Tuesday, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:08
Hi Mikey, I understand your thinking but I still think you are making the wrong conclusions. Here's how I see for your choices:
1. You mention the GC would have better off road capabilities than a ML320, yes perhaps, but then you mention the V8TD Cruiser and not having heard great things about them, IMO it's a misnoma to mention Grand Cherokee and Landcruiser in the same breath, whether or not you've heard great things is irrelevant, the cruiser is lightyears ahead of the Cherokee and Toureg in things that matter, that is unquestioned reliability and capability, the 2 things you need most.
2. The Cruiser is still king, don't fool yourself into thinking a GC or VW can come along and take that crown with bells and whistles, the Cruiser earned it's reputation over a long period of proving itself time and time again, nobody else has come close to earning that reputation, in reliability and capability.
3. If you prefer the style, comfort features of a GC or Toureg thats ok, it's your choice, it's what makes you happy, but I would buy the Cruiser time and time again, forget the niggly comments you've heard, it's still a Landcruiser and a bloody good one. For towing 3.5 Tonnes, the TD is
miles ahead of the other 2 and it has fixed price service levels up until 100,000kms of thereabouts.
In summary I think the Cruiser has suffered from small niggly criticisms but thats to be expected when you are the top selling benchmark, nobody has said yes the Cruiser has been king all these years and now it isn't, their simply saying I don't like this feature or that one, none of them are killers for the cruisers reputation IMO.
FollowupID:
663538