Advice on Petrol vs Turbo Diesel engines on 2010 Prado
Submitted: Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 16:00
ThreadID:
73898
Views:
26593
Replies:
18
FollowUps:
10
This Thread has been Archived
WattsNew
We're looking at the new 2010 Prado VX to buy. We took a
test drive of a petrol model and a diesel model today. We'll be doing a mix of city driving and 4WDing. The Toyota dealer said "if you're doing 4WDing get the diesel" but this is where we need some real unbiased advice.
1. The price difference is only $1000 more for the diesel.
2. On the
test drive we found the petrol more responsive and quicker off the mark. The diesel was a bit noisier and agricultural sounding (but that's not a big factor, just not used to it!).
3. The dealer was saying the diesel are more reliable and when you're out bush petrol may not be available.
3. We're a one car family (as my husband takes the train to work) and we'll be keeping this car for the long term.
4. It'll probably be doing about 15,000 km's a year.
We could really use your opinions.
Thanks.
Jenny
Reply By: Member - Tony V (NSW) - Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 16:46
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 16:46
WattsNew,
Thats a hard ask.
Only $1,000 difference as
well.
My choice was Petrol with LPG on th 100 series back in 2004, but the petrol to diesel buy price was over $12k
I believe that I made the right choice and still love the power and the 57 cents per ltr on LPG.
I was also doing 34,000kms a year.
Your choice is harder
What big trips are you going to do?
Are you going to do much hard 4WD'ing?
I would dismiss the reliability, in fact Toyota should have words with the salesman suggesting a vehicle they sell is not reliable.
Wouldn't worry about petrol with 180 ltr tank and a claimed 13.1 ltrs per 100kms and I have never had issues getting petrol, just the price, but diesel in the bush is the same.
Not many of us spend 3 months out in the bush at a time, so you need to decide what you are going to use it for then the performance.
Redbook info here
Please remember that this is just an opinion..... :)
AnswerID:
392011
Follow Up By: Member - Bruce T (SA) - Sunday, Nov 22, 2009 at 01:08
Sunday, Nov 22, 2009 at 01:08
The new Prado has a 150L tank, down from 180. Main tank is 87L and the sub is 63L. We were checking them out on Friday. It's a shame about the smaller tanks.
Bruce
FollowupID:
660047
Reply By: Ted G - Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 16:54
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 16:54
Hi Jenny
I have had petrol Landcruisers (3) they are better if you want a quieter motor.
Petrol less fuel economy, sometimes fuel not available outback.
I now have a Diesel Prado towing is ok but slower advantage goes further on the fuel, motor lasts a lot longer but more expensive to service.
In one of the Caravan magazines the was a
test on diesel verses petrol Prados towing two identical caravans going up
hill the comment was the petrol they had to back off half way up the
hill at 80 klm the diesel would pull all day at 60 klm. The difference in cost over 5 years was about $1000 in favour of the diesel.
Hope this helps
Regards
Ted
AnswerID:
392015
Follow Up By: Madfisher - Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 17:50
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 17:50
Good day Ted, And Jenny,
Just remember you could rebuild the petrol motor for the price of injector replacement(200000ks) $4000 then another $5000 for a fuel pump rebuild. The petrols last at least 400000ks anyway. Something to think about. Also Jenny Diesels do not like constant shorts trips, like dropping kids off at school etc.
Cheers Pete
FollowupID:
659999
Reply By: ABR - SIDEWINDER - Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 16:57
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 16:57
Hi Jenny
I picked my one up this week. It is the 4.0L V6 and compared to the diesel is a very powerful and high performance vehicle.
I know diesel will use less fuel but I enjoy being able to put my foot down and get instant power, especially when towing my Supreme Getaway on soft sand.
I will plan my trips
well if there is a possibility of no fuel on any route as I have always done will my LC100 petrol.
I must say compared to my LC100 this drives very
well and has way more power, will tow the Getaway with ease and will use less fuel than the LC100.
