Digital Video Camera ??
Submitted: Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 13:40
ThreadID:
73000
Views:
5665
Replies:
12
FollowUps:
5
This Thread has been Archived
Member -Signman
We are looking at purchasing a Video Cam. for usage on our trips.
Haven't used one before, and know zilch about them.
Would prefer something 'user friendly'- something where the 'footage' can just be downloaded to a puter.
Not up to speed with the techo. specs.!!
Would like some suggestions on brands/models/ types to look for!!
Thanks
Reply By: Member - John (Vic) - Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 13:46
Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 13:46
David I'm a bit like you on this technology, it seems to move so fast these days its so hard to keep up with.
My suggestion is contact Mick O (If he does not respond directly on this thread) he seems to be right up to date and produces some good stuff with what he says is a simple camera system.
Cheers
AnswerID:
387017
Reply By: Rossco 09 - Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 13:58
Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 13:58
Saw a good one in the junk mail last night. It was a
water proof HD digital video camera for under $500. Don't remember the brand, and it needed extra memory, but the
water proof part is pretty cool.
AnswerID:
387018
Reply By: ozwrangler - Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 14:28
Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 14:28
They're not the most robust things, especially the newer ones with built-in HDD (like your computer).
I had a $700+ video camera die at 14months old and was advised by repairer too expensive to fix, buy another!
He said the tape type are more robust, as
well as cheaper to replace.
BIG W's latest catalogue had a small one for $140. Doesn't say what memory it uses. If SD card, then many laptops have a slot for an SD card, making it simple to get onto your computer.
http://catalogues.bigw.com.au/portal/offerdetails/aiptek_digital_camcorder/12550513205284?CatalogueID=12550513191939&gotopage=7&CatalogueID=&source=catalogueoffer&jump=&pageview=two.
These days I just use the movie fxn on our digital camera, if needed, otherwise I found I was carrying too much gear around.
AnswerID:
387022
Follow Up By: Mr Pointyhead - Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 15:18
Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 15:18
I would go for one of the newish models that use Flash Memory for storage. No moving parts to break and flash memory is getting very cheap.
FollowupID:
654599
Reply By: Notso - Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 15:28
Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 15:28
Only one thing, don't make the mistake I did and buy one without an eyepiece to view through?
It's a nightmare trying to see what you are recording on the viewing screen especially when it is in
bright sunshine. My old Sony bought back in 2000 has an eyepiece and I've gone back to it for most of my videos.
AnswerID:
387029
Follow Up By: Member - Mike DID - Thursday, Oct 15, 2009 at 07:14
Thursday, Oct 15, 2009 at 07:14
Very few current Videocams have a Viewfinder.
I bought an older model second-hand, because newer models don't have the features I want !!!
FollowupID:
654681
Follow Up By: Member -Signman - Thursday, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:22
Thursday, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:22
Good tip thanks mate...Our current 'still' camera doesn't have an 'eye viewer'..only the screen viewer...and its a real pain in the ar$e..especially in
bright light!!
FollowupID:
654691
Reply By: jeep cherokee - Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 16:23
Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 16:23
Signman, i have a Sony HDR 11 Video camera. It records 7 1/2 hours in HD and 22 on the lower setting, direct to the hard drive. There is also a memory card slot which i dedicate to photos, using an 8 meg memory card. On 10 mb's it can store over 1000 pics.Once i have taken all the video i want, i then download it to the computer and proceed to edit it using Windows Movie Maker,a very easy entry level programme that came with the computer.
The photos are down loaded from the card and into Picasa 2, which is a free programme you can get off the net.You can then edit the pics and get them ready for printing.
Hope this helps.
PS YOU CAN ALSO TAKES PICTURES ON THE FLY WHILE USING THE VIDEO.
AnswerID:
387037
Follow Up By: jeep cherokee - Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 16:25
Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 16:25
That should read 10 megapiceles (spelling) not megabites.
FollowupID:
654603
Reply By: Peter McG (Member, Melbourne) - Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 16:35
Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 16:35
We have an el cheapo that we got from the markets in Beijing about 4 years ago. It has a fixed lens and can take still pics up to 7MP. It's fine for short videos. On our
Kimberley trip it got dropped into the
creek near
Mitchell Falls for a few minutes and is still working fine after drying out in the sun. It doesn't have all the smarts that the new Sonys etc have but fine for short shoots. It has a 1GB card that can store about an hour before we copy to the notebook.
So have a look at the cheaper options as
well as the name brands.
Peter
AnswerID:
387045
Reply By: WBS - Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 17:58
Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 17:58
I agree with Notso. I have two camera's and both have through the lens view. In
bright sunshine it is nigh on impossible to see an LCD screen. Also, using an LCD screen uses more battery in a shorter time.
