dc/dc charger for my situation

Submitted: Saturday, Dec 04, 2010 at 15:13
ThreadID: 82846 Views:6573 Replies:3 FollowUps:8
This Thread has been Archived
G'day all. Something for the wiring experts (and others) to consider. We have decided to go for the compressor type fridge (220l vitifrigo) in our new c'van. I currently have a 12 pin plug with pins 8 & 12 bridged to supply power from the aux battery in the L/C turbo diesel. ( there is a smart solenoid b/w the start battery and the aux which is a 100 a/h calcium king deep cycle). Pins 8 & 12 will also be bridged on the c'van side and be connected to the 3 x 120 a/h deep cycle agm batteries in the c'van. Pin 9 runs from the aux but is connected to vehicle ignition so power only flows when the engine is running as this was for a 3 way fridge in the current c'van. ( this will be redundant as compressor fridge will draw direct from c'van batteries). I am not sure of the wire size in pins 8 ,9 & 12, but think it may be 8 b&s. The wires for the fridge and pins 8 & 12 are separate right back to the aux battery. At engine idle, there is b/w 13.6 & 14.4 volts at aux battery and at pins 8, 9 & 12 at rear of l/cruiser. Batteries in new c'van will be approx 2.5 metres from l/cruiser 12 pin plug. I have never had any problems with voltage to the 3 way fridge and it will make ice on 12 volts whilst travelling so wiring seem to be ok. This set up also allows the aux battery to be charging when c'van connected to mains or solar power ( when vehicle & c'van connected by 12 pin plug). This is all background info for my actual question which is -- can I install a dc/dc charger on the now redundant 9 pin line extending the line through to the 3 x 120 a/h batteries so that the dc/dc charger only operates when the engine is running. I am also hoping that this will still allow the vehicle aux battery to be charging when connected to c'van and mains/solar. I am assuming that blocking function in dc/dc charger will not interfere as this circuit is not operating as engine is not running. Would appreciate any comments and hope enough detail has been provided.
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: murrayman - Saturday, Dec 04, 2010 at 16:09

Saturday, Dec 04, 2010 at 16:09
Hi ian I have a l/c100 t/d and run 2 crankers and 1 deep cycle under the hood. i charge the deep cycle via a rotronics isolator. I have run a pair of 6mm twin to the rear of the vehicle to run my 60 ltr engel. These wires are looped down to a anderson plug, into the van to a redarc 20 amp dc/dc charger. It charges my 3 x 100 amp agm batterys. I also run a 230 ltr vitrifrigo fridge. In the future i will run a dedicated 6mm twin line from the cranking batterys to another anderson plug so i dont draw my power from the auxillary for the dcdc charger. As it is now the system works well and with the 3 85 amp solars on the roof of the van the whole system holds up well. I chose the redarc as it is voltage sensitive and i did not have to run a seperate ignition wire the the dcdc in the van. cheers mm
AnswerID: 437813

Reply By: Mick O - Saturday, Dec 04, 2010 at 16:22

Saturday, Dec 04, 2010 at 16:22
G'day Ian. I must preface my response with a disclaimer – “I’m no expert”. I can see one issue at present in that you have two pins linking your vehicle Aux to your caravan Batteries. In reality I think you would be better off running a DC-DC charger direct to the caravan batteries and leaving the vehicle Aux isolated and vehicle related only.

I made this decision with my LC build opting for a the Redarc BC-DC charger to handle the vehicle aux alone (Hybrid DC). The 2x140 A/H AGM’s are taken care of by a separate DC-DC charger with a direct feed from the main battery. I utilised a Redarc BMS in that situation as it is also a AC-DC charger and MPPT Solar controller as well. It will automatically select the best power supply option available so once the main battery hits 13.2, it will take the feed from the vehicle alternator and then hunt another source once the vehicle is turned off. Therefore if your solar is roof mounted, the minute the vehicle is switched off, it will take direct feed from the panels.
This leaves your aux battery for what nature intended, the vehicle.

Cabling is also an issue given the distance but with 8 b&s you seem to have given it some thought. I have used 6 b&s for my main feeds albeit with a lot less distance to cover than your set-up. Would you consider a separate feed with an Anderson plug as an alternative to the 12 pin?


