Manual versus Automatics
Submitted: Friday, Aug 27, 2010 at 21:12
ThreadID:
81003
Views:
4623
Replies:
14
FollowUps:
8
This Thread has been Archived
mepvic
I have been driving 4WD's for the last 33 years and have never ever had an automatic.
About to upgrade for the 6th time having gone through an FJ40 short wheel base Landcruiser, two HJ60 Landcruiser wagons and two Hilux's.
Looking at a 100 series Landcruiser this time for towing reasons and am thinking about an automatic.
How do they compare to manuals? I know that the latest Landcruiser only comes in auto but what are the like in a steep down
hill decline? Have heard that they can tend to run away a bit.
What are they like towing at highway speeds? Do the tow ok in overdrive?
Some seem to have a problem with gear box overheating. Is this an issue on all?
Will mainly be using it for long trips towing a camper trailer. Desert runs, corrugated roads, Gulf country etc. Days of serious off roading through bog holes and hard up and down
hill runs probably minimal but still an option.
Interested in your feedback.
Reply By: Ozhumvee - Friday, Aug 27, 2010 at 21:26
Friday, Aug 27, 2010 at 21:26
Like you I have had 7 toyota's in 35 years, all manuals but after having an auto in the Humvee for the last eight I'd be very reluctant to go back to a manual to the point that any 4wd I bought in the future would have to be auto. Always in the right gear, never misses a change, no loss of drive in soft condtion due to gear change and much easier on the drivetrain.
AnswerID:
428680
Follow Up By: AlbyNSW - Friday, Aug 27, 2010 at 21:36
Friday, Aug 27, 2010 at 21:36
Agree 100%, I think the auto is superior particularly in sand except with geared engine braking on steep declines.
Fitting a additional transmission cooler will sort out any overheating issues, a cheap remedy.
FollowupID:
699405
Follow Up By: Gronk - Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 09:53
Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 09:53
Funny that......everyone thinks the auto is better in sand ( I did also )..
Last 2 times up at
Stockton Beach, after having a play down in the bowl ( up behind the Signa ), the only 4x4s to have any trouble getting out were autos !!
High range/low range.....holding it in a gear....didn't seem to make much difference.......my only thoughts were too much slippage thru the torque converter and not enough power to the
wheels ??
They seemed to have to use more speed and more revs to have the same result as the manuals....and yes they were the same make and model of 4wd (
well a few were....a couple were other brands as
well, so it wasn't a case of X brand being no good !! )
FollowupID:
699451
Follow Up By: StormyKnight - Sunday, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:44
Sunday, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:44
Yes its true you can't drop the clutch on an auto & get the revs up to the power band as easy....
However your less likely to get stuck in an auto in the first place, but once you are.....
Did Petrol vs Diesel make a difference either?
Where they all running the same tyes & pressures?
Cheers
FollowupID:
699565
Reply By: Maîneÿ . . .- Friday, Aug 27, 2010 at 21:28
Friday, Aug 27, 2010 at 21:28
I've been driving an auto diesel for 24yrs, (6OO,OOO Klm) not 4wd, but gets a flogging anyway, used to tow a camper trailer and now a boat.
I would think asking a qualified transmission re-builder would give you some good advice, some may be a bit biased, but the general advice I believe will be simply add a heavy duty transmission oil cooler to maintain low temperature in those heavy use, high rev, low speed up the dunes times.
I will buy another diesel and yes it definitely will be an automatic . . again
Maîneÿ . . .
AnswerID:
428682
Reply By: Member - neville G (QLD) - Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 06:53
Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 06:53
I am on my fifth cruiser and it,s the first auto, never thought I would go that way. I have an 05, 10 series T/D and tow a 3T. Phoenix caravan, have done about 60000klms. trouble free. I would not go back to manual, as for the oil cooler, our dealer said not required and I have not felt the need for one.
Cheers, Nev.
