Batteries in Parallel - is there a right right and wrong way to do it.

Submitted: Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:01
ThreadID: 88778 Views:4643 Replies:7 FollowUps:27
This Thread has been Archived
Hi all

Next topic for discussion is a couple of things I have read / been told and again I am interested in comments from the well informed of you out there.

1. connecting batteries in parallel is not a recommended situation?? this was in an article I cannot find right now but it was discussing AH ratings and voltages of batteries in series and parallel - it discussed batteries in parallel but said it was not a recommended configuration. It was inferring that 2 x 6V batteries in series is a better option that 2 x 12V batteries in parallel.

2. if you connect 2 batteries in parallel, take the negative feed from one battery and the positive feed from the other battery - don't take both feeds from the one battery?? This was from the supplier of my AGM batteries - a major supplier of batteries to the Perth market.



Ken
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Boobook - Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:18

Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 06:18
Honestly Ken this has been covered so many times it could be committed to memory.

Try doing a search. A little time spent by you searching will save a lot of time for many others holding your hand.
AnswerID: 463912

Follow Up By: KenInPerth - Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:13

Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:13
Sorry - but I believe forums are generally here to invoke discussion and get responses that increase the amount of information available to others.

The reason for the post is to generate some discussion about a couple of specific issues as a result of the searches providing varying answers with no real science.

Being a technical person I tend to be a bit more curious and I am sure there are some out there who may be willing to share there wealth of knowledge and it might just be of use to someone else.

Those that don't want to "hold my hand" will not post a reply. If the moderator's think I am wasting space on the forum I am sure they will remove the post.


Ken


0
FollowupID: 737807

Follow Up By: Member - warren G (VIC) - Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 20:13

Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 20:13
with replies like that its no wonder why good people have given up on this site.just because something has been dissused before who's to know who seen the thread,just maybe the goroo on that subject was not spending every waking second of his or her life watching what gets posted and might be watching now.some people like to get current opinions not old ones.some questions do seem simple but obviously not to those that post them.if you have got nothing to offer but sarcasm just read on and let someone els reply that has some insight in to the discussion
,
,cheers warren
0
FollowupID: 737854

Follow Up By: Member - Boobook - Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 20:23

Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 20:23
Warren my point is that I suspect and observe that many of these Gurus have given up answering the same ol question time after time.

The questions asked have been answered many many many times satisfactorily and accurately. A little effort on behalf of the OP would find that.

A little effort before posting would go a long way to save effort of everyone, that is all I am saying.



0
FollowupID: 737858

Follow Up By: BrownyGU - Friday, Sep 02, 2011 at 23:07

Friday, Sep 02, 2011 at 23:07
Bb
Interesting the trouble you have gone to Bb, to point out how the poster should of used the search function,blah blah blah, then you responded to some criticism. Mate if you cant or don't want to help, don't respond

Surely giving the answer or advice ( if you have it) would of been far more beneficial to everyone?


Browny
0
FollowupID: 737997

Reply By: Ray - Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:16

Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:16
The answer to your initial question is YES
AnswerID: 463917

Follow Up By: Member Al (Sunshine Coast) - Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:27

Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:27
If by "YES" you mean it is NOT a good idea, then my vote is NO!

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 737820

Follow Up By: Ray - Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:36

Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:36
The question was :- Batteries in Parallel - is there a right way and wrong way to do it? The answer is obviously yes.

There is a right way and wrong way to do it.
0
FollowupID: 737828

Follow Up By: Member Al (Sunshine Coast) - Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:06

Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:06
Ray,sorry, there were two questions. By "initial" you indicated that you were responding to the first one. But I didn't twig that yours was a 'smarty' answer.

But to the second question.....there are two basic connections proposed, direct or diagonal. The diagonal is not exactly 'right or wrong' just unnecessarily elaborate.

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 737831

Reply By: olcoolone - Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:02

Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:02
Just connect them in parallel any old way and draw power from them any old way and it will be fine.... There is a right way of doing it but the improvements would be minimal.... I sure there would be other issues in the system thats more critical.

