Forum Etiquette
Submitted: Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 19:11
ThreadID:
84238
Views:
6165
Replies:
33
FollowUps:
97
This Thread has been Archived
Fab72
Hello all,
As a regular reply poster to many
forum inquiries on here, I am starting to notice an alarming trend.
Take Thread 84175 for example sorry to pick on this one, now this really got up my goat. A question was asked regarding a modification to a vehicle...pretty standard post. However, despite some really good replies, one being my own, there has been not even one "Thank you" or even acknowledgement from the original poster. I understand that not everyone sits on their computer, however after a few days - still nothing.
I went to great lengths to include contact details of a personal friend who could specifically help with the OP's problem, going so far as to ring, SMS and email my mate asking for permission to post his email address on here.
I don't expect accolades, however, a "Yep" would have sufficed.
This is one recent example that springs to mind, however it is a growing trend.
Is it just me or do others consider it rude to not at least acknowledge a reply, even if the reply may not be specifically what the OP was after? What ever happened to manners?
Fab.
Reply By: Madfisher - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 19:49
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 19:49
Yes Fab you are right on the money, and is one reason I do not reply to posts as often as I use to. Damm right rude if you ask me. Mind you on a fishing
forum I am a member of you can click on a THANK YOU icon, which brings up a thank you.
Cheers Pete
AnswerID:
444799
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 19:57
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 19:57
I hear ya Pete. Like I said, the reply doesn't need to be a long winded one, just an acknowledgement of the fact that someone has given up their time to (a) read the post and (b) reply.
Fab.
FollowupID:
716932
Follow Up By: nick b - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 16:57
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 16:57
I'm with you
forum's how much effort doz it take to say thanks , just like when your on a out back road to give a quick wave , more & more dont these days .nor do they slow down showering you with stones . "THANKS"
FollowupID:
717127
Follow Up By: Hairs & Fysh - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:05
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:05
Howdy Nick b,
Don't open another can of worms please
FollowupID:
717129
Follow Up By: nick b - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:30
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:30
"hay" maybe some of the non replys are no longer with us .
FollowupID:
717151
Reply By: Bonz (Vic) - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 19:54
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 19:54
so the OP should reply with at least a yep to every comment in reply to a post??
Yer ... no! I dont think so
AnswerID:
444801
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 19:59
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 19:59
I didn't quite mean it that way Bonz...perhaps a bit too much.
In instances where there are a lot of replies, this is obviously not always logistically possible, however a blanket statement after a few posts wouldn't go astray. Something like a "Thank you to all who have replied, the infomation was valuable/useless/not what I was after/ the issue is now resolved/I'll look into it etc."
Fab.
FollowupID:
716934
Reply By: Member - Stephen L (Clare SA) - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 19:55
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 19:55
Hi Fab
Yes your are not alone on your thoughts. I have notice the trend and like you say, it is common curtsey to say thanks or words along those lines. I have also found that it is often the newer members or members that do not get on the
forum very often.
Lets hope that they read your post and will know better in the future.
Cheers
Stephen
AnswerID:
444803
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:02
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:02
Stephen, the trend is exactly as you stated...more prevalent amongst newbies. They'll post a question, sit back and get their answers and then fly the coop.
Sad because knowledge is a powerful thing, everyone can contribute in a positive, value added way regardless of experience etc.
Sharing is caring...... :)
Fab.
FollowupID:
716936
Reply By: Robin Miller - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 19:55
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 19:55
I can't but agree Fab - sometimes you can put some effort into these things and they don't get seen or acknowledged at all.
Overall this tends to reduce the quality of those efforts and it is this qualiity that ultimately has seperated this site from some others.
AnswerID:
444804
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:05
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:05
Sad but true Robin. I have always considered the Etiquette shown by regualr posters on this site to be far more advanced than on any other site.
Credit must also be given to the Mods, who as much as I get annoyed when I get moderated, do so to maintain equality and preserve the quality of the posts on here and prevent anyone from being ostricised because of their new comer status, left wing opinion or whatever.
Fab.
FollowupID:
716940
Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:09
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:09
Ok Fab - but moderation is another subject and I will stick to the rules and make no comment.
FollowupID:
716941
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:13
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:13
Safe bet Robin
FollowupID:
716943
Follow Up By: dbish - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:25
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:25
I agree at least some acnowlegement after a few answers wouldnt go astray. Ive seen threads on other forums where you wonder if the answers were of any help due to absoulutley no feed back by the orig poster.
FollowupID:
716947
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:07
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:07
Exactly right dbish... how does anyone know if the advice is even close to the mark if no
feedback is given?
FollowupID:
716975
Reply By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:23
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:23
I totally agree
Far too many ask for info, frequently which is found by someone else doing the Googling for them and not a peep out of them as to whether they managed to fix the problem.
Also by inane requests as in Thread 84225 What the ++++ is that supposed to mean.
I note it got treated with the answers it deserved.
I rarely ask for help as I know that most can be found by searching but try to say thanks on the rare occasion I do.
Also far too many replicated requests.
EG Tyres Batteries etc.
Look through a few pages of threads Its all been asked before.
Also asking for opinions on legalities.
These are best directed to the relevant authority rather than getting sometimes uninformed answers on here which may point you towards the wrong side of the law.
Cheers
Let the jousting begin LOL
AnswerID:
444810
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:09
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:09
Mmmm Graham..TV sticks. Yes...an interesting one. Are they the Arnotts variety?
On a serious note... the legallities questions are usually 90% opinion and 10% fact. I don't think ".....But I read it on a
forum Officer" will cut the mustard in a court of law.
FollowupID:
716976
Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:21
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:21
Exactly, unless the authority says it, opinion is worthless.
