Can an auto locker actually be a disadvantage in certain circumstances?

Submitted: Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 16:50
ThreadID: 73715 Views:12327 Replies:13 FollowUps:32
This Thread has been Archived
I have been told by an ARB retailer that an auto locker such as the Detriot can be a problem because in certain circumstances you may not want a locker engaged but the auto doesn't give you that option - it locks and unlocks without any input from the driver. He cited mud as an example and said he had experienced it personally whilst in someone else's vehicle.
I know that all salesmen's tales should be treated with scepticism however just wondering whether it could in fact be correct.
Never having had much to do with lockers to date I thought I'd put the question here and see what's what.
Also was told by a TJM guy that their locker is superior to ARB because it doesn't blow seals (isn't there a joke involving Eskimos and blowing seals?). The ARB guy said that issue was overcome some time ago. Once again comments are welcome if anyone has any personal experience they wish to share.
Thanks from the Moose
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: gbc - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 16:58

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 16:58
You didn't mention if you were talking front or rear.
I had an auto locker in the front of my last hilux without issue for 200,000kms. The steering in 4wd definitely has a heavier 'return to centre' feeling, but nothing that you don't get used to in 10 minutes.
The turning circle of the vehicle when in 4wd was also marginally bigger - again never an issue.
The benefits however are amazing (any style locker).

Buy either style with confidence.

Mine was a 'lokka' from 4wd systems and I'd say it would be the best improvement for $600 odd that anyone could do to a fourby.

AnswerID: 391021

Follow Up By: Moose - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 17:04

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 17:04
Good point re front or rear - didn't consider that. Was talking about the rear.
0
FollowupID: 658850

Reply By: Crackles - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 17:18

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 17:18
The ARB dealer was right in saying that in some instances an auto locker can be a disadvantage but is possibly overstating the problem to make a sale. Likewise the problem with leaking seals was very minor & just led to a little oil blowback in the airline. This was mainly an installation problem from what I've been told & nothing to be too concerned about.
Autolockers by there design will stay locked in slippery conditions so can lead to some understeer which may happen when you least want it to. This can often be minimised by simply backing off the power momentarily. Also some vehicles handle poorly on sealed roads when they are fitted to the front axle. So annoying was it for a friend with a shorty Cruiser that he would pull up every time he hit the main road & take the hubs out.
Personally I like the ability of the ARB locker to have it IN or OUT when I want it to be while others like the fact autolockers still work on main roads in wet slippery conditions.
Cheers Craig........
AnswerID: 391023

Follow Up By: Member - Mfewster(SA) - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 17:30

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 17:30
I don't follow this. To the best of my knowledge, autolockers should only be used with manual locking hubs and the autolock only works when 4wd is engaged. You don't use 4wd manual hubs locked on main roads.
0
FollowupID: 658851

Follow Up By: gbc - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 19:36

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 19:36
it's absolutely impossible for an auto locker in the front diff to affect steering if it's in 2H in a shorty cruiser. If it was grabbing on the road, then he was driving the front shaft even in 2H, which would be a major issue.
0
FollowupID: 658869

Follow Up By: Bonz (Vic) - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 15:02

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 15:02
gbh, if the locker is in then the front axles will be locked together in 2H or 4H, this will mean the autolocker will be "grabbing" as you corner and it can be annoying and can affect the steering, it does so in the front of my patrol if the hubs arent unlocked.
.
Time is an illusion produced by the passage of history
.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message
Moderator

0
FollowupID: 659045

Follow Up By: Member - Mfewster(SA) - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 18:28

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 18:28
A front diff autolocker should not engage in 2h, with or without the hubs being locked. Unless you are in 4wd with hubs locked (and they shouldn't be used with full time 4wd), you shouldn't experience any change in the steering whatsoever.
0
FollowupID: 659066

Follow Up By: Bonz (Vic) - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 18:50

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 18:50
They will still lock the front wheels together regardless of drive in the input shaft
.
Time is an illusion produced by the passage of history
.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message
Moderator

0
FollowupID: 659068

Follow Up By: Member - Mfewster(SA) - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 19:37