One other point is the method of downloading. Both my camera have usb and firewire connections. Most of the software I use to download the stuff I've taken preferes Firewire. (Adobe Premiere and Sony Vegas Pro).
A third point is the medium the video is captured on. Both my cameras are DV tape. I was advised not to touch the HDD types as they were not as robust. One of my camera's was dropped from a reasonable height and caused the tape not to fully eject. With a bit of pusshing and prying I managed to coax it out and from there on the camer has worked faultlessly.
The new SD card type I am unsure of but they should be quite ok.
I have used Sony cameras up till now as the lenses in them were quiite a good quality IMO.
WBS
AnswerID:
387068
Reply By: psproule - Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 21:04
Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 21:04
I teach broadcast TV production for a living. I'm a techie type - just finished screwing together a 1/2 million dollar OB truck (which is a cheap one BTW). This will sound like a big statement, but IMHO there is no such thing as a good home-user video camera any more. You used to be able to buy a decent DV camera such as a Panasonic NV-MX300 or a Sony TRV 900 with good dual viewfinders, decent stabilisation, 3CCD's, a robust tape mech, good manual override controls a user friendly layout and a common recording system / codec across most manufacturers.. Today they have removed much of the functionality in the name of cost cutting, and despite claims of brand name lenses and HD resolution the optical quality in some is shocking. The other issue is that there is no one common file standard making editing the output of the cameras in good applications like Final Cut Pro, Premiere or Vegas a PITA.
Having bagged all and sundry - we have had some reasonable results in using JVC GY-HD6 hard disk domestic cameras as "throw-away" items. Converting the resulting .TOD wrapped MPEG2 files can be a bit of a pain but the pics aren't bad. Biggest issue is lack of a focus or iris ring on the camera.
If you
follow this youtube link, and then click on the HD button (if you have the bandwidth) you will see the 1080i output of the camera in 720P.
There is plenty of scope in the $3,000 + camera range but below that it is almost pot luck.
Cheers - Pat
AnswerID:
387087
Reply By: Bob of KAOS - Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 22:24
Wednesday, Oct 14, 2009 at 22:24
Image Could Not Be Found
Kogan
AnswerID:
387102
Reply By: Member - Kroozer (WA) - Thursday, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:44
Thursday, Oct 15, 2009 at 01:44
Understand what your saying about have no idea about them or how to use them. I would suggest that if you want to just downlaod straight to computer then a camera with a memory card or flash drive would probably be easiest. Probably best to go into Dick Smiths or a camera
shop and look and see which are the easiest to use and explain to a pro what your looking for. I recently purchased a Sony Handyman, and its easy to use and cost me about $500 with a bag and extras. Not sure if its the a good one though, but i do like Sony products and the Carl Zeiss lenses seem to be pretty top notch.
AnswerID:
387122
Reply By: Member - Dennis P (Scotland) - Thursday, Oct 15, 2009 at 08:02
Thursday, Oct 15, 2009 at 08:02
Hi Signman,
My lovely wife, Lynne, got me one of these for my last birthday,
Sony Hybrid
We used it on our last trip back home in August and was very happy with it.
Uses a 'mini disc' for recording video and a memory card for photos.
Easy to use and download onto the computer.
Highly recommend it.
Cheers,
Dennis
AnswerID:
387125
Follow Up By: Travelin OZ - Thursday, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:08
Thursday, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:08
We have the model before this one, it only has 40x zoom, but as Dennis said easy to use and in my opinion a good entry level camera.
FollowupID:
654689
Reply By: chevypower - Thursday, Oct 15, 2009 at 17:48
Thursday, Oct 15, 2009 at 17:48
Well the choice is Hard drive or flash, and some cams have both. I prefer to have the larger recording capacity of a hard drive. Go with High Definition. SD camcorders have actually gotten worse with the MPEG 2 compression, low bit rate. The image stabiliser sucks on cheap camcorders. I recommend going with Sony or Canon. I prefer Sony. The models you should look at are HDR-XR500v, HDR-XR520v (larger hard drive), HDR-CX500v (flash based), HDR-CX520v (larger flash memory). These Sonys all have 1/2.8'' CMOS sensor, which gives excellent colour accuracy and vibrant images, very good optical image stabiliser (the best I have seen on anything in that price range). Also, very easy to use. Yes, you pay more for these camcorders than your basic, bottom of the range camcorder, but I have done enough comparisons to prove it is worth spending the extra $$$$$. Hope this helps.
AnswerID:
387188