Backpackers renting vehicles on Fraser Island

Submitted: Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 19:21
ThreadID: 74385 Views:5338 Replies:12 FollowUps:13
This Thread has been Archived
Another death, and several serious injuries, involing backpackers in a rented 4x4 on Fraser Island.

Backpackers, who didn't know how to adequately drive their rented vehicle in the conditions, which was also (according to the news just on 7) apparently overloaded?

Playing devils advocate, given the number of deaths on the road normally, one death on Fraser in 7 months is pretty low, so the same excuse could be made for stopping people driving on the black top. Do we ban unskilled drivers from all our roads? That won't happen.

Personally, seeing how so many backpackers do drive on the beach at Fraser and elsewhere, I'd have no problems seeing them banned, unless they can prove they have the skills to drive safely on the beach. They're generally kids, having a party time away, and not really thinking about the consequences.

Then again, one of our group last Easter was rammed from behind by an interstate idiot speeding in unsafe conditions while towing a huge camper trailer, AND jumping the sand banks in the soft stuff while trying to overtake ON THE LEFT. So, gross stupidity on the beach isn't limited to just backpackers.

So, not just backpackers, then. But they do seem to play it pretty stupid, at times.

But does that mean they should be banned from the beach in rental vehicles? Or are we al expected to suffer the consequences when a group of them have a serious incident, and the government overreacts?

What do people think? I'm curious.
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Sir Kev & Darkie - Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 20:01

Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 20:01
See thread 74375 it is about the same subject but 10 threads previous


Cheers Kev
Russell Coight:
He was presented with a difficult decision: push on into the stretching deserts, or return home to his wife.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 394923

Reply By: Member - Leigh (Vic) - Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 20:07

Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 20:07
It's such a great place for young kids to explore and create memories that will last a lifetime. More a shame that some will never get over it.

From my observations, and as a troopy owner acutely aware of the respect this vehicle needs to be shown, I was horrified to see them so overloaded and top heavy with all the gear stowed overhead. There is little protection for rear seated passengers on bench seats and in a roll-over or head-on these vehicles are a death trap.

Once this is known, you drive accordingly and with great caution on terrain that can vary greatly, particularly like Fraser island.

I believe the problem must be placed squarely on the shoulders of the rental companies who supply vehicles to people visiting Fraser Island. Why they do not require a hirer not to be accredited in some fashion is to say this frequency of loss of life is acceptable. It is clearly a risky activity and deserving of some mitigation strategies.

Perhaps an induction type of test is appropriate showing the do's and do not's. If you pass you can hire and the converse applies. If the accidents resulting in loss of life was more broadly based then you could require any driver to have passed an "induction test" before entry to Fraser. With all the technology around these days it wouldn't be hard to set up on the internet and ensure drivers had some awareness of the pitfalls associated with certain types of driving behaviour/ignorance. To be informed is to be aware, choices then dictate the outcomes.

The problem is not helped by irresponsible advertising aimed at youth that shows what remarkable feats are possible in light SUV's and to the middle aged purchasers of Landcruisers and Patrols whose vehicles can defy gravity and other laws of physics. Whilst I'm at it I'll also have a shot at some of the dvd's produced by a certain monthly 4WD mag that just perpetuates these myths at the expense of the unwary.

Too much testosterone and not enough education? Who knows??


AnswerID: 394925

Reply By: Falco80 - Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 20:42

Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 20:42
Why were 8 people in a 105 series cruiser to start with. They only have seatbelts for 6 don't they? Were 2 people in the cargo area perhaps? I, like everyone else, was expecting this to be another troopy incident...
AnswerID: 394929

Follow Up By: Rocko Wallaby - Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 20:47

Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 20:47
And why were so many projected from the vehicle? Was it 6? SHows a total lack of care, as well as respect for the driving condition.
0
FollowupID: 663322

Follow Up By: Member - joc45 (WA) - Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 21:32

Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 21:32
The ABC news item describes the vehicle as a troop carrier (tho you never know with media reports). Depending on config, these can accommodate more than 8 people seated on the two longitudinal benches. Not sure about seat belts, tho.
If it was a 105 series wagon, there was legal seating for 8 adults (didn't say comfortable seating) in 3 rows of seats, with seatbelts.
Certainly sounds like lack of experience. It's a tragedy whether they were driving carelessly or just unfortunate.
0
FollowupID: 663336

