How slow is to fast to be considered discourteous
Submitted: Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 22:45
ThreadID:
80200
Views:
6615
Replies:
18
FollowUps:
40
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Trevor H (SA)
Hi all just got back from the Simpson and
Birdsville and was quite amazed by the speeds other drivers considered safe when passing on coming traffic in stony sections of the tracks in remote areas.
A group of on coming towing C/T’s (a club trip from the NSW Central coast area) at speed were annoyed when I challenged them on the speed at which they slowed to “what’s your problem we took off 30 km” was the response back on the two way. I suggested that may be 50 off would have been more appropriate in the conditions and given they were towing. This invoked a further gruff response.
My question is? Is travelling fast really worth it in those conditions, really worth it given the danger the stones kicked up by the trailer pose to on coming at moderate speeds.
Am I just a nerd and alone in this or do others slow down often to 60km when approaching on coming cos I do and find it annoying that others disregard the risk of damage to glass and the inconvenience this causes in remote areas.
Well that’s it, time to step down from the soap box and hopefully I have instilled some caution in at least one other. That was the worst thing that I encounter on a fantastic trip what a dessert we have (apart from the VB cans along the track, come to SA they are worth 10Cents I could have paid for a tank of juice)
I am sure I saw many of you out there I am a new member and will put the sticker on the car once I clean it.
Reply By: Member - Old Girl (QLD) - Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 23:06
Tuesday, Jul 20, 2010 at 23:06
Trevor your not a nerd
Some just don't give a hoot. My sister had her windscreen smashed, not cracked smashed by a fast travelling 4x4 towing a c/t out Arrabury way. They lived out there at the time. It wasn't easy to get a replacement. My husband works out there towing b-triples, some of the stories he comes
home with. The last hitch he came across city people trying to change a tyre, Bloody joke he reckoned. Last weekend he said there were very dirty caravans everywhere out Thargo. Busier due to the greenery and B/T closed I expect.
Any how the trouble with this kind of traveller is they only have one week to do a 2 week trip.
Another thing some do is expect a huge fully loaded truck to verge off the track. Those that read this and have done it shame on you. Those that get out of their way, on the truckies behalf a big thankyou. They don't have tow trucks to pull them back on.
It really comes back to courtesy.
Cheers
AnswerID:
424685
Follow Up By: Member - Brian R (WA) - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 00:27
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 00:27
Hi Trevor
No... I think it is good that you put your thoughts and experience on this
forum. We are not able to travel at present however , when we have , ...In these situations I would slow down , not just for
the hazards, but to be ready in case our on coming travellers have the need to stop us to pass on info or just to say gooday...enjoy the the outback and be ready to share. take time to spell the roses , or the' whatever'. I don't know if that makes sense, however....
we see and hear of so many of us planning this trip or that trip and I feel sometimes that people want or need to travel too fast and not give time to take in the scenery or the people that they can meet on their trips
Brian
FollowupID:
695150
Follow Up By: Member - Brian R (WA) - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 00:29
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 00:29
Sorry SMELL not SPELL
FollowupID:
695151
Reply By: time waster - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 06:40
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 06:40
Agree 100% Trevor we have the same trouble all the time they just don't seem to care we are towing and know the stones that are shot out and always slow down to around 40-50km/h and you can tell when the on coming are not slowing because the dust cloud is huge.
It's not crappy 4wd's either lots of new 4wd's and when they are in convoy they love to sit in each other’s dust.
They either don't worry about stone damage or just like to go
home and brag after doing 8oookm in 2 weeks how far and rough it was, "look at what we broke".
I think some of the problem is the roads such as the Birdsville/Strzelecki are too wide and smooth allowing high speeds.
We now take more remote tracks that are less travelled and find these very enjoyable.
Christian
AnswerID:
424690
Reply By: Member - Oldplodder (QLD) - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:11
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:11
Agree with you Trevor.
I have been saving up the cracks on my screen and just replaced it.
One bad one was just out of
Birdsville, I slowed to about 60 from 80, but the oncoming telstra 4wd still sat on his 100, and threw a stone.
Other major crack was on the short bit of bitumen outside
Hells Gate from a CT.
Always get at least one good chip if not a crack every trip.
Really sours it when you get a friendly wave in most cases and a second or so later, the bang of a stone on the windscreen.
AnswerID:
424697
Follow Up By: anglepole - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:19
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:19
I could not agree more about the Telstra 4WD. They always pass at 100k (not their vehicle any way).
On one trip in outback Queensland a while ago a Telsta Truck damaged 7 vehicles in one pass. Panel damage, broken windscreens and broken head lights.