Cheers Mick
''We knew from the experience of well-known travelers that the
trip would doubtless be attended with much hardship.''
Richard Maurice - 1903

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 437814

Reply By: Member - John and Val - Saturday, Dec 04, 2010 at 21:29

Saturday, Dec 04, 2010 at 21:29
Ian,

If I follow you proposal correctly :

You propose
1) having the LC auxilliary battery (Calcium) in parallel with the three 120Ah batteries (AGM) in the c'van, via pins 8 and 12.
2) using the pin 9 line to carry charging current from the alternator/cranking battery to a dc-dc charger in the c'van to charge the above batteries.
3) I assume you would disconnect the present controller between the alternator/cranking battery and the LC aux battery, and use it to send current back along the pin 9 line to the dc-dc charger. (It will be important that you don't use the dc-dc charger to charge the aux battery if that battery is concurrently fed charging current direct from the alternator/cranking battery. This would effectively short the output of the dc-dc to its input side.)

It sounds a good scheme to me, allowing solar or mains charging at the c'van to reach all 4 batteries, alternator charging to reach all 4 batteries, and allow you to use all 4 to provide power to fridge etc. The possible issues I see are:

1) Alternator charging current will run through the pin 9 line to the dc-dc charger, and will be quite considerable. A 20A charger for example will draw over 20A through that one wire and single connector pin. I very much doubt if they have sufficient current carrying capacity. I'd consider adding the pin 9 wire to the 8/12 pair and using a seperate high current (at least 6B&S) wire and anderson plug to supply the dc-dc charger.

2) The batteries - You mention the vehicle aux is a calcium doped type, the others AGM. It's not clear that they are different, but assuming they are, they will have different charging requirements. Generally, the calcium one will be better with a higher charging voltage than the non-calcium ones. The manufacturer's recommendations may be printed on the batteries, or google should find them for you. If their requirements are markedly different you will not get top performance from the one needing higher charging voltages. If I'm right in thinking that the one in the vehicle is the only calcium one, it will miss out, both through having higher requirements and suffering voltage losses in the long wiring run.

HTH

John
J and V
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
- Albert Einstein

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 437833

Follow Up By: Member - Ian G (NSW) - Sunday, Dec 05, 2010 at 22:05

Sunday, Dec 05, 2010 at 22:05
G'day John & Val & thanks for the reply.

I perhaps wasn't clear enough in my initial post. The aux battery is a Bond silver calcium deep cycle & Pin 9 connects back to the aux battery, not off the start/cranking battery, therefore the smart solenoid should (hopefully) still be ok where it is.

I believe the c'van batteries are not calcium.


Not knowing a great deal about dc current, my main concern was that, when driving, the c'van batteries are receiving charge from 2 wires, ie the dc/dc charger (pin 9) & the bridged pins (8 &12). Would this be a problem?.

I am assuming the calcium aux battery will receive plenty of charge whilst we are driving and will not be heavily discharged at any time, even though it does run a 40l engel fridge. The engel runs off a marine grade cig socket that is "live" all the time and connected direct to the aux battery.

The c'van will have a 40 a/h mains charger & the solar regulator will also be 40 a/h (3x135w solar panels on c'van roof).

If I am really stuck, I have a Honda 2.0i generator and a seperate ctec 8 ah portable mains charger & a portable 80w solar panel with 20 a/h regulator that I can connect direct to the vehicle aux battery (when not hooked up/ connected to the c'van).

On reflection, the dc/dc charger may be a bit of overkill !. However, would still appreciate any comments/suggestions.
0
FollowupID: 709550

Follow Up By: Member - John and Val - Monday, Dec 06, 2010 at 09:30

Monday, Dec 06, 2010 at 09:30
Hi Ian,

I misunderstood what you propose.

The present arrangement with the smart solenoid connecting the vehicle aux battery to the alternator/cranking battery is fine, and taking a line from the aux battery (ie after the solenoid) back to the van to the input of the dc-dc charger is also fine, but with a proviso discussed below. Connecting the batteries all together using the 8/12 lines and connecting them to the output of the dc-dc charger has big problems.

First - The input to the dc-dc charger MUST be disconnected from the aux battery when the engine isn't running, as otherwise the aux will continue to charge the other batteries through the dc-dc charger. This will call for some device, maybe just a high current relay (eg headlight relay) controlled by the ignition switch (maybe directly off the "accessories" circuit?)

The problems - I think you proposing to connect the van batteries to the auxilliary battery via the 8/12 lines and then to connect them all to the output of the dc-dc charger. If I'm right in this - The 8/12 and 9 lines will all be connected together at the aux battery. The input of the dc-dc charger is connected to the aux battery via the the 9 line (via some switching device to disconnect when the engine isn't running). There is then a direct path via the 8/12 and 9 lines from the dc-dc input to its output, a short circuit from input to output. This will either kill the charger or at best render it inoperable.

