ST X NAVARA/ SR5 HILUX
Submitted: Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:04
ThreadID:
83303
Views:
8549
Replies:
11
FollowUps:
15
This Thread has been Archived
Turbo Lux
Time to purchase a new Lux or Navara, not sure what to get though. Value for money the Navara wins hands down, however not sure about a few points such as ground clearance and
suspension upgrades for the Navara, people seem to comment that the Navara drops it's belly to much??? Has anyone gone from a SR5 Lux to a STX Navara? Would really appreciate your comments on what you like and dislike.
Thanks in advance.
Reply By: Notso - Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:53
Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:53
Maybe you should wait for the new Navara 550 with V6 Diesel 7 speed auto box.
Navara 550
AnswerID:
440085
Reply By: Patrol22 - Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:20
Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:20
G'day Turbo Lux
I can't comment on shifting from a 'lux to a Nav but I do have a 2008 auto 2.5crdi D40 Navara. Gotta say thus far (now have 55000km on the clock) it has performed very
well in both off road (
Vic High Country,
Simpson Desert, Gary/Gunbarrel/etc Highways) and nothing has gone wrong with it. I have fitted quite a bit of after market stuff but would have done this whatever vehicle I bought (ie bar and winch, rear air locker, underbelly bash plates, 50mm lift, storage system,
water watch, 2x120ah aux batteries,
water tank and a few other odds and sods). I can say that the footprint of the D40 is every bit as big as the Patrol if the size of garage is anything to go by. I previously had a GU Patrol and had to rearrange my garage to fit the Nav in.
One drawback with
mine is that it is a trifle thirsty returning a average of 14.5 ltrs/100km over the 55000km thus far....and quite a bit of that was towing my 1.4 tonne Kanga campertrailer.
I'm happy with it thus far but like all modern vehicles the jury is still out on longevity - but then again we also worried about that when we progressed to electronically controlled engines and that proved to be nothing to worry about at all.
For what it is worth - I my final two were the 'lux and the Nav and I finally went for the Navy because of the larger cabin space, better value for money and looks. Resale is not an issue for me as I tend to keep vehicles too bloody long to worry about such things :-)
AnswerID:
440089
Follow Up By: Turbo Lux - Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 13:13
Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 13:13
Thanks for the feedback, just a questions on the Dual Batteries is the second battery mounted under the bonnet or in the tray, seem to remember hearing that you can't fit a dual battery system under the bonnet???
FollowupID:
711962
Follow Up By: Patrol22 - Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 14:43
Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 14:43
Mine are both fitted in
the tub....I have built out the back for touring and the unit is permanently fitted. I also have a 70ltr stainless steel
water tank and a 47 ltr Evakool fridge in this unit.
You are right about space under the bonnet being tight and I don't believe that there is room for a 2nd battery. I think I read somewhere that TJM had made a kit for fitting under
the tub.
FollowupID:
711972
Reply By: Bomber_WA - Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 13:40
Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 13:40
I have a STX and clearance is an issue. I have done 20,000km without any problems yet.
I went through the same thoughts as you when buying and I figure that with the extra $ that the Hilux costs, you can spend that on upgrades with the Navara.
Good luck.
AnswerID:
440092
Follow Up By: Patrol22 - Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 14:46
Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 14:46
I was lucky when I bought
mine at the height of the GFC....the dealer threw in a number of extras including tinted windows, swap to BFG AT tyres, a 2nd spare wheel (with a BFT AT fitted), HD towing kit with an Anderson plug and a Tekonsa brake controller, and a set of IPF
driving lights......I had to pay for the steel bar and winch though.
FollowupID:
711973
Follow Up By: Patrol22 - Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 14:59
Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 14:59
Should have also said that while clearance does look to be an issue with the naked eye I haven't yet experienced a problem. I have lifted
mine about 50mm and removed the prissy OEM running boards and replaced these with a set of ARB steel steps/sliders. Just removing the steps makes the thing look higher but given the long wheelbase of the D40 if I was looking for a dual cab for serious off road work then I'd probably go for the D22...unfortunately not enough cabin space for my liking.