AnswerID:
428705
Follow Up By: petengail - Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 07:43
Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 07:43
I have had two auto 4wd's and have been happy with both. Current vehicle is Rodeo TD Auto, I wanted to fit a transmission cooler, as I tow a small 14ft van but my mechanic said, very difficult as there is no room without major reconfiguration. He also said that transmision cooler was not required on newer vehicles.
FollowupID:
699431
Reply By: Mr Pointyhead - Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 07:50
Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 07:50
To get over the engine breaking problem you just need to fit one of these:
http://www.automatictransmission.com.au/release.asp?NewsId=12101
I currently have a manual 100 series but like the others in this thread, I think the next 4x4 will be a auto (Hopefully still many years away though !)
AnswerID:
428707
Follow Up By: Member - peter f (VIC) - Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 18:57
Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 18:57
interesting reading everyones coments on autos . I am on my 2nd auto GQ
petrol , a bit of a guts on fuel but you cannot beat them for sand ,mud etc
very difficult to induce wheel spin therefore no digging up the tracks and so easy to drive . The issue of engine braking is a bit of a pain . have to use more brakes ,but big deal , the rest of the benefits outway that minor problem .
have had autos since 92 an never had any issues .
Also have a convertor lock up , never tow but rarely use it .
if everyone drove autos think how much less damage to the country
mechpete
FollowupID:
699506
Reply By: Member - Vic S (VIC) - Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 08:23
Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 08:23
Hello
I have had 2 manuals and always had the opinion that autos were too "soft" but once I changed I am now on my second auto and would not go back.I manual shift when I need to and no more problems with stall stops on steep inclines or getting going on steep stuff as its a lot easier and safer with one foot per pedal.
Vic
AnswerID:
428710
Reply By: CJ - Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:25
Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:25
Same tune same chorus
Third car. After two manuals have auto.
The only thing I find with the auto is that it takes away a little challange. With the auto, tracktion control, crawl control, anti skid control, torsen diffs, etc. it just makes it too easy. Sometimes when "out to play" one wants to be challenged a bit more...
But that's just the kid in me. As I said, won't go back, auto is just sooo much easier around town too
CJ
AnswerID:
428725
Follow Up By: StormyKnight - Sunday, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:54
Sunday, Aug 29, 2010 at 11:54
Yep I've gone from a HJ60 rear wheel drive to a LC Prado 90 constant 4WD......its harder to play, but its safer & less unnecessary damage to tracks I spose!
In the 60 you knew it was getting hard with the wheel spin coming on, it takes a lot longer in the Prado to show unless your lifting
wheels....
FollowupID:
699567
Reply By: Member - John B2 (VIC) - Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:52
Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 10:52
I have a 2002 100 series Landcruiser Auto TD (4 speed) it has done 140000Ks no problems, over 75% towing.
I tow a 3 tonne van and also a camper trailer for the off road trips.
I always tow with the overdrive turned off, I find it gives me the same or better economy and keeps the transmission cooler.
The auto comes fitted with a transmission cooler as standard.
Cheers,
John
AnswerID:
428730
Reply By: Member - Captain (WA) - Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:31
Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:31
Also singing the same tune - had many different manual 4WD's over 25 years and currently have my first auto. Cannot imagine ever going back to a manul now.
Cheers
Captain
AnswerID:
428732
Reply By: Madfisher - Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:41
Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:41
Vic we have an auto and man Jackaroo , so can give you unbiassed advice. 4wd up
hill auto will out climb the man, downhill engine braking is much better in the man, but ours are petro. City auto only way to go. Towing the auto is more relaxed but man has better fuel economy by 1/100. Passing abitity, the man wins hands down, so much so you need a much longer straight in the auto, But the man has a very good 3rd gear that will do 120plus with still a 1000rpm to the red line.
I am glad we have one of ea actually. But the newer 5 speed autos are a big improvement.
Cheers Pete
AnswerID:
428733
Reply By: Robin Miller - Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:45
Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:45
Hi Mepvic
This basis of that question really is why an auto - what does it do for you ?