Think the sticks may be Dick Smiths domain LOL
FollowupID:
716987
Reply By: Member - DAZA (QLD) - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:27
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:27
I notice a few Members or Past Members will acknowledge replies or input into threads to other members ect, probably it's as they say professional courtesy.
Cheers
AnswerID:
444812
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:42
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:42
Fair comment Daza.
FollowupID:
716997
Reply By: Axle - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:34
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:34
G/Day Fab,.... You are right, But as mentioned a while ago the way posts are tuned upside down, read in a totally different way as to what they were intended to be ,is getting a real concern, the original poster just thinks " What the Hell", so what has he got to thank??. A lot have left this site for that reason alone,
Cheers Axle.
AnswerID:
444813
Follow Up By: Bonz (Vic) - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 21:39
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 21:39
And Axle HUNDREDS have joined the site too. Tha arguement is as old and cheesy as my jocks after a week outback!
FollowupID:
716970
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:12
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:12
Sure that element exists Axle, however I honestly believe that a bit more detail and emphasis in the OP will prevent the smarty pants responses that aften accompany vague OP's.
Bonz.... one mental picture I'd rather live without...hehe.
FollowupID:
716980
Reply By: vk1dx - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:36
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:36
You are so right Fab.
On the few threads started I can assure all that I made sure when I had my answer to post a reply that everyone would see. Sometimes the threads had carried on with "chatter" amongst "themselves". Good on them.
Have you also noted the lack of acknowledgement with emails. Same thing. We don't exist once the information has been obtained. If you leave a message do the recipients call back. Not always hey.
Its turning into a not as it was rude world. And its this lack of physical contact that's doing it. Too casual and easy to "hide" and just walk out of the room. Read "forum".
With that I shall top and go and wash up after a top Thai Lemon Chicken and rice noodle dinner. Yum. And leftovers for tomorrow.
Cheers
Phil
AnswerID:
444814
Follow Up By: bgreeni - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:47
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:47
Not sure about acknowledging email. I get 40 - 50 a day at work, and often send as many. The last thing I want is my inbox cluttered up with lots of "thankyous". Separating the sheep from the goats is hard enough already.
FollowupID:
716959
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 21:26
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 21:26
Question: Would you press "Yes" to an automated read response?
Phil
FollowupID:
716966
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:15
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:15
[YES] .... I generally do.
However I'm not a big fan of the Return Read Reciept... it almost suggests by the author that they have doubts that you will actually read what has been sent. For this reason... I sympathise with bgreeni.
FollowupID:
716982
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:47
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:47
I was hoping that bgreenie would have responded.
bgreenie: Would you press "Yes" to an automated read response?
Phil
FollowupID:
716999
Follow Up By: bgreeni - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 23:56
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 23:56
Generaly yes. If the email was unsolicited and was maybe trawling for active addresses obviously not.
FollowupID:
717014
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:58
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:58
So we agree.
But should I have gone back to you and said that I agreed or just said to myself, "He agrees" and nicked off. You would never know if I didn't. But maybe you really do not mind either way.
At least now you do know and we have an amiable and simple end/closure to the chat.
eg: There was a poster the other day who asked what he could do about gear and bearing noises in his gearbox. It was fairly urgent and some offered to go and help him or to get him to contact them privately. He was in a bind as he had a long way (very) to get back
home. Nothing wrong with his attitude. Quite amiable etc. He got lots good helpful responses.
I have been dropping back to the thread to see how he is going as he hasn't come back to us. Zip, nil, nothing at all. We don't know if the situation has been resolved or that he is in a worse bind etc. Its all up in the air. A response would really be appreciated. No need to say which member helped him. Just say "Thanks everyone". That would be nice.
Phil
FollowupID:
717034
Reply By: Notso - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:42
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:42
The true giver is one who expecteth nothing in return, so says saint someone or other!
AnswerID:
444815
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:16
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:16
.... and a Thank You costs nothing....so says my mum.
FollowupID:
716983
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:50
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:50
Does that mean that when the postie hand delivers the mail and a package to you at your door you take them from him and shut the door without even a thanks or a smile?
Or do you smile, say "Have a good day" or the like, and then shut the door politely.
Phil
FollowupID:
717002
Follow Up By: Notso - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 23:06
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 23:06
Actually no, what I am saying is that the act of giving is one that doesn't call for any reward.
Now if someone chooses to reward someone who gives that's fine, but hey don't we all just love to give out our advice and the reward is in the giving, not the getting of a thankyou!
So what you'll see now is a whole bunch of thankyou posts because people feel that they have to, instead of the occasional genuine "Thanks Mate"
Now isn't it much more rewarding to get a genuine thanks than a thankyou because it is expected!
FollowupID:
717008
Reply By: Shaker - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:52
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:52
As
well as a simple "thanks" it would be good if the OP let the people who assisted know the result, ie if there problem ws resolved or not.
AnswerID:
444817
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:18
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:18
Spot on Shaker... and a very good point for people who might be in a similar situation and have actually taken the time to do a Thread Search. Surely someone in that situation would like to know if the responses were accurate,
well informed and useful.
FollowupID:
716985
Follow Up By: Member - Dunworkin (WA) - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 23:58
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 23:58
Hi Shaker, that's the one, it's not so much the thank you as I wouldn't want anyone to give me a forced thank you, it's knowing whether your advice was helpful or not is what mainly counts.
Cheers
D
FollowupID:
717015
Reply By: Member - Phil B (WA) - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:52
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:52
Good post Fab,
Some info requests can be vague hence what they get may not be want they want - but a bit of appreciation doesn't hurt. Some respondees eg Stephen L go to a lot of trouble with photos, maps and info and often there's no thanks.