What it comes down to is that the aux cannot be simultaneously charged by the alternator as at present AND by the dc-dc charger. Either, but not both simultaneously. I think my preference would be to retain the existing system in the vehicle (it's not broke so don't fix it!), and use a dc-dc charger for the van batteries. I would also use all three wires to carry current from the vehicle to the input of the dc-dc charger, and provide switching in that line to disconnect when the engine isn't running. You will not have aux battery power to the van, but will retain the present vehicle setup and can deliver a good charge to the van batteries.

One final point - we tend to overlook the fact that current flowing in the positive line/s must also flow through the negative lines - ie, the earth return also needs to be pretty robust.

HTH

John
J and V
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
- Albert Einstein

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 709581

Follow Up By: Member - Ian G (NSW) - Monday, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:18

Monday, Dec 06, 2010 at 11:18
G"day again John & Val.

Seems to be a bit of confusion & probably caused by me. The c'van batteries will be connected to the aux battery by the bridged 8 & 12 pins using a separate line. The dc/dc charger will be installed near the c'van battery bank using a continuation of the no. 9 pin which goes back to the aux battery via a seperate wire , which has a device connecting to the ignition switch so that it only carries current when the engine is running.

The 8/12 pins will not be connected to the dc/dc charger (no. 9 pin) in any way. This should mean that the aux only receives charge from the alternator (via the smart solenoid). It shouldn't receive any charge from the dc/dc charger as the dc/ dc charger is only charging the c'van batteries (and then only when the engine is running).

The purpose of the dc/dc charger (in my case) is to ensure full charging of the c'van batteries not the aux battery. As I have the redundant no. 9 pin already in the current system (and it has the ignition cut -out device in place). I was hoping to utilize my current system without to much extra wiring.

Does this make it any clearer?
0
FollowupID: 709598

Follow Up By: Member - John and Val - Monday, Dec 06, 2010 at 12:45

Monday, Dec 06, 2010 at 12:45
Ian, this is getting complicated! Mainly I think because it's hard to describe in words what can so easily be described by a picture. I think the following is what we are talking about, but I could very easily be wrong! :

Image Could Not Be Found


With both the smart solenoid closed and the ignition switch closed there is a direct path from A down the right hand path to the INPUT side of the dc-dc charger AND a direct path down the left hand side to the OUTPUT side of the charger at B. The charger's input is directly connected to its output around the loop and it will either die or not function at all.

Have I interpretted your proposal correctly? The issue could be resolved like this but has the disadvantage that the aux cannot be diestly charged from the trailer charge system ( solar and mains).

Image Could Not Be Found

Cheers

John




J and V
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
- Albert Einstein

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 709602

Follow Up By: Member - John and Val - Monday, Dec 06, 2010 at 13:13

Monday, Dec 06, 2010 at 13:13
Something went wrong there -

"The issue could be resolved like this but has the disadvantage that the aux cannot be diestly charged from the trailer charge system ( solar and mains)."

should have read "cannot be directly charged..." and the image that still refuses to load is simply as above, but with the diagonal link to pins 8,12 removed.

HTH

John
J and V
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
- Albert Einstein

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 709607

Follow Up By: Member - Ian G (NSW) - Monday, Dec 06, 2010 at 21:29

Monday, Dec 06, 2010 at 21:29
G'day again, again John & Val.

You are right about pictures vs words.

Hopefully the attached diagram can clarify the situation.
0
FollowupID: 709679

Follow Up By: Member - Ian G (NSW) - Monday, Dec 06, 2010 at 21:33

Monday, Dec 06, 2010 at 21:33
Image Could Not Be Found
0
FollowupID: 709680

Follow Up By: Member - John and Val - Tuesday, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:18

Tuesday, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:18
Hi Ian,

The loop problem remains. The dc-dc charger operates by taking available input voltage and increasing it to meet the battery's requirements. It will get hot and bothered if it's output is connected directly to its input. With the ignition switch closed in your diagram there is a direct link around the loop from its input to its output.

An aside - I'm not familiar with the standard wiring arrangement in your vehicle, but I would expect the ignition switched pin 9 line to be fed by the cranking battery, not the aux battery.

The loop MUST be broken. This can be done by removing the long diagonal link to 8,12 thus leaving the aux battery independent. A further complication would remain if this link was removed - IF the pin 9 line is fed by the aux battery as you indicate, the aux battery will charge the other batteries through the dc-dc charger whenever the ignition key is in the accessories position without the engine running.

Ian, if you'd care to send me your email address by a Member message I'd be happy to continue this discussion privately.

Cheers

John
J and V
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
- Albert Einstein

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 709710

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)