Regards
Derek from ABR
AnswerID:
392017
Follow Up By: age - Sunday, Nov 22, 2009 at 09:16
Sunday, Nov 22, 2009 at 09:16
Hi Derek
Was your LC100 the 4.5l straight 6 or the V8 ? Just interested as thinking of also going to the Prado from the LC100 V8 and very interested in your comment about more power in the V6 Prado (I tow a boat in soft sand) - It looks the goods on paper, but you now have direct comparison experience between the two
Cheers
A
FollowupID:
660065
Follow Up By: ABR - SIDEWINDER - Sunday, Nov 22, 2009 at 13:08
Sunday, Nov 22, 2009 at 13:08
Hi A
Mine was the 4.5L six.
Regards
Derek
FollowupID:
660092
Reply By: Member -Dodger - Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 17:03
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 17:03
My opinion as a diesel owner,
Do your maths on your choice.
For the Diesel
Plus for the oiler is the pulling power (torque) when towing a caravan.
Fuel economy over the petrol, usually around 3 ltrs per 100k or better.
Longevity of the engine.
For the petrol
Quicker off the mark.
Slightly quieter
No oily mess when refueling.
As an oiler owner I would still have a diesel because I do go off road seriously plus with a snorkrel water is never a problem.
And in my case range between fueling stops is often critical.
AnswerID:
392024
Reply By: Sand Man (SA) - Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 17:04
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 17:04
Hi Jenny,
You would not be disappointed in the diesel, regardless of where you drive.
Although diesel prices are around 10c/litre more than petrol the better economy of the diesel will make up the difference even on shorter runs.
Price fluctuations of Diesel are also minimal, so it doesn't matter what day of the week you fill up, the cost is similar.
My previous Jackaroo had a 3.5 litre petrol engine which returned around 18l/100kms with either city driving, or country travel pulling a camper tralier and although I had a great run with it, I have recently upgraded to a Colorado 3 litre turbo diesel. Economy is currently 9.8l/100kms driving in peak hour traffic to work each day. On a couple of longer runs this has dropped to 9.6 but I am yet to take it for a serious off-road excursion.
Both of our vehicles are now diesels as my wife drives a Holden Epica diesel and this goes like a rocket if you let it loose.
If you are intending to keep the vehicle long term, the diesel is the better choice IMO.
Bill.
AnswerID:
392025
Reply By: Tenpounder (SA) - Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 17:10
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 17:10
Hi Jenny. You're lucky!! My only comment, from experience with a petrol vehicle when travelling off road with others (such as in a convoy situation) is that almost everyone else has been driving a diesel, so I've had to be entirely self reliant. I've read that the new Prado has a little less fuel capacity (150 compared to 160), and we all know the dangers of petrol in jerry cans. But I suspect there are not too many (though still some)
places where only diesel is available.
My only personal experience of diesels is the older engines, and I love the torque at low revs when off road, but I haven't a clue of the relative merits of newer, smaller, turbo diesels apart from one or two very
well known duds.
All the best, whichever way you go!!
AnswerID:
392027
Reply By: Member - Stephen L (Clare SA) - Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 17:46
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 17:46
Jenny
Go for the diesel and you will never regret the purchase. I have had diesel vehicles for years and would never consider a petrol vehicle again.
For our driving, diesel wins hands down, and if you head bush, you will always be able to buy diesel.
Also as stated, better resale value, as any true four wheel driver wants diesel. Where we live, our Toyota dealer would sell
well over 10 diesel Prados to one Petrol.
Cheers
Stephen
AnswerID:
392040
Follow Up By: Member - Kroozer (WA) - Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 18:09
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 18:09
Totally agree. No such thing as a true 4wd that aint Diesel. Water crossings are a major part of 4wding, not Petrol territory thats for sure. Diesels will go for years and years also, a Petrol not so long. Way way better resale value also.