Makes you often think why bother responding. If the requestees get a phone message asking them to ring back do they ignore that too? What’s the diff here?
Maybe the powers that be could put a little reminder at the top of the front page of the
forum eg
If requesting information please be courteous and at least acknowledge you’ve received it!
Cheers to all
AnswerID:
444818
Follow Up By: Member - Stephen L (Clare SA) - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 21:00
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 21:00
Hi Phil
Good reply. The reason why I sometimes go overboard is there is a good old saying, a picture can tell a thousand words. It is good to hear one thing, but to see pictures to me means a lot more and they can see what they are often after.
Take care and all the Very Best
Cheers
Stephen
FollowupID:
716962
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:23
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:23
Agree Phil..... take a look at how many "hits" Stephen gets on his updates especially anything regarding The
Birdsville Track. Yet it's always the same people who thank and acknowledge the effort Stephen puts into his posts.
Sunday History sessions are another good example....lots of hits.
I wonder if a CHAT ROOM might be the go. It would allow people to openly and quickly discuss issues without bogging down the
forum. Save the
forum for more detailed posts.
Just a thought.
FollowupID:
716988
Follow Up By: Member - Dunworkin (WA) - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 00:08
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 00:08
"I wonder if a CHAT ROOM might be the go. It would allow people to openly and quickly discuss issues without bogging down the
forum. Save the
forum for more detailed posts. "
I'll second that Fab.....
FollowupID:
717016
Follow Up By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 00:17
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 00:17
A "Chat Room" could also be a good place to debate contentious matters such as 230V electrical arguments !!!
FollowupID:
717018
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:16
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:16
Is it really 230 or 240. Ha Don't start that one.
But isn't it really like a chat room. Only in slow mode. I cannot sit here all day. So a
forum is effectively my chat room.
Our sons and I swap a great series of emails about a topic that can last for days. Isn't that chatting in slow time.
By all means, a chat room has its place. But for those who don't "live" on line a
forum is much better. The "conversation" hasn't scrolled off the screen so you pick up where you left off.
Phil
FollowupID:
717053
Follow Up By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:41
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:41
Ha Phi, here we go again with the challenges!!!!! No, only joking as I know you were.
To be honest, after many, many years saying 240V I tend to still express it that way in general, however the standard is now 230V and if I do not conform I am likely to be confronted on this
forum by someone challenging my competence, and frankly I am sick and tired of that form of
forum etiquette. And on top of that, it results in the thread being hijacked away from the original topic. Lousy etiquette also.
FollowupID:
717064
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:58
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:58
Cheers
Phil
FollowupID:
717067
Reply By: Sand Man (SA) - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 21:35
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 21:35
Personally, I don't care if good advice is acknowledged by the original poster at all.
But, has anyone considered, that on many occasions, the myriad of advice, (sometimes conflicting) may have confused the original poster even more than before they submitted their query?
Bill.
AnswerID:
444835
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:25
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:25
Most probably YES Sandman. Often though it is through lack of detail in the OP that the replies are so varried and sometimes stray off topic.
FollowupID:
716990
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:26
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:26
Whoops...forgot to add though, that some mid-conversation
feedback by the OP would usually be enough to clarify any uncertainties or help to keep the advice relevant and on-track.
FollowupID:
716991
Reply By: Motherhen - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 21:41
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 21:41
Yes Fab, I too appreciate a thank you on the thread and even better a follow up to what worked for them. Manners don't hurt.
One of the best examples was when travelling, i saw someone wanting a free overnight stop in a certain area where we had found a nice
gravel pit. As we were on the road i didn't have all the details but described it as i remembered it (some years before).
Apart from thanks at the time, after his trip, i got a message of thanks saying he found it, stayed there, and took the coordinates which he gave to me.
So nice to know my vague message was of value and get the
feedback.
Motherhen
AnswerID:
444838
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:31
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:31
Now that is the ultimate in
feedback!!!
As others have suggested.... without
feedback, how do we know if the response has helped or hindered the OP'er.
Nothing worse than continually recommending a place or service, only to find out that after numerous recommendations, the service or place has lost it's intergrity or is no longer in existance.
Imagine that... "Oh yeah.. there's a really great service station with cheap fuel between point A and Point B".......only to find it closed 8 months ago.
Feedback is KING....and a Thank You is courteous.
FollowupID:
716993
Reply By: The Landy - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:26
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:26
Hear what you are saying and as others have suggested it takes very little to post a ‘thanks’ to replies received , and I don’t think it need to be to every response, but a general acknowledgement at least gives
feedback on whether problem is solved or anan swer has been found, or even still looking for it.
Having said that, the Australian Landrover
Forum has a ‘thanks’ button that enables anyone reading a response to provide a vote of thanks for the post, and maybe the EO team could take a look at whether it is possible (or appropriate) to provide a similar mechanism.
I’m sure there are similar examples in other forums. I recall seeing one recently (not sure were) that you could click a ‘found the response helpful’ button. In itself that is a useful way of telling the respondent that his or her post was found useful by X number of people…..
Cheers, The Landy
AnswerID:
444849
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:35
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:35
Not a bad suggestion Landy... haven't seen it myself but the concept sounds good.
Love your catch phrase BTW.... just reading Crossing the Dead Heart at the moment. Just arrived at Mulligans.
Anyway.. back on track. I also can see value in a CHAT ROOM, to throw ideas around, get instant replies without the bother of bogging the main body of the
forum down.
FollowupID:
716995
Follow Up By: The Landy - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:16
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:16
It's a great read, and that is one of my favourite quotes.........
