Mounting Long Range Tanks

There are several tales in these forums about long range tanks failing at the mounting brackets due to the tank being rigid and the chassis flexing.
Has anybody tried mounting their tanks using rubber bushes between the tank and chassis ?
I was thinking of replacing the sub tank in my GU Patrol, but am concerned with the quantity of "horror" stories around.
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Rod W - Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:59

Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:59
I mounted a centre belly tank (up and over the rear drive shaft) to the underside floor of my Troopy 75 series, its been in for several years and has not been a problem.
AnswerID: 396176

Reply By: Member - Scoot (SA) - Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:36

Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:36
I had a long range tank fitted to my Triton had no problems and now have one fitted to my Pajero and touch wood have not had any problems with it.

I would run with a good brand of product and it should be OK.

I'm sure most of the manufactures would of made a few hundred for GU Patrols by now and all the bugs would be ironed out.

Cheers Scoot. :-)
AnswerID: 396179

Reply By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 13:16

Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 13:16
You could buy a 145lt main tank for a GU which bolts in with the original bolts.

Had one in mine had a bit of a prob with the filler hose but was easily fixed.



AnswerID: 396183

Follow Up By: BluePrint Industries Pty Ltd - Thursday, Dec 31, 2009 at 14:02

Thursday, Dec 31, 2009 at 14:02
Hi Graham, what brand tank have you got?

Thanks

Kurk
0
FollowupID: 665829

Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Thursday, Dec 31, 2009 at 14:18

Thursday, Dec 31, 2009 at 14:18
Was a Longranger but as you see by my pic I no longer have the vehicle.

New owner got a shock when he first filled it up as dealer never told him it had
it. and car had about 20 litres in it when I traded it
ROFL

The filler pipe didnt line up properly with the pipe in the car so had a few probs .

Didnt do a lot of k's in it as needed a Cruiser so sold it.

Tank was Ok as I bought it 2nd hand and it was about 3 years old then.

Had been in a Petrol TI so maybe a different filler in tank????????
0
FollowupID: 665832

Reply By: Voxson - Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 14:05

Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 14:05
If you drive to the conditions then you shouldnt have any problems...
Most of the horror stories told on here are due to poor driving habits...
Too fast over corrugations,,, wrong tyre pressures etc etc...
Then you will hear stories such as long range tanks failing and Cooper tyres are crap..
I have delaminated a Cooper tyre and i have also destroyed a long range tank but back then my driving habits were poor because of no idea and bad advice such as "drive over the corros at 80kmh and get up on the plane"...or "sit on 100kmh on the birdsvilletrack with 40psi in the tyres".........

Plenty will disagree, but if it wasnt for the bad advice i wouldnt have learnt so quickly....
AnswerID: 396190

Follow Up By: JR - Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 14:16

Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 14:16
Ive got one from Opposite Lock, done over 500'000km, in three Gu wagons no probelms, Done Simpson plus lots of corrugations and gravel road work
Small hoses dont line up well with outlets though, but this is minor, should have got them to fix this on the first one

I had it powder coated in between each vehicle and inspected closely still no probelms
0
FollowupID: 664896

Follow Up By: Member - Bucky - Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 15:35

Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 15:35
Voxon
Gotta disagree with that one ..
Yes we did many Km's, on corrugations and outback roads on our trip, and I am not likely to flog my vehicle on those corrugations.. reason to keep colateral damage to a minimum.
Mine went, due to faulty workmanship ( could have been a Monday Tank ) , just the welds.

Good news was that I was looked after, both in Alice, by to get me home, and then in Bayswater, by Brown Davis..
Nothing but praise.
Cheers
Bucky



0
FollowupID: 664902

Follow Up By: Voxson - Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 16:18

Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 16:18
Bucky,

I am normally pretty careful with my choice of words...

You have to disagree with "most" breakages are caused by poor driving?

Yours may not have been but i still think most are.

Anyway,, all entitled to our own opinion.