Follow Up By: guzzi - Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 21:49

Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 21:49
Looked a lot like a 100 series with barn doors.
Can they have up to 8 seats?
The biggest problem is ignorance, and that's not only demonstrated by "backpackers".
Yes there are places on the beach where its like a highway and 100kph "seems" slow/safe, until the sudden appearance of a washout or you hit some soft sand and the whole lot gets pulled to on direction or another them bam you are on your ear..
0
FollowupID: 663342

Follow Up By: fisho64 - Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 23:44

Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 23:44
as far as I know the only 105 to come out with the 8 seats is the GXL model but they dont have barn doors.
Barn door (poverty pak) has 3 and 3.
100 series has 2 3 3.
0
FollowupID: 663494

Follow Up By: Member - joc45 (WA) - Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 23:57

Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 23:57
Yeh, my slip! Was thinking of the GXL when I wrote the above.
Saw a tour operator in the NT carting 7 passengers (who were dressed like high-end payers), and they didn't look too comfortable in the back row.

0
FollowupID: 663497

Follow Up By: fisho64 - Tuesday, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:18

Tuesday, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:18
my GXL is set up to carry the kids in the back but there is almost no foot room for an adult, certainly not a paying one!
0
FollowupID: 663521

Follow Up By: Member - joc45 (WA) - Tuesday, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:44

Tuesday, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:44
Likewise my GU. Wouldn't cram kids any older than 10yo in the back! That's why I removed them!
I laughed watching those tourists in that GXL! Dressed to the nines as the wagon crossed some shallow river. One got out to video the crossing of the river, but the rest stayed put in the wagon lest they dirty their clothes! Still, they didn't dress up like Naomi Robson in faux safari gear!
(make a personal note: must source a pith helmet)

0
FollowupID: 663544

Reply By: pop2jocem - Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 21:33

Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 21:33
So why is one tourist/backpackers death on Fraser Island, as tragic as any death is, so newsworthy? What about the hundreds of lives lost on our roads? Is it that this is so commonplace that it doesn't rate a mention on a news bulletin? Not newsworthy enough? What about the tourist/backpacker that rolls up to the hire car desk with an international licence who may never have driven on the left hand side of the road or never been out of a city or town in his life. Hires a car either 2wd or 4wd and heads off onto our country roads with no experience of this type of driving. How does a hire company qualify who gets a car and who doesn't?
No I dont work for or own a car hire mob
Cheers
Pop
AnswerID: 394944

Follow Up By: Rocko Wallaby - Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 22:01

Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 22:01
Exactly.
But one death of a foreign tourist on the blacktop won't make the Queensland Government go ape at 4x4 owners as they did 7 months ago, concerning the last accident on Fraser. I don't disagree with what they have done, but the over-reaction was totally out of proportion to the number killed/injured then.
Hypocritical, but that's the reality.
0
FollowupID: 663346

Follow Up By: xcamper - Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 22:17

Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 22:17
Hi,
There are many accidents on our main roads involving foreign visitors ,they seem to occur very close to the main disembarking points, airports, seaports.
When these unfortunate situations happen ,on main highways, by the same type of drivers, not allways 4WD vehicles, but ordinary 2WD cars, or more usually campervans, there is never as much media hype.
These drivers are usually just as ill prepared as the beach drivers, but the press never makes such an issue of them, it seems to be just another road accident, and is usually forgotten,even when another similar one happens.
On a beach ,in a fourby,it is "MAJOR" news.
Just my thoughts on these matters .
pete
0
FollowupID: 663351

Follow Up By: pop2jocem - Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 22:26

Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 22:26
Quite right, what would entice people to watch a news program or buy a paper more.

person bitten by shark

or

MANEATING BLOOD CRAZED SHARK MAULS INNOCENT SWIMMER SEE THE HORRIFIC INJURIES LIVE

What gets reported is what sells


Cheers Pop
0
FollowupID: 663352

Reply By: rumpig - Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 23:06

Sunday, Dec 13, 2009 at 23:06

apparently it was a 105 series engineered to be an 8 seater like a 100 series is, so not illegally overloaded.
AnswerID: 394955

Reply By: Member - Old Girl (QLD) - Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 01:19

Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 01:19
Q. Do people wearing seatbelts get thrown from vehicles. Seen roll-overs worse than that one where the occupant's walk away from because they were wearing their seat belts.
AnswerID: 394963

Follow Up By: Member - Timbo - Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 13:28

Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 13:28
If true in this case, it wouldn't be the first time (or the last) that someone thought they didn't need to wear a seatbelt because they were 4WDing or not driving on the "road".

