choosing a 4wd!

Submitted: Wednesday, Jun 15, 2011 at 22:51
ThreadID: 87021 Views:4552 Replies:8 FollowUps:32
This Thread has been Archived
Hi guys I've been choosing a 4wd and got a little bit confused. First of all my wife and me have a dream to cross the Simpson desert our own. Not sure which 4wd drive is a better choice. looking for prado petrol or desiel, patrol 3.0 desiel, pajero patrol or desiel. is the petrol 4wd can finish a long range travel with a extral tank? we prefer petrol 4wd because it is quiet. thanks!
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: eighty matey - Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:03

Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:03
Hi Chris,

diesel 4wds drive just like a petrol now. Some are a bit rattley but nothing bad.

I prefer diesel because I like the way they drive, they handle water better and the fuel economy is better for starters.

That's my opinion.

Hoo roo,

eighty matey
AnswerID: 457567

Reply By: ross - Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:59

Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 01:59
I wouldnt base your decision on noise,modern diesels are so quiet you dont notice them.
One of the big advantages of diesel is that when you have to refuel from jerry cans in a remote location,you are not risking an explosion.
I know petrol can be handled safely to some extent,but you cant beat diesel.

Generally ,diesel 4wds sip fuel in slow going,while petrol engines seem to use even more,although I dont have much experience with modern petrol 4wds

I would choose the Prado diesel 1st and the Pajero diesel 2nd.
AnswerID: 457568

Follow Up By: Member - Doug T (NT) - Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 04:14

Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 04:14
I second the 1st your choice but would if finances permited look at the V8 Troopy instead of Pajero.

.
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 730745

Follow Up By: ross - Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 23:49

Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 23:49
That would be the ultimate choice ,but the OP hasnt put a price limit.
We could be talking about sub $20k units here
0
FollowupID: 730850

Reply By: Robin Miller - Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 08:09

Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 08:09
Hi Chris

You should have no confusion if you base your research on the facts that matter to you, and aviod the exaggerations you often get.

I would suggest straight up front that you get a car like the 4800 petrol patrols that I love, and here are some reasons why.


First of concern to you is noise - more commonly refferred to as NVH noise vibration harshness.
The petrols as a class are simply better everywhere here, measuring the order of 10db better in the irratating noise ranges that counts.

Three new diesels new I have driven can be almost as quiet though the 200 series some discoveries and the new Nissan STX-550.

Fuel consumption - the petrols usually use around 1/3rd more , but cars like the 4800 and Prados can cross the Simpson on standard tanks - but your always well advised to carry a seperate jerry anyway.

I cannot reccomend cars like Prado's because they tip over more easily at 42 degrees or less whereas the 4800 Patrol is best of these wagons types at some 48 degrees .

Strength and suitability for the job - the Patrols come with twin solid axles and a strong drivetrain , you can belly them out on a rock and the cross member will take the full weight of the car - don't even think of doing this with most other cars.

Power - many earlier diesels in particular are seriously underpowered and lack pulling torque. Just simply not an issue with the 185kw 420nm 4800 patrols.

Reliability - Unfortunately the newer diesels have become high strung and require higher levels of skill to maintain repair & service.

Auto generally use about 20% more fuel in places like the Simpson.

The toyota 80 series from late last century are also worthy of consideration.


Robin Miller

Member
My Profile  Send Message

AnswerID: 457586

Follow Up By: ross - Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:01

Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:01
Robin ,what the real world fuel consumption of a 4800 Patrol in sandy conditions or on road?
0
FollowupID: 730763

Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:28

Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:28
Manual 4800 GU Patrol driven generally conservatively has recorded 16.5lt /100km over 250,000km ( includes everything)

Varied from 14.1 lt/100km highway to 23lt sand (not towing)

Figures for a few of bigger trips

Hay River Birds/Batton 23lt/100km

Simpson 22lt/100km

Simpson towing bike trailer 26lt/100km

Canning (Wiluna to Halls ) 18.3lt/100km (Reference V8 troppy - 14.3)

Note - as per recent detailed post - my auto 4800 uses about 20 % more when in sand than my manual 4800 and about 5% less on highway cruise.
Robin Miller

Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 730767

Follow Up By: Axle - Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 16:45

Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 16:45
G/Day Robin, There good figures , But averaged out over a long time,

How about Mr JoBlow, 20,000,ks a yr and say one long trip a yr?

The 4.8L Petrol Patrol then falls into the same cat as the 4.7 V8 petrol cruiser and likes, Bloody terrible compared to a diesel, Do 20000ks for two yrs with short running and then work it out..lol. The last of the turbo six 100s toyo will take a lot of beating as far as $ cost per 1000k travelled, The patrol under heavy consistent load and extreme 4wdriving would no doubt show as a stronger unit but who's doing that all the time?...Not criticising but after owning a v8 petrol for average use , over 2yrs now, and a 4cyl diesel for 10yrs. I'll never except a Petrol is anywhere near as cost efificient as a diesel .


