A JAck or Prado

Submitted: Friday, Oct 23, 2009 at 17:39
ThreadID: 73254 Views:4452 Replies:12 FollowUps:14
This Thread has been Archived
My 37 year old son is thinking of buying a 4wd. He was interested in either a 2000ish Jackeroo or 2000ish Prado'Expects to do the usual annual trip with his son and occasional longweekender nothing serious but maybe a Simpson Desert trip or Kimberley WA trip. I expect both vehicles to be OK with some slight Mods Question is do Prados come factory fitted with additional fuel tanks if so what size and what about the Jack, do they also have extra tanks. General comments would also be appreciated. If he gets into trouble his dads Troopy will pull him out of the poo LOL

Regards....................jeff
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Tonyb (FNQ) - Friday, Oct 23, 2009 at 17:53

Friday, Oct 23, 2009 at 17:53
Jackeroo - by a mile - great car and you will get them for a steal

Cheers Tony
AnswerID: 388404

Follow Up By: Member - Tonyb (FNQ) - Friday, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:28

Friday, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:28
I never had any issues with getting hung up and there are accessories galore for these models which make them unstoppable.

They are a much better motor with power to spare - You have to drive them moderately to keep the fuel consumption down to the 12-14ltr per 100k

When you give them pedal they will respond but then they will use the fuel :-)

Nice Jacks like this
0
FollowupID: 656054

Reply By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Friday, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:11

Friday, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:11
Prados have twin tanks for all V6 and TD - 159Litres all up.
Prados have 8 seats
Prados have more clearance - the Jackaroos have a very low slung transfer case that tends to get hung up.
Jackaroo TD's had a few problems with injectors etc and are fussy with oil - they need 5W30. They also got twin batteries to crank easier in the later versions.
Better Prados are the GXL and VX/TX - good list of standard features like Cruise Control, remotes, electric windows.
The 4 cylinder Prados and RV models had skinny wheels, and not many modcons.
AnswerID: 388406

Reply By: Isuzumu - Friday, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:21

Friday, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:21
Quick look on carpoint 2003 Pardo 4.0 petrol $29,990 2003 Jacaroo 3.5 petrol $10,000 Pardo 2003 diesel $35k/$40k Jackaroo $17k/$21k
AnswerID: 388410

Follow Up By: Member - Tonyb (FNQ) - Friday, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:43

Friday, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:43
Yes - The above thread has a link to a 2002 Model with only 135k for 15k

Thats good buying for top 4 x 4 ing :-)
0
FollowupID: 656056

Reply By: Member - Oldbaz. NSW. - Friday, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:32

Friday, Oct 23, 2009 at 18:32
A 3.5 V6 Jack is the most 4WD you can get for your buck, & yes I drive one.
Nothing against Prados...great vehicle. Mine is bog standard, apart from LR tank
& had no problem doing Ood, Tanami, Mereenie, Bungles & GRR towing C/t.
LR tank is 140L, gives me safe range of 800k. Mods are a matter of taste but
not required for any of above roads. If kept under 100kph mine returns 15L to
100k,towing a light C/t & its an auto......oldbaz.
AnswerID: 388413

Reply By: Member - Timbo - Friday, Oct 23, 2009 at 20:20

Friday, Oct 23, 2009 at 20:20
The Jackaroos are very good value for money and certainly up to the task for touring: I've had mine up the Strzelecki, Birdsville & Oodnadatta Tracks (even up through the rough roads around Dalhousie, Finke, Chambers Pillar etc.) and up the Tanami Tk/Rd/Hwy to and around the Kimberley (including Cape Leveque, Mitchell Plateau & Bungle Bungles).

My Jack's pretty well stock standard except for a bullbar, cargo barrier and UHF CB radio. The standard suspension started to feel a little soggy when loaded up for trips like that but Jack are very comfortable tourers (even had passengers comment to me how comfortable it was for travelling).

The additional fuel storage of the Prados is a big advantage and, due to their popularity, spare bits may also be easier to come by in remote areas (not that I ever really needed anything other than a new tyre). The Prados come with two tanks for total of 159L (unless you get the pleb-pack 2.7L 4cyl petrol RV) while the Jackaroos have only a single 85L tank.Mine was a 3.2L V6 and I could generally get around 500km on a tank but for long stretches like the Tanami, I carried 4 jerries which gave me up to 1000km range.

I sold mine at the end of last year with 396,000km on the odo (it already had 226,000km on it when I bought it) and I never had to do any major work on it during that time - apart from changing the timing belt (that just about counted as major work!). The bigger 3.5L V6 had more power for better acceleration etc. and I'd expect you should get a good run out of one of those engines as well if regularly serviced (I've heard if the oil isn't changed regularly, it can sludge up and block some critical 'arteries'!).