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 19:37
Bonz, that just isn't so. Certainly mine doesn't and neither does that of anyone else I know who has one. We are talking about the front diff and autolockers. Certainly, what you say is true of ARB style lockers, but only when they are switched on.
Further, re FollowupID: 659045, why would you be driving in 2h with the hubs locked?
0
FollowupID: 659071

Follow Up By: Bonz (Vic) - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 20:10

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 20:10
yer it sure is so Mike, I have one in the front of the Patrol and it does exactly that. Think about it, It is always engaged, not just when it it driving but always. Thats why, to make it easier to steer you take the hubs out when in 2wd.
.
Time is an illusion produced by the passage of history
.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message
Moderator

0
FollowupID: 659073

Follow Up By: Member - Mfewster(SA) - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 20:30

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 20:30
Interesting Bonz. I can not pick up any sign of anything different happening in the steering unless I have both the hubs and 4wd engaged. Anyone else want to comment on this?
0
FollowupID: 659074

Follow Up By: Bonz (Vic) - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 20:31

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 20:31
I have the auto hubs on the Patrol and you can hear it clicking as you turn the corner if its not unlocked
.
Time is an illusion produced by the passage of history
.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message
Moderator

0
FollowupID: 659075

Follow Up By: Member - Mfewster(SA) - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 20:39

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 20:39
When you say "Autohubs" do you mean autohubs are autolocker? Not the same thing. On the LC, with manual hubs, I don't hear any clicking when not in 4wd and with hubs not engaged. I wouldn't run with hubs engaged when not in 4wd anyway. Mind you, the old 60 series diesel is a bit noisier than later models, so maybe I just don't hear it?
0
FollowupID: 659077

Follow Up By: Bonz (Vic) - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 20:42

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 20:42
I mean the frewheeling hubs are auto's as well as having a manual setting just like normal freewheeling hubs. The diff is a lockrite, auto locking hub and as mentioned above in this thread, its really an auto unlocking hub
.
Time is an illusion produced by the passage of history
.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message
Moderator

0
FollowupID: 659078

Reply By: Wayne (NSW) - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 17:28

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 17:28
Moose,

The auto locker that you talk about is really an "un locker".
The diff is locked all the time. When the vehicle is driven in a straight line this is not a problem for the diff.
When the vehicle is driven around a corner, a wheel on the same axle has to go slower than the outside wheel.
With an open diff this is not a problem and a open diff is designed to work like this.
If the diff is locked and the vehicle is driven around a corner one of two things have to happen.
The inside wheel has to slip on the road surface or if the wheels can not slip one of two thing can happen. The vehicle will not turn or the axle/ diff will snap.

The auto locker will allow a wheel on the same axle to go slower around a corner by ratcheting. The locker will unlock mechanically to allow the wheel to travel at a different speed.
If there is not enough traction for the inside wheel to make the diff ratchet the vehicle will tend to go straight and will not turn.

On the rear wheels you can get away with it but on the front wheels, with the vehicle in 4WD, it can be very dangerous.

Wayne

AnswerID: 391024

Follow Up By: gbc - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 19:51

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 19:51
Wayne, you're almost right.
The inside wheel is the 'driven' wheel, and it stays the same speed as it is driven by the propshaft. It is the outer wheel on the larger radius of the corner that is let go by the locker and is allowed to spin quicker than it is driven.
As soon as the outer wheel slows back to driven speed (ie back in a straight line) the locker re-engages.

The ONLY way you can get an auto locker (front or rear) to engage around a corner in the wet is to spin the inside wheel past the point of traction and catch up to the outer wheel - this obviously requires a bootfull of throttle. The effect is the same as a limited slip diff taking up at that point. An open front diff would continue to spin the inside wheel and understeer off the corner around which it is trying to negotiate.

For an auto locker to be 'dangerous' in the front of a vehicle I would suggest that the driver is already doing something very dangerous. I have never felt anything but safe with an auto locker in the front over many outback tours.