Cheers Axle.
0
FollowupID: 730799

Follow Up By: Dennis Ellery - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:23

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:23
Diesels produce their max torque at much lower revs than petrols.
Big advantage when the motor is struggling and revs are dropping off.
0
FollowupID: 730889

Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:58

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:58
Hi Axle - missed your post - will reply in , a minute.

Dennis unfortunately we can no longer count mixed bag now with some like v8 cruisers with wide flat and high torque, but rule now seems to be more smaller diesels with turbo's that dont really cut in till > 1500 rpm and are woeful below that.
I often reccomend the 4800's but only on good technical grounds.

below are torque figures for various Patrols that show that petrols do have torque up higher but their is so much more that they better diesels down to idle.

PATROL TORQUE
3.0 Td 1000RPM 275nm 2000RPM 354nm (max) 3500RPM 250nm (Peaky curve which stops @ 3500 rpm)
manual version CRD peaks @ 380nm from year 2006

4.2TD 1000RPM 325nm 2000RPM 330nm (max) 4000RPM 320nm (nearly flat all the way)

4.8lt 1000RPM 360nm 3600RPM 420nm (max) 5000RPM 350nm (relatively smooth curve)
from 2006 onwards 5% lower -> 343/1000rpm 400max/3600rpm 333/5000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Axle -
Intersting example you used as depreciation costs are the reeason why independant reviews have made the turbo 100's the worst value in RACV type comparo's.

The 4800's fuel use is about 10% worse than your V8 100 series petrol , but with the patrol I had the choice of a manual which then made it better particularly around town where constant use of torque converters is really felt.

Another comparo on pet/diesels recently gave costs as $75,000 / $77,000 over some years in favour of diesel , but from these figures its much the same.

The bottom line I often give to people is that the old adages have changed and there is little real overall difference, however paying extra every week at the pump is hard for some to do.



















Robin Miller

Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 730893

Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:54

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:54
In my rush for a coffee I forgot to address your key question Axle.

A 4800 auto is very thirsty in stop/start traffic.

I drive the full length of melbournes stud rd every day , not quite stop/start but moderately heavy.

My manual 4800 can hold around 16 lt/100km here but my new auto 4800 is 17-18lk/100km (no loads).

The offical consumptions are the other way around , 17.7 for the manual and 16.4 for the auto so this shows the reality of daily commutes on fuel use with autos.
Robin Miller

Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 730902

Follow Up By: Axle - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 17:52

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 17:52
Hang on...Hang on!!, Robin you can't possibly say the last turbo sixToyo landcruisers suffer depreciatin Problems!!, Stuff me there worth nearly as much on the open market now, as to when they where new?



Cheers Axle.
0
FollowupID: 730943

Follow Up By: fisho64 - Saturday, Jun 18, 2011 at 01:19

Saturday, Jun 18, 2011 at 01:19
too right Axle-I bought mine for $48K 4 years back (04 TD) and havent seen one advertised for less than about $45K for the 5spA.

Im not saying Id buy a 6 year old TD LC for that, but its what they are going for.

In the real world the depreciation comparison of a 4800 Patrol and HDJ100 is laughable, Im sorry to say.
0
FollowupID: 730995

Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Saturday, Jun 18, 2011 at 11:08

Saturday, Jun 18, 2011 at 11:08
Hi guys

Its not me but the independant umpires like Red Book , NRMA and RACV that give give the thumbs down to that cars running costs , and I think it came out in some reports as simply the most expensive 4wd to run of the lot.

Pretty sure we explored this in some posts a year or two back so may be some more data there.
Robin Miller

Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 731014

Follow Up By: Madfisher - Saturday, Jun 18, 2011 at 11:53

Saturday, Jun 18, 2011 at 11:53
Dennis my 3.5 Jack has far more low down torque then any 4 cylinder diesel, although once on boost they go like a scalded cat. My Jack has excellent torque from 1000rpm.
I get to drive them all at work, except Dmax which is a shame.
Cheers Pete
0
FollowupID: 731025

Follow Up By: fisho64 - Saturday, Jun 18, 2011 at 13:22

Saturday, Jun 18, 2011 at 13:22
compare Redbook figures to what they are selling for-to quote a pilots/maritime saying

"ya cant always trust your instruments, sometimes you have to just look out the windows"

In other words, just cause a book says its so, doesnt make it true.
This is not a comment on the abilities or otherwise of a 4800. Just that I cant recall anyone complaining here about how much they hold value when trying to buy a used one?? As opposed to a HDJ100
0
FollowupID: 731038

Reply By: Batt's - Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 14:43

Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 14:43
G.day I'd say go with the Prado diesel their proven to be good over the years plenty of power just look at the 4X4 action vids there hard to break and you'll be comfortable driving it around town plenty of accessories good resale
AnswerID: 457617

Follow Up By: ross - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 05:42

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 05:42
Thats really what its all about. Most 4wds spend 99% of their life as commuters.
The Prado and Pajero have long been a favourite family 4wds that could do the easy and relatively rough stuff.
0
FollowupID: 730857

Reply By: AlbyNSW - Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 16:02

Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 16:02
All of the vehicles on your shortlist will do the job as far as crossing the Simpson goes.
I would be choosing the vehicle that suits you for all other intended uses. I personally favour the diesels and as others have pointed out diesel is a safer product to be carrying in jerry cans.

