Forum Etiquette
Submitted: Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 19:11
ThreadID:
84238
Views:
6363
Replies:
33
FollowUps:
97
This Thread has been Archived
Fab72
Hello all,
As a regular reply poster to many
forum inquiries on here, I am starting to notice an alarming trend.
Take Thread 84175 for example sorry to pick on this one, now this really got up my goat. A question was asked regarding a modification to a vehicle...pretty standard post. However, despite some really good replies, one being my own, there has been not even one "Thank you" or even acknowledgement from the original poster. I understand that not everyone sits on their computer, however after a few days - still nothing.
I went to great lengths to include contact details of a personal friend who could specifically help with the OP's problem, going so far as to ring, SMS and email my mate asking for permission to post his email address on here.
I don't expect accolades, however, a "Yep" would have sufficed.
This is one recent example that springs to mind, however it is a growing trend.
Is it just me or do others consider it rude to not at least acknowledge a reply, even if the reply may not be specifically what the OP was after? What ever happened to manners?
Fab.
Reply By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:23
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 20:23
I totally agree
Far too many ask for info, frequently which is found by someone else doing the Googling for them and not a peep out of them as to whether they managed to fix the problem.
Also by inane requests as in Thread 84225 What the ++++ is that supposed to mean.
I note it got treated with the answers it deserved.
I rarely ask for help as I know that most can be found by searching but try to say thanks on the rare occasion I do.
Also far too many replicated requests.
EG Tyres Batteries etc.
Look through a few pages of threads Its all been asked before.
Also asking for opinions on legalities.
These are best directed to the relevant authority rather than getting sometimes uninformed answers on here which may point you towards the wrong side of the law.
Cheers
Let the jousting begin LOL
AnswerID:
444810
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:09
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:09
Mmmm Graham..TV sticks. Yes...an interesting one. Are they the Arnotts variety?
On a serious note... the legallities questions are usually 90% opinion and 10% fact. I don't think ".....But I read it on a
forum Officer" will cut the mustard in a court of law.
FollowupID:
716976
Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:21
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:21
Exactly, unless the authority says it, opinion is worthless.
Think the sticks may be Dick Smiths domain LOL
FollowupID:
716987
Reply By: Motherhen - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 21:41
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 21:41
Yes Fab, I too appreciate a thank you on the thread and even better a follow up to what worked for them. Manners don't hurt.
One of the best examples was when travelling, i saw someone wanting a free overnight stop in a certain area where we had found a nice
gravel pit. As we were on the road i didn't have all the details but described it as i remembered it (some years before).
Apart from thanks at the time, after his trip, i got a message of thanks saying he found it, stayed there, and took the coordinates which he gave to me.
So nice to know my vague message was of value and get the
feedback.
Motherhen
AnswerID:
444838
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:31
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:31
Now that is the ultimate in
feedback!!!
As others have suggested.... without
feedback, how do we know if the response has helped or hindered the OP'er.
Nothing worse than continually recommending a place or service, only to find out that after numerous recommendations, the service or place has lost it's intergrity or is no longer in existance.
Imagine that... "Oh yeah.. there's a really great service station with cheap fuel between point A and Point B".......only to find it closed 8 months ago.
Feedback is KING....and a Thank You is courteous.
FollowupID:
716993
Reply By: The Landy - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:26
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:26
Hear what you are saying and as others have suggested it takes very little to post a ‘thanks’ to replies received , and I don’t think it need to be to every response, but a general acknowledgement at least gives
feedback on whether problem is solved or anan swer has been found, or even still looking for it.
Having said that, the Australian Landrover
Forum has a ‘thanks’ button that enables anyone reading a response to provide a vote of thanks for the post, and maybe the EO team could take a look at whether it is possible (or appropriate) to provide a similar mechanism.
I’m sure there are similar examples in other forums. I recall seeing one recently (not sure were) that you could click a ‘found the response helpful’ button. In itself that is a useful way of telling the respondent that his or her post was found useful by X number of people…..
Cheers, The Landy
AnswerID:
444849
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:35
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:35
Not a bad suggestion Landy... haven't seen it myself but the concept sounds good.
Love your catch phrase BTW.... just reading Crossing the Dead Heart at the moment. Just arrived at Mulligans.
Anyway.. back on track. I also can see value in a CHAT ROOM, to throw ideas around, get instant replies without the bother of bogging the main body of the
forum down.