In a high current situation doing it right is more important.

Seriously too many people worry too much about the .001% 'ers and get confused on stuff they have no idea about and cause bigger problems.

I'm sure this will turn into a discussion with input from all the engineers out there saying this is what happens and this could happen.

Think KISS.
AnswerID: 463921

Follow Up By: KenInPerth - Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:30

Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:30
Thanks

I aggree with you completely - KISS is something we have always applied to our business for the benefit of the customer - the less complex it is the less that can go wrong. Seems we often reverse the logic when it comes to our own projects and think too much about it.

I guess I am trying to generate a bit of a scientific discussion here as I am a curious person - you see lots of "do it this way or that way" but not always with any reasoning.

Ken
0
FollowupID: 737810

Follow Up By: ben_gv3 - Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:03

Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:03
A big problem with a lot of forums, this one included, is everyone's an expert at everything, so they speak with a lot of so called "authority". This may be because they heard the advice from a mates brothers sisters fathers workmate so hence believe it's gospel. It may also because forums give a cloak of anonymity and hence give out advice without fear of repercussion.

I would take forum advice very cautiously and seek multiple sources.

The point is use your own best judgement as it's probably correct.
0
FollowupID: 737817

Follow Up By: Member Al (Sunshine Coast) - Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:35

Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:35
Ben, I think that is a very perceptive comment.
However, "multiple sources" will not distance you from the vocal ill-informed. Better maybe to seek information from accredited sources.

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 737823

Follow Up By: olcoolone - Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 15:43

Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 15:43
Like most things in life "it's not rocket science" but so many think everyday tasks are.

We do auto electrical, done all the training and we can make things look like rocket science if we really wanted to.

When you start talking calculations and bring science into it most people are lost with in the first 30 seconds hence KISS.

Sure there are some basics that need to be explained but you don't need to talk about - loose per meter of cable - charge rates - resistance - milliamps or voltage drop.

99.9% of customers have a problem they wanted solved and that's all they want.... they don't want to know the ins and outs..... they want a dual battery fitted that can power their fridge for a few days and work trouble free.... they don't want to know why one battery is better then the other or how a AGM vs SLA vs calcium battery differs... all the want is a dual battery setup that will power their fridge for a few day and will work trouble free.

Sure if some one wants more information that,s fine and we will give it to them.... the number of customers who come in thinking they know everything is astounding.... the worst thing is they know at beats about everything for about 5% of the total job.

with our KISS idea we use quality over rated parts, cabling/wiring and do everything applying worlds best practices....

As they say too much information is dangerous and so true.

I don't even get into discussions about technical stuff any more because to many people think they know more they you.... I just sit back and smile and think do they really know what they are on about...

0
FollowupID: 737839

Reply By: Member Al (Sunshine Coast) - Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:02

Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:02
Ken, some of this was discussed in thread 88757 a couple of days ago, however.....

Q1. It is quite OK to connect batteries of the same "chemistry" in parallel even if of differing capacity. If batteries are connected in series they need to be not only of the same chemistry but also of the same ampere hour rating otherwise the smaller will get both overcharged and over-discharged.

Q2. This fancy concept of "taking the negative feed from one battery and the positive feed from the other battery" is an absolute nonsense proposed by those who know little but seek to be seen as very wise. The idea is based on balancing the wiring impedance to each battery, but if adequate cabling has been used then it is of negligible consequence. Your "major battery supplier" as usual knows little of electrical fundamentals.

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 463932

Follow Up By: Battery Value Pty Ltd - Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 13:42

Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 13:42
good point Al, let's stick with the minor battery suppliers for one more reason :)

@Ken,

I'm thinking error redundancy.
Therefore my advice to our battery customers is to wire at least two identical batteries in parallel (if a larger capacity is desired) because there'll be a point in time when one battery fails due to old age or whatever. In most cases the second battery survives this (it just slowly gets discharged to about 10.8V if the failure mode was a shorted cell in the other one).

