Wednesday, Dec 14, 2011 at 17:42
LeighW,
obviously you didn't get it the first time around, or your brain plays tricks on you which can be summarised under the wellknown phenomenon called wishful thinking.
The manufacturer Optima differentiates between alternator charging and charging in cyclic applications.
Alternator charging has nothing to do with charging in cyclic apps because starting only requires a few hundred milli ampere-hours which can be easily replaced by the alternator, and there's no need to equalise the battery cells as long as the Ah draw is small before it gets re-charged.
Compare this to tens of ampere-hours in a cyclic application: the alternator won't cut it because now, there's a more complex charging routine to be followed.
In case of a spiral wound battery, this charging routine is overly complex in order to prevent early battery failure in a cyclic application.
The alternator cannot fully re-charge (actually significant over-charging similar to equalisation charging is required) an Optima type battery whenever the battery is subject to a higher amp draw over some time, read amp-hour draw.
As a consequence, cycle life, read number of charge/discharge cycles this battery can deliver, shrinks to a level which makes the use of an Optima uneconomical in a cycilc application.
Similar goes for any type of battery actually, but spiral wound technology is in fact more vulnerable to undercharging.
And to make matters worse, you pay a premium - around twice as much when buying it, compared to a flat plate deep cycle battery.
Would you really be willing to pay double for a product which gives less cycle life under real world charging conditions?
cheers, Peter
FollowupID:
747363