FollowupID:
716995
Follow Up By: The Landy - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:16
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:16
It's a great read, and that is one of my favourite quotes.........
Cheers, The Landy
FollowupID:
717031
Reply By: Fab72 - Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:40
Wednesday, Feb 09, 2011 at 22:40
OK.....suffering from writters cramp.... but what I did prove tonight is that
(A)... people do read interesting posts (over 500 hits in one night)
(B)... people do appreciate
feedback, and
(C)... it really didn't take that much effort on my behalf to read and reply to almost everyone on here.
Considering many posts don't get the level of response I got tonight, it really isn't that hard to reply with a simple THANK YOU.
However...I feel I'm preeching to the converted here, considering the replies have all come from regualr posters that ALWAYS acknowledge a response.
For the regulars....Thank you for the stimulating converstaion.
For the passive Forumites...consider the art of Etiquette.
Good night and safe travels where ever you may be.....
Fab.
AnswerID:
444857
Reply By: Member - Ruth D (QLD) - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:55
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:55
Well, hallelujah - this is like old times. I don't have much time to be on EO at the moment but how nice to
check out this morning and have a GREAT thread - and I totally agree about
Forum Etiquette (or lack thereof).
Although I have people talking AT me all the time at work you would think I would not be interested in CONVERSATION when I come
home but I miss in my daily life my daily does of informative conversation I had become used to on EO over the many years- it has most certainly been missing.
Thank you I can go to work now feeling a little more upbeat. Keep up the good conversation please.
AnswerID:
444883
Follow Up By: member - mazcan - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:42
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:42
hi all
just having a read through and i agree that a thank you for the imfo should be a natural thing as a result for imfo that is given by the helpful members and registered users on here i too have noted there seems to be a new culture on here in the last few months where requests for help and imfo is just taken for granted and i think its just good maners to say thanks
so i have decided to establish for my own reasons
-- -a do not respond to --
list of op's names
who request help and dont have the decency to just say a simple thankyou
and when their title pops up again for help
guess what?? you guessed it no imfo will be given even though i may have the answer to their problem
it maybe a harsh way of dealing with the situation
but in time imho it will weed them out
cheers to all
FollowupID:
717105
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:49
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:49
G'Day Ruth...glad to hear you're enjoying the thread. It has certainly raised a few eyebrows, but most importantly, it has raised MANY really good reasons why
feedback is so mportant, ranging from the Etiquette to the need for someone to know if their information is still accurate and useful.
At the end of the day, we reply because we care.!!!
Take a look at the general trend with posts. Some of the most frequented posts are those that portray a sense of urgency or desperation. That to me signals that WE... yes all of us... actually do give a rats.
Why would anyone neglect a simple thank you or follow up when so many people have spent the time making contacts, researching or even just writing a reply.
MAZCAN... the list sounds like a good idea...SAD though that this world has come to that. That list is one I'd like to avoid as would 99.9% of the people here.
Fab.
FollowupID:
717137
Reply By: Member - John and Val - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:55
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 08:55
The lack of any response from a poster after giving time and thought to a comprehensive reply is something that really irks me. Maybe I'm just grumpy.
I note that Fab's post appeared about 12 hours ago and has scored 3 or 4 times as many
views as other posts at around that time, and many more responses than usual. I conclude that I'm not alone!
I've largely given up trying to help those who clearly won't be able to tackle the learning curve that I see ahead of them. I've largely given up on those who obviously need help in just defining their problem. If I spend half an hour on a decent response, I reckon at the least I can expect a one line acknowledgment. I'd be against a "thankyou" button to provide a one click response - it would probably be too hard for most to click anyway!
While it doesn't solve the etiquette issue, it can save a lot of writing to simply point to a blog or site where the information sought is already available. Rob D's recent tyre blog (
here) for example points to some very
well researched information and will answer many of the more complex tyre questions.
If we can't expect at least some acknowledgement that our words have been read, maybe we just cut down on words.
Cheers
| J and V
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
- Albert Einstein
Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message |
AnswerID:
444895
Follow Up By: Bazooka - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:27
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:27
Agree, where someone has obviously gone out of their way to help and spent a fair bit of their time to chase something up a (general, or specific in some cases) acknowledgement would be a 'not unreasonable' expectation. Thing some on here have forgotten tho' is the 'pleasure' both in replying (and hopefully helping in a small way) and reading the variety of responses. As for automated tick thank yous etc - no thank you.
