Thursday, Jan 20, 2011 at 20:15
There are two really good solutions available for a similar cost.
I own a 75Ah Thumper and have also installed a Sidewinder Flyer in the rear of my vehicle. Both have their distinct advantages and both can be recharged from the vehicle alternator on the go when travelling.
I like the Flyer due to it's large capacity, depending on what size battery you put in it.
I have a 100Ah Remco which is a good size, but I would hardly call this system "portable" due to the relatively heavy weight. This system stays in the vehicle, runs the fridge while travelling and gives me a backup supply should I need it.
The 75Ah AGM Thumper is a great portable battery system providing a reasonable capacity supply for my 40L Engel fridge and is light enough to enable me to lift it out of the vehicle and placed under the awning when I am using our tent or previous camper trailer.
The Thumper will run the Engel for two days easily and is sort of a "permanent" supply when stationary for days, with the assistance of an 80 watt solar panel array.
So both of these auxiliary battery systems give a sound solution, depending on your exact requirements.
There are other variables, such as a smaller capacity, lighter battery in the Flyer to make it more portable, or the purchase of say a 105Ah Thumper which gives greater capacity, but is about as "portable" as the Flyer with a heavier battery in it. If the fridge is to be removed from the vehicle, a portable battery system that can "go with it" is the most flexible solution.
Both these systems come with their own alternator charging capabilities and both include all cabling and an Isolator to protect the starting battery from becoming flattened accidentally.
Which one is best?
I enjoy both of them equally
well.
Bill.
AnswerID:
442465