Monday, Jan 09, 2012 at 11:34
That frankly is statistical crap.
There are two very good reasons our snakes do not kill more people.
1. The fact that due to our population and lifestyle snake encounters are a relatvly rare occurance for the majority of our population.
2. We have very good understanding of treatment and medical services.
Make no mistake, we have 5 or six of the snakes most capable of killing humans in the world...depending on how you fiddle the figures.
In third world countries, far less dangerous snakes account for many deaths, because there are far more snake encounters and there is very poor understanding of snake bite
first aid and even worse medical services.
If a large portion of our population farmed, hunted and gathered on foot, with bare feet and legs......we would see many more incidents of snake bite.
Consider also that nearly 90% of our population is within a 30 minute ambulance response time and less than a hour by ambulance from a well equiped modern free casualty ward.
Deadly is a throw away term.
Coastal Tipan... Agressive and third most toxic venom of any land snake in the world.
Mulga Snake.... largest venom output of any snake.
Western or Inland Tipan...THE most toxic venom of any snake......but no deaths recorded....probably because it lives well away from any major human population centres......if ya want to get bit by one of these, first you have to find one and for most of the population that takes at least a 3 day drive.
In
Australia, the Tiger Snake and the Eastern and Western Brown Snakes would be considered more dangerous than the above as they account for more reported bite cases and deaths......all three are agressive and have highly toxic venom easily capable of killing a human in one strike if no medical aid is available.
cheers
FollowupID:
749391