About configuring 2x6V batteries in series versus 2x12V in parallel:
There are small capacity differences between equally specced batteries.
In a series configuration these differences can grow larger, unnoticed at first.
The bad thing is that this effect has runaway characteristics, which can lead to severe over/under charging of each individual battery, shortening their life significantly.
Series configuration is only recommended for flooded type batteries which can be charge equalised occasionally, and topped up with water (which becomes necessary because equalisation charging always means gassing).
Note that the cells within one battery are usually more closely matched, then the cells of two different batteries.
Cell matching is actually one of the quality indicators for multi cell batteries.

So for VRLA batteries it's definitely better to have them in 2x12V than 2x6V configuration unless there's additional charge balancing circuitry which prevents the 6V batteries from developing capacity imbalance.
Another way to prevent this is by charging them separately with a 6V charger.

cheers, Peter



cheers, Peter
0
FollowupID: 737835

Reply By: KennyBWilson - Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 05:24

Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 05:24
I hate using the search function on this site, does it really work properly

Ken , was is it you want to do ?

Are you looking for 12V or 24V or simply double up your amp hours

The old imported South African GQ patrol had a 24V system it must have been 2 x 12 volt batteries, many trucks run 2 x 12 volts , Kimberly camper-trailers run 10 or so 12 volt batteries for it's 12 volt power supply
AnswerID: 463966

Follow Up By: olcoolone - Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 08:14

Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 08:14
No wonder the Kimberlys are so heavy....
0
FollowupID: 737871

Follow Up By: KenInPerth - Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 08:51

Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 08:51
Hi Kenny

I am happy to run the 12V batteries in parallel - I am after capacity not voltage.

As some people say, we probably theorise too much about the right way and "not so right" way and it will not make a lot of difference in the end - unless you really do put something together that is just plain wrong as highighted by others.

I was more trying to confirm (a bit after the fact) that if I did have something really wrong I should fix it now and was also looking for a bit of explanation as to why 2 specific aspects of them in parallel seem to have conflicting comments made about them on many sites (not so much this forum). I had done a fair bit of searching beforehand contrary to the comment made about wasting peoples time. The searches and conflicting information was the reason for the post. I am not sure that person even understood or read the questions I was asking.

Anyway, I am now happier as a result of the information provided here that I can continue onward with some comfort that the world is not going to end. The valuable and genuine contributors have posted much good information as usual. Forums are all about getting varying opinions from both practical and theoretical experience but it is still up to the individual to decide what is "best" for them.

Ken.
0
FollowupID: 737875

Follow Up By: Member Al (Sunshine Coast) - Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:20

Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:20
That's great Ken.

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 737880

Reply By: Member - Captain (WA) - Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:20

Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:20
Hi Ken,

You have asked for some technical discussion here, so at the risk of going against the grain here, I believe there can be merit in taking the +ve and -ve supply from different batteries!

But... that’s only if the cables joining the two batteries are grossly undersized, or if there is a significant distance between the two batteries. For most, there is no real world benefit of doing so if appropriate sized cables between the batteries have been used and/or the cable run is short. However, there are circumstances where it is beneficial to do so. Some camper trailers have the batteries mounted behind the wheel arches on opposite sides so there is a long wiring run between the batteries and the charger for one battery.

As an example to show why there is benefit; - assume a load of 30A, a charge rate of 40A and a cable distance between the two batteries of 5m using only 6mm (4.5mm2) automotive cable to join the two batteries (undersized!). Under discharge conditions, both batteries should supply an equal current of 15A, but the second battery would have a voltage drop 0.6V, so in reality the first battery would supply more of the current (the exact amount depends on several things and the batteries internal resistance, but will be in the order of a few amps).

Now, under charge conditions of 40A, (using say a Redarc bcdc1240...) the voltage drop is now 0.8V if they were receiving an equal 20A charge, but the second battery would receive a few less amps at a LOWER charge voltage. Now the first battery actually needs more charge as it has been doing more of the work, but over time the second battery may become undercharged due to the lower charge voltage.