FollowupID:
695173
Follow Up By: Member - Old Girl (QLD) - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 20:53
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 20:53
We cant get answers about our phone bills I think these workers know any complaints will be binned also.
FollowupID:
695260
Reply By: Outbacktourer - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:57
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 08:57
Good post Trevor, hopefully you posting this will bring it to a few people's attention who never give it a thought.
Most of these folks drive this way out of ignorance, they just have no idea what chaos is going on around them.
People who grew up on unsealed roads or who have been trained to drive on them know the unwritten laws of this environment. How to ovetake, be overtaken, pass and be passed. Unfortunately these rules are not written up in the magazines so the two week warriors with the 20K+ of accessories (not that there is anything wrong with that) do not learn them and don't spend wnough time in one place to be instructed on them.
I did a trip a couple of years back with a bloke (city slicker) who copped abuse two days running over the 2 way and had no idea what he was doing wrong. When we had a little fire-side chat about it he suddenly realised why he we getting flack and no more problems. He was pulling out and blasting past people towing as fast as he could (covering them in stones), in one case only 2K out of an upcoming town (why not wait) where the bloke gave him a broadside in person!
It would be good actually to have a ExploreOz code of conduct on it!!
How's this for starters:
Overtaking on dirt/gravel: Call on CB. Headlights on, pull out of dust trail when safe and flash headlights until it is obvious the vehicle ahead has seen you. Accellerate as quick as safe until alongside the other vehicle and then throttle off and maintain speed with gentle throttle in anticipation the other vehicle will slow (which it should). Stay on the other side of the road as long as possible and then move over when the following vehicle is reasonably clear of your dust.
OBT
AnswerID:
424714
Reply By: Robin Miller - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:15
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:15
Hi Trevor
I am sure you will enjoy and find this site useful
Its a tricky subject I guess and the response seems to change with the situation.
Or our recent trip we passed and overtook many vehicles.
Up the Canning it was easy as people pretty
well were on the same UHF channel and everyone would assist the manovere's in a sort of spirit of adventure.
On back roads like
Oodnadatta track etc it was a different story - no common UHF channel and wet weather which left most cars covered in mud , many towing trailers not able to see out the back window made it much harder.
In addition there was often only one track thru the mud and often the track wanders from one side of the road to the other even over dips and crests.
One took one small window crack from a CT as the driver swerved out of the track and sprayed everywhere.
One thing you can do is remember that the higher passing speed does the damage and we have had no hesitation in slowing down to a dead stop on a track sometimes and let the other driver drive around.
AnswerID:
424716
Follow Up By: The Landy - Tuesday, Aug 03, 2010 at 18:09
Tuesday, Aug 03, 2010 at 18:09
Good point...slowing your vehicle will reduce the chance of a stone crack as it is the speed at which you hit the offending
rock that often does the damage.
And hey..driving a 'Landy' I'm always being passed so I have experience, happy to pull aside and let tyhem on their way.
Hopefully have my battery/power issues sorted over the next couple of weeks......
Cheers, Baz, The Landy
FollowupID:
696662
Reply By: brushmarx - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:32
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:32
I slow down and puul to the side where possible to minimise rocks thrown by my vehicle, but mainly to try and prevent damage from rocks picked up by the passing vehicle.
What I have never seen discussed is whether the damage from windscreens is mainly caused by the speed of the damaged vehicle or the speed of the vehicle throwing rocks.
If a vehicle is travelling at 100kph, are the rocks thrown at the same speed?
Are the rocks flicked up at a low speed, and the windsreen damage is caused by the speed of the vehicle being showered with the rocks?
Let's face it, if you chuck a
rock at a windscreen at 40kph, it will probably damage the screen, so slowing down from whaterver to 40kph probably won't save it.
Are the rocks flicked up at very little speed, then accellerated by bouncing under the vehicle?
Is it a combination of all of the above?
If you stop, and a
rock is thrown up by a passing vehicle, will it break your windscreen?
Does anyone know?
Maybe the old wire mesh windscreen and headlight prorectors from the 60's could make a comeback.
Cheers
AnswerID:
424719
Follow Up By: Allan B, Sunshine Coast, - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:08
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:08
Brushy, you make some very good points that I also have been considering.
From observation and applying some physics I feel the following are likely:
1. Higher speed will produce an increase in rocks being thrown up (obviously) but I think it is likely that more rocks are thrown up if the vehicle is under power. That is, the incidence of
rock-throw is reduced if the foot is lifted and the vehicle is coasting but still at the same speed. It has long been my practice to lift my foot right off as I pass an oncoming vehicle....... I just wish they would do the same!