I raced twin air locked 4wd's for 6 seasons (extreme winch challenge), and I like them very much. I just don't like the scuttlebut that is spread about auto lockers by people who obviously haven't lived with them.
0
FollowupID: 658871

Follow Up By: gbc - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:02

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:02
Having said that I think Moose would find an air locker easier to live with in the rear end.
0
FollowupID: 658873

Follow Up By: Member - Timbo - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:22

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:22
GBC - agree with what you've said: the faster moving wheel is the one that is unlocked with all engine drive going to the inside wheel (this is what causes the self-centering when the auto locker is on the front axle).

I've never had one myself, but do you know what happens if you are descending a slope under engine braking and one wheel lifts or loses traction? Would this cause the other wheel to be road driven faster and therefore unlock from the axle, leaving all the engine braking to be done by the wheel that has no traction (or is in the air)? I guess worst-case, it's still no worse than having an open diff, is it?
0
FollowupID: 658875

Follow Up By: gbc - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:40

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:40
Timbo - no, the wheel with traction(in this case on the ground) will remain revloving at the same speed as it is driven. The wheel in the air will also remain spinning at the same speed as it is driven. It is impossible for an auto locker to let go going down hill because the wheels are locked together, or the wheel on the ground is locked. There is no way for a wheel with no traction to spin faster going down hill. Turning corners downhill - the locker allows stardard differential action assuming the outside wheel has enough ground resistance to force it to turn faster.
The 'take off' feeling that front open diffs do whilst negotiating steep downhill sections and lift a wheel is circumvented with an auto locker., that is of course unless all four wheels are sliding and not turning :)

It is always difficult to explain how they work - I hope I have made sense?
0
FollowupID: 658878

Follow Up By: Member - Timbo - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 21:11

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 21:11
I believe you, I'm just trying to think through the logic of it…
Turning a corner makes the faster moving wheel unlock, but if a wheel lifts/slips during a downhill descent (think steep rocky fire trail), the wheel with traction will be going faster than the one in the air - I just can't imagine why it wouldn't unlock the faster moving wheel with traction? Or do they operate the reverse way since the load is on the diff in the other direction (ie. the slower moving wheel is the one that unlocks)?

They're tricky devices that's for sure!
0
FollowupID: 658888

Follow Up By: gbc - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 21:42

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 21:42
Think of it another way - the locker will at ALL times keep at least one wheel attached to the propshaft, and turn (or brake) that wheel at the same speed as the propshaft.
I can see you're imagining (remembering) going down some steep rutted hill, and whenever the truck cocks a wheel it takes off in a way that turns your rectum into a limpet and tries to suck onto the the seat until the wheels hits the ground again and the engine braking brings it all under control again (assuming we (I) have managed to keep both feet off the brake). This is because a standard open diff will always favour the wheel with least traction.
An auto locker diff will always favour the wheel with most traction in a downhill situation, thus preventing the runaway from occurring in the first place.
Has this helped at all?

0
FollowupID: 658893

Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 08:23

Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 08:23
Hi Craig

We used to have those issues with the lockright in the front.

Under circumstances when power is applied it would cause significant understeer often causing traction to be broken on the outside wheel as the force required to unlock increases.
For a while , before we ditched it, we had to significantly reduce driving in 4wd on tracks going back to 2wd , and only engaging 4wd on straight sections where it worked really well.
Another issue with the autolocker we had (lockright) was that it would zap power in the sand during turns making it harder to get over things like last little bit up big red, effectivily like loosing a gear.

Lot of fun to drive with though as you could literally plant the foot on a bend and it would roatate the steering wheel in your hands and if you got it right line you up for next section.

Moose - there are significant differences between auto - lockers in the amount of wheel rotation required for them to disengage.
I think the figure for the more expensive detroit was 13 degrees as opposed to about 26 degrees for the less effective lockright we had.






Robin Miller

Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 658924

Follow Up By: Member - Timbo - Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 13:30

Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 13:30
Ha ha ha, what a vivid picture you create, GBC! Yes, some memories of steep rutted tracks - none too scarey though, just a little unnerving at the time.

Ok, I'll believe you that the auto-locker will favour the wheel with the most traction (uphill or downhill) I just can't quite get my head around how/why. I've read through the explanations on the product websites and it's a bit hard to follow the description of what is actually happening... I think I'd have to see a moving diagram or have a play with a working scale model of one to really understand what's going on inside. Thanks all the same for your time/effort in explaining to me.