Cheers, The Landy
FollowupID:
717031
Reply By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:40
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:40
OK.....suffering from writters cramp.... but what I did prove tonight is that
(A)... people do read interesting posts (over 500 hits in one night)
(B)... people do appreciate
feedback, and
(C)... it really didn't take that much effort on my behalf to read and reply to almost everyone on here.
Considering many posts don't get the level of response I got tonight, it really isn't that hard to reply with a simple THANK YOU.
However...I feel I'm preeching to the converted here, considering the replies have all come from regualr posters that ALWAYS acknowledge a response.
For the regulars....Thank you for the stimulating converstaion.
For the passive Forumites...consider the art of Etiquette.
Good night and safe travels where ever you may be.....
Fab.
AnswerID:
444857
Reply By: Member - Old Girl (QLD) - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:47
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:47
Could always look at the positive side. Take this post for instance there has been 559 hits with 37 replies/follow-ups. There are probably more people than we realise that have learnt from other peoples experience. I know I have.
AnswerID:
444859
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:40
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:40
Aw without a doubt Old Girl...there's many passive readers than never put fingers to keyboard.
However, they are probably the ones that never post a new thread. My post targets more specifically those that start a thread and then are never heard of again.
You're so right though.... I'm sure a few people out there may be thinking this post refers to them.
FollowupID:
717134
Follow Up By: David Jje - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 21:51
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 21:51
Hi old girl,
I am one that learns alot from this site without contribution, from others experiences. I do recall you saying that you do not reply to non members. I found that very offensive and have since shown you the same respect. My Dad, now in his mid seventies, taught me at a very
young age to "always help a bloke along his way". and thats in the real world. What is your price to help a stranger on a
forum.
FollowupID:
717363
Follow Up By: Member - Old Girl (QLD) - Saturday, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:16
Saturday, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:16
David Jje,
What is your problem. Ive been trying to work it out. All I can come up with is without realising (sorry) i replied to Fab72 to which from what I can see is a non member.
Well in my opinion this non-member has contributed heaps to the site and I didn't even take a second thought about him being a non member.
Second thought this thread is about a non member posting a question and not answering it, I didn't even have a look until now to see if it was a member or not.
Thirdly this thread is not about
membership.One more now I have a bee in my bonnet its not actually the fact they are a non member or not for me its a security issue. Maybe you should open a
membership thread up if you feel that strongly about it.
FollowupID:
717405
Reply By: Member - Dunworkin (WA) - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 23:46
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 23:46
Yes Fab, I had one not so long ago, like you I contacted my friends as I knew they had not long got back from the place in question, after consultation with my friends I forwarded their email along and I have not heard any more, didn't think about it til you mentioned it here but you are right, manners definitely seem to be going out the window. Sad really.
Cheers
D
AnswerID:
444868
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:42
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:42
Funny how we all probably have a story that relates to the situation listed here.
Cheers Dunworkin. Appreciate your comment.
Fab.
FollowupID:
717135
Reply By: Shaker - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 00:15
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 00:15
It isn't only here, a few years ago we met some people at
Birdsville that had taken some photos at
Dalhousie Springs only to find that the SD card in their camera had become corrupted.
We were heading that way, so offered to take similar photos for them & email them to them when we got back
home.
We did just that, & didn't even get a thank you reply!
AnswerID:
444870
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:43
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:43
Shaker... now that's beyond rude. :(
Fab.
FollowupID:
717136
Reply By: Member - Ruth D (QLD) - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:55
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:55
Well, hallelujah - this is like old times. I don't have much time to be on EO at the moment but how nice to
check out this morning and have a GREAT thread - and I totally agree about
Forum Etiquette (or lack thereof).
Although I have people talking AT me all the time at work you would think I would not be interested in CONVERSATION when I come
home but I miss in my daily life my daily does of informative conversation I had become used to on EO over the many years- it has most certainly been missing.
Thank you I can go to work now feeling a little more upbeat. Keep up the good conversation please.
AnswerID:
444883
Follow Up By: member - mazcan - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:42
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:42
hi all
just having a read through and i agree that a thank you for the imfo should be a natural thing as a result for imfo that is given by the helpful members and registered users on here i too have noted there seems to be a new culture on here in the last few months where requests for help and imfo is just taken for granted and i think its just good maners to say thanks
so i have decided to establish for my own reasons
-- -a do not respond to --
list of op's names
who request help and dont have the decency to just say a simple thankyou
and when their title pops up again for help
guess what?? you guessed it no imfo will be given even though i may have the answer to their problem
it maybe a harsh way of dealing with the situation
but in time imho it will weed them out
cheers to all
FollowupID:
717105
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:49
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:49
G'Day Ruth...glad to hear you're enjoying the thread. It has certainly raised a few eyebrows, but most importantly, it has raised MANY really good reasons why
feedback is so mportant, ranging from the Etiquette to the need for someone to know if their information is still accurate and useful.
At the end of the day, we reply because we care.!!!
Take a look at the general trend with posts. Some of the most frequented posts are those that portray a sense of urgency or desperation. That to me signals that WE... yes all of us... actually do give a rats.
Why would anyone neglect a simple thank you or follow up when so many people have spent the time making contacts, researching or even just writing a reply.
MAZCAN... the list sounds like a good idea...SAD though that this world has come to that. That list is one I'd like to avoid as would 99.9% of the people here.
Fab.
FollowupID:
717137
Reply By: Member - John and Val - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:55
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:55
The lack of any response from a poster after giving time and thought to a comprehensive reply is something that really irks me. Maybe I'm just grumpy.
