reading a compass
Submitted: Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 18:01
ThreadID:
80770
Views:
4927
Replies:
5
FollowUps:
11
This Thread has been Archived
qubert
hello. dose anyone know how i read the heading of 0.0'20" on a conventional compass. i know its very close to north.
Reply By: Member - Jeff P (SA) - Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 18:09
Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 18:09
That is so close to North that I doubt you could do it. If memory serves it is 20 seconds East of North, so 1/3 of 1/60 of a degree East.
AnswerID:
427493
Reply By: equinox - Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 18:15
Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 18:15
0.0055 degrees where 0 is magnetic north so yes very close to north.
AnswerID:
427496
Reply By: Member - Fred B (NT) - Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 18:15
Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 18:15
You need something like this
compass. If you are not familiar with using a compass, there are plenty of good books available such as
Dymocks
AnswerID:
427497
Reply By: qubert - Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 18:28
Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 18:28
so over 850 metres how much deviation would it be from north. about 1.8 metrs ?
AnswerID:
427499
Follow Up By: qubert - Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 18:30
Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 18:30
just surveying fenceline of my block. ( i already accidentaly bulldozed a heap of the neighbours bush already by trying to guess!!)
FollowupID:
698184
Follow Up By: Member - Charles Jenkinson(WA) - Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 19:48
Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 19:48
Using some trigonometry, the result is exceptionally small.
Depending on whether you measure 850 metres to the north, then move to the east until you make a reciprocal bearing of 180.00'20", or move 850 metres on your bearing of 0.00'20" prior to measuring your deviation from your north-south line from your origin, the amount of deviation can be represented as either 850.tan(0.00'20") which is approximately 8.2 cm, or 850.sin(0.00'00") which is also approximately 8.2 cm. Very difficult to measure over 850 metres!
I guess one also has to wonder how accurately with differing terrain one can measure 850 metres without specialised equipment.
Best of luck!
FollowupID:
698197
Follow Up By: Member - Tommy T (Moonta SA) - Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 19:56
Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 19:56
G'day qubert
Long time since I've done any trigonometry with sine & cosine but I agree with Charles. Deviation over 850 metres is 82 mm.
Regards
FollowupID:
698200
Follow Up By: Bazooka - Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 19:57
Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 19:57
Presume you are not pulling the wool and are only after a very rough
boundary?
I'm not a surveyor but I'd be surprised if your survey bearings/boundaries were based on magnetic north as the pole actually moves around from year to year ('polar wander'). More likely the readings are based on True North using a defined datum and coordinate system.
FollowupID:
698201
Follow Up By: Member - Jeff P (SA) - Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 20:07
Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 20:07
I agree 82 mm over 850 m, who would know?
FollowupID:
698203
Follow Up By: Bazooka - Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 20:49
Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 20:49
Boundary surveys should be done professionally (far cheaper than legal fees sorting out the mess at a later date).
But just to show you the difference between Magnetic North and True North have a look at this diagram from Geoscience Australia :
http://www.ga.gov.au/image_cache/GA16046.jpg
Variations from -3 degrees in SW WA to +13 degrees in SE Tasmania.
FollowupID:
698205
Reply By: Pete Jackman (SA) - Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 20:04
Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 20:04
Unless you are using surveying gear very few compasses will be accurate to seconds of arc.
0.0'20" is 20 seconds of arc east of north. There are 60 seconds in a degree so that is 000.3º
Magnetic variation in Oz can be up to 10º depending where you are and if you are near any metal that will also affect the accuracy.
For that sort of precision on a
boundary you will need to get a surveyor to peg it for you.
Cheers
Pete
AnswerID:
427508
Follow Up By: Pete Jackman (SA) - Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 20:07
Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 20:07
Sorry, "seconds" of arc - 60 minutes in a degree, 60 seconds in a minute - it is 20/3600 of a degree or 0.00555555555555556 of a degree.
Pete (red faced)
FollowupID:
698202
Follow Up By: Mrbrush - Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 21:18
Tuesday, Aug 17, 2010 at 21:18
I dont think you will ever find a compass with this sort of accuracy.
20" of arc is equivalent to bumping a theodolite or total Station.
FollowupID:
698206
Follow Up By: ob - Wednesday, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:06
Wednesday, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:06
Not to mention magnetic variations for a particular location
FollowupID:
698269
Follow Up By: Member - Boobook - Wednesday, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:44
Wednesday, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:44
ob posted:
Not to mention magnetic variations for a particular location....
or the fact that the variations ( declinations) move over time at 1 - 10 minutes per year for any particlar location.
So even if you could find a compas that was 100 times more accurate than any other, and you had a map that shows the variation as of when it was printed, you would have to adjust for the changes over time at this level of accuracy. ( most good maps will show the movement over time).
If you picked say
Canberra, it moves at about 5 minutes per year. So your fence measurement would move those 20 seconds in about 3 weeks.
FollowupID:
698270
Follow Up By: Member - Ian H (NSW) - Wednesday, Aug 18, 2010 at 20:57
Wednesday, Aug 18, 2010 at 20:57
So that is why the federal govt is in
canberra. So it can keep up with the rest of us!
FollowupID:
698301