FollowupID:
660001
Follow Up By: Madfisher - Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 18:39
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 18:39
The idea that Diesels will far outlast a petrol was true when we had diesel truck engines in 4wds eg ihz, td4.2 sd33, 2 h etc, but with the advent of high performance diesels you are kidding yourselfs. We run 130 vehicles of all descriptions. In the last 12 months one of our large trucks had to be towed back to the dealer, and a courier done a head at 120000ks. Petrol issues not one.
Many of the better petrols are now doing
well over 400000ks with out rebuilds especially toyota and isuzu petrols. I do see the value of diesels for desert use especially a non electronic, non turbo like Willems.
Cheers Pete
FollowupID:
660004
Reply By: WattsNew - Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 18:59
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 18:59
Wow, thanks everyone for the quick reply and the really useful information. It sounds that whatever we get, we will be happy with it given there are pros and cons for diesel/petrol.
Although we will predominately use it for city driving, we will go 4wd'ing about once a month for the weekend and then for about 1 week every year. When our kids grow up a bit more and my husband gets some long service leave, we would love to do more long distance trips to remote areas. We intend to keep the car for a good 15 years or so and so we will definitely do some good hard and remote trips in that time.
A couple of comments that were made:
a. The diesel is no so good for short trips such as dropping off the kids at school.
Why is that? Are short distances not good for the engine?
b. The diesel is better for water crossings. Is the diesel not so affected by water on the engine? We will get a
snorkel for the car before we attempt any serious water crossings.
Thanks
Jenny
AnswerID:
392059
Follow Up By: kiwicol - Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 19:54
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 19:54
The modern diesal has no worries of being mums taxi. If you havnt driven a diesal a lot in the city, you will be surprised on the controlability with in city limits, you will stay within speed limits easier due to the superior engine braking of a diesal. Japanese diesals do like to be reved as if you hate them, which takes a bit of getting used to. Highway trips easily bring a diesal back to life, and city driving wont harm them in any way.
Water crossings are not an issue for 99% of 4wds as most people dont go through rivers that will affect either petrol or diesal.
I have had both diesal and petrol, for both city and country driving and will pick diesal by a country mile, any day, a far more relaxed form of power.
I have a 15 yr old diesal with 470,000 ks on the clock and all i have done is 1 set of injectores and 2 tappet adjustments.
Cheers Col
FollowupID:
660016
Follow Up By: Madfisher - Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 21:05
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 21:05
Jenny if a diesel does not get a chance to warm up properly(about 20k depending on ambient temperature) they suffer from cold corrosion , which can halve engine life. Do not take my word for it, ring someone who
services and rebuilds diesels.
Cooma diesel in
Cooma would give great advice.
Also before you buy a diesel go and put some diesel in one. I spend half the day refilling the
dam things(maybe thats why I am not wrapped in them). I know you can wear gloves but that is still an inconvience.
Col I bet you are running a 1hz or td42 , truck type motors with a design life of 1000000 ks, where the injectors are a couple hundred at most and are rebuildable anyway. Your motor generates arround 20kw per litre of capacity, modern diesels are being asked to generate 40kw per litre and more, the injectors are $1000 ea, are non rebuildable are are due for replacement at 200000ks. We will never know how long these highly stressed motors will last because something usually goes bang first like the head.
Cheers Pete
FollowupID:
660027
Follow Up By: kiwicol - Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 21:58
Saturday, Nov 21, 2009 at 21:58
Hi Madfisher, yes you are right, i drive the TD42. and more than happy. I don't agree with your comment on cold corrosion, but sadly a lot of travellers do, you only have to stay at a caravan park and listen to people start up their diesel at some ungodly hour and let them idle for long periods of time on the pretext of having to warm a diesel up before driving. Diesels do not like being idled for long periods of time with no load, which causes glazing of the
bore. Hence my comment above about driving a diesel as if you hate it. I also don't agree that modern diesels are highly stressed, i think the tecknowledgy in most cases is great, lets not get side tracked by the 3 ltr nissan, which has only a sensor that causes all the grieve to their owners. You only have to look at all the other manufacturers of modern diesels to see how reliable they have been for many thousands of ks. The only thing that lets diesels down which also applies to petrol's on the same level is the electronics of modern vehicles right across the board. With the modern metals used in building engines the longevity has increased 10 fold.