I note that Fab's post appeared about 12 hours ago and has scored 3 or 4 times as many
views as other posts at around that time, and many more responses than usual. I conclude that I'm not alone!
I've largely given up trying to help those who clearly won't be able to tackle the learning curve that I see ahead of them. I've largely given up on those who obviously need help in just defining their problem. If I spend half an hour on a decent response, I reckon at the least I can expect a one line acknowledgment. I'd be against a "thankyou" button to provide a one click response - it would probably be too hard for most to click anyway!
While it doesn't solve the etiquette issue, it can save a lot of writing to simply point to a blog or site where the information sought is already available. Rob D's recent tyre blog (
here) for example points to some very well researched information and will answer many of the more complex tyre questions.
If we can't expect at least some acknowledgement that our words have been read, maybe we just cut down on words.
Cheers
| J and V
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
- Albert Einstein
Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message |
AnswerID:
444895
Follow Up By: Bazooka - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:27
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:27
Agree, where someone has obviously gone out of their way to help and spent a fair bit of their time to chase something up a (general, or specific in some cases) acknowledgement would be a 'not unreasonable' expectation. Thing some on here have forgotten tho' is the 'pleasure' both in replying (and hopefully helping in a small way) and reading the variety of responses. As for automated tick thank yous etc - no thank you.
FollowupID:
717084
Follow Up By: The Landy - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:57
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:57
I won’t try and persuade anyone with respect to a ‘tick thank you’, and have an open mind on it, but consider this..
This post is about the thread initiator posting a thank you for helpful responses, whether it is to individuals or to the thread collectively. But often other readers (not the original poster) benefit from specific answers given in the
forum and they might want to pass on a vote of thanks for the response. A ‘tick thank you’ serves a couple of purposes in this instance, it enables acknowledgement without dozens of thank you posts cluttering the thread, especially if it was a useful answer, and secondly and more importantly, if done correctly it can show how many times individual posters have been ‘thanked’ for responses. In itself that is useful.......
All food for thought...Cheer’s, The Landy
FollowupID:
717089
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:56
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:56
John, Val, Bazooka and Landy.... all very good points. I agree that the THANK YOU check box is a good idea. It, if nothing else, acknowledges that the poster has at least read the reply. Very minimalistic but for those pressed for time, it's better than nothing.
It amazes me.... and I use your point here John and Val, how responders will often take up to 30 minutes to write,
upload images etc, yet the OP can't be bothered, is too lazy, or lacks social grace to spend.... what?....15 seconds to type "Thanks". That's just plain rude.
Thanks for the reply guys...
Fab.
FollowupID:
717139
Reply By: Rod W - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:53
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:53
Who cares!
AnswerID:
444909
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:09
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:09
Well that says a lot about your social attitude. I will certainly remember not to help you.
By your own words, you are saying that you couldn't even be bothered saying thanks to anyone who helps you.
Says heaps mate.
One to remember everyone!!!
Not a very wise post.
Phil
FollowupID:
717047
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:10
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:10
I must apologise. I used the title "mate". Shouldn't have.
Phil
FollowupID:
717049
Follow Up By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:10
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:10
Well clearly at least 50 contributors care, judging by the responses here.
FollowupID:
717050
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:38
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:38
Too true Allan.
FollowupID:
717062
Follow Up By: Rod W - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:45
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:45
It shows that some people need to get a life and stop carrying on with dribble.
FollowupID:
717106
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:00
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:00
A post and a follow up reply Rod W... you sure you don't care?
I'd say you care more than some. Thank you for not caring in the way that you have. :)
Fab.
FollowupID:
717140
Reply By: Wilko - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:53
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:53
Hi Fab,
Agreed, some acknowledgment would be nice.Even a more generalized "Thank you for the reply's" at the bottom of the thread a day or 2 later would be sufficient if the original poster didn't have time to thank individuals.
Cheers Wilko
AnswerID:
444910
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:02
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:02
Agree with the day or two theory too Wilko. I think you're eluding to a very good point here. If people are
on the road, internet access may at times be limited, so the day or two rule probably will apply.
To go weeks without a reply could only suggest 1 of two things.... they either don't give a hoot or they're dead. Only the second resason is excussable.
Fab :)
FollowupID:
717142
Reply By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:29
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:29
Certainly I feel it's nice to be thanked for responding to help someone but what I find more important is an acknowledgement that it was worth my going to some time and trouble to respond to a request for assistance.
What is even worse is offering information based on my competence only to have it challenged by someone else. You then have to defend yourself and you feel that you wished you had not assisted in the first place. The poor person making the enquiry finds their thread embroiled in an argument of egos. This behaviour is the pits in
forum etiquette.
But don't be too hard on all those who do not respond with gratitude. It can be that circumstances have prevented them from getting back to the
forum thread.
AnswerID:
444915
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:04
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:04
Gets even better Allan when opinions get challenged with personal attacks. Thankfully not so much on this website, but on some others it runs rife.
Fab.
FollowupID:
717144
Reply By: TerraFirma - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:55
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:55
Forum Etiquette and manners are pretty much the same thing. If someone helps me via these forums a big thankyou is always forthcoming. The cyberworld is a crazy place sometimes, these forums are very powerful in so many ways. Well said Fab72.
AnswerID:
444929
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:06
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:06
Terra... I think you're probably one of the best qualified to comment on here. I've seen your long and detailed replies to posts...and sadly I've also heard the crickets chirping from the other end for days with no thanks been given.
Fab.