Cheers....
0
FollowupID: 664907

Follow Up By: Crackles - Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 18:23

Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 18:23
"Most of the horror stories told on here are due to poor driving habits... "
Voxon while that is one possibility, the vast majority of vehicles driven over the same tracks with just factory tanks rarely suffer a failure yet a far higher percentage of after market ones leak. These manufacturers know where the vehicles are being driven (rough remote areas) so why can't they at least make them as reliable as a factory tank?
My B.D. long range tank failed after just 1000km of dirt. I put it down to a poor design & zero field testing in fact I believe I WAS the field test :-)
By your theory shouldn't we see an equal percentage of standard tanks failing on cars when driven pooly? People shouldn't have to drive any more carefully to avoid damagaing a product that isn't up to the job.
Cheers Craig..................
0
FollowupID: 664937

Follow Up By: Voxson - Thursday, Dec 24, 2009 at 08:52

Thursday, Dec 24, 2009 at 08:52
Hi Crackles,

I am not really pinpointing tanks,,,, but everything as a whole....
You only need to drive along The Gibb River Road or The Overland Telegraph Track during June, July or August to get a good look at poor driving techniques...
Especially the Kalumburu Road.....
Hearing people whinging about their shockers leaking fluid after they have driving up there sitting on average speeds of 80kmh... DUH...

Anyway,,, Merry Xmas to all and safe travels.....
0
FollowupID: 665010

Follow Up By: Peter McG (Member, Melbourne) - Thursday, Dec 24, 2009 at 09:08

Thursday, Dec 24, 2009 at 09:08
Spot on Craig! I think there needs to be a lot more R&D done by the tank manufacturers. I've been looked after when mine has leaked and hopefully it's better for the repairs but I really don't think enough outback testing has been done.

Peter
0
FollowupID: 665015

Follow Up By: fisho64 - Thursday, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:56

Thursday, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:56
periferal and ancilliary equipment, that is specifically designed for offroad use should generally handle what the occupants can handle in terms of vibration/corrugation etc.
Especially a fuel tank, tyre etc of ALL things.
If an item such as these fails cos the driver can handle it but not the equipment then it is honestly JUNK and should be roundly condemned.

Just as an aircraft in most cases can handle far more stress than the people aboard it.
The equipment mentioned is "critical equipment".
0
FollowupID: 665815

Reply By: Outnabout.. - Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 19:36

Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 19:36
I think that to much stress is put on these tanks. They are only thin guage steel holding 170 kilo's on some fairly lighweight brackets welded to the tank. Add to that some off road work and you have a huge chance of fatigue and failure.
On the other hand as Crackles said not many OE tanks fail. Why? Well I think I am right in saying that most if not all OE tanks are held on with straps which spreads the load and stops fatigue.

I have no basis for this except observation, however an engineer freind said that when he makes my water tank he will do straps so that it doesn't fall off so that is confirmation of my thoughts.
AnswerID: 396216

Follow Up By: Ozhumvee - Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 19:46

Wednesday, Dec 23, 2009 at 19:46
Outnabout you are correct, the vast majority of OE tanks from the smallest cars to the biggest trucks are usually held in with straps, no fatigue points and no problems with them cracking etc. If OE tanks develop cracks it is usually due to either too thin a material on bends and most vehicles of that particular model will have the same problem or impact damage. Thirty years ago we used to make our own auxilary tanks for our 4wd's, usually held in with two 30mm x 3mm mild steel straps bolted through the floor with high tensile bolts and a plate to spread the weight, never had a problem.
0
FollowupID: 664944

Follow Up By: B-Rat - Thursday, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:59