They sure are clever devices and whoever thought them up was one smart cookie!
0
FollowupID: 658949

Reply By: Wayne (NSW) - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:12

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:12
Moose,

This link might also help.

Diff

Wayne
AnswerID: 391034

Reply By: Member - Timbo - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:15

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:15
Following on from what Wayne said - it is true that the auto lockers are actually more correctly referred to as auto UNlockers because they are usually locked and only unlock when they need to.

When do they need to unlock?
It's when one wheel is road driven faster than the other* - usually when you go around a corner and the outside wheel takes a wider/longer arc (it needs to turn faster to complete the longer arc in the same amount of time as it takes the inside wheel to complete a smaller arc). This means that the inside wheel is doing all the driving while the outside wheel is just rolling along (being driven by the road) - this is what causes the self-centering when fitted to the front axle.

Since the diff is unlocked by the outside wheel being 'road driven', you need some grip/traction on the outside wheel in order for the diff to unlock. In very low traction situations (greasy mud/clay or snow) sometimes the diff does not unlock. If this is on the front axle, it makes steering very difficult (or impossible) - this is what the salesman was referring to.

However, in the rear axle (which is where you said you'd want it), it can cause worse problems (assuming you're driving a part-time 4WD - the effect will be less in a full-time 4WD). Going around a corner will unlock the diff and all drive (engine power) will be going to the inside wheel. However, at higher speeds, turning a corner shifts more of the vehicle weight onto the outside wheel (as the vehicle leans around the corner) and OFF the inside wheels. If you're accelerating around a slippery corner, this can cause the inside wheel (which is doing all the driving) to lose traction and spin. As it spins, the speed of the inside wheel 'catches up' to the speed of the outside wheel which then locks the diff again - locking a spinning wheel to a non-spinning wheel can be enough to break traction on the outside wheel also, and if that happens while you're cornering, you'll very likely end up in a spin.

I've heard it said that the ideal set-up would be an auto locker in the front (so you don't have to switch it off for steering) and an electronic locker (or air locker) in the rear.

* This poses an interesting question: what happens if you're descending a hill under engine braking and one wheel loses traction? Does the other wheel just free-wheel down the hill?
AnswerID: 391035

Reply By: robertbruce - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:58

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 20:58
auto-locker, even a premier set of tyres can esily be not a benefit....
like in getting you into places you have the potential you can't get out of....
AnswerID: 391042

Reply By: Rangiephil - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 22:05

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 22:05
I had a Detroit for 8 years in the rear of a 2door Range Rover.

In that time I had a couple of occasions where it was a disadvantage.

Going up a steep slippery hill with a hairpin half way up. The car tended to plough forward and not turn in as both rears remained locked.

Ditto in the Nissan Trials, the turning circle is larger with both rears driving on slippery clay, which made me miss a couple of "gates' .

However with an ARB , exactly the same would occur unless you unlocked the diff and then you would not have the traction benefit.

My objections ( which caused me to fit a Maxidrive to my next Rangie) were more about the civility on road. My locker was an interim sof-locker which was not as smooth as the latest ones .

When you accelerated say in second gear around a sweeping curve, as you changed gear the car would move inwards as the load came off.

Turning a right angle turn in a shopping centre could cause a chorus of clanks and bangs unless you made sure to accelerate through, and this can be difficult.

Sometimes when taking off from lights on a very slight curve, the splines would sit on top of each other and fall into mesh with an almighty "bang"

You do not say which car but sometimes you will need upgraded axles as axles are generally not designed to take full torque through one wheel.
Regards Philip A
AnswerID: 391052

Reply By: Mr Pointyhead - Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 07:43

Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 07:43
I had a Detroit Locker in the back of a red prado I used to have and I now have airlockers in the hzj 105 I currently own. The Detroit was not bad, but it was a PITA in some places, like navigating tight car parks etc. Also, I did find on very slippery red clay roads it was difficult to keep the vehicle in a straight line with Detroit compared to using the Airlocker.

I much prefer the Airlockers to the Detroit locker.