I found the 3.2L V6 was adequate for maintaining speed limit on all but the biggest hills on the highway and was plenty torquey enough for offroad work including deep soft sand and was well matched to the gearing and lo-range. (The 3.5L V6 was in Jacks from 1998-on).

The only other mod I'd suggest before venturing out onto endless corrugations is reinforcement of the fuel pump assembly (see my blog here about Jackaroos, corrugations and fuel pumps!)

Anything else you'd like to know, just ask...!
AnswerID: 388430

Follow Up By: Member - Trouper (NSW) - Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 at 15:51

Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 at 15:51
Thanks Timbo for that info and others above who contributed

Regards.................jeff
0
FollowupID: 656297

Reply By: The Lobster - Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 01:27

Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 01:27
Probably comes down to his budget, as others have said. The Prados are far more reliable than Jacks (sorry Jack owners, but it really is true, and no, I don't own a prado) but that reliability will cost you a lot more. As others have stated, the V6s and TDs have the massive fuel capacity. Larger capacity than a Landcruiser, incidently. But the 2.7 petrols only have one tank. Be aware that the V6 drinks fuel like it's going out of fashion. The TD is definitely the pick of the engines but you will pay more, and the V6s are far more common.

The Jacks are very good value though, so I think the bank balance will make the final decision.

Just a suggestion. He would probably get a dual cab 4x4 hilux the same age cheaper than a prado, if that interests him. Basically the same engine choices, except a 3.0 litre non-turbo diesel was also available. And diesel hiluxes are far more common than petrol ones, so could be easier to find a good diesel hilux than a good diesel prado. Chassis' are very similar. Just a thought.

Hope that helps.

matt
AnswerID: 388469

Follow Up By: Member - Timbo - Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 17:14

Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 17:14
Matt, I'm a bit curious about your comment: "The Prados are far more reliable than Jacks (sorry Jack owners, but it really is true...)" because based on my experience it would be very hard to improve significantly on the reliability of the Jack - at least the V6 ones. Perhaps you are referring to the 3.0L TDs (1998-on) which are very fussy about the correct engine oil and won't run well (if at all) unless you use the right oil?
0
FollowupID: 656159

Follow Up By: Madfisher - Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 17:43

Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 17:43
Have to agree with Tim, my 3.5 reliabity has been better then my 4 runner . The diesels as Tim said can be problamatic.Do not forget the 3lt in the prado had head problems as well.
Cheers Pete
0
FollowupID: 656167

Reply By: Robin Miller - Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:48

Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:48
Hi Jeff

Good move taking the son - both of those cars have more wheel travel than the Troppy !
AnswerID: 388472

Follow Up By: Member - Trouper (NSW) - Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 at 15:56

Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 at 15:56
Yeah Ronin I think so, we are goood mates

Regards...jeff
0
FollowupID: 656301

Reply By: Bob of KAOS - Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 07:10

Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 07:10
Jeff

If he likes Jap cars, why not include the Pajero. Probably a better car than either and at a price somewhere in between. Also, more than capable of handling outback touring without mods.

In my experience, an oversize fuel tank is unnecessary. Simpson can be crossed on a tank.
AnswerID: 388473

Follow Up By: Member - Stephen L (Clare SA) - Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 08:26

Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 08:26
Hi Bob
Yes the Pajero is a very capable vehicle, we have had 4 of them. But seriously though, even 90 litres is a very small fuel tank for any serious outback travels. When I had Pajeros, I did replace the standard tanks with long range fuel tanks. Our current Prado with standard from the factory 180 twin tanks which is perfect, that gives you some very serious distances between fuel stops.

As for Simpson crossings, the best that we ever did was about 88 litres. Most of our Simpson zig zags would use about 130 litres, and 180 litres doing Geosurvey Hill and the Geographical Centre, so any standard fuel tank would leave you standard. Long range fuel tanks are not a cheap change over, so the bigger that you can get as standard is a very real bonus.

Also our last Great Victoria Desert trip, had over 1350 kilometres between any fuel stops, from Warburton to Laverton, taking in the Connie Sue, Plumridge Lakes, Lake Rason, so without that extra fuel, means having not to carry a very lot of extra fuel.

