Friday, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:56
Chris,
everything chemical decays with temperature, batteries included.
This is without use/abuse, so anything like that shortens the life even more.
I've derived a formula if you're interested in the maths:
In order to find out the relationship between life expectancy and battery temperature, you can use this simplified formula:
x=y*(1-((z/168)*(1-0.55^a)))
x...life expectancy in years
y...design life in years which is based on 25°C
z...average number of hours driven per week
a...exponent (increases by 1 for every 10°C step, i.e. under bonnet temperatures: 25°C a=0; 35°C a=1; 45°C a=2; 55°C a=3; and so on)
I've based the formula above on the Arrhenius factor of 45% for every 10°C temperature increase.
e.g:
y = 8 years
z = 30 hours
a = 3
If your under bonnet temperature is 55°C, then you can plug your 30 weekly-hours-behind-the-wheel into the formula,
and the result is: x = 8*(1-((30/168)*(1-0.55^3))) = 6.8 years
If the battery isn't going to last this long, then it's because the charging voltages aren't adjusted according to the battery temperature, and/or the charging current exceeds the max specified value.
cheers, Peter
AnswerID:
449957
Follow Up By: ChrisGU - Friday, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:06
Friday, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:06
Thanks for this. One question though.
Is the a (under bonnet temperatures) on average. ie, say the cars driven for 2 hours a day. So for 2-4 hours the temperature would be higher like around the 50°C. But the rest of the time it would be ambient say 25°C. So the average would be 29°C.
Cheers, Chris.
FollowupID:
722366
Follow Up By: Battery Value Pty Ltd - Friday, Apr 01, 2011 at 14:48
Friday, Apr 01, 2011 at 14:48
Chris,
the formula helps to estimate the battery life by applying your average weekly driving time and the increase in temperature during this time.
So for z you substitute with the average weekly driving time (in hours), and for a you substitute with the number of 10°C steps above 25 (in integers, see description above).
Time-averaging the temperature would give a less accurate result because the life-time/temperature relationship is non-linear (the accumulated damage increases faster with temperature than with time).
cheers, Peter
FollowupID:
722410