tongue which means you don't bend the pin. As Hairy said, I drive accordingly - ie. not flat out like many people seem to think necessary! While a snatch strap is a quick way to get a lightly bogged vehicle out, if a couple of gentle tugs won't even budge the stuck vehicle, it's not a recovery that can/should be done with a snatch strap anyway (ie. if you have to drive flat out to snatch someone, then you shouldn't be using a snatch strap in that situation). And yes, it will be a sad day for Australia when you can't "help out a mate who's in trouble" without a JSA or StatDec.
FollowupID:
653980