If you intend on doing a lot of KLM's the diesel will probably be a more economical solution otherwise go with the one you feel comfortable with.
AnswerID: 457620

Reply By: Kimba10 - Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 17:31

Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 17:31
Prados tipping over pffff, Robin has a thing about prados tipping, I have been out with heaps of prado owners and I mean heaps and have done many a trip with them, short day trips and weeks away (pradopoint) and have yet to see a prado on its side, Yes they arn't as wide as a patrol or cruiser but neither are troopy's, pajeros, etc It all comes down to common sense and driver ability, By the sounds of it you have no intentions of going rock hopping or the like so this is some thing that is very unlikely to be of a concern to you, Yes a 4wd of any type will end up on its side if you swerve quick enough at high speeds, again driver imput. The prados have 159L,180L, and 150L been the latest prado so based on the D4D using around the 12L per 100 in mixed conditions there will be plenty of fuel on board. If you are towing you need to take this into consideration obviously. I also think the pajero is a ripper of a vehicle for towing, grunt, and economy and this is coming from a prado owner, I personally just like the prado for more serious off roading then the pajero due to the full chassis under the prado and solid axle rear end for suspension flex. There have been plenty of prados in petrol form that have done the Simpson,)check trips on pradopoint) Yes they are not as economical as a diesel but after having 3 prados, one petrol, one diesel and currently petrol is suits me fine as its also my day to day vehicle. Yes I pay for for running around town but take into consideration diesel servicing costs, parts etc plus the initial purchase costs it takes a while to recoup the extra outlay but diesel definately has better resale, and you want to hope you dont pick up crappy fuel with the new D4D's, if buying new you will lose more when its time to sell with a petrol but buying second hand not a huge difference (my opinion). The petrol prado is definately quiter inside without a doubt (drive both and find out for yourself) I have been in the later diesel and petrol. The mitsi is definately louder inside (not sure on current model) but my neighbour has previous model and is heaps noiser then the D4D prado. Patrol 3 litre is also a great off road vehicle but you have to remember, if you are driving this around town on a daily basis this is some thing to take into consideration. My wife and I have been in patrols, cruisers as well and while even she has commented on how roomy they are she would freak having to take it into car parks where as the prado she is fine with, but again this is just my wife, I would have no issues with driving a bigger vehicle on a daily basis (drive trucks so size doesnt bother me) All the best with your choice, its tricky but either way the trip will be great if well prepared.........
AnswerID: 457628

Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 19:34

Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 19:34
Forgive me Kimba


Image Could Not Be Found
Robin Miller

Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 730822

Follow Up By: Member - DAZA (QLD) - Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 19:53

Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 19:53
And the 4.8 litre Patrol can tow 3500kg.
The 3.0 litre Prados are 2500kg.
0
FollowupID: 730823

Follow Up By: Kimba10 - Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 20:42

Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 20:42






Enough said. as I mentioned before can happen to any vehicle, driver imput and/or some times stupidity
0
FollowupID: 730826

Follow Up By: Axle - Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 21:09

Thursday, Jun 16, 2011 at 21:09
Now thats proving a point Kimba!!......LOL.


Cheers Axle
0
FollowupID: 730830

Follow Up By: Member - DAZA (QLD) - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 08:01

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 08:01
Nah Axle !!

All that damage was caused by Wayward Out Of Control Prados lol lol lol.
0
FollowupID: 730867

Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 08:14

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 08:14
Hi Kimba

You should have asked me for some GU pictures , as I was ready with them , but ones you choose all have one thing in common - after market suspension - rasing the C of G.



Robin Miller

Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 730869

Follow Up By: Kimba10 - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:47

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:47
lol Dazza i like that one, robin, come on if im correct i dont think the 3rd pic of the patrol even has a lift ?? Not sure, either way proves that any vehicle can roll, and must say there seems a fair gap on the rear of the prados wheel arch to, indicating possible lift ?? There would not be many people who would be pushing there vehicles to the limits on roll over angles crossing the simo, willhave to agree to disagree, while i respect your comments and love some of your daily storys there are plenty of other vehicles that would be in the same catogory as the prado eg pajero,troopys etc as mentioned before, have a great day regards steve
0
FollowupID: 730892

Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:47

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:47
You can tell from the colour of the shocks Kimba - by the way you included some non GU Patrol pictures - its only the GU that is so stable and this came about more or less by accident as Nissan were looking for a cheap upgrade and bascially left the chassis alone and just widened the track when inventing the GU.