I can't comment on the TJM airlockers as I have not used them.

The only general comment is to ensure that you get your locker fitted and setup by a diff specialist. Also, in the case of a 105 series it is a good opportunity to go to a solid pinion spacer to strengthen the diffs, but they have to be fitted by someone who really knows what they are doing.




AnswerID: 391079

Reply By: montana - Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 08:35

Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 08:35
what type of vehicle doyou have? TJM seem to be more reliable and arb still do have seal problems.if you have a nissan shim the rear ,if toyota a detroit can be better than a air locker in a lot of situations,they are a lot better now than a few years ago.
AnswerID: 391085

Reply By: Moose - Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 08:58

Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 08:58
Thanks guys. Most educational. Good to hear from those that have actually used them. Sounds like the air locker may be the better option for me - but gee they are expensive (wouldn't worry some, but lots of $ for me).
AnswerID: 391089

Reply By: viz - Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:58

Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:58
One thing that is missed in this whole conversation - lockers, manual or auto have the propensity of getting you DEEPER into trouble, making it that much harder harder to get out. Automatic lockers will do that automatically (bad pun intended), manuals you have a choice.

I had a manual vacuum operated lock in my Rangie - I rarely used it, effective as it was. I think on one memorable occasion I was carting a whole bunch of people up a knarly hill, deep ruts and washouts. The Rangie spun a wheel, so I engaged the locker. Yep - my progress up the hill resumed - until I slid sideways into a rut and damaged the sill and door. I got myself out with much bellowing (6 litres will do that) and the use of the locker, but it reinforced the message that lockers drive you further into trouble it not used judiciously...

Brings to mind a conversation I had with a locker specialist in Sydney when I was thinking about putting autos in my Rangie. There is a track:wheelbase formula that is used to see if lockers can be used. Apparently the older Rangies (mine was a two door) have a short wheelbase and wide track and thus auto lockers would not work well in them... This may well change with modern lockers.

viz
AnswerID: 391114

Follow Up By: Member - Mfewster(SA) - Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 13:08

Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 13:08
I really don't follow this argument. It is just as true to say that 4wd will get you deeper into trouble than 2wd. Autolockers will certainly get you deeper into trouble because they can get you through situations that otherwise you wouldn't get through. Autolockers should certainly be fitted first to the front diff rather than the rear, which eliminates many of the problems mentioned in this thread. I have had an autolocker in the front for many trouble free years. It has saved my bacon on many occasions and not once got me into trouble I couldn't get out of or given me problems on slippery surfaces.
0
FollowupID: 658945

Follow Up By: viz - Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 19:32

Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 19:32
And we are disagreeing over - what??? :)

viz
0
FollowupID: 658974

Follow Up By: Member - Mfewster(SA) - Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 21:15

Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 21:15
It seems to make no sense to argue that lockers will get you deeper into trouble. They give you more traction, just like 4wd gives you more traction. 4wd will take you further into mud than 2wd. If you then get stuck, we don't criticize 4wd because it got us deeper into trouble. It is just our experience/skill that guides us in how and when to use the potential of the particular facility. In my experience, an auto locker has got me through some difficult moments; has made situations like driving sand dunes much easier and has, so far at least, never let me down.
Incidentally, I have reread the last sentence on lockers and length of wheelbase/vehicle width and can't for the life of me see how this can have any bearing on locker functionality.
0
FollowupID: 658982

Follow Up By: viz - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 00:03

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 00:03
I think we are arguing around in circles - I don't disagree with what you say at all. It is more a way of looking at justifying why one has a locker. I had one for years and rarely used it. I don't have one now, and wont put one in the car in the short term at least. Technique, experience/know-how and the fact that I am not out to challenge nature says that I should not need it...

