Monday, Aug 02, 2010 at 13:40
Notso, I must respectfully disagree - while I concede that the condensation of water occuring around a nidus may be theory, to my knowledge there have not been any other accepted theories proposed by physicists. In fact, I found a reference from Balkovsky et al. (2001) with the title 'Intermittent Distribution of Inertial Particles in Turbulent Flows' from Physical Review Letters (American Physical Society) where the theoretical effects of dust and wind (the novel part of their theory) is explained. Unfortunately I do not have access to the full text, not having access to my alumni university's library any more.
I would be interested if you could cite an article, research, or theory where this is refuted?
Another article I found, written by Asman et al. all the way back in 1981, determined the concentration of H, NH4, Ca, Mg, K, Na, SO4, NO3, Cl, F, Pb, Fe, Br, Mn, V, and Al in rainwater in the Netherlands in their work, 'Meteorological interpretation of the chemical composition of rain-water at one measuring site'. The concentrations were non-zero.
Furthermore, Root et al. (2004) from Carleton University in Minnesota performed a study on the geographical differences between anion concentrations in rainwater across the
United States. There is no reason to suspect that this study would totally lack external validity. They found variable concentrations of chloride, nitrate, and sulphate in practically all samples, with less prevalent concentrations of nitrite and phosphate. Interestingly enough, chloride concentrations were largest in rain forming over bodies of salt water, and lowest over bodies of fresh water in their analysis.
They cite Ayers et al. (2001) in 'Chemical composition of rainwater and anthropogenic influences in the Piracicaba River Basin, Southeast Brazil' from Atmospheric Environment, claiming that during evaporation of water bodies, small quantities of anions and cations (ie: sodium and chloride) travel with the vapour.
I agree with one point - I doubt the dissolved gases would have an effect on batteries. I also agree that they would become less soluable. However, the cells in a serviceable lead acid battery are on tight - forming a closed system. Although your equilibrium constant will change, favouring the gaseous state of the CO2, O2, and N2 (amongst others), in this closed state system the effect will not be nearly as pronounced as in an open state system - a new equilibrium will form.
Now, whether the small concentrations of minerals in rainwater is of any practical application to wet cell chemistry, I'm not certain. Perhaps the concentrations are low enough to be of no detriment. Perhaps they are. It would be difficult to show with any confidence that temporary use of rainwater has any effect on battery life.
The difference between "distilled water" as purchased, and rain water (which as above I agree goes through a process of distillation, is purity. Rain water is not as pure as commercially produced "distilled water".
I'm interested - what is your background? You put together a logical and convincing argument which you form around evidence. A combination of rarity in this
forum. :-)
With respect,
Charles
FollowupID:
696529