Some people seem to think seatbelts were invented just to give Mr Plod something to potentially fine you for not wearing...
0
FollowupID: 663411

Reply By: Member Brian (Gold Coast) - Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 07:57

Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 07:57
Rocko Wallaby wrote:

"Do we ban unskilled drivers from all our roads?"

We should! Then there'd be hardly any traffic problems!!

;-))


Cheers

Brian
AnswerID: 394967

Follow Up By: Rocko Wallaby - Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 19:41

Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 19:41
Grinz.Well, ever since they introduced compulsory use of P plates in Queensland, I near poop my pants every time I see a red "P" on a vehicle, and become even more scared when I see a green "P" on one... It's simply a red "P" driver with "Experience"!!!
Heaven help us!
0
FollowupID: 663458

Reply By: Alloy c/t - Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:07

Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:07
And Qld govt reaction will be to hit all 4x4 drivers with a licence endorsment = $$$.
AnswerID: 394976

Reply By: kevanancy - Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 23:46

Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 23:46
Surely speed limiting these vehicles to 60km/h would eliminate a lot of the trouble . If it's for hire to drive on Fraser I say it should be speed limited , not that would be a magic fix but better to roll over at 60 than 80 or 100km/h .
Kev.
AnswerID: 395089

Follow Up By: rumpig - Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 23:53

Monday, Dec 14, 2009 at 23:53
so how do these vehicles go when they hit the 100 klm / hr zones before they reach the barges to get over to fraser. would you like to be stuck behind a rental fourby doing 60 kph in a 100 kph zone?????
0
FollowupID: 663496

Reply By: Rob! - Tuesday, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:58

Tuesday, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:58
It should be noted that between 2003 and 2007 there were 40 car related deaths on fraser island. 21 of these were Australian citizens. So it's not just a backpacker problem.
AnswerID: 395121

Reply By: Member - ross m (WA) - Tuesday, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:31

Tuesday, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:31
Part of the problem is the hire companies do not allow tyre deflation , presumably for insurance reasons.
This means drivers are trying to get up too much speed to get through soft spots.
Its also damaging the tracks
AnswerID: 395125

Reply By: Member - Richard H (NSW) - Thursday, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:23

Thursday, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:23
Having spent some time on Fraser Island, and doing a lot of FWD driving, we came upon a lot of foreign tourists in hired 4 x 4's.

One was lying on it's side, after driving into a washed out section of the beach. This vehicle a Troopy had 11 kids in it from the U.K. plus all of their crap on a roof rack (three across the front & eight in the back). Luckily for them, except for a bad scare, no one was hurt.

We pulled the vehicle back onto its wheels and eventually got it going. My mate who is a Supervisor Diesel Fitter in mining, claimed that the vehicle was a piece of crap, it had a lot of rust in the body, the poorest tyres possible, and how many times the odometer had done a world trip, no one knows. In his opinion should have been burnt at the scene.

As for the kids on board, and that's all they were bloody pommy kids, two of them had hired the vehicle at Hervey Bay, they had never driven a manual before. The hirers gave them a short, quick instructional drive, then they took off. Enroute they picked up their mates. It saves money when you don't have much.

Look, I know that they were doing the wrong thing, but FWD'ing is not big in the U.K. and though they could drive, well one almost could, they said that they weren't told about overloading, the only thing was not to let the tyres down, and that if the vehicle was returned with any damage they would have the amount taken from their credit card account.

I believe Transport Qld. has taken a number of the hire companies to task over the condition of their vehicles, and it's about time, but the practice/s that we observed that day, and a number of others was just a disaster waiting to occur.




AnswerID: 395388

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)