2. The velocity of the thrown
rock is not necessarily the same as the vehicle speed. The ejected
rock may
well be travelling sideways toward the oncoming vehicle but without forward velocity. The impact on the windscreen may
well be only caused by the forward speed of the vehicle receiving the impact. Hence lowering your speed may reduce the severity of impact. But it would become intolerable to slow to zero for every oncoming vehicle.
I really don't want to wear a steel mesh protector in front of my windscreen. (Tried that years ago!!!) Modern windscreens are laminated rather than the old toughened Armour-plate so at least we only get a chip or crack rather than having the whole screen become opaque as a result of an impact.
FollowupID:
695202
Follow Up By: OzTroopy - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:11
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:11
heh heh ....
Still have my mesh windscreen protector ....
And no faerie stories about slicing and dicing
sydney pedestrians will make me leave it off west of a line from charters towers to mt gambier.
FollowupID:
695203
Follow Up By: Allan B, Sunshine Coast, - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:21
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:21
Haven't seen one for years. OzTroopy you may be a dinosaur but perhaps the only one of us without windscreen chips! eh? LOL
FollowupID:
695204
Follow Up By: OzTroopy - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:27
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:27
Its been remeshed a coupla times .... but improves windscreen life by about 75% I reckon ... the little ones still get through on occaision.
Annoying things at first .... until you learn to "look ahead" of the mesh ...
Coat of flat black paint and some weathering and they are as good as gold.
FollowupID:
695205
Follow Up By: Allan B, Sunshine Coast, - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:31
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:31
Hmmm, maybe I'll go out to my electronics bench and start developing a Force Field.
Now where is my DVD collection of Star Wars?
FollowupID:
695206
Follow Up By: Member - Mfewster(SA) - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 20:50
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 20:50
The mesh screens really work, but the trouble is that they eat up fuel at about the same rate as a roofrack. What you save on screens, you lose on juice, which is why they went out of fashion.
FollowupID:
695257
Follow Up By: OzTroopy - Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:07
Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:07
Heya Mfewster .......
Yep you're right ... it does increase fuel usuage ..... but I've got a funny attitude about fuel economy ...... I think it's a load of horse .................................. dung. ... lol
A vehicle, in good condition - uses what it uses, as per its application by the driver. If the drivers not happy with the fuel use rate ... They bought the wrong vehicle.
If my average trip distance is 1000klm .....
Should I spend $60,000 on a vehicle just to get 1mpg better fuel economy than what Im driving now and keep some greeny happy ??? ...
$60k is a lot travelling
miles in the current vehicle.
Should I happily pay $10 for the extra fuel used by having a second spare on the roofrack .... or keep $500 in the wallet for recovery/repair/replacement because I left the 6th wheel at
home to keep some greeny happy ???
Should I happily pay $10 for the extra fuel used by having the mesh screen protector fitted .... or keep $500 in the wallet for recovery/repair/replacement because Im supposed to get my windscreen chipped and cracked to keep some greeny happy ???
I prefer to work on a trip cost getting the best overall value and savings I can ....... instead of faerie tale fuel use rates dictated by Prius drivers.
Each to their own I guess ....
FollowupID:
695321
Follow Up By: Member - Mfewster(SA) - Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:37
Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:37
As you say, each to his own. I don't see that it has anything to do with Greenies however. I was simply pointing out that a mesh screen will do the job, but its probably a false economy. What you save on the screen, you are likely to more than pay for on the extra fuel.
FollowupID:
695327
Follow Up By: OzTroopy - Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:13
Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:13
G'Day Mfewster ...
Dont get me wrong ... I wasnt havent a go at you ....
I was just making the point about being content with a vehicles fuel usuage/best economy ... according to ... the way the vehicle is setup and used.
Rather than being obsessed with achieving fuel economy targets at the expense of not having the vehicle set up the way you want it.
Takes a LOT of trips for the screen protector fuel cost to outweigh the cost of a windscreen on ONE trip ... Otherwise I would have used it for a
gate on the chookpen a long time ago ... lol
FollowupID:
695332
Follow Up By: Member - Mfewster(SA) - Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:41
Thursday, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:41
Gday Oz, I like creative use of language rather than resorting to cliches. Loved the chookpen image.
Regards
FollowupID:
695333
Follow Up By: The Landy - Tuesday, Aug 03, 2010 at 18:12
Tuesday, Aug 03, 2010 at 18:12
Good points...
I actually believe that it is the speed at which your vehicle is doing that does the damage as
the rock my acutally have no forward velocity at all, it might be going sideways. Therefore, you can control the potential outcome to some degree.
