Jayco/Coromal suitability

Submitted: Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 12:44
ThreadID: 81170 Views:5329 Replies:4 FollowUps:12
This Thread has been Archived
Thanks to those who've responded. I'm having trouble with the Reply Login so can't re join the thread.
Nice travel log and pics Christian. It helps to have a willing assistant for photography and depth checking - it's a good thing those crossings are not in the Snowys.

I don't plan to tempt fate by fitting a snorkel.
The van will not be "Outback" configured.
Due to size it will be a tandem axle of some sort with independent susp. There are only 2 types that come within budget.
Coromal has their own version as standard and Simplicity which is optional on just about any van but in my case I'm looking at a Jayco. These vans are on the list due to layout functionality and tare v's size.

I initially posed the question because the Jayco SEEMS a bit undernourished in the interior build department the reverse being so in the Coromal. My query was really - does anyone have experience of the Jayco getting a bit on the loose side internally?
I am in no doubt that either chassis would do the job.
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 12:59

Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 12:59
Our Coromal is going in for repairs in the next month as the internal cabinetry has moved and rubbed some of the cross fronts of the over cupboards in several places.
Also the flat pack componetry is not actually the best quality either.

Is all Melamine with that paper covering. Looks nice but not as good as real wood.

If its a standard Coromal chassis I would be very hesitant to take it on a corrugated road for any distance.
The underneath is just two stringers with box section only at front and rear and where suspension is mounted, rest is just angle and not very heavy either.
The Roadstar had a full boxed frame right through and was much more substantial and stiffer.
You could jack up one corner and it didnt flex. Wouldnt do that with the Princeton.

Get under and have a look.

AnswerID: 429523

Follow Up By: Gazza51 - Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 13:56

Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 13:56
Thanks for that info Graham.
I am surprised. I understood all the cabinetry to be ply and as such would be very rigid.
I assumed it to be covered with stuff which was more pretty than functional. Such is life.

I'm forming an opinion that the frame might be light weight and the apparent rigidity comes from stiff internal structures, perhaps that could be reversed somewhat in the case of Jayco. More stiff in the frame outside but more flexible inside? Swings 'n' roundabouts?

I was drawn to Coromal due to the suspension. I really don't like the load sharing business. I don't think much of stock caravan suspensions in general. Observing the road behaviour of most vans it seems the tyres do most of the flex work anyway.

I guess there has to be good reason why the Coromals come in at quite low tare values for size. Chassis would be one of them.

When it stops raining so much I'll have a proper crawl under one.

0
FollowupID: 700290

Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 16:31

Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 16:31
I have mine because my wife liked it and bought it I would have bought a Supreme or a bigger Roadstar or Traveller, all very good substantial vans.

Any of these would be better than either of your choices IMHO

It depends on the model of Coromal you are getting
Mine is a Princeton 754.
It has the new style cabinetry.

A 752 and some of the Lifestyles still have the older framed wooden door style which are perhaps more substansial than the new Eurostyle stuff.

All vans are only stiffened inside by the cupboards and any cross walls it may have. Thats why most have a wall across it somewhere.

Jayco are different in that the walls are a panel with the frame bonded in.

Coromals have a light alloy frame with the wall boards glued and riveted inside.
Not the flashest IMO.

However it is a nice layout and the Minister of Finance likes it.

Cheers

0
FollowupID: 700302

Follow Up By: Gazza51 - Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 17:29

Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 17:29
Hi Graham.
I'm looking at the Lifestyle 667. Presumably new style cabinetry coz it'll be a new van. They all feel pretty solid inside. The layout ticks most of the boxes required.
That's important. Might have to spend a lot of time in it. Probably equal to anything else. .....suspension......weight.

Hmm.
0
FollowupID: 700304

Reply By: Member - Terry W (ACT) - Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 17:27

Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 17:27
Gazza,

We have had 3 Jaycos, all Outbacks: a Penguin camper, a 20 foot Sterling and a 21 foot Sterling. All spent quite a bit of time on corrugated gravel roads. We have just got back from Cameron Corner and the Darling etc. The sole damage from corrugated roads was one door in the Penguin coming loose once.