If I was doing my
suspension again today I would probably visit
Cal Off Road in Berridale and get something like he did for the Mickey Thompson Tyres D40....but then again I probably couldn't justify the cost of this sort of refit to the Minister for War and Finance :-)
Disclaimer: I have no affiliation and do not even know anyone at Cal Off Road or Mickey Thompson Tyres (still running BFG ATs).
FollowupID:
711975
Follow Up By: Jeffie - Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 15:55
Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 15:55
I have an 07 STX D40 and it tows my 2.5tonne van with ease.
So far have covered 60,000ks without a hitch.
Have upgraded
suspension with Old Man Emus.
Travelled the
Canning Stock Route this year without any concerns.
Clearance was not an issue.
Took the side steps off so they would not get damaged though.
Unless Toyota have changed, the tow capacity of the HiLux is far to low at 2.25tonne - might have been upped with the new engine??
I dont see HiLuxes pulling anything of substance due, I believe, to their low towing capacity.
Jeff.
FollowupID:
711979
Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:57
Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:57
Jeff,
Thats amazing - did you really tow a 2.5T van along the full length of the Canning?
FollowupID:
712030
Follow Up By: Jeffie - Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 09:51
Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 09:51
Phill,
No,No,No, No way - didn't mean to make it sound like I did.
Left the van at Erdunda then went - Great Central Rd -
Canning Stock Route - Tanami Hwy -
Erldunda - pick up the van then -
Darwin -
Townsville -
Gold Coast -
Adelaide -
Melbourne.
Averaged 18litres per 100ks overall, which is about what we get just towing the van without the 700-900 sand-dunes etc on the CSR.
Very happy so far with the Navara, you do see a lot of them towing decent sized vans around the country, and a lot of 5th wheelers too.
Nothing wrong with the Hilux apart from its lower towing capacity.
Jeff.
FollowupID:
712062
Reply By: Tanka - Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 21:04
Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 21:04
A good friend of
mine recently traded his Nav STX in on an SR5 Hilux. He was happy with it in most respects (doesn't really do hard core 4x4ing), but traded it with about 40k on the clock due to clutch woes. But in an Auto this would be moot.
He has said to me that he prefers the lower end torque of the hilux, and it uses less fuel.
Have you considered the DMAX/Colorado?
Cheers Chris.
AnswerID:
440130
Follow Up By: Patrol22 - Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 09:33
Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 09:33
His clutch woes are not going to be solved with the Hilux as this is a
well known problem with them as
well - you might like to point him to the newhilux
forum. In fact the clutch issue seems to be across the full range of manual utes fitted with dual mass flywheels - and moreso when using these vehicles as tow vehicles. I drove them all when doing my research and all were pretty crappy off the turbo and when towing in steep country (even my quite steep driveway) that can spell disaster for clutches especially if you have to slip it a little.
There are some guys of both the Navara and Hilux forums who say they have fitted solid mass aftermarket HD clutches and this seems to have resolved the problem.
FollowupID:
712060
Follow Up By: Tanka - Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:43
Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:43
Yep, you are right about the solid flywheel options, however Nissan did inform him that doing so would void warranty on the engine and gearbox. Now I'm not sure how much truth there is to this, or whether the dealer was just pulling his leg, but I'd hate to be stuck in a court battle with an incapacitated car.
The Hilux he bought had some shudder from factory which was rectified, but it is still only new, so will be interesting to see how it goes. Neither car was used for towing.