FollowupID:
717084
Follow Up By: The Landy - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:57
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:57
I won’t try and persuade anyone with respect to a ‘tick thank you’, and have an open mind on it, but consider this..
This post is about the thread initiator posting a thank you for helpful responses, whether it is to individuals or to the thread collectively. But often other readers (not the original poster) benefit from specific answers given in the
forum and they might want to pass on a vote of thanks for the response. A ‘tick thank you’ serves a couple of purposes in this instance, it enables acknowledgement without dozens of thank you posts cluttering the thread, especially if it was a useful answer, and secondly and more importantly, if done correctly it can show how many times individual posters have been ‘thanked’ for responses. In itself that is useful.......
All food for thought...Cheer’s, The Landy
FollowupID:
717089
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:56
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 17:56
John, Val, Bazooka and Landy.... all very good points. I agree that the THANK YOU
check box is a good idea. It, if nothing else, acknowledges that the poster has at least read the reply. Very minimalistic but for those pressed for time, it's better than nothing.
It amazes me.... and I use your point here
John and Val, how responders will often take up to 30 minutes to write, upload images etc, yet the OP can't be bothered, is too lazy, or lacks social grace to spend.... what?....15 seconds to type "Thanks". That's just plain rude.
Thanks for the reply guys...
Fab.
FollowupID:
717139
Reply By: Hairs & Fysh - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 13:03
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 13:03
Hi Fab72
Funny isn't?
Some posters, you ever only see them once to ask a question yet they will acknowledge every reply to their question and some times ask more and that's fantastic, Well done.
Others post a question and you never see them post again,
maybe they are traveling and can't because of lack of internet availability. I realize that sometimes some replies can be a bit short and rude and some people don't seem to posses tact in the way they give answers and maybe this has something to do with why some don't thank others, who knows
Then there are others that skip replies then thank the next poster that has given the exact same answer
but maybe not as detailed as the previous ones.
Hmmm, I guess this is what makes the world go round.
AnswerID:
444930
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:12
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:12
Hairs and Fysh... all excellent points. the internet access is a big thing... I know we struggled for a week to get any signal at all when going from
Adelaide to QLD via The Track. (Thank you 3).
I do believe also that the replies...if a bit abrassive can scare people off. A bit of common sense when posting the original question will generally avoid unwarranted replies.
Questions like " What's wrong with my car" where the poster fails to mention Make, model, year, engine type, symptoms etc is kind of like asking for a useless reply.
The last point regarding thanking Johnny come latley.... that happens a bit too much also.
Fab.
FollowupID:
717146
Reply By: 3gobush - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:19
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 14:19
I think the point here is this.
I would guess that a large %age of replies are Googled, or someone actually did a
search on this site for the info, therefore did the work for the OP.
So in getting no response would be to some and is to me annoying.
Now on the other hand, on many occasions someone has been admonished for suggesting to either Do a
Search or Google it yourself, so one guesses that either way you can't win.
Oh well my info is free and you can do with it what you will, but just remember this if the OP asking the question acknowledges the info to confirm a
solution to a problem, I wounder if we would have less repeat questions here, or is that just wishful thinking.
AnswerID:
444944
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:33
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:33
Wishful thinking 3gobush. I always try google first. It's just nice and easy.
However... I'm actually impressed by the number of times I've googled something and one of the top hits redirects me to this
forum.
Fab.
FollowupID:
717152
Follow Up By: Member - John and Val - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 08:54
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 08:54
Hi 3,
What would be really useful if people would give a clue about whether they have done any searching. Its not too hard to say, "Ive searched this site but" ... or "I have Googled but ...". Sadly it seems many just find it easier to jump in and ask their question without making any effort themselves.
I think it might have to do with the huge rush that many younger people are always in - no time to even think it seems. Its a pity though - information is now so easily available online, but apparently not accessible for many because of "lifestyle" issues.
Cheers,
Val
| J and V
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
- Albert Einstein
Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message |
FollowupID:
717222
Follow Up By: The Landy - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:01
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:01
That's one of the best points in this thread. And not to discourage people asking questions, but I often ‘google’ questions people have asked out of self-interest as many questions are good, and I’m always interested to learn the answers....
And when you ‘google’ you find a plethora of information and wonder why the original poster didn’t simply do the same, and as Fab mentioned, often ‘google’ points you back to the EO site.