FollowupID:
717145
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Monday, Feb 14, 2011 at 21:26
Monday, Feb 14, 2011 at 21:26
Just re-read that and I hope you didn't take it as though you fell into the non replier category. I was implying that you often give long detailed replies with no thanks be given to you. Just needed to clarify that. :)
FollowupID:
717711
Follow Up By: TerraFirma - Monday, Feb 14, 2011 at 21:56
Monday, Feb 14, 2011 at 21:56
All good didnt take it the wrong way..
FollowupID:
717716
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Monday, Feb 14, 2011 at 21:58
Monday, Feb 14, 2011 at 21:58
Phew... will sleep better tonight.
FollowupID:
717718
Reply By: Hairs & Fysh - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 13:03
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 13:03
Hi Fab72
Funny isn't?
Some posters, you ever only see them once to ask a question yet they will acknowledge every reply to their question and some times ask more and that's fantastic, Well done.
Others post a question and you never see them post again,
maybe they are traveling and can't because of lack of internet availability. I realize that sometimes some replies can be a bit short and rude and some people don't seem to posses tact in the way they give answers and maybe this has something to do with why some don't thank others, who knows
Then there are others that skip replies then thank the next poster that has given the exact same answer
but maybe not as detailed as the previous ones.
Hmmm, I guess this is what makes the world go round.
AnswerID:
444930
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:12
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:12
Hairs and Fysh... all excellent points. the internet access is a big thing... I know we struggled for a week to get any signal at all when going from
Adelaide to QLD via The Track. (Thank you 3).
I do believe also that the replies...if a bit abrassive can scare people off. A bit of common sense when posting the original question will generally avoid unwarranted replies.
Questions like " What's wrong with my car" where the poster fails to mention Make, model, year, engine type, symptoms etc is kind of like asking for a useless reply.
The last point regarding thanking Johnny come latley.... that happens a bit too much also.
Fab.
FollowupID:
717146
Reply By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:07
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:07
There are also some who post replies without reading the previous ones.
Recently I posted a reply to have it repeated by several following ones.
Either they didnt read the thread and just triped away or ?????
Cheers
AnswerID:
444943
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:14
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:14
I think it boils down to people reading the OP and thinking...Oh I know that one.
I think the embarrasment is all theirs.
Fab.
FollowupID:
717148
Follow Up By: Crackles - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 14:24
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 14:24
"Either they didnt read the thread and just typed away or ?????"
or they started typing out their reply while the previous reponse was posted only to find they had doubled up the answer when they submitted 10 minutes later. Very common & annoying as there is no edit button to remove it.
Cheers Craig...........
FollowupID:
717284
Reply By: 3gobush - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:19
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:19
I think the point here is this.
I would guess that a large %age of replies are Googled, or someone actually did a
search on this site for the info, therefore did the work for the OP.
So in getting no response would be to some and is to me annoying.
Now on the other hand, on many occasions someone has been admonished for suggesting to either Do a
Search or Google it yourself, so one guesses that either way you can't win.
Oh well my info is free and you can do with it what you will, but just remember this if the OP asking the question acknowledges the info to confirm a
solution to a problem, I wounder if we would have less repeat questions here, or is that just wishful thinking.
AnswerID:
444944
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:33
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:33
Wishful thinking 3gobush. I always try google first. It's just nice and easy.
However... I'm actually impressed by the number of times I've googled something and one of the top hits redirects me to this
forum.
Fab.
FollowupID:
717152
Follow Up By: Member - John and Val - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 08:54
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 08:54
Hi 3,
What would be really useful if people would give a clue about whether they have done any searching. Its not too hard to say, "Ive searched this site but" ... or "I have Googled but ...". Sadly it seems many just find it easier to jump in and ask their question without making any effort themselves.
I think it might have to do with the huge rush that many younger people are always in - no time to even think it seems. Its a pity though - information is now so easily available online, but apparently not accessible for many because of "lifestyle" issues.
Cheers,
Val
| J and V
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
- Albert Einstein
Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message |
FollowupID:
717222
Follow Up By: The Landy - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:01
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:01
That's one of the best points in this thread. And not to discourage people asking questions, but I often ‘google’ questions people have asked out of self-interest as many questions are good, and I’m always interested to learn the answers....
And when you ‘google’ you find a plethora of information and wonder why the original poster didn’t simply do the same, and as Fab mentioned, often ‘google’ points you back to the EO site.
Cheers, The Landy
FollowupID:
717244
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:39
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:39
I agree about the
search. But there are three main problems with using the
search. Namely:
1. How to abbreviate the question to the right phrase etc. to find the answer,
2. How to find the answer in the plethora of information, and
3. How to filter out the old material that has been superseded or updated.
Then some questions can only be answered by a "conversation" to add more data by the requesting poster and then to make sure all parties are "on the same page". If you want to consider this in more detail, then no doubt there are more reasons where a chat/conversation is needed.
I do like the start having something like "I ha searched . . . "
Phil
FollowupID:
717249
Reply By: muffin man - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:03
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:03
I pretty much disagree with the majority here.
Ive been on here for close to ten years with a number of names and have been a member on and off.
I couldn't care less if someone doesn't thank me but in the early days I would always reply. It was smaller then and had a better feel about the place, even went on a few gatherings.
It was once a hang out of 4x4 enthusiasts, now it seems to be dominated buy huge caravan towing nomads.
Muffin Man
AnswerID:
444964
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:37
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:37
Muffin...glad you posted. It's good to see someone disagree. Any opinion is a good opinion.
Of course I disagree with your opinion, but each to their own.
Fab.
FollowupID:
717153
Follow Up By: Shaker - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 21:37
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 21:37
Beware of the huge nomads!
FollowupID:
717182
Reply By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:45
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:45
Fab, You ask ... "What ever happened to manners?"
Well I guess they went the same way as the ability to spell or use reasonable grammar. Probably due to laziness and the lack of concern for others.
