Thursday, Sep 18, 2003 at 09:47
This is taken from another
forum, however I happen to agree with it.
78 Series... Leaf sprung rear end... Welcome to the Horse and Cart!
A vehicle with a basic design from the 40 series.
100 Series... Overgrown land barge... Large wallowing cumbersome beast.
Needs an instant
suspension upgrade to prevent you getting seasick.
Friend has one (due to having 4 kids) and says he likes it but would prefer
a Discovery Series 2 bit needs the space for the kids. This guy has had 3
patrols 2 GQ, 1GU and 1 80 and now the 100 series.
GU Patrol... Great vehicle ruined by being fitted with High and Mid range
gearing (Low not low enough)
Better than a Cruiser, tougher and more about practicality than the cruiser.
Virtually unbreakable drivetrain although older 3.0L are questionable.
Currently in bad need of major revamp (due to age not ability)
Kia Sportage... Actually an amazingly capable offroader within its limits.
Good LSD and short wheel base allows it to be driven more precisely and with
the agility of the SWB and the LSD pushing can climb many hills with easy.
Lack of ground clearnace can be an issue, and it will poke a wheel in the
air quite easily.
Good budget buy for the occasional offroader.
Landrovers... The anit-kudos 4wd!!!
Old design works on the 'if-it-aint-broke-dont-fix-it' motto. A practical
no-frills vehicle with a slab sided profile (no worse than 78 series) that
allows it to go through some rather tight tracks without catching fragile
(expensive) plastics components.
Large interior space in the rear.
Simple interior means no panicking when climbing in or out with mud etc on
boots.
TD5 motor is smooth and powerful enough to propel the vehicle along quite
nicely.
Excellent articulation from factory.
Off the floor will out-flex the 78 or GU easily.
78 only wins with lockers fitted.
More affordable than equiv troopy. Fit difflocks to the Landy and its still
cheaper than stock 78.
If you want modern comfort from Landrover then the Discovery MY03 and the
Range Rover are definately 2 of the most comfortable/plush yet capable
offroaders on the market.
They are also running with the others on the forefront of 4wd technology.
I did some reserarch into the anti-LR attitude and found:
1. Historic. Older Landies, Series I Discos, were very unreliable.
2. It's Not A Toyota Or A Patrol syndrome.
You'll also find that a lot of the detractors have never sat in one,
driven one or seen one go offroad. So they repeat what they've heard.
The interior is more basic than most, but do you *really* need power
windows and cupholders?
The Defender has more room in the back than either the Patrol or the
100 Series. This is because of the shorter bonnet and squarer body.
It can also carry 1 tonne+. Payload for the others is a lot less.
Defender Xtremes have very good, possibly market leading?
articulation, excellent clearance, 1:43 crawl ratio and traction
control. So I think they are highly capable out of the box.
Because the Defender weighs less than 2000kg, just, it uses a lot less
juice than a 2400kg Patrol or Cruiser. It's also got a modern tdi
engine which helps. Fuel economy is reported to be around 8-12/100,
whereas 4X4 Australia's recent
test had significantly higher figures
for the Patrol; 14-16/100.
From what I can see the later Defenders are very reliable.
AnswerID:
31395
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Thursday, Sep 18, 2003 at 17:54
Thursday, Sep 18, 2003 at 17:54
Thats what we like to see!!! Finally an unbiased write up.
5 lines on the Yota,
5 lines on the Nissan
4 lines on the Kia
and 209348029384029834092834098203498203948230498230498 pages on the Landy...
Well done!
FollowupID:
22360
Follow Up By: Rhubarb - Thursday, Sep 18, 2003 at 22:12
Thursday, Sep 18, 2003 at 22:12
Where does it say it's unbiased? Oh thats right it doen't. Just a few peoples around the traps honest opinions.
FollowupID:
22399
Follow Up By: Member - Russell - Wednesday, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:27
Wednesday, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:27
Interior ergonomics by Homer Simpson - pathetic.....Russell S
Prado RV6
FollowupID:
22720