We did not opt for the Simplicity suspension on ours, and have the standard Outback ALKO Roller-Rocker suspension which seems to work fine. We stayed (privately) on a station out in corner country and were told by the station owner that Roller-Rocker is the suspension of choice for station trailers on those roads. Can't confirm that, but his trailer certainly had 5 tonne Roller Rocker suspension.

My brother recently purchased a new Roadstar and has regretted it ever since. The current Roadstar is not the same as the former company.

We have stayed with Jayco because we like them more than any of the others that we have seen, they have by far the best product support and very low depreciation.

Hope this helps.
AnswerID: 429537

Follow Up By: Gazza51 - Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 18:20

Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 18:20
Thanks Terry.
It's great you're having such good experiences.
I'm being convinced that the Stirling is not a bad way to go. I was leaning otherwise. Of course there are always situations where one van in one size/layout is fantastic and another version is a dud. Can't grizzle about the Jayco's flexibility in design adjustment either.

I have friends who've enthusiastically dragged me off to see Roadstar stuff recently.
I know beauty is supposed to be more than skin deep but I couldn't see anything to get excited about. Interestingly it's these same friends who caution me about the Jayco. They tow neither.

As for suspension it's probably guesswork in the end. Then all I have to do is believe it to be the right guess. That extra money for Simplicity could buy a lot of fuel or tyres or fishing gear. Or scotch.............
0
FollowupID: 700310

Follow Up By: Member - Terry W (ACT) - Tuesday, Sep 07, 2010 at 20:29

Tuesday, Sep 07, 2010 at 20:29
Gazza,

One other thing. I have assumed that you are buying a van for holiday use or similar, and not for a long term home. The requirements are somewhat different if the van is to be a long term home, and a custom built van may be a better choice.
0
FollowupID: 700401

Follow Up By: Gazza51 - Wednesday, Sep 08, 2010 at 00:03

Wednesday, Sep 08, 2010 at 00:03
Definitely not a long term home Terry. Which certainly must on the one hand make a difference (durability etc.). On the other, comfort and convenience wise a short termer just has to work. Straight off the bat. No arm wrestle to quickly beat it into shape. Hmm............or is it the other way around?

There are people close to me. People who no longer have a 'proper' home and people who headed off with a probable journey's end and now don't know when they'll stop. Can't get definitive answers there. There's 4 vans in that mix. It's horses for courses, swings and roundabouts. Ying and Yang.

Everything but black and white. Your good experiences say a lot.
0
FollowupID: 700408

Reply By: Hoffy 2 - Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 18:19

Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 18:19
Gazza, do not take a standard Jayco off road! Get under an outback and compare.
AnswerID: 429539

Follow Up By: Gazza51 - Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 18:27

Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 18:27
Will do Hoffy 2 but what am I looking for?
Vital bits being better covered on an Outback? My first concern was that what sits above the chassis doesn't shake to bits.
0
FollowupID: 700311

Follow Up By: Member - Don M- Tuesday, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:57

Tuesday, Sep 07, 2010 at 08:57
As I have said on the other post, you will be struggling to tell the difference between an Outback and my 'on road' 24' Sterling. The underslung chassis is exactly the same as Outback, but doesn't have 12" brakes as someone else said they have. Mine is a full 150mm chassis as well as draw bar and I think you will find that is now the case for ALL Sterlings, maybe over 20'.

No problem with going for an Outback, I just don't believe it is that much better than an on road version...and, as I have said, I have done a few thousand km on gravell/dirt and quite some corrugations and the only problem I had was the dust ingress and, more recently replaced my hubs and magnets because the dirt scoured them. Maybe that is a reason to go Outback.