I am aware that there was a period when our education system failed a generation of students but I am surprised that those same do not have a "penny-drop" when they read text and do not have their curiosity aroused at reading for example "their" when they themselves have only known "there". Do they not wonder at the use of "their" and consult a dictionary. Seems not..... possibly too (or is it to?) lazy and uncaring of the recipient reader. Etiquette?
Even when a responder spells the word correctly the original poster still does not twig and repeats the error. Helloooo?
Why should we expect people to say thanks when they cannot be bothered to observe and learn correct spelling of even very basic and common words?
AnswerID:
444968
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 19:38
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 19:38
I wonder if the casual "get a life" attitude has something to do with it.
The lack of respect. Like the very rude habit of not taking the sunnies off when talking to people. Lots of examples. Just too casual. I will not let the children next door call me "Phil" To them it's "Mr . . .".
Just a thought
Phil
FollowupID:
717165
Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 22:17
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 22:17
I agree with you there Allan
Like Duel and Dual.
There, Their and They're.
I "seen" something. Hello???? I saw something.
I thought I had seen something.
I could go on.
But then schools aren't what they were in my day I guess.
Waits for flames LOL
FollowupID:
717189
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 22:25
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 22:25
A good note to say goodnight on.
Cheers
Phil
FollowupID:
717191
Follow Up By: Member - John and Val - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:06
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:06
Hi Allan,
Yes the spelling and grammar are sometimes beyond belief. Maybe too much texting has something to do with it. And not reading much, or not reading at all!
Then there are those who deliberately drop into slang such as "how ya'll goin" or some such supposedly "cool" lingo.
Some questions on here are a real struggle to work out what is intended to be asked. I generally wont respond to such questions - if the person asking hasn't made the effort to frame a sensible question why waste your time on it?
Cheers,
Val
| J and V
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
- Albert Einstein
Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message |
FollowupID:
717224
Follow Up By: Bazooka - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:50
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:50
Amen Allan. I don't think anyone expects perfection in either spelling/typing/grammar on an internet
forum but all those common errors mentioned are often just plain laziness in my book. Appears that some like to think of themselves as Aussie battlers, 'real' country people (and some may well be), so they put something akin to the Aussie drawl in their posts, eh (sorry couldn't resist).
FollowupID:
717232
Follow Up By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:44
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:44
Well, I'll be darned! When I made that posting re spelling and grammar I thought that I would get attacked for being critical of people with poor English skills. However each response to date has been supportive. Thank you.
Perhaps even more significant is that each of those responses has spelled my name correctly with the double 'LL'. So often on the
forum the response is with a single 'L' and on a recent thread my complaint was met with a scornful response. The correct spelling of one's name is an expression of respect to which we should all be entitled. And for extending that respect I again thank you.
FollowupID:
717250
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:12
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:12
I agree wholeheartedly.
There are lot of us sleeping "correct spellers", who find that it is either useless to try and correct incorrect spelling etc. or have been abused just too often and now they just shut up and chuckle at the ignorance and lack of care that abounds in the written world.
Isn't it nice when they ask which way it is spelt in a
shop etc. My name is with the single "L". Not the American or European double "L". I got "Fill" once!!!! No "P". And they always muck up my surname as well. And what's more the local phone book only has two spelt with the "or" and heaps with the "er". Beats me where they get the "or" from then. Ours is the "or" version.
At least Allan, with two "L"'s, it is spelt, not "spelled" by the way, correctly on my birth certificate.
Phil
FollowupID:
717255
Follow Up By: member - mazcan - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:39
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:39
hi phil --- vk1dx
in respect to not taking ones sunnies off
well in some cases like mine i don't
remove them for health reasons
as i have an eye problem and sunlight is a real killer to my eye
so it appears your over looking this fact that some people do have a legit reasons and are not being rude
but i don't personely become offended if a person i'm talking to doesn't remove their s/glasses as after all don't we wear them to stop the glare damaging our eyes or perhaps maybe some just wear them for looks ???
but its gets boring to have to keep explaining to people i talk to that i have an eye problem and consider this personel and generally keep it to myself
with respect to your comments from your point of view
i don't believe you have taken this into consideration
i am however not having a go at you just pointing out there are exceptions for peoples actions
cheers
barry
FollowupID:
717260
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:54
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:54
That I thought would be understood. As it would be for a blind person etc. Its common sense.
Same as I do not bother to explain why I am parking in a disabled parking
spot when I am allowed to and have a permit on the windscreen.
Apologies.
Phil
FollowupID:
717264
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:55
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:55
Hi all, just sitting back and enjoying this conversation. I often correct my Mother in Law for her seen/saw errors.
Unfortunately, one point I disagree with is the reference to "The Good Old Days of Schooling". My Mother in Law falls into that category, and yet my 13 year old daughter has better grammar and punctuation than the afore mentioned.
I agree strongly to the contentious sunglasses issue (with the exception of for medical reasons or the like eg: transition lenses that are slow to adjust). However (noticed I didn't start that sentence with "But") my number one gripe is the wearing of hats at a table whilst dining. I don't care if it's MacDonalds, a boutique restaurant or just the
kitchen table. For me, it's a definite hats off policy.
Fab.
FollowupID:
717266
Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:03
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:03
MIL should have had my English teacher.
Do it wrong and get a ruler across the knuckles.
Taught us to remember. LOL.
FollowupID:
717269
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:05
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:05
Hats inside and especially at the dinner table. Agree.
Do you realise that if you walked into an Army Seargents mess with a hat on and didn't take it off before they rang the bell you had to shout the mess. Visitor or not! Your escort who signed you in should have told you. Women as well unless it was formal and the hat was part of their outfit.
