3" mandrell exhaust
Submitted: Tuesday, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:25
ThreadID:
84870
Views:
9873
Replies:
9
FollowUps:
4
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Noel C (NSW)
Hi,
I,m considering upgradeing my exhaust.
I have a TD 2004 (IFS) Cruiser and would like comments on weather or not the mandrell system is worth it. Also mild or stainless steel?
Thx
Reply By: Member - Tony (ACT) - Tuesday, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:30
Tuesday, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:30
Most if not all "Turbo" mild steel exhaust tube on a diesel will last for many years, A muffler will develop leaks before the pipe. So no benefit going stainless.
The 3' mandrell bent exhaust system will allow the turbo to spin up a lot quicker as it get the spent exhaust gasses away and free up the turbo. By and large gets heat away from the turo as
well.
A great addon to complement the turbo system.
AnswerID:
447649
Reply By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Tuesday, Mar 08, 2011 at 12:33
Tuesday, Mar 08, 2011 at 12:33
I have a friend who fitted a 3"
Beaudesert exhaust and dump pipe to his 2004 TD Landcruiser (identical to yours). It was a very nice piece of gear, but on its own there was not much difference in performance or economy.
I think if you were to add a chip as
well, there may be more benefit.
This contrasts to my 1HD-FTE 79series, where a 3"
Beaudesert exhaust made a huge difference - mainly because my cat converter was blocked with soot and the
Beaudesert replacement skips the cat converter.
AnswerID:
447659
Reply By: Member - Bruce C (NSW) - Tuesday, Mar 08, 2011 at 19:48
Tuesday, Mar 08, 2011 at 19:48
Hi Noel,
A few weeks back I was talking to Graham H (QLD) and I am sure he said that the 3" system he had put on his TD 100 series Landcruiser was of greater benefit that the chip he had put on.
I may have got that wrong but I am fairly confident that's what he said.
He recommended I do likewise on
mine and I am thinking seriously about it.
There is a lot written about 3" exhausts and all good.
Cheers, Bruce.
| At home and at ease on a track that I know not and
restless and lost on a track that I know. HL.Lifetime Member My Profile Send Message |
AnswerID:
447702
Reply By: Richard W (NSW) - Thursday, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:44
Thursday, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:44
I fitted one a few years ago.
FWIW here's a comparison of fuel consumption.
2005 TD100
Blue: Standard
Pink: 285X75X16 Muds fitted
Red: 3" steel mandrel bent exhaust fitted.
Green: D'tronic Chip fitted.
Orange: Towing light hard top camper with all the above.
Outliers are sand driving.
AnswerID:
447821
Follow Up By: Richard W (NSW) - Thursday, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:48
Thursday, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:48
BTW exhaust improved mid range performance and chip improved bottom end performance.
FollowupID:
720132
Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Thursday, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:15
Thursday, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:15
Gday Richard,
Nice graphs!
The upward trend with standard exhaust (blue line) is typical of this motor. I believe its due largely to the cat converter blocking up with soot. Thats why some people (like you and me) got a good improvement when you fit the 3" exhaust, while other people (typically newer vehicles) have got little or no improvement. So if you fit the 3" exhaust to a newer vehicle where the cat is not blocked, there is little benefit.
FollowupID:
720153