All in all, the Jayco has a much stronger chassis than most people give credit to and, I have not had any trouble with any cabinetry coming loose or similar BUT, if I want to keep on dioung that, I will be buying one of the serious off roaders..., in my case Kedron. But, a really good van that I reckon is a solid off roader without going to Kedron is Aussie Wide.. Only problem for me is that it has a timber frame and if I did go for the BIG end, I would only have aluminium frame.
0
FollowupID: 700366

Follow Up By: Gazza51 - Tuesday, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:04

Tuesday, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:04
Hi Don.
I have a suspicion you may be correct re the outback/standard comparison. The current brochure states the main chassis member and A frame sizes for the outback but not for the standard. There can be simple marketing reasons for that and can go many ways with that...you fill the gaps. Of course there is the ride hight issue which is obvious.
Don't know how much the suspension is jacked up but there's a lot of lift in the bigger wheels and tyres but all that's a bit academic if one perseveres with a beam axle IMHO (people like to use that these days).

Suspension on your average van seems to do little more than separate the body from the wheels. It can do more.

Some research tells me the off road brake magnets are of a more durable design more suited to multiple repeat applications possibly incl. dust. Why not only make one type? It would be cheaper for all in the long run. While I'm at it.....just get rid of drums all together. They hold dust, dirt, and water which turns into a luvverly cutting compound. Discs are largely self cleaning and if wet dry out in a flash and are simple to maintain. So, Outback brakes are more durable but being drums the scouring issue still exists.

I'm with you on the aluminium frame thing but hat brings me back to my original durability question. Given that I thought the interior solidity of the Jaycos was wanting I would like to have confidence in the frame strength. Shaking and wobbling in due course may cause metal fatigue and eventual cracking.

I'm going to the Jayco factory for a tour soon so hopefully I can answer all my questions......AND GET ON WITH IT!!!!!!!!
0
FollowupID: 700371

Reply By: murrayman - Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 19:41

Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 19:41
hi gazza, currently havn a new van built here in south aust. its chassis is 6 in box on 6 inch box, 12 in chassis. simplicity suspension. 21ft internal, full onsuite across back inc washing machine. q/s bed. full 12 volt, 3 x 100 amp agm batterys, 300 lts water underneath etc. etc. very well built, can watch it every step of the way. down side its about 6-8 months wait, good side is about 30 percent cheaper than an equivilent productuion line van. should have mine next week. cheers mm
AnswerID: 429559

Follow Up By: Gazza51 - Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 20:31

Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 20:31
Who? What? Where?
Sounds too good to be true. How heavy would it be? I reckon that configuration would be too much for me.
I had been looking for something like that process in Melbourne but Google-ing manufacturers was not giving me much joy. The lead time's not a problem. You must be jumping out of your skin now the wait's almost over.
0
FollowupID: 700331

Follow Up By: murrayman - Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 22:00

Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 22:00
hi gazza, the builder is a custom builder that builds caravans and motor homes to your specs and design. you tell him what you want, he loads all the info into a cad design program and it designs it for you and then you fine tune it. you can pick what you want, right down to the kitchen sink. no retailer involved means no 30percent mark up. we think it will be about 2500kg empty or loaded with water and supplies and crap that you cart about 3100kgs. its got all 12 led lighting, 230 liter compressor 12v fridge, 12v 19 inch lcd tv, 12 sattelite system, 12v dvd player, gas electric hot water, gas electric 4 burner stove, 240v air con and microwave, 35 amp 240 charger. 20 amp 12v dc charger, 2 x 90 watt solar panels on the roof, 3 kv honda inverta genset. mate i could go on all night. as you can tell im fairly excited. goin down tomorra to wire up a state of the art solar controller that measures amps in, amps out, can call up the genset automatically iff required. if you want any other info, is there any way you can pm me on this site and i will give you my email or ph no. cheers mm.
0
FollowupID: 700341

Follow Up By: Gazza51 - Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 23:18

Monday, Sep 06, 2010 at 23:18
It's an avenue I'll have to put some more effort into. I really like the personal input ability AND to observe progress. Mmm.

I'm intrigued. What kind of tug's going to haul that lot around? An ex military Hummer? My plan is to max out at about 2600Kg all being well!

Thanks for the offer of follow up. I'll see how I go.

Gazza.
0
FollowupID: 700354

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)