If the wiring had have been such that the +ve was taken from one battery and the –ve taken from the other, the voltage drop would be equal and both batteries would be charged/discharged at the same rate.

The above is not a typical situation but also not unrealistic either. But it does demonstrate why there can be technical merit to wire the batteries as such. It can be particularly relevant where many batteries are used as the different batteries may age at a different rate. But if the effort has been made to wire correctly, then appropriate sized cables would also have likely been used, so almost makes it a moot point.

So to answer your original question, yes there is some technical merit but no, it’s unlikely to make any difference for the vast majority of users.

Cheers

Captain
AnswerID: 463981

Follow Up By: ben_gv3 - Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:36

Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:36
Thanks for the balanced explanation el'Capitain.

My only problem with forums is people profess to be experts and give one-sided answers without explanation and people take it as gospel.
0
FollowupID: 737885

Follow Up By: Member Al (Sunshine Coast) - Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:48

Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:48
O Gawd!! If you are making momentous decisions such as 'diagonal battery connection' then it could be expected that your thought processes would have led you to installing adequate cabling in the first place.

In any case, connecting both the charging and load cables in a 'diagonal' fashion actually results in increased resistance to both batteries, rather than just one. Draw it out and look at it. Why on earth even consider or give credence to a convoluted wiring arrangement when it should be simply disregarded in favour of adequate cabling size and arrangement? It is a wacko idea which would not even be considered by competent electricians.

Oh and Ben, I do not profess to be 'expert' but I do claim to be qualified and experienced. Perhaps bear that in mind when considering "balanced explanations".

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 737886

Follow Up By: Member - Captain (WA) - Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 16:45

Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 16:45
Hi Ben,

Yes, some people seem to take exception when simply trying to have a technical discussion and put forward an alternate point of view. Why have a balanced explanation after they have presented theirs, surely no other can compare? It seems you have to agree with them, or othewise are belittled by their comments and “qualifications and experience”, even when they have no idea what your own qualifications or experience are. It condescending to be told you have “wacko ideas” or “convoluted wiring arrangements” as part of their “technical comment” on a post.

Interestingly, they seem to actually agree with the technical merit as they state “..actually results in increased resistance to both batteries, rather than just one...”, thus acknowledging the fact that this method equalises what otherwise would be different resistances between the batteries! A point worthy of further discussion IMHO is whether equalising the resistance is better, or whether having one battery with marginally more resistance is better due to....

I have learnt a lot from reading many forums and taking advantage of the experience that is around, including those “experienced” ones who have posted on this thread. Unfortunately almost any electrical thread on almost any forum ends up with some form of ego stroking by those who are “more experienced or qualified” as we mere mortals could not possibly comprehend all that information, it would be too dangerous! Hopefully I have not got such a closed mind that I cannot see alternative ways of doing things or seeing how there is more than one way to do it.

Cheers

Captain
0
FollowupID: 737912

Follow Up By: Member Al (Sunshine Coast) - Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 17:51

Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 17:51
Captain, Firstly, I did not say that "you have wacko ideas". I said that the concept of diagonal connection is a wacko idea. Quite different unless you are claiming credit for conceiving the concept.

Then your logic and arithmetics do not hold credibility. In a conventional parallel arrangement you argue unbalanced charging resulting in the second battery becoming undercharged. This does not in fact happen. As the batteries charge and if the first battery "leads" the charging, then as its internal voltage rises the reduced potential difference reduces the current to this battery whilst the second battery continues to absorb current. Ultimately, both batteries attain 100% State of Charge. The second battery does not become "undercharged over time".

The diagonal arrangement will work equally satisfactorily in the charging mode but in your example of cable sizes and volt-drops you have introduced an additional 0.03 volts drop into the 15A load circuit. There is no "technical merit" in that. Why waste this power when you don't need to? And that is what makes it a "Wacky Idea".

