Environmental Damage the big picture

Submitted: Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 16:53
ThreadID: 79875 Views:3460 Replies:7 FollowUps:9
This Thread has been Archived
The amount of threads about damaged caused by 4 x 4 vehicles got me to thinking about the big picture :-)

100 years of 4 wheel driving on the tablelands - the amount of damage and trees cut down compared to 1 Day of cyclone Larry.

No contest - nature won!

100 years of all the 4 x 4ing on the Beaches and sand displaced compared to the storms that hit the coast this year.

No contest - nature won!

100 years of 4 x 4s in Australia exhausting gasses compared to the recent Iceland VOLCANO.

No contest - nature won!

No need to go on, I think you will get the train of thought now :-)

Well what do you say?

Cheers Tony

Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Wilko - Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 17:10

Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 17:10
Hi Tony,

Agreed, Nature is the problem lets destroy it (Onlykidding),

I think the biggest problem facing the Oz is overpopulation. If we had only 15 million instead of the bloated 20 something we currently have, we wouldnt be having these issues

There wouldnt be as many people trying to enjoy the great outdoors and a lot less pressure on the areas.

Cheers Wilko

AnswerID: 423112

Reply By: Member - barry F (NSW) - Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 17:12

Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 17:12
I think when the majority of people refer to environmental damage that they are referring to damage done by us humans,whether it be by vehicles or otherwise, not damage done by nature. Cheers
AnswerID: 423114

Follow Up By: Tonyfish#58 - Tuesday, Jul 06, 2010 at 17:56

Tuesday, Jul 06, 2010 at 17:56
True - But have a look at the outcry when some one races up a vegetated dune face. The condemnation of the act is usually heated and prolonged.

A storm comes by and erodes away the whole entire length of dunes and Oh well its natures way.

So why be so hard on the 4w driver? Nature or progress will always do a lot worse.

By the way I like to stick to made tracks when they are there.

Cheers Tony
0
FollowupID: 693675

Reply By: Andrew & Jen - Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 17:47

Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 17:47
Hullo Tony
Of course there are many more examples utilising a false premise, for example, the number of people killed involving car accidents vs those killed by an earthquake. Clearly nature won! Why worry about road deaths/injuries. Yer, right.
The false premise involves comparing the consequences following an act of choice - eg, driving on sensitive dune environments - vs those over which there is no choice - an earthquake, storm, volcanic eruption, etc.
So we can make a choice to defer using a track that will be severely cut up if we drive on it now rather than, if possible, use it in two days time when it has dried out sufficiently. We can choose to drive on dunes in a way that damages the vegetation that helps to hold it together during storms or we can avoid doing so.
Many people consider that the first option in the above two examples as inconsiderate, short sighted, stupid, even selfish. Unfortunately, in an increasing number of cases these choices affect others who have no say in the matter and result in losses to the wider (4wd) community due to increasing number of restrictions / closures, etc.
Rgds
Andrew
AnswerID: 423118

Reply By: Rockape - Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 18:44

Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 18:44
You maybe right, on a resent trip south we came across this.

Image Could Not Be Found

I believe the locals are very p***ed off with anyone who owns a 4wd and is not a local.

I also drove another road that day and it was very steep and cut to bits by moron's.

Where I worked years ago, they lost up to 5 sheep a week from idiots, we had to make the letterbox from hardened steel to stop the idiot's shooting holes in the mail and bread. Delivered once a week.

Go the gun laws, they haven't saved any people but hell the wild life and the signs can relax.



AnswerID: 423131

Follow Up By: bomnnat - Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 19:09

Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 19:09
the gun laws only go against the responsible gun owners, not the idiots that are not licsenced and dont care about what they shoot up.
0
FollowupID: 693529

Follow Up By: Rockape - Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 19:20

Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 19:20
Old son you are right to a point, you can still use your guns if you area proper gun owner. May I ask how that affects you, I would like to now.

This is not a smart arse question.
0
FollowupID: 693533

Follow Up By: bomnnat - Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 19:33

Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 19:33
i am a member of a gun club have been for 20 years. dont get me wrong i agree with some of the laws that have been put in place, but not all gun owners just shoot at signs or letter boxes. but were the ones that always cop the flak.when idiots like you mentioned do the wrong thing
0
FollowupID: 693537

Follow Up By: Rockape - Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 20:04

Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 20:04
Bomnnat,
I have no problem with you or genuine gun owners. Just the retards, and they are still out there. I willl still stand by my statement, that the best thing was gun laws. Honest people can still use their weapons.
0
FollowupID: 693546

Follow Up By: bomnnat - Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 20:20

Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 20:20
Rockape, I see where your coming from.but unfortunatly those retards will always be out there.
0
FollowupID: 693550

Reply By: chingate - Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 18:46

Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 18:46
Thanks Tony, interesting thoughts, lead with the chin shall we?

I'm a regular vistor to the forests of SW Oz, especially around Blackwood and Walpole.