With respect to the wheelbase:track ratio thingy - I was at one time looking at replacing the locker in my Ranger Rover. This ratio was explained to me by the salesman at the time and not recommended for my application (it would have to be 15 years plus ago). I would be interested in someone refuting the argument - I don't know either way.

viz
0
FollowupID: 659001

Follow Up By: Member - Mfewster(SA) - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 07:56

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 07:56
Sorry, I still don't see the point you were making. You started off by saying "The one thing that is messed in this whole conversation..." This is a 4wd forum so I understand that we are talking about using vehicles to get into terrain that normally wouldn't be accessible. An argument based solely on the premise that a piece of equipment will take you further into the difficult stuff doesn't seem relevant.
Re the Range Rover ratios argument. Maybe this was something to do with the kind of lockers then fitted to Range Rovers, but again, without details as to just what the argument was , it seems completely irrelevant to discussion of the positives and negatives of either the ARB or autolocker style lockers, the use of which, as far as I can see, is completely independent of length/width ratios.
Again, sorry if this sounds as though I am attacking you personally, it wasn't meant that way. I find lockers useful and this thread interesting, I just couldn't follow the points you were making.
0
FollowupID: 659009

Follow Up By: viz - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 08:54

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 08:54
Don't worry I am not taking it personally :) - if I thought otherwise I would not respond. You are asking me to justify a statement I made, and fair enough...

Dunno how I can explain my side any further - except perhaps to say that I have a particular (or peculiar) philosophy with regard to off-roading. I do not have lockers, winches (mounted or hand). I am an experienced 4WDer, being on the wrong side of 50 and born and bred on a farm (I learnt to drive at a very early age on tractors and Series 1&2 Landies and Dodge army trucks). I have recovery gear on board, which includes a snatch strap that has not been taken out of the wrapper since its purchase possibly 10-12 years ago... (The other one that I had got wrecked pulling someone a 4WD/Trailer combo up Billy Goat Bluff Track (I think it is called) in the Vic High Country. It got run over...)

Now please someone don't say I don't try hard enough... That will get me cranky! :)

I was taught on my father's knee that respect for the land was paramount. I take pride in minimising my impact, driving or camping, whilst in the bush. For me, lockers and winches are for getting one's self OUT of trouble, not INTO it. And yet on one trip I watch three 4WDs on the way to Poeppel Corner in the Simpson charge into a billabong in the Eyre channel and then spend the next couple of hours winching each other out, whereas they could have travelled a couple of km south to drive around it. They succeeded, of course - but the mess they made was incredible. Sad to see. When asked - "we enjoy the challenge".

There is a lot of argument *for* winches, lockers and indeed having a 4WD drive train (as against 2WD). You can say with these things you will also minimise the impact on the bush - and they do, I agree, when used with thought and care. Unfortunately the average joe uses these items to overcome their own limitations and lack of ability or experience and in doing so does unnecessary damage to the environment.

So to summarise - I am not against lockers. But what are you going to use them for? Charging into a mudhole even further still? Or getting yourself out of a pickle that you should not have got yourself into? Or are you getting it as a safety item? Or as an assist for a difficult situation? Or using them to be able to explore further into unknown terrain?

Are you going to go through the expense and hassle of installing something that is rarely used? And using up good fuel to cart it around all day?

I am hoping to do another trip to Yorky's Knob in the near future - the last got cut short by the approaching wet. For safety's sake I may have to add a hand winch to my collection, and maybe lockers as well. In my case they will be used in the same way as 4WD is used - to minimise impact on the environment, not as a challenge of man against mountain...

Hope that clears up any confusion :)

viz

0
FollowupID: 659015

Follow Up By: Member - Mfewster(SA) - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:09

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 10:09
Thanks Viz. That's fair enough.
Regards
0
FollowupID: 659018

Reply By: gbc - Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 13:29

Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 13:29
Don't blame a poor old diff lock for picking the wrong line.
Perhaps a camry would keep you safer from getting stuck.
AnswerID: 391123

Follow Up By: viz - Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 19:29

Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 19:29
Don't laugh - we were in the Vic high country, somewhere between Craig's Hut and Tom Groggin (t'was a while ago and the details are fuzzy). Four 4WDs (us) heading in a somewhat northerly direction, some of it in low gear. And we came across a Camira coming the other way. Yes that is right - a Camira. Somewhat battered and the worse for wear, but very much in the bush on a 4WD track

It became the joke of the trip - every time we got to a knarly piece comments would fly over the two way - "what are you doing mate - the Camira would have done it!"