Col
FollowupID:
660033
Follow Up By: Madfisher - Sunday, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:43
Sunday, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:43
Got to agree with you about ilding of diesels Col, BIG NO NO, I drove a concrete aggi for a while and cylinder
bore glazing could be an issue because of fast ilding most days. Cold corrosion is more an issue when Mum starts up takes the kids 2ks to school comes
home and turns the motor off before warm. Later she ducks into town for shopping same scenario. Then she picks the kids up from school. The motor has been started three times but has not got the oil temp up once.
My uncle was an engineer and hated the warm up idea, but would never give it a bootfull or exceed about 2500 rpm till the gauge was on about quarter depending on the vehicle.
When I was driving the aggi the best performing truck was a driver who drove it on the redline 3000rpm. I use to sit on about 90 on 2700 rpm if memory serves me correct, could not be that cruel lol.
Cheers Pete
FollowupID:
660084
Reply By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Sunday, Nov 22, 2009 at 13:51
Sunday, Nov 22, 2009 at 13:51
Someone on a previous thread said the best way to treat a diesel is drive it at 80% 80% of the time and yes it goes better hot.
We had a Merc bus that had done 890,000k running hot from 5am till 830pm every day.
Didnt use any oil between
services, in fact I only put oil in it twice in 4 years
when it was short filled slightly at a service.
Had never had injectors done either and it went like stink.
Diesels dont like trips to the shops for a 5k run as they dont get warm even.
Dont know about glazing as we never turned the buses off all day in case for
some reason they didnt start at the other end of the run, so they sat idling
for 20mins 5 times a day.
Didnt seem to adversly affect them.
AnswerID:
392178
Reply By: Bob of KAOS - Sunday, Nov 22, 2009 at 17:15
Sunday, Nov 22, 2009 at 17:15
I don't know much about Toyotas, but experience with diesel Land Rovers (Disco TD5 manual and auto), diesel VWs: GT Golf (125kW 350 Nm, 6 speed DSG), and diesel Passat (125 kW 350 Nm, 6 speed DSG), would make me reluctant to go back to petrol.
The torque makes driving effortless. The economy is astounding. The only negative is the lack of launch feel from stationary, but you get used to not having that.
They have all been brilliant on the hwy. The VWs are as good as any petrol car around town- they seem quite happy with even short trips. 0-100 8.2 and 8.8.
I have two petrol 4WDs as
well. A ten year old LX470 with 320 ks on it. It has a very smooth V8, but it is thirsty, and lacks the torque of a diesel. It changes down and revs its head off at the least provocation. The diesel Sahara would have been a better choice in retrospect.
The final car is Porsche Carrera 4. It has a 221 kW 5 speed tiptronic drive train. Whilst it goes like a scalded cat it needs plenty of revs. I miss the effortless torque of the VW diesels. Its fine for fanging around the 'burbs but I wouldn't take it on any sort of trip.
GO DIESEL
AnswerID:
392205
Reply By: WattsNew - Sunday, Nov 22, 2009 at 22:37
Sunday, Nov 22, 2009 at 22:37
Thanks to all for your comments, we've read them all very carefully. (I feel we've opened the great debate - almost as bad as 'what's better - holden or ford!').
After reading all your comments we're now leaning more towards a diesel but not sure how we'll approach the issue on short distance driving, eg. school run, food
shop later, then school pick up again. It's a big decision and we need to get it right. Anyway, I feel whichever way we go, we'll be getting a great car. Can't wait to get it dirty .....
Thanks again.
Jenny
AnswerID:
392255