I've driven many goat trails in small 2wd and SUVs

Occasionally had 'issues' when meeting up with 'BIG MEN IN THEIR BIG TRUCKS'

Seen numerous bad mouthed bad tempered Oz beerguts churning up the fire trails 'for fun'. Fun that causes severe erosion and access problems for other (more respectful) NP users, and may hinder local fire/emergency people

Had several beerguts upset that my 2wd Mazda found it's way to 'THE BIG MAN SPOT' that they think is exclusively for bigots in their expensive fuel guzzlers, then they churn the track to make exit difficult for me

Of course you aren't endorsing that sort of 4x4 activity are you Tony? No, of course not.

The world is getting smaller, and we need to perhaps preserve and share what's left

Tread lightly
AnswerID: 423132

Follow Up By: Tonyfish#58 - Tuesday, Jul 06, 2010 at 18:11

Tuesday, Jul 06, 2010 at 18:11
By no means condoning idiots in their 4x4s :-)

I like to 4 x 4 with the least impact on the environment as possible.

Point was that the damage a 4x4 does pales into insignificance to what nature can dish out.

Example - Cooktown area - Big local outcry with 4wd's using a track near a river

Next year a record flood came through and removed the bank of the river by 25 meters. Where the track was and beyond. No outcry then, just amazement as nature did it :-)
0
FollowupID: 693679

Reply By: Joe n Mel - Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 21:24

Monday, Jul 05, 2010 at 21:24
I dont think you can really compare our intentional damage to what nature does, nature does what it does but has a system where it recovers it's self and always returns even better, a beach erosion is normal and natural and MUST happen to keep the "cycle" going, cyclones are the same, even storms......
The damage we do does not ever self repair, we have to help it repair so hence we as people have placed restrictions on us to limit what damage we do....
Ever been in the middle of a cyclone ????? we have, the birds seem to know and just go "away" someware, the trees get smashed and stripped bare ...... within a few days fresh green shoots are starting on the trees, birds return, life starts all over again and it seems after a few years that it never happened......

If you have ever driven from the Coast to Paraburdoo/Tom Price through the Ashburton "flats" you will see the road has completely different "structure" to the grass, trees, soil and erosion on each side of the road, an old chappy from a station was showing me it all, the road they put in has up-set the flow of water both under the ground and on the ground and has up-set the balance of the land, every time i drove it i noticed it more and more (worked for the shire there) and had driven past it heaps without noticing it for 6 months before he showed me ........

Look at it like the old aboriginal people do, we get up-set when someone walks through our house with muddy boots, mud on my carpet, how dare they do that, move something in someone else's house and dont they get up-set yet we dont think twice about doing all sorts of things to the outside world, it is our house, keep it clean, respect it, tread lightly and be gentle to it as it is the ONLY house we have ............ would you hand your house over to your kids with it full of rubbish, holes in the floor, no roof ..... do you own a house and rent it out, the tennents trash it and you dont care ??? yeh right, so look after this house for our kids...
AnswerID: 423164

Follow Up By: Tonyfish#58 - Tuesday, Jul 06, 2010 at 18:19

Tuesday, Jul 06, 2010 at 18:19
Sorry can not agree, why not? - The damage we do will be repaired by nature if left alone. Over the years I have seen many a track that was badly eroded or damaged. Now if I drive in those areas on the bypass tracks made to get around this damage you would not know the old track was ever there.

Leave a track alone for a while and nature will repair :-) Cheers Tony

PS - Since you asked - a few cyclones and in the eye of Larry :-) which was in 2006 and the Forrest still has not recovered. One track that was closed by Larry tree debris never reopened and now you are flat out finding it? It is reverting back to Rain Forrest - Wonderful thing Nature :-)
0
FollowupID: 693681

Reply By: roberttbruce - Tuesday, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:26

Tuesday, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:26
lol...well done TF, we know your secretly a greenie, this has to be the best reverse-troll post i've seen here yet..

almost as good as the pic on the top of 79884
AnswerID: 423234

Follow Up By: Tonyfish#58 - Tuesday, Jul 06, 2010 at 18:28

Tuesday, Jul 06, 2010 at 18:28
Roberttbruce - Now that is a good pic and brought back memories. I had to rescue my Overseer from those Falls back in the early 90s.

There was at least 7m of sand on top of that crossing after a large wet, believe it or not :-)

He had driven out 75 mtrs or so to see if he could get across and sunk through the sand into mulch buildup to the diffs and beyond. He then spent the rest of the day trying to winch backwards until the winch burnt out. He did well and had got about 25mtrs back

A call on the HF and I got a good job late in the day to go fetch :-)

Just got to thinking - Some interesting thoughts above.

Another interesting point - That road after the wet in some places is nearly impossible to find as it is so overgrown - One wet and the damaged we caused making the road is nearly gone :-)

Cheers Tony
0
FollowupID: 693686

Sponsored Links