Unfortunately it is exactly places like the Simmo and slow speed work where people come to grief , I have had to even winch a vehicle upright again.

What happens is that people are not pushing their cars but go over a dune which turns at the top , oftens goes off camber and then into soft sand, cars frequently go on crazy angles , classic case are some reports on Exploroz from previous seasons.

P.S. Don't tell anybody else this , but at speed (100km / hr) I think a Prado is just as stable as a GU when it counts because of its better dynamic control systems (American recall models excluded).








Robin Miller

Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 730901

Follow Up By: Kimba10 - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 15:28

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 15:28
""P.S. Don't tell anybody else this , but at speed (100km / hr) I think a Prado is just as stable as a GU when it counts because of its better dynamic control systems (American recall models excluded). "" lol cheers............


0
FollowupID: 730928

Follow Up By: ross - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 20:07

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 20:07
Even if a Patrol does have a greater tipping angle,not many owners go anywhere near that.
The overwhelming number of rollovers happen on the road when the vehicle goes into a slide or down an embankment or ditch
0
FollowupID: 730963

Reply By: Shaver - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:17

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:17
And Robin should also tell you that the Landcruiser 200 Series Petrol has more power, more torque, also tows 3,500kg, has a 138ltr fuel tank, has KDSS with greater wheel articulation, Crawl Control & leaves the Nissan for dead in regard to ride & refinement. Don't believe me, take a 200 for a drive & see how quiet they are inside. The Nissan feels like a tractor in comparison. I looked at both before buying, no comparison, but naturally you will have to pay more for this when purchasing the Cruiser. The 200 will use between 12 - 13ltrs/100 on a trip & is far more economical than the 100 Series V8 even though it is heavier.
AnswerID: 457703

Follow Up By: Axle - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 17:43

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 17:43
Shaver i think the variable valve timing made a big difference to the later V8 petrol, Toyo seem to have healthy sales for them, The old 4.7 is reasonable on consistent revs and load. but stray away from that and make sure you have a fat wallet!..lol.


Cheers Axle.
0
FollowupID: 730941

Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Saturday, Jun 18, 2011 at 11:04

Saturday, Jun 18, 2011 at 11:04
Hi Shaver

Actually I did really consider the 200 series petrol , and it is even quieter than petrol patrol - but noise is still quite low in all petrols and not and issue anyway.

The 200 series petrol does have more kw up high , but is big weight penalty
meant its slower than the 4800.

I also except that on cruise it uses less fuel - but as far as I can determine its significantly more than figures I posted elsewhere in this thread in the rough.

To be honest the 200 series petrol generally felt heavier and more cumbersome and didn't point as well , but I do understand why many would like it as its a nice car and the ride is more refined.
Even though its a bit slower this is a non- issue also, because its fast enough.

The KDSS etc is a good feature and out of the box gives a greater RTI than the Patrol due to Patrols heavy swaybars.

But the simple, no cost, unbolting of a rear swaybar sees the Patrol in front
with the benefit of those tough solid axles up front.

Many like me often run with no swaybars which really does the trick.

The well proven use of lockers completes the 4800 package which still comes in some $15 less than the petrol 200 series.


















Robin Miller

Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 731012

Reply By: shanegu6 - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 17:24

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 17:24
Prados are for people that used to own Camrys....
AnswerID: 457731

Follow Up By: rags - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 17:44

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 17:44
Patrols are for former Datson120y drivers maybe,
0
FollowupID: 730942

Follow Up By: sassenach.girl - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 18:16

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 18:16
I have a Prado and have never owned a Camry :)
0
FollowupID: 730944

Follow Up By: Kimba10 - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 20:20

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 20:20
This post has been read by the moderation team and has been moderated due to a breach of The Foul Language Rule .

Forum Moderation Team
0
FollowupID: 730967

Follow Up By: Kimba10 - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 20:23

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 20:23
They go alright to for a diesel to......................

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0IGNj-N11Y&feature=related
0
FollowupID: 730970

Follow Up By: shanegu6 - Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 23:30

Friday, Jun 17, 2011 at 23:30
White goods on wheels!!!!
0
FollowupID: 730991

Follow Up By: Kimba10 - Saturday, Jun 18, 2011 at 08:26

Saturday, Jun 18, 2011 at 08:26
""White goods on wheels!!!!"" Ill pay that one lol, thats what my wife thinks of them to.............But there still a great reliable and economical vehicle !!!!!!!
0
FollowupID: 730999

Sponsored Links