Cheers, The Landy
FollowupID:
717244
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:39
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:39
I agree about the
search. But there are three main problems with using the
search. Namely:
1. How to abbreviate the question to the right phrase etc. to find the answer,
2. How to find the answer in the plethora of information, and
3. How to filter out the old material that has been superseded or updated.
Then some questions can only be answered by a "conversation" to add more data by the requesting poster and then to make sure all parties are "on the same page". If you want to consider this in more detail, then no doubt there are more reasons where a chat/conversation is needed.
I do like the start having something like "I ha searched . . . "
Phil
FollowupID:
717249
Reply By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:45
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 18:45
Fab, You ask ... "What ever happened to manners?"
Well I guess they went the same way as the ability to spell or use reasonable grammar. Probably due to laziness and the lack of concern for others.
I am aware that there was a period when our education system failed a generation of students but I am surprised that those same do not have a "penny-drop" when they read text and do not have their curiosity aroused at reading for example "their" when they themselves have only known "there". Do they not wonder at the use of "their" and consult a dictionary. Seems not..... possibly too (or is it to?) lazy and uncaring of the recipient reader. Etiquette?
Even when a responder spells the word correctly the original poster still does not twig and repeats the error. Helloooo?
Why should we expect people to say thanks when they cannot be bothered to observe and learn correct spelling of even very basic and common words?
AnswerID:
444968
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 19:38
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 19:38
I wonder if the casual "get a life" attitude has something to do with it.
The lack of respect. Like the very rude habit of not taking the sunnies off when talking to people. Lots of examples. Just too casual. I will not let the children next door call me "Phil" To them it's "Mr . . .".
Just a thought
Phil
FollowupID:
717165
Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 22:17
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 22:17
I agree with you there Allan
Like Duel and Dual.
There, Their and They're.
I "seen" something. Hello???? I saw something.
I thought I had seen something.
I could go on.
But then schools aren't what they were in my day I guess.
Waits for flames LOL
FollowupID:
717189
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 22:25
Thursday, Feb 10, 2011 at 22:25
A good note to say goodnight on.
Cheers
Phil
FollowupID:
717191
Follow Up By: Member - John and Val - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:06
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:06
Hi Allan,
Yes the spelling and grammar are sometimes beyond belief. Maybe too much texting has something to do with it. And not reading much, or not reading at all!
Then there are those who deliberately drop into slang such as "how ya'll goin" or some such supposedly "cool" lingo.
Some questions on here are a real struggle to work out what is intended to be asked. I generally wont respond to such questions - if the person asking hasn't made the effort to frame a sensible question why waste your time on it?
Cheers,
Val
| J and V
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
- Albert Einstein
Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message |
FollowupID:
717224
Follow Up By: Bazooka - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:50
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:50
Amen Allan. I don't think anyone expects perfection in either spelling/typing/grammar on an internet
forum but all those common errors mentioned are often just plain laziness in my book. Appears that some like to think of themselves as Aussie battlers, 'real' country people (and some may well be), so they put something akin to the Aussie drawl in their posts, eh (sorry couldn't resist).
FollowupID:
717232
Follow Up By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:44
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:44
Well, I'll be darned! When I made that posting re spelling and grammar I thought that I would get attacked for being critical of people with poor English skills. However each response to date has been supportive. Thank you.
Perhaps even more significant is that each of those responses has spelled my name correctly with the double 'LL'. So often on the
forum the response is with a single 'L' and on a recent thread my complaint was met with a scornful response. The correct spelling of one's name is an expression of respect to which we should all be entitled. And for extending that respect I again thank you.
FollowupID:
717250
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:12
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:12
I agree wholeheartedly.
There are lot of us sleeping "correct spellers", who find that it is either useless to try and correct incorrect spelling etc. or have been abused just too often and now they just shut up and chuckle at the ignorance and lack of care that abounds in the written world.
Isn't it nice when they ask which way it is spelt in a
shop etc. My name is with the single "L". Not the American or European double "L". I got "Fill" once!!!! No "P". And they always muck up my surname as well. And what's more the local phone book only has two spelt with the "or" and heaps with the "er". Beats me where they get the "or" from then. Ours is the "or" version.
At least Allan, with two "L"'s, it is spelt, not "spelled" by the way, correctly on my birth certificate.
