Monday, Aug 02, 2010 at 02:21
The problem is that rain generally has a spec of dust inside it - a nidus for condensation to form around. In most models involving condensation/precipitation, you require a saturated solution and a nidus to form around. This is true of rain as
well. It then dissolves gases from the atmosphere in the same manner that evaporation occurs in the first place - a process of equilibrium in a non-closed state system.
I could now write a long follow-up involving thermodynamics and probabilities/statistical analysis, but we have moved so far away from the original topic debating whether rain
water can be used in batteries.
Rain
water is not pure
water - it is filled with dust, and dissolved gases (the most abundant being carbon dioxide due to its great solubility, followed by nitrogen, followed by oxygen in much smaller amounts)
Evaporation is a similar process to boiling, but not the same. When
water evaporates, it is because a proportion of the
water molecules posses enough kinetic energy to break free of the hydrogen bonds holding the
water together as a liquid. They leave in the gaseous state via the surface of the liquid. Boiling is slightly different - it occurs when the AVERAGE kinetic energy of the molecules is greater than the boiling point of
water (100 degrees celsius, or 373.15 degrees kelvin at one atmosphere/101.3 kPa/760 mmHg/whichever units you prefer) when molecules throughout the ENTIRETY of the liquid enter the gaseous state - hence the bubbles observed when boiling a billy on a fire. The end result is the same -
water in a gaseous state.
Distillation then commonly involves a process whereby the gas is recondensed by a countercurrent heat exchanger in clean laboratory/industrial equipment (where the nidus for recondensation is often a glass surface) and is collected in a container.
I disagree that gaseous contaminants come out of solution quickly. They will come out of solution compared to the concentration at altitude, but only due to the temperature of the
water. Liquids lose their ability to dissolve gas as their temperature increases - hence why raising the temperature of a pond by even a degree is a threat to marine life - oxygen loses its solubility in the
water. At a given temperature and partial pressure of gas solute, the concentration of dissolved gas is in equilibrium - the gas leaving solution does so at a rate of new gas entering solution.
Water sitting on your sink will have carbon dioxide and other gases dissolved at a concentration depending on atmospheric pressure and temperature.
Theoretically, (please if anyone can correct me with thermodynamics, equilibrium, or other principles of applied chemistry, I welcome it) the distilled
water added to a battery would contain as much carbon dioxide dissolved (as carbonic acid) as rainwater after it were hypothetically added, and equilibrium allowed to ensue. Although the equilibrium constant would be altered by the presence of the hydrogen ions from the sulfuric acid...
From a semantic point of view, I guess you could argue (once again from a semantic point of view) that rain
water has been distilled - distillation is a process by which a solvent is removed from a solute, by conversion to the gaseous state (usually where different boiling points exist). You could, in theory, distill
water by evaporation, though as get outmore argued, it would take a long time. In fact, there are
well documented and practiced survival techniques involving moist ground and plastic sheets that rely on this technique! (I can fairly easily argue that collecting
water in this fashion does not rely on increasing the local temperature to >100 degrees celsius). This could be considered a method of distillation. However, we are dancing around an important point - rain
water is not PURE
water. It is contaminated, and much more so than "distilled water" as purchased for batteries/ironing/cleaning etc in containers in a grocery
shop.
Okay, I'm rabbiting on, and starting to sound like a know-it-all. (Hey, at least I admit it!)
As I mentioned before...
Chemistry is complicated :-)
With respect,
Charles
FollowupID:
696493