FollowupID:
712088
Reply By: patsproule - Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 21:55
Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 21:55
Sister and Brother-in-law's diesel D40 has given them a fair bit of grief. It's been in limp home mode several times, had DPF troubles, sensor troubles, transfer switching troubles and recently a new rear diff. It had an ironman 2" lift that didn't cope all that
well with off-road duties (broke the rear leaf-packs & snapped the front struts). It now has a tough-dog setup. Clearance has been a bit of an issue when off-road. But otherwise it goes
well. Huge though.
I'm keen to look at the V diesel when it's out.
AnswerID:
440146
Reply By: paulnsw - Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:05
Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:05
What about Isuzu DMax, Mitsubishi Triton, Holden Colorado?
Why pick the 2 bottom contenders of utes.
To pay the massive money Toyota want for a Hilux for what is a very average vehicle with low towing capacity and towball weight made in Thailand is beyond me. They say ones are born everyday and lucky they are for Toyota.
AnswerID:
440148
Follow Up By: Tanka - Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 16:03
Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 16:03
Why are they the bottom two contenders? They both do their job
well, with some things on one better than the other and vice versa. Its up to the buyer to figure out which they prefer, and what suits their budget. Not everybody tows. The Dmax and Colorado are both made in Thailand as
well, so what?
None of the vehicles in the ute segment really deserve rubbishing.
FollowupID:
712096
Reply By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:54
Wednesday, Dec 29, 2010 at 22:54
I think Toyota are very wise to keep the Hilux towing capacity down to 2.25T.
Looking at the number of bent chassis on dual cabs such as the D40...in my opinion they should also be downgraded to 2.25T. In any case, Nissan are recognising the problem and now restrict the towball weight according to weight of the vehicle - at GVM you are only allowed 80kg on the towbar.
Navara specs - see page 4
AnswerID:
440161
Follow Up By: Patrol22 - Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 09:38
Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 09:38
That variable download on the towball has always been with the D40 and I believe it is implicit in all other vehicles. For example if you are carrying a 1 tonne load in the back of a Troopy Ute you should also take this into consideration when you place another (say) 300kg on your towball......it just makes engineering sense to this engineer but I could be wrong.
FollowupID:
712061
Follow Up By: Turbo Lux - Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:22
Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:22
Recently we towed a dual axle Quintrex Legend back from 1770 in a Extra Cab TD Hilux current model, to say it was comfortable towing something of that size behind a ute would be crazy, we drove at around 95 - 100 km's an hour, personally I don't feel the light commercial utes can really handle towing a load for long distances, I think a cruiser or patrol are more suited for long distance towing. Could be wrong but still remember not feeling too comfortable in the lux with that much weight on the back, how people manage to two 2.5+ ton in a ute is a credit too them.
FollowupID:
712074
Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:46
Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:46
Patrol22,
The specs for a stronger vehicle such as a leaf sprung Patrol cab chassis - they have braked towing limit of 3200kg and also have a table for towball weights - but it allows 250kg download at GVM (a lot more than 80kg). I've looked at all the literature I can find on the Hilux and as far as I can make out it is a straight 225kg and for the 70series landcruisers its 350kg. Happy to be corrected if you can point me to some more detailed info.
I really think the Navara and Hilux are equally strong vehicles, the difference is that Nissan, Mitsubishi and Holden have upgraded towing capacities to 3T to boost sales. Toyota didn't have to because the Hilux has been near the top of all the sales charts - I think it even nudges Corolla and Commodore.
FollowupID:
712075
Reply By: Turbo Lux - Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:17
Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:17
Thanks for the comments everyone, planning on a test drive on the Navara next week, I'm a little concerned about the lack of space under the bonnet for the battery etc, a little concerned about the low radiator as
well, however still think it is a great ute that will do everything we need it to do. I think in the end it will come down to value for money, who knows Toyota might drop the price of the Lux........but I doubt i very much!!
AnswerID:
440181
Follow Up By: Patrol22 - Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:02
Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:02
The exposed radiator can be addressed by fitment of underbody bash plates which are available from Brown and Davis or TJM....others too I think.