Phil
FollowupID:
717255
Follow Up By: member - mazcan - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:39
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:39
hi phil --- vk1dx
in respect to not taking ones sunnies off
well in some cases like mine i don't
remove them for health reasons
as i have an eye problem and sunlight is a real killer to my eye
so it appears your over looking this fact that some people do have a legit reasons and are not being rude
but i don't personely become offended if a person i'm talking to doesn't remove their s/glasses as after all don't we wear them to stop the glare damaging our eyes or perhaps maybe some just wear them for looks ???
but its gets boring to have to keep explaining to people i talk to that i have an eye problem and consider this personel and generally keep it to myself
with respect to your comments from your point of view
i don't believe you have taken this into consideration
i am however not having a go at you just pointing out there are exceptions for peoples actions
cheers
barry
FollowupID:
717260
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:54
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:54
That I thought would be understood. As it would be for a blind person etc. Its common sense.
Same as I do not bother to explain why I am parking in a disabled parking
spot when I am allowed to and have a permit on the windscreen.
Apologies.
Phil
FollowupID:
717264
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:55
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:55
Hi all, just sitting back and enjoying this conversation. I often correct my Mother in Law for her seen/saw errors.
Unfortunately, one point I disagree with is the reference to "The Good Old Days of Schooling". My Mother in Law falls into that category, and yet my 13 year old daughter has better grammar and punctuation than the afore mentioned.
I agree strongly to the contentious sunglasses issue (with the exception of for medical reasons or the like eg: transition lenses that are slow to adjust). However (noticed I didn't start that sentence with "But") my number one gripe is the wearing of hats at a table whilst dining. I don't care if it's MacDonalds, a boutique restaurant or just the
kitchen table. For me, it's a definite hats off policy.
Fab.
FollowupID:
717266
Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:03
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:03
MIL should have had my English teacher.
Do it wrong and get a ruler across the knuckles.
Taught us to remember. LOL.
FollowupID:
717269
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:05
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:05
Hats inside and especially at the dinner table. Agree.
Do you realise that if you walked into an Army Seargents mess with a hat on and didn't take it off before they rang the bell you had to shout the mess. Visitor or not! Your escort who signed you in should have told you. Women as well unless it was formal and the hat was part of their outfit.
I wonder if they still do it. I certainly hop so.
Phil
FollowupID:
717271
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:18
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:18
Of all the times to make a silly spelling mistake!
That's "hope so".
Chuckle
Phil
FollowupID:
717274
Follow Up By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:20
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:20
Hi Phil, 'Spelt' or 'spelled'? It is optional, either being correct according to the Oxford dictionary. I personally prefer 'spelled' as it is more unique and unambiguous whereas 'spelt' also describes a variety of wheat. Furthermore 'spelled' seems more logical as the past tense or past participle of 'spell'. After all, we say that we 'felled a tree' rather than 'felt' a tree, or 'called' someone to dinner rather than 'calt'? LOL
Seriously, have it either way.
FollowupID:
717275
Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:51
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 13:51
Have a read of this then
http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuxNYXxks7fn8TqRAqSkb2YYEBV.;_ylv=3?qid=20080410032358AAci96y
Perhaps we should agree to differ but I prefer the English way.
Typos are acceptable, we all make them but as in one thread recently they had
a heading about Trailer Breaks and then went on to discuss brakes.
Either that or the other way round. Whatever, it looked stupid.
It seems people don't read what they have written.
FollowupID:
717279
Follow Up By: vk1dx - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 15:27
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 15:27
I agree to disagree. Spelt is the English way and spelled is the American version. Just as I use the spelling colour, then so will I use spelt. I cherish the English background even though it's seven generations back. I do not have any links with America apart from the jeans I wear. I don't even watch The Simpsons or go to MacDonalds.
Like you Graham, I prefer the English ways. Not much tradition left but we may as well hang on to what we have left.
Synonyms. A spelling teachers nightmare!!
Try this trivia quiz
Phil
News flash!!! Its raining in
Canberra; again.
FollowupID:
717293
Follow Up By: Fab72 - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:27
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:27
Phil.... ditch the Levi's and go with RM's. You'll never look back.
FollowupID:
717318
Follow Up By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:35
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:35
RM's?? He'll have to learn Chinese!!
FollowupID:
717320
Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:43
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 17:43
Now now boys.
Part of etiquette is staying on the subject and you are getting away from it a bit.
ROFL
FollowupID:
717323
Follow Up By: Allan B (Sunshine Coast) - Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 18:03
Friday, Feb 11, 2011 at 18:03
Yes, your'e right Graham. We are drifting away.
Lets get back to bashing the non-responders. LOL
FollowupID:
717330