In reality it multiples torque down low.
Hence it is only of value if you have insufficent torque (in the traction sense not the - I'm to lazy to change gears sense)
Insufficent torque includes torque over a wide enough rev band.
Many of todays cars - particularly diesel, have simply lost it it that there torque drops of massively below where the turbo cuts in generally some 1500rpm.
I look at the new prado 3lt it has good torque but roughly only from 1500-2800rpm.
They need auto or lots of clutch slipping by default to get them off the line and then they run out of revs, making an auto almost mandatory.
The 100 series diesel bigger and hence better all round but really !
The 200 series is 1 of few exceptions.
The manuals also have higher high efficentcy by 5-10% , less electronics
and a dam side easy to play with in the bush.
The right engine simply doesn't need an auto and its cost and complexity.
So if you have a choice - base it on the engines characteristics.
AnswerID:
428734
Reply By: Member - Warrie (NSW) - Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 12:17
Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 12:17
Steep downhill test done with 2007 Prado manual vs 1999 Pathfinder auto. Both in low range 4WD on a steep firetrail. Locked auto into 1st gear and no foot on brake. It did not start to run away. Prado also same result but much surprise from Prado driver. He has just traded it in for another Prado - an auto!!!
I tow 1500kg Jayco in overdrive but a touch on a button puts it back into top if the headwind comes up or the
hill is a bit steep. You can drive an auto like a manual if need be... W
AnswerID:
428738
Reply By: Crackles - Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 14:35
Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 14:35
The auto is a far superior box offroad & a pleasure to drive particually the 5 speed. The trade off is slightly increased fuel consumption, brake pad wear & maintainence costs.
Cheers Craig............
AnswerID:
428748
Reply By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 15:31
Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 15:31
Here goes We have just done a 50,000k trip in a 100 AutoTD
We ALWAYS tow in 4th
Reason EGT temp is up to 100deg LOWER than in 5th.
The TD already has an trans oil cooler on it
Look in top left corner in front of radiator
I also have a Trans temp gauge fitted.
It is fitted in the OUT pipe to the oil cooler.
The temp rarely gets over 70deg c and the hottest it has ever got was 95deg going up the Willunga
Hill near
Adelaide.
That was towing a 2.8t van and car was fully loaded
At the same time the Exhaust temp was going north of 500deg after turbo so I chopped it back and slowed down to keep it sane.
As Cylinder temps are about 200deg hotter than the dump pipe that is any amount hot enough.
Fuel consumption over the whole trip averaged 5.7kpl.
Not towing it does 9.6kpl
Weather was as hot as 48deg some days in the west and trans didnt get very hot and stayed within figures above
Hope that answers your questions.
DONT change trans fluid for anything else as you may have problems with
anything but WS oil if later than 2003 model
IE If it has WS stamped on the trans sump plug only use that.
AnswerID:
428756
Reply By: mepvic - Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 22:19
Saturday, Aug 28, 2010 at 22:19
Thanks to all. Interesting comments. Seems auto is the general consensus. The unit we were considering - HDJ100R around 2005 - 2007 seems to be like hens teeth after looking around all day and talking to people so may look at a Prado. Thanks again.
AnswerID:
428782
Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Sunday, Aug 29, 2010 at 13:03
Sunday, Aug 29, 2010 at 13:03
Prado has a lesser towing capacity and possibly not as robust as a 100ser TD.
FollowupID:
699570
Follow Up By: mepvic - Sunday, Aug 29, 2010 at 19:50
Sunday, Aug 29, 2010 at 19:50
Thank Graham, don't realy need the 3500kgs or 350 ball weight for my rig. Can squeeze in with the 2500/250 on the Prado. Upgrading from a Hilux and although we have had HJ60's in the past, couldn't get over how big the 100 series is inside. Don't need all that much room. Prado will be more than adequate.
FollowupID:
699617