Still do not know how it got there... Personally I think it got towed up.

viz
0
FollowupID: 658973

Follow Up By: Steve - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 17:29

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 17:29
yeah Viz, I think I saw that Camira too - the one with the "Landcruiser rescue vehicle" sticker on the back window.

;)
0
FollowupID: 659058

Follow Up By: viz - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 17:40

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 17:40
LOL :D

viz
0
FollowupID: 659060

Follow Up By: Steve - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 19:03

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 19:03
ha - that was before I clicked on your pick - so you know it's true

;)
0
FollowupID: 659069

Reply By: splits - Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 16:20

Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 16:20
Like gbc, I have had a 4WD Systems Lokka in the front of my Hilux for years and would never be without one. I have driven the car in mountains, mud and outback sand and noticed only the most minor of disadvantages. If there are any major ones then I am still trying to find them.

I did initially think about putting one in the rear but so far I have not seen the need for it. The combination of manually selected 4wd with a front locker and the stock lsd rear diff has always taken me everywhere I want to go without any problems.

It is often said these things are locked all the time and only unlock when going around corners. That is correct but there is a little more to it. When going forward, the wheel with the shortest distance to travel is always driven by drive shaft applied torque while the wheel with longest distance is driven by road applied torque. That is pretty much all the time because two wheels on the same axle will rarely turn at exactly the same speed, even in a straight line on a freeway. The moment a wheel has a longer distance to travel, the unlocking process will commence. It may only partially unlock before a change in vehicle direction or road surface causes the other one to turn faster. The unlocking process will then start on that wheel. This process is constantly changing depending on road surface, direction and even tyre diameter.

This is why you can drive around a city or bush track all day with a auto locker in the rear but you can't do it with an air locker engaged. The problems described by Timbo are very real but a sensible driver will soon eliminate them by the correct driving technique.

Regarding the operation up and down hills: the 4wd Systems type operates in both directions. Other types may do the same but I am not sure. Drive comes from the diff carrier cross shaft pushing into the oval shaped hole in the two cam gears. Half of the hole is in each gear, there is a gap of about .150" to .170" between them and they are held apart by tiny springs and pins. The hole is the same shape front and rear. The driving teeth on these gears are in constant mesh with matching teeth on the driven gears on the ends of the axles. The cam gears can't move out any further but they can slide in towards the centre of the diff allowing the teeth to ratchet over each other.

The moment you drive forward, the cross shaft presses hard into the front end of the two halves of the cam hole. This action tries to spread the cam gears further apart. It can't do that because they are already in full contact with the gears on the axle. The result is the gears are held together with so much pressure they can't possibly separate so the diff is locked. This continues until one wheel is driven ahead of the other by road torque. Its half of the cam hole will now come off the cross shaft freeing the pressure on the teeth and they will start to ratchet over each other. The diff is now unlocked.

This will continue with the inside wheel i.e the one with the shortest distance to travel, doing the driving until it looses traction. The cross shaft will instantly apply pressure to the teeth on the other side, pressing them firmly, and that wheel will take over driving. The diff will now be locked and both wheels will be turning at the same speed although the one that lost traction will just be rolling over the loose or muddy surface without assisting.

When you back off downhill, the cross shaft is now pulled back into the rear end of the cam hole. The cam gear on the wheel with the longest distance to travel will now be the one in firm contact with the shaft, that is it will be the one that wants to roll forward but the shaft will be pulling it back. Its teeth will now be the ones with firm pressure on them so they will stay firmly locked. The inside wheel, if it has a shorter distance to travel, will unlock the same way a wheel turning faster does and its teeth will ratchet over each other only it will be in the opposite direction.
AnswerID: 391135

Follow Up By: Member - Mfewster(SA) - Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 15:57

Saturday, Nov 14, 2009 at 15:57
Splits, that has to be the most comptrehensive description I have seen of the working of an autolocker. I have one in the front of my 60 seriesLC and wouldn't be without it. It has never caused me problems but it has certainly helped in difficult conditions, especially on sand dunes where I needed to keep changing direction and an ARB type that locks you into a straight line would have been a pain to keep flicking on and off while my hands were full of steering.
0
FollowupID: 659047

Sponsored Links