And nice to see you OzTroopy....BTW.
Cheers, The Landy
FollowupID:
696663
Reply By: JAX W - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:28
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:28
Hullo All
I agree with most that this is a real issue. Certainly most of the idiots that won't slow down are city slickers who haven't a clue. However, we were recently travelling north out of
Birdsville towing our large van, when an oncoming idiot ia a 200 Series white Cruiser with a Diamantina Council logo on the side raced past us on his way into
Birdsville for a function for the Navy. (I hope that pretty much describes the bloke!!!)
Anyway, we were sprayed with rocks resulting in a cracked windscreen. I was not impressed needless to say.
It is couteous and safer to slow down and respect others.
Regards, Jack
AnswerID:
424731
Follow Up By: Tony_ - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 13:45
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 13:45
For me personally.......slow enough so as to not hear stones hitting inside the wheel wells.
Tony_
FollowupID:
695199
Reply By: OzTroopy - Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:21
Wednesday, Jul 21, 2010 at 14:21
Good question Trevor.
A set passing speed is often irrelevant .... Its the conditions ... and sometimes your passing speed should be as low as 20kph.
I have always driven at whatever max velocity I deemed suitable for the conditions ... but always slow for traffic.
On the narrow single lane bitumen dev roads .... I was often the one trundling along in the tabledrain at 30kph .... allowing the oncoming vehicle to maintain their higher speed ... and vehicle control.
Back then there seemed to be a separation distance that was accepted as a "move over" point .... Now it seems to be a "game of chicken" to see who keeps control of the most road the longest.
Rude day trippers ... or two minute tourists as someone else called them ... with no spare time, have certainly changed outback driving experiences and social values.
AnswerID:
424744
Follow Up By: The Landy - Tuesday, Aug 03, 2010 at 18:15
Tuesday, Aug 03, 2010 at 18:15
Crikey....we agree on far too much these days! hahaha!
Cheers, The Landy
FollowupID:
696664
Reply By: Member - Rowdy6032 (WA) - Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 00:18
Friday, Jul 23, 2010 at 00:18
Hi
Glad you brought this up.
Have recently returned from trip down the
Gibb River Road. One of the things that spoilt it was the attitude of some of the other drivers.
They weren't happy unless they were speeding past spraying you with rocks, from behind and in front.
Some were becoming airborne at the dips, didn't have a clue.
One clown passed myself and another vehicle in a shower of rocks only to come to a
creek crossing. He had to cut in front and come to a sliding halt in a shower of dust and rocks. He left even quicker as I think he got the message we would have liked to have a word with him. This was
on the road into
El Questro.
In one caravan park one of the workers was overheard bragging how he liked to speed past vans and spray them with rocks. Got a big kick out of it, a real winner.
Others could be heard over the UHF travelling in convoy, racing around slower vehicles bragging about flashing his "high definition" spotlights.
A female "Wicked van" driver who had not driven on unsealed roads before had been told not to drive less than 80klm. An accident waiting to happen.
Saw one accident. Surprised we didn't see more.
Whilst some didn't know better I'm afraid the attitude of some drivers leaves a lot to be desired.
AnswerID:
424951
Reply By: The Landy - Tuesday, Aug 03, 2010 at 18:24
Tuesday, Aug 03, 2010 at 18:24
Interesting thread and I think there is a general consensus in favour of ‘considerate’ driving and mind you that is probably open to far too wide an interpretation.
But to take the point off-track slightly, but related, often it is the vehicles that Trevor describes in the original post that suffer failures on outback trips; you know the thing, broken
suspension etc. Followed up with a post somewhere telling you how hard this track or that track was on the vehicle when in fact it was the person in the front
seat doing most of the damage.
Ultimately they end up paying, one way or another............
Cheers, The Landy
AnswerID:
426093
Reply By: miandering fiander - Wednesday, Aug 18, 2010 at 22:23
Wednesday, Aug 18, 2010 at 22:23
Spot on Trevor,
No not a nerd but a concerned and cautious driver.
I was in a group north bound from
cooper creek ferry and encountered that same group from
central coast 4wd club( signs across their windscreens) heading south to the ferry. I was about to go around a soft sandy section of road the first 2 cars coming were on the wrong side of the road and nearly out of control one with the drivers tyre nearly over the
embankment
I think they soiled themselves when they saw me.
You have to have your wits about you I reversed back enough and waited till all cars had passed.
We called on the radio to the last car after he told us he was last that the front group were idiots.
We did not get a reply.
We struck them a couple of times and reports from others was not good either.
AnswerID:
427637