Thursday, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:59
Thanks for your replies, I agree with the idea of using straps. I had looked at a secondhand sub-tank and was thinking of cutting off the damaged bracket and making up a strap to go under the back end. Unfortunately it went for more than I thought it was worth on ebay.
Further investigation into the OE tanks on the Patrol show they are pressed in two halves and then the halves are joined in a seam around the middle of the tank, this seam is then bolted directly to the chassis.
Makes me wonder if the theory of the chassis flexing is a myth, and it is just insufficient metal in the long range tank wall to support the weld or the welds are too small to support the weight.
Looking at the design of long range tanks, they all bolt directly to the chassis too, if one of their brackets was not positioned correctly in manufacture then the load would not be balanced and one of the brackets would take too much load until it fails.
I still think that if I do go long range tanks I would look at mounting it between two rubber blocks.
0
FollowupID: 665028

Reply By: awill4x4 - Thursday, Dec 24, 2009 at 13:17

Thursday, Dec 24, 2009 at 13:17
I've built a number of Aluminium fuel tanks for various applications and wherever possible I recommend straps as the best way to mount to a vehicle.
If straps aren't possible then I will weld compensation plates to the tank shell then weld any brackets to that compensation plate. In the event of a weld failure it will only break on the plate and not tear the tank shell.
Regards Andrew.
AnswerID: 396299

Reply By: Member - Oldplodder (QLD) - Thursday, Dec 24, 2009 at 13:58

Thursday, Dec 24, 2009 at 13:58
I had a number of problems with the original tank in the old pajero, would crack on the folds in the light guage metal, and only only on corrugations when the tank was more than 3/4 full. The bootm of the tank must have flexing too much.

Put in a long range tank (cheaper replacement than a genuine tank), and it has done over 500,000k no problems.

It uses the original bolts, set out as a three mount system.
I would be wary of a 4 mount system since body flex would be transmitted to the tank, and it is usually the mounts or the area around the mounts that crack.

Was also running a 70l auxilary tank without any problems, for a total capacity of 210l.
AnswerID: 396306

Reply By: SteveL - Friday, Dec 25, 2009 at 23:47

Friday, Dec 25, 2009 at 23:47
I have an L.R.A. Auxillary tank in my GQ which snapped both rear mounting bolts on the Kalumbaru Road.The tank sagged down towards the rear and was only 4 inches from the road.These were only 8mm bolts.
AnswerID: 396420

Reply By: B-Rat - Thursday, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:44

Thursday, Dec 31, 2009 at 12:44
Thanks to all who have replied.

From your replies and other reading it seems that you can get quite a bit of variation in manufacture quality with these long range tanks. Some people report they have no trouble yet others with the same tank have no end of problems.

Makes it hard to cough up the $$$ being charged for a tank that could let you down just when you need it the most.

I work in manufacturing and understand they every process has variation, particularly steel fabrication, why then design your product with fixed rigid mounts and no means of compensating for minor differences or misalignments in the tank or chassis ?

For example, on the GU sub-tank I saw there are two mounts at one end that are welded to the wall of the tank. The right angle bracket will transfer the force from the weight of the tank to a pulling force trying to tear the end of the bracket off the wall. Given that the brackets are almost opposite why not run a strap under that end of tank, it might cost a few cents more but would remove all the force off the wall of the tank, improving its reliability.

If anybody reading this works for one of these tank manufacturers please treat this as constructive discussion and a chance to use these people's experience to improve your product design, I would love to hear your point of view.
AnswerID: 397067

Follow Up By: Peter McG (Member, Melbourne) - Thursday, Dec 31, 2009 at 17:46

Thursday, Dec 31, 2009 at 17:46
I agree that there needs to be more R & D done by manufacturers. There certainly doesn't seem to be enough strebgthenng, gusseting and strapping to ensure that the tanks have the same reliability as OE tanks.

If I was in the market again then I'd be asking for firstly a heavier gauge material - apparently use din competition vehicles and additional strengthening near areas where there are spot welds for swirl pots and baffles.

I suspect that there are lots of tank repairs done when cards return home from serious trips outback. I just hope that manufacturers are learning from this and making design changes.

In any case, I'm taking enough tank repair goo with me on future trips to so we can reduce fuel loss.

Peter
0
FollowupID: 665876

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)