Cheers

Stephen
Who has been here

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 656112

Follow Up By: Crackles - Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 09:04

Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 09:04
"Simpson can be crossed on a tank."
Not in the later half of this year you wouldn't. Soft sand & the Eyre Creek bypass have seen fuel usage up to 50% higher than what would normally be expected, not that carrying a couple of jerries in the back for a trip is any real problem.
Cheers Craig...........
0
FollowupID: 656117

Follow Up By: Member - Trouper (NSW) - Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 at 15:54

Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 at 15:54
Yeah thanks Bob he was also concidering a Paj

Regards................jefff
0
FollowupID: 656299

Reply By: Best Off Road - Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 07:23

Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 07:23
Jeff,

I'd throw the Hyundai Terracan into the equation as well. Ironman do a lift kit for them which makes them very capable.

Fuel tank is only 75 L but there is an aftermarket 120 L tank available.

Jim.

AnswerID: 388474

Reply By: Bonz (Vic) - Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:56

Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:56
Its an interesting question, initially I would say Prado, as they are very capable and very car like to drive, but so is the Jack. Once you take price into it, the Prado wiould also have a higher resale as well as purchase price, and they'd probably cost you the same all up over the life of the vehicle.

I think with 159 l on board I would go the Prado.
.
Time is an illusion produced by the passage of history
.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message
Moderator

AnswerID: 388492

Reply By: Madfisher - Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 17:46

Saturday, Oct 24, 2009 at 17:46
Remember auto Jacks have less clearance them manuals , and it is a shape that does not easily slide over obstacles. Wide track models have a 1 in lift at the back already but no free wheeling hubs.
Cheers Pete
AnswerID: 388526

Reply By: CJ - Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:56

Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:56
I sold my Jack because it was not reliable on remote tracks, when things go wrong spare parts are not available, and when things go wrong in the city then spare parts cost a small fortune.
Service yards do not know how to fix any small engine problem (diesel)

So yes they are much cheaper, but the service and maintenance will cost you. $79 for one oil filter... very particular on the oil choice, many recalls when it was still in production, roof rack carry capacity was approx 120kg when I bought it, then downgraded to 30kg - cheese the rtack itself weighs that much

Too much trouble, It felt like a noose was removed from my neck when I sold it
AnswerID: 388607

Follow Up By: Bob of KAOS - Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 at 13:42

Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 at 13:42
CJ

I wonder if any brand would alleviate the concerns you have.

They all fail from time to time, even when you you aren't near a dealer.

They all gouge on parts prices.

Frankly, if you are immobile due to a breakdown in some remote region, it doesn't matter if its a Toyota or a Mercedes, its a pain in the cloaca.

There is no 100% reliable vehicle. There is no brand with a repair shop around every corner.

Remote travel, and the attendant risks, isn't for everybody.
0
FollowupID: 656274

Follow Up By: Crackles - Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 at 17:05

Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 at 17:05
Well yes there are some brands better than others in all those regaurds. Needed at rear wheel bearing for an 85 Hilux in Meekatharra & it was on the shelf. What chance do you give there being one for a Jack?
Remote service yards work on Toyota's all the time so will have a far better chance of knowing what's wrong & have a scan tool to to at least check fault codes.
$79 for a Jack filter, $36 for a Toyota. Still costly but half price.
Roof rack at 30KG well at least the Prado carries a usable 100.
You are right in that there is no 100% reliable vehicle but some vehicles are better suited to outback conditions & have a service network to match.
Cheers Craig..................
0
FollowupID: 656317

Follow Up By: Isuzumu - Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 at 18:08

Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 at 18:08
Maybe people should learn how to fix the vehicles they own....Jackaroo parts are not hard to get and they are not expensive, that is as long as you stay away from the Holden dealer. Owning two import vehicles I was told you can not get parts for them bull chit they are either Rodeo or Jackroo and my local grage can get me parts over night. So the Jackaroo is not a problem.
0
FollowupID: 656331

Follow Up By: CJ - Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 at 19:00

Sunday, Oct 25, 2009 at 19:00
Bob you are right:
There is no 100% reliable vehicle, but some are more than others ;-)
Yes I did fix my Jack myself in remote areas, note I fixed it more than any nissans and toyos in our group, and more than any other vehicle I had before or after. Always carried spares, but whenever I wanted to replenish spares there were no ones to be found unless going into major centres. Even there, one has to order them in and wait, whereas nissan and cruiser parts are all stock on the shelf
Fact is I have had nowhere near the trouble and cost I had with the jack, not before and not after
Just telling it like I experienced it, and trying to answer the original Q



CJ
0
FollowupID: 656347

Follow Up By: Madfisher - Monday, Oct 26, 2009 at 15:22

Monday, Oct 26, 2009 at 15:22
Got to agree the diesels give problems(the 3lt anyway), but the petrols are long lasting and super reliable.
Cheers Pete
0
FollowupID: 656480

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)