FollowupID:
712071
Reply By: Jeffie - Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:20
Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:20
And therein lies the problem.
Tow capacity of the D 40 STX Dual Cab Navara is 3,000kgs with a towball download of a maximum of 300kgs.
But what do some people do? They hook up their 2.8 - 3.0 tonne van (cause the car can tow 3.0 tonne) then they add a boat to the top, outboard motor,fuel for the boat plus all the safety and fishing gear then the 80litre fridge for all the fish they hope to catch then they start on the extras we all like to take in the van but wont fit.
They end up with an excessive ball weight and more than likely over the cars towing capacity as
well. Iv'e seen plenty of examples of this with all kinds of tow vehicles, not just Navaras.
No wonder things bend and break.
Also, I know there are a lot who take their Navaras etc bush bashing but to me they are not built for that so again they bend and break.
If these trucks were meant for bush bashing they would be built that way.
I took
mine on the CSR but I upgraded the
suspension especially to do this and we took 18 days to travel the CSR - thats about 100ks per day.
We took our time and in our group only 1 shock absorber needed to be replaced (on a Defender).
Only my opinion - probably wrong, but its
mine!
Jeff.
AnswerID:
440182
Follow Up By: Patrol22 - Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:04
Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:04
Agree entirely Jeff......in any case you opinion is the one that is important when it all boils down to it....you will be the one who has to address any problems out in the never never.
FollowupID:
712072
Reply By: peteC - Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:39
Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:39
I just went from a 2007 ML 3.2lt TD Triton ( good car except for the steering and engine computer programming issues) to the MY11 SR5 Hilux. I never liked the Navara and still dont. The Hilux does have 1 or 2 less creature comforts, but with the new model with 17inch wheels and traction/stability control, air bags galour, it is still up there with the other utes. I hope its known reliability remains with the new model. The towing capacity I think is the same as the others, its just that the others are pushing the marketing limits to rate that high ( and it seems to work ). Toyota has not gone to the smaller wound up motors so still have the low down torque missing in the smaller motors. It does have the good clearances and under protection standard but I will be looking at a 50mm lift. Navara has some problems doing lifts due to design of its
suspension so do your research if going that way. As far as price goes the Hilux is only about $5k more than a Navara and I think its money
well spent. I qualified for some good discounts on the Hilux which gave a drive away price of $49k which sealed the decision to go Toyota. I have now added ARB Step/tow, canopy, Sahara Bar and
Snorkel. Side bars will go on when they are released to side air bag compatability. Dual battery will go in later and there is a spot for them under the bonnet. I would also advise you to look at the Triton if you want good value for money.
AnswerID:
440208
Reply By: peteC - Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:39
Thursday, Dec 30, 2010 at 15:39
I just went from a 2007 ML 3.2lt TD Triton ( good car except for the steering and engine computer programming issues) to the MY11 SR5 Hilux. I never liked the Navara and still dont. The Hilux does have 1 or 2 less creature comforts, but with the new model with 17inch wheels and traction/stability control, air bags galour, it is still up there with the other utes. I hope its known reliability remains with the new model. The towing capacity I think is the same as the others, its just that the others are pushing the marketing limits to rate that high ( and it seems to work ). Toyota has not gone to the smaller wound up motors so still have the low down torque missing in the smaller motors. It does have the good clearances and under protection standard but I will be looking at a 50mm lift. Navara has some problems doing lifts due to design of its
suspension so do your research if going that way. As far as price goes the Hilux is only about $5k more than a Navara and I think its money
well spent. I qualified for some good discounts on the Hilux which gave a drive away price of $49k which sealed the decision to go Toyota. I have now added ARB Step/tow, canopy, Sahara Bar and
Snorkel. Side bars will go on when they are released to side air bag compatability. Dual battery will go in later and there is a spot for them under the bonnet. I would also advise you to look at the Triton if you want good value for money.
AnswerID:
440209