I wonder if they still do it. I certainly hop so.
Phil
FollowupID:
717271
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:18
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:18
Of all the times to make a silly spelling mistake!
That's "hope so".
Chuckle
Phil
FollowupID:
717274
Follow Up By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:20
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:20
Hi Phil, 'Spelt' or 'spelled'? It is optional, either being correct according to the Oxford dictionary. I personally prefer 'spelled' as it is more unique and unambiguous whereas 'spelt' also describes a variety of wheat. Furthermore 'spelled' seems more logical as the past tense or past participle of 'spell'. After all, we say that we 'felled a tree' rather than 'felt' a tree, or 'called' someone to dinner rather than 'calt'? LOL
Seriously, have it either way.
FollowupID:
717275
Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:51
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:51
Have a read of this then
http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuxNYXxks7fn8TqRAqSkb2YYEBV.;_ylv=3?qid=20080410032358AAci96y
Perhaps we should agree to differ but I prefer the English way.
Typos are acceptable, we all make them but as in one thread recently they had
a heading about Trailer Breaks and then went on to discuss brakes.
Either that or the other way round. Whatever, it looked stupid.
It seems people don't read what they have written.
FollowupID:
717279
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 15:27
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 15:27
I agree to disagree. Spelt is the English way and spelled is the American version. Just as I use the spelling colour, then so will I use spelt. I cherish the English background even though it's seven generations back. I do not have any links with America apart from the jeans I wear. I don't even watch The Simpsons or go to MacDonalds.
Like you Graham, I prefer the English ways. Not much tradition left but we may as well hang on to what we have left.
Synonyms. A spelling teachers nightmare!!
Try this trivia quiz
Phil
News flash!!! Its raining in
Canberra; again.
FollowupID:
717293
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:27
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:27
Phil.... ditch the Levi's and go with RM's. You'll never look back.
FollowupID:
717318
Follow Up By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:35
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:35
RM's?? He'll have to learn Chinese!!
FollowupID:
717320
Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:43
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:43
Now now boys.
Part of etiquette is staying on the subject and you are getting away from it a bit.
ROFL
FollowupID:
717323
Follow Up By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 18:03
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 18:03
Yes, your'e right Graham. We are drifting away.
Lets get back to bashing the non-responders. LOL
FollowupID:
717330
Reply By: Member - John Baas (WA) - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 03:13
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 03:13
's'truth.
After reading all of the above, I feel stressed out.
It's midnight, I can't sleep.
Particularly because I've nothing to offer that already hasn't been said!
I'd appreciate a suggestion for a new line of attack on this one.
I hope that someone responds to this reply by the time I get up today.
Frustrated.
AnswerID:
445015
Follow Up By: Sir Kev & Darkie - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:46
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 07:46
Mornin' John ;)
| Russell Coight:
He was presented with a difficult decision: push on into the stretching deserts, or return home to his wife.Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message |
FollowupID:
717217
Follow Up By: Hairs & Fysh - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:10
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:10
Afternoon John
FollowupID:
717272
Follow Up By: Member - John Baas (WA) - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 21:29
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 21:29
Having a rum and coke now.
Feeling much better guys.
Cheers.
FollowupID:
717359
Reply By: vk1dx - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:59
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:59
Morning John
AnswerID:
445041
Reply By: member - mazcan - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 14:14
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 14:14
hi fab72
well its been a long and drawn out and also very interesting discussion on this topic and i've come to a general consensis//conclushion
and that 'ish' :/
pobody's nerfect
thay just haff the pursunel riot too beeleave they arrrr
chears
bary
AnswerID:
445051
Follow Up By: Bazooka - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 14:47
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 14:47
Yuo mkae a ogod piont Can. Wrt pselling htough - htere ahs eben umch scohlarly idscussion on hte orle fo pselling in ocmmunication (a la this sentence). Ohwever, ti odesn't atke umch ot elarn hte idfference ebtween cite, sight and site; they're, their, and there; dual and duel; break and brake; etc.
Most of us will inevitably make a typo or spelling error at sometime while posting, but for Pete's sake we should all try and make an effort. No doubt some of the same wags who can't be bothered are vocal about 'foreigners' coming to our country and not being able to speak or write the language after a couple of years.
FollowupID:
717290
Reply By: Member - Stephen L (Clare SA) - Saturday, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:59
Saturday, Feb 12, 2011 at 07:59
Hi Fab
Some people still have not taken head of what you have just posted. If you check out a post, a few above yours from an "Ex member" who should know better, post 84251, there are still no "thank you" replies for the question that he asked days later.
As one of our TV personalities would say, Shame, Shame, Shame.
Cheers
Stephen
AnswerID:
445143
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Monday, Feb 14, 2011 at 21:22
Monday, Feb 14, 2011 at 21:22
Stephen..can lead a horse to water but still can't make it drink.
BTW...did you enjoy your Sunday Mail on the weekend?
Bulk paper deliveries to Watervale, Seven Hills and Clare were done by yours truely. Just started the run as a weekend job.
I go up as far as Wilmington.
Fab.
FollowupID:
717709
Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Monday, Feb 14, 2011 at 21:57
Monday, Feb 14, 2011 at 21:57
Should report this as "chit chat" LOL
They haven't learned a thing, witness thread 84356 Spelling !!!!!
Why don't people use the spell checker.
Cheers
FollowupID:
717717
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Monday, Feb 14, 2011 at 22:01
Monday, Feb 14, 2011 at 22:01
LOL...back at your comment too Graham.
I'm kind of surprised this thread has gone on as long as it has.
FollowupID:
717721