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 737913

Follow Up By: Member - Captain (WA) - Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 21:26

Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 21:26
Hi Allan,

I actually genuinely appreciate your technical comments as you do have significant experience and knowledge, just a pity about the sarcasm and belittling that it sometimes comes with. I have never attempted to claim the idea as my own, in fact I didn’t even recommend it if you had bothered to read my post properly. All I did was try and explain the concept behind it, it’s widely acknowledged on the web by several electrical/battery/solar suppliers.

While you did supply some technical comment amongst the sarcasm this time, you also made implicit assumptions to justify your position. As you say, “ultimately” they will both be charged fully and I agree. But the implicit assumption of ‘ultimately” requires a long charge time. If you have long enough charging time, you are right they will be fully charged, but if there is restricted charging time then how long “ultimately” is becomes very relevant. You say my arithmetic’s do not hold credibility, but justify this on the additional 0.03v drop on the first battery – but you fail to mention the 0.6v drop on the second battery that has been overcome, hmm...

Also, you mention a downside to the concept of “convoluted wiring arrangements” being required. But guess what, my camper actually uses this “convoluted wiring arrangement” for its 2 batteries, not for any technical reason, but simply because the installation of a shunt for a battery monitor made it far easier to do so. I did not initially even realise it was like this, it was purely for simplicity of wiring practicality that it was done this way. And I claim no benefit for its use, the wiring is more than adequate so it’s use is a very moot point – it was purely for simplicity of wiring!

One of the biggest issues on web forum discussions is that insufficient information is given to analyse a problem or assumptions are made to justify a solution. I liked how the OP was looking for technical discussion on the concept, I am sure he wasn’t after single one line “do it this way” type response.

I truly hope you see that amongst all the “chaff” posted on forums, there is the occasional bit of “wheat”. No matter how experienced or trained one is, one should NEVER be too old to occasionally learn something, unless of course you already know everything!

Cheers

Captain
0
FollowupID: 737937

Follow Up By: Member Al (Sunshine Coast) - Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 22:21

Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 22:21
Captain, I have no idea where the concern of "sarcasm and belittling" comes from. I have even re-read my comments and cannot find it. I never stoop to "attacking the person" but deal only with the subject.

"Ultimately" does not necessarily imply a long time. It simply means that it will happen, without stipulating length of time.

The "additional 0.03 volts" is being introduced in the supply to the load from the extended single wire to the second battery. The 0.6 volt drop that has been "eliminated" from the direct parallel configuration does not appear in the supply to the load which is coming directly from the first battery. That is why it warrants no mention. And is not the "hmm..." sarcasm on your part?

These volt-drop values you postulate, being so small in the overall consideration, serve to demonstrate that the goal of improving performance by diagonal paralleling is of such minor consequence as to be not worth the complication.

Yes, I learn something every day, even on this thread. It is no wonder that Collyn Rivers departed this forum.

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 737939

Follow Up By: Member - Captain (WA) - Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 23:31

Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 23:31
Hi Allan,

I originally wasn’t going to respond further to this thread, but perhaps you genuinely cannot see your sarcasm and belittling. How does “O Gawd!!”, “why on earth”, “wacko idea”, “not considered by competent electricians”, “bear that in mind when considering ‘balanced explanations’ " as some examples from your first post alone. Even your last post comment “It is no wonder that Collyn Rivers departed this forum” but unfortunately I don’t think you can see the irony in that one!

It’s a pity that when faced with an alternative view you use scorn in your comments. My original post in its first line even said “...at the risk of going against the grain...” as your condescending response was unfortunately just what I was expecting. You seem to have a wealth of experience to add to threads and your knowledge is obvious, why be belittling when you have no need to as your expertise actually shines through? My simple post to try and explain the concept of diagonal wiring, of which I went out of my way to a) use a simple example and b) not promote as being necessary, had the exact type of response I was unfortunately expecting from the “experts”.

I have sometimes winced at my responses when I have had time to reflect on what I have posted in haste, I now take extra effort to avoid poorly chosen responces, but I am not always succesful...

