Prado in the hand option on a Pajero
Submitted: Monday, Oct 17, 2011 at 18:46
ThreadID:
89599
Views:
3356
Replies:
5
FollowUps:
5
This Thread has been Archived
lubo
Have a 2003 turbo diesel Prado with 165,000kms on the clock, have the option to buy a 2010 Pajero diesel with 80,000kms at a good price. Toyota has a good reputation and is everywhere in the bush and mines (they must know something) also the 180 litre
tank is a great bonus BUT the Pajero is much newer ? We tow a 16ft caravan.
Reply By: Kimba10 - Monday, Oct 17, 2011 at 19:11
Monday, Oct 17, 2011 at 19:11
Put the van behind the pajero and take for a run then you will regret you never got the 3.2D before for towing instead of the prado, Prado's are a great 4wd, good size, great
fuel capacity as you mentioned. Now with the pajero a extra large
tank can be fitted, wont be as big as the prados factory tanks but have you ever been anywhere that you needed the full 180 L ?? Im a prado owner and love myn BUT if i was after a comfortable tow vehicle with great economy, heaps of grunt I wouldnt hesitate as getting the pajero. My only reason for choosing the prado over the pajero was the solid rear end on the prado where as the pajero is independent all round and doesnt have the wheel travel for off road I like to do, in saying that the traction control
well and truely makes up for it. If its a genuine vehicle and you like it then go for it, check the prices on the diesel pajeros, they hold their value as
well as a diesel prado...............
AnswerID:
467867
Follow Up By: Member - Wayne B (NSW) - Monday, Oct 17, 2011 at 20:16
Monday, Oct 17, 2011 at 20:16
Agree. Pajero has got some grunt. If the price is right and it has good service history you cant go wrong.
Cheers
Wayne B
FollowupID:
742034
Reply By: Wilko (Parkes NSW) - Monday, Oct 17, 2011 at 20:23
Monday, Oct 17, 2011 at 20:23
I had a 2007 Pajero and It impressed me. The bride liked the look of the Prado I liked everything else about the Paj.
Cheers Wilko
AnswerID:
467878
Reply By: Madfisher - Monday, Oct 17, 2011 at 21:29
Monday, Oct 17, 2011 at 21:29
Apart from the great motor, the paj is a more stable towing platform. Also yours is getting to the age where they do the head.
cheers pete
AnswerID:
467887
Reply By: patsproule - Tuesday, Oct 18, 2011 at 07:21
Tuesday, Oct 18, 2011 at 07:21
If it's a 2010 Pajero it should be an NT which had the more powerful 3.2 motor and they fixed the issues with the DPF that the NS had. You will find it
miles ahead of the old 1Kz Prado diesel (pre D4D) in performance, caravan pulling power and
fuel economy, and you will get a ton of standard fitment items that the Prado would have missed out on. What you might not like is that the Pajero will ride a lot firmer than the Prado and probably be noisier. An aux
tank will cost about $1500 (less if you want to fit one yourself) and it will take capacity to either 150L or 170L depending on the model you fit.
Regards - Pat
AnswerID:
467910
Follow Up By: Member - Kevin S (QLD) - Tuesday, Oct 18, 2011 at 07:48
Tuesday, Oct 18, 2011 at 07:48
Pat, for the non technical. What is a DPF and what was wrong with it? I see this type of Pajaro as a logical replacement for my Jackaroo so I am interested to learn.
Thanks,
Kevin
FollowupID:
742061
Follow Up By: snoopyone - Tuesday, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:05
Tuesday, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:05
Presumably a Diesel Particulate Filter which heats up every so often and burns off the undesirables..
No NO not Toyota owners The c**p in the exhaust
FollowupID:
742068
Follow Up By: patsproule - Tuesday, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:06
Tuesday, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:06
Yes - Diesel Particulate Filter. Earlier common rail diesel auto Pajeros had the first of these and the calibration of the burn-off cycle as programmed into the ECU proved to be problematic for the Au delivered vehicles. This was resolved with an ECU re-flash by dealers that in 98% of cases seemed to resolve issues with the check engine light coming on and the engine going into limp mode.
The early auto diesel NT pajero used a different DPF with no sensors and does not appear to have a problem. Later NT's have done away with the DPF. Manuals never got them.
Pat
FollowupID:
742076
Follow Up By: Member - Kevin S (QLD) - Tuesday, Oct 18, 2011 at 14:07
Tuesday, Oct 18, 2011 at 14:07
Thanks pat & snoopyone.
Kevin
FollowupID:
742096
Reply By: Member - Phil 'n Jill (WA) - Tuesday, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:54
Tuesday, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:54
G'day lubo
One more for the Pajero
camp - I picked up a 2004 NP in 2007 at 72,000 km at the time and have clocked another 100,000 k since - almost half of that towing (mostly long haul trips) - can't fault the towing capabilities, storage room, comfort, power or
fuel economy.
One other benefit is the ease of lifting out the 3rd
seat to create extra room for storage (just push a lever and it releases - no bolts & nuts to undo) - or space for the extra
fuel tank if you really need it.
As stated above - the Paj may be a tad noiser ? - I'm half deaf and don't notice, but if it is a problem - turn the radio up.... ;O)
Good luck with your decision & happy travelling.
AnswerID:
467922