100k Australia NATMAP Disappoints
Submitted: Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 07:45
ThreadID:
83108
Views:
5036
Replies:
9
FollowUps:
1
This Thread has been Archived
Member - John and Val
At around $40, the 100k NATMAP DVD covering a lot of the continent at 100k:1 seemed a bargain compared with the its 250k predecessor. But - take a look below. The image has been scanned from the paper maps, colours are soft, blurred and pixilated. Compare the screenshots of 100k and 250k. Reckon we'll continue using the 250k.
Image Could Not Be Found
Image Could Not Be Found
.
| J and V
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
- Albert Einstein
Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message |
Reply By: Member - Stephen L (Clare SA) - Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 08:19
Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 08:19
Hi Val
Thanks for the comparison. I have wondered why they were so much cheaper than the 1:250,00, now we know why.
Cheers
Stephen
AnswerID:
439125
Reply By: The Explorer - Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 08:45
Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 08:45
Yes
Spotted the sad resolution back in August when they were released - discussed here
GPS Australia 100k Thread
Resolution is disappointing but not so bad they can't be used - there is useful extra detail in some areas. There is a high resolution version but not sure of its availability to us mere mortals....and of course there are some other 100K map sets (of select areas) available that have a good resolution :)
Cheers
Greg
| I sent one final shout after him to stick to the track, to which he replied “All right,” That was the last ever seen of Gibson - E Giles 23 April 1874 Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message Moderator |
AnswerID:
439130
Reply By: Member - Boobook - Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 08:55
Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 08:55
Yes I too was surprised to see the low quality. Dissapointed is probably the mildest reaction I had. :-)
Total waste of money.
AnswerID:
439131
Reply By: vk1dx - Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:45
Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:45
Thanks for the heads up. We were looking at the GA 100k. Not for a while now though.
Phil
AnswerID:
439135
Reply By: StormyKnight - Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:57
Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:57
I wonder if the reason is that a full set of 100k maps needs to be at that resolution to fit on a single DVD?
AnswerID:
439137
Follow Up By: The Explorer - Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:19
Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:19
Hi
It comes on two DVDs - but yes - its all to do with a comprimise between file size and resolution. Figure it would take about 5 or so DVDs to hold a good resolution set.
Cheers
Greg
| I sent one final shout after him to stick to the track, to which he replied “All right,” That was the last ever seen of Gibson - E Giles 23 April 1874 Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message Moderator |
FollowupID:
710978
Reply By: Member - Phil 'n Jill (WA) - Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:58
Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 09:58
Thanks for the 'heads up' J & V
I was disappointed enough with the 250k purchase recently, in the lack of detail I expected. Lost interest when I couldn't find a few
places of interest we visited on our '
Goldfields Loop' trip, and haven't really got back to it.
Only 'win' I guess was the 'free file sharing' aspect. When I contacted Natmap in a panic cos I was unable to register the programme, I received the following response:-
'If it is just the registration ……………….
You are no longer required to register the NATMAP Digital Maps 250K 2008 (formerly NATMAP Raster).
The Geoscience Australia material in this product is now subject to the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence.
The new licence terms and conditions for the NATMAP Digital Maps 250K 2008 (formerly NATMAP Raster) can be found on the Creative Commons website.
Reference to the above can also be found via our Geoscience Australia website by opening the following link ……….
http://www.ga.gov.au/topographic-mapping/digital-topographic-maps/using-attributing-products.html '
So I have passed it on to son and SIL to use.
Compliments of the season to all
Regards - Phil
AnswerID:
439138
Reply By: Member - bungarra (WA) - Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:07
Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:07
Thanks for the post. I was considering purchasing but the $40 put me off !......just didn't seem right considering the previous cost of the 250k........something did not add up..........if something looks like too good a deal..........look again
AnswerID:
439139
Reply By: ExplorOz - Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:10
Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 15:10
John,
Would you mind putting this review in the actual
shop item also please that way people will be able to see the comment at time of purchase.
Thanks David.
AnswerID:
439158
Reply By: Member - John Baas (WA) - Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 21:52
Friday, Dec 17, 2010 at 21:52
Boy, at $40 a full set of Oz 1:100k mapping it's a snap. Some people are hard to please :-)
I use this map all the time as my default map (I have had a test copy for two years); it's far more accurate when on remote and faint tracks. I'll pass on the res. issue; for me the actual (readable) detail is far more important.
Cheers.
AnswerID:
439188