Cheers

Captain
0
FollowupID: 737945

Follow Up By: Member Al (Sunshine Coast) - Friday, Sep 02, 2011 at 00:18

Friday, Sep 02, 2011 at 00:18
Hi Captain, I am genuinely sorry if you believe that any of my critical expressions were directed at you personally. They were all directed at the concept of diagonal connection.

Have you actually read Collyn Rivers departing post? Or if you have, did you comprehend his reason for saying goodbye and leaving us without his wealth of knowledge and contribution?

I'll leave it at that.

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 737947

Follow Up By: Member - Captain (WA) - Friday, Sep 02, 2011 at 14:03

Friday, Sep 02, 2011 at 14:03
Hi Allan,

I appreciate you did not intend to cause offence, often it’s hard to get the “tone” of a post right, unlike face to face conversations were you can see facial expressions.

I did read Collyn’s post many years ago, he was a great loss to the forum. One of the biggest issues in electrical threads is that while it should seem there is a right and wrong way to do things, often it depends so much on the assumptions/requirements that subtle differences make an alternative solution “better”. But if those subtle differences are assumed rather than stated, then unfortunately the war of words begins. Throw in the lack of emotive expressions and there goes another electrical thread downhill. If only more people played the ball and not the man.

Cheers

Captain
0
FollowupID: 737964

Follow Up By: Member Al (Sunshine Coast) - Friday, Sep 02, 2011 at 17:11

Friday, Sep 02, 2011 at 17:11
Thanks Captain.

The words that are used for emphasis sometimes do not come over as well in print as they do whilst holding a stubby sitting around the campfire.

Cheers mate.

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 737975

Follow Up By: KenInPerth - Saturday, Sep 03, 2011 at 09:36

Saturday, Sep 03, 2011 at 09:36
Hey you two (Al and Captain)

While there is a bit of banter between you in these follow ups it dragged out some really good discussion.

A huge problem with email and forum discussions is that sometimes a person's "way of expression" is completely lost in the emotionless words. You can talk to some people face to face who are completely dead pan and factual and others will embellish their conversation with all kinds of sarcasm and one liners that are not demeaning or derogatory in the tone of the discussion. With words we can interpret them the way we want to and not necessarily the way they were "said" in the writer's head.

I tend to be a bit sarcastic the way I talk and have to be careful with email and other written information that it does not come across the wrong way.

Anyway thanks for a good discussion. My background is Electronic Engineering hence the reason I like a good technical discussion on these subjects.

Ken
0
FollowupID: 738014

Reply By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 20:02

Thursday, Sep 01, 2011 at 20:02
Ken,
You haven't stated whether you are paralleling the cranking batteries or the aux batteries, (or both!)

Many vehicle manufacturers connect cranking batteries in parallel so its not all bad! You double the cca's, and reduce the stress on each battery so they last longer. 100series TD and the late 3.0 Jackaroo TDs are examples.

The big issue is that if one battery dies (drops a cell etc), then it will flatten the good battery with it. If you're talking cranking batteries then you can be left on an isolated bush track with not enough electrons to power your HF radio or satphone, leaving you up the creek. So if you are a solo traveller it is better to isolate the cranking battery. And if you are paralleling batteries its good to have batteries of identical age and type, so the likelihood of one failing is reduced.
AnswerID: 464015

Follow Up By: KenInPerth - Saturday, Sep 03, 2011 at 10:05

Saturday, Sep 03, 2011 at 10:05
Phil

Thanks for the reply. I am talking about 2 x AGM Deep Cycle house batteries in parallel and am just looking for capacity.

As much of previous discussions point out the right mixing of chemistries is important, but the way you parallel them up is probably not so important generally.

I read an article that was discussing battery combinations (series and parallel) for various AH and Voltage situations and it made the comment that parallel batteries was not a recommended scenario whithout any explanation. And yet most multi battery installations out there I would expect were simply parallel (not including parallel situations by way of a battery isolator).

Given my age and health I will not be straying far from bitumen any